Heather Barry Kappes

Sad mood promotes self-initiated mental contrasting of future and reality.

Self-regulation by mentally contrasting a positive future with negative reality leads people to differentiate in their goal commitments: They commit to goals when expectations of success are high and let go when expectations of success are low. On the contrary, when indulging in the positive future or dwelling on negative reality, people fail to consider expectations of success and do not form selective goal commitments (Oettingen, Pak, & Schnetter, 2001). Whereas prior research has examined the effects of experimentally induced mental contrasting, we address sad mood as a contextual influence promoting self-initiated mental contrasting. Across various mood inductions, sad moods--which are associated with problem solving strategies--facilitated self-initiated mental contrasting more than neutral moods (Studies 1, 5) or happy moods (Studies 2, 3, 4, 6). Importantly, mood did not affect the relation between mental contrasting and selective formation of goal commitment (Studies 5, 6). The results suggest that sad moods aid in self-regulation by making people self-initiate goal commitments that are sensitive to their expectations of success.

When Goal Sharing Produces Support That Is Not Caring

Four studies used experimental and correlational methods to investigate the effect of a “partner-achievement goal,” or a personal goal for a relationship partner’s successful achievement. This goal led support providers to offer unhelpful support about how to play a computer game (Study 1). It also predicted poor achievement for dieting support recipients (Study 2). The effects of partner-achievement goals were moderated by recipient expectations of success and mediated by recipient effort. Recipients with low expectations of their own success requested that their provider partners with partner-achievement goals refrain from offering them support (Study 3); they also invested less time studying Latin grammar and learned fewer Latin words over one week (Study 4). Together, these findings highlight the unique behavioral consequences of partner-achievement goals for both members of a relationship.

Needs and incentives as sources of goals

G. Moskowitz, The Representation and Regulation of Goals. A.B. Satpute, D. Badre, K.N. Ochsner, The Neuroscience of Goal-directed Behavior. K. Fujita, K.E. MacGregor, Basic Goal Distinctions. P.M. Gollwitzer, H. Barry, G. Oettingen, Needs and Incentives As Sources of Goals. N. Liberman, J. Forster, Goal Gradients, Expectancy, and Value. P. Sheeran, T.L. Webb, From Goals to Action. A. Fishbach, S.R. Finkelstein, How Feedback Influences Persistence, Disengagement, and Change in Goal Pursuit. R. Custers, B. Eitam, J.A. Bargh, Conscious and Unconscious Processes in Goal Pursuit. J.V. Cavallo, G.M. Fitzsimons, Intergoal Dynamics and Self-regulation: Goal Competition, Conflict, Coordination, and Completion. A. Dijksterhuis, H. Aarts, Control, Consciousness, and Agency.The Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC) assigned the Ministers of Education for Alberta and the Northwest Territories the joint lead in identifying innovative ways to enhance Aboriginal education in Canada. The Ministers shared their action plan at CMEC’s 2014 annual meeting in Charlottetown, PEI. It recommended practical steps to improve educational outcomes for Aboriginal students and to raise awareness of Aboriginal history among the population at large.

Wishful Information Preference Positive Fantasies Mimic the Effects of Intentions

When pursuing set goals or intentions, people prefer to acquire information about the pros rather than the cons of their goal pursuit. Little is known about information preferences at earlier stages, when people are not yet serious about pursuing a given future. In the present three studies, positive fantasies that depicted an idealized desired future—compared with fantasies that questioned whether the future would be so ideal—created a preference for pros over cons, just like set goals or intentions have been shown to do. Positive fantasies created a stronger preference for pros versus cons when people were not serious about pursuing an imagined future or had just foregone an opportunity to do so. Results suggest that before people are engaged in serious pursuits, positive fantasies spur the selective acquisition of pro information, which may lead to poor decisions even if the acquired information is carefully deliberated on later.

Motivated Reasoning During Recruitment

This research shows how job postings can lead job candidates to see themselves as particularly deserving of hiring and high salary. We propose that these entitlement beliefs entail both personal motivations to see oneself as deserving and the ability to justify those motivated judgments. Accordingly, we predict that people feel more deserving when qualifications for a job are vague and thus amenable to motivated reasoning, whereby people use information selectively to reach a desired conclusion. We tested this hypothesis with a 2-phase experiment (N = 892) using materials drawn from real online job postings. In the first phase of the experiment, participants believed themselves to be more deserving of hiring and deserving of higher pay after reading postings composed of vaguer types of qualifications. In the second phase, yoked observers believed that participants were less entitled overall, but did not selectively discount endorsement of vaguer qualifications, suggesting they were unaware of this effect. A follow-up preregistered experiment (N = 905) using postings with mixed qualification types replicated the effect of including more vague qualifications on participants’ entitlement beliefs. Entitlement beliefs are widely seen as problematic for recruitment and retention, and these results suggest that reducing the inclusion of vague qualifications in job postings would dampen the emergence of these beliefs in applicants, albeit at the cost of decreasing application rates and lowering applicants’ confidence.