Heather J. Ross

Canadian Cardiovascular Society consensus conference recommendations on heart failure 2006: Diagnosis and management

Heart failure remains a common diagnosis, especially in older individuals. It continues to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality, but major advances in both diagnosis and management have occurred and will continue to improve symptoms and other outcomes in patients. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society published its first consensus conference recommendations on the diagnosis and management of heart failure in 1994, followed by two brief updates, and reconvened this consensus conference to provide a comprehensive review of current knowledge and management strategies. New clinical trial evidence and meta-analyses were critically reviewed by a multidisciplinary primary panel who developed both recommendations and practical tips, which were reviewed by a secondary panel. The resulting document is intended to provide practical advice for specialists, family physicians, nurses, pharmacists and others who are involved in the care of heart failure patients. Management of heart failure begins with an accurate diagnosis, and requires rational combination drug therapy, individualization of care for each patient (based on their symptoms, clinical presentation and disease severity), appropriate mechanical interventions including revascularization and devices, collaborative efforts among health care professionals, and education and cooperation of the patient and their immediate caregivers. The goal is to translate best evidence-based therapies into clinical practice with a measureable impact on the health of heart failure patients in Canada.

The 2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation listing criteria for heart transplantation: A 10-year update

Mandeep R. Mehra, MD (Chair), Charles E. Canter, MD, Margaret M. Hannan, MD, Marc J. Semigran, MD, Patricia A. Uber, PharmD, David A. Baran, MD, Lara Danziger-Isakov, MD, MPH, James K. Kirklin, MD, Richard Kirk, MD, Sudhir S. Kushwaha, MD, Lars H. Lund, MD, PhD, Luciano Potena, MD, PhD, Heather J. Ross, MD, David O. Taylor, MD, Erik A.M. Verschuuren, MD, PhD, Andreas Zuckermann, MD and on behalf of the International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Infectious Diseases, Pediatric and Heart Failure and Transplantation Councils

Canadian Cardiovascular Society Consensus Conference recommendations on heart failure update 2007: Prevention, management during intercurrent illness or acute decompensation, and use of biomarkers

Heart failure is common, yet it is difficult to treat. It presents in many different guises and circumstances in which therapy needs to be individualized. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society published a comprehensive set of recommendations in January 2006 on the diagnosis and management of heart failure, and the present update builds on those core recommendations. Based on feedback obtained through a national program of heart failure workshops during 2006, several topics were identified as priorities because of the challenges they pose to health care professionals. New evidence-based recommendations were developed using the structured approach for the review and assessment of evidence adopted and previously described by the Society. Specific recommendations and practical tips were written for the prevention of heart failure, the management of heart failure during intercurrent illness, the treatment of acute heart failure, and the current and future roles of biomarkers in heart failure care. Specific clinical questions that are addressed include: which patients should be identified as being at high risk of developing heart failure and which interventions should be used? What complications can occur in heart failure patients during an intercurrent illness, how should these patients be monitored and which medications may require a dose adjustment or discontinuation? What are the best therapeutic, both drug and nondrug, strategies for patients with acute heart failure? How can new biomarkers help in the treatment of heart failure, and when and how should BNP be measured in heart failure patients? The goals of the present update are to translate best evidence into practice, to apply clinical wisdom where evidence for specific strategies is weaker, and to aid physicians and other health care providers to optimally treat heart failure patients to result in a measurable impact on patient health and clinical outcomes in Canada.

Organ donor management in Canada: recommendations of the forum on Medical Management to Optimize Donor Organ Potential

In collaboration with the Canadian Critical Care Society, the Canadian Association of Transplantation and the Canadian Society of Transplantation, the Canadian Council for Donation and Transplantation (CCDT) sponsored a forum entitled „Medical Management to Optimize Donor Organ Potential,” 23–

Mobile Phone-Based Telemonitoring for Heart Failure Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background Previous trials of telemonitoring for heart failure management have reported inconsistent results, largely due to diverse intervention and study designs. Mobile phones are becoming ubiquitous and economical, but the feasibility and efficacy of a mobile phone-based telemonitoring system have not been determined. Objective The objective of this trial was to investigate the effects of a mobile phone-based telemonitoring system on heart failure management and outcomes. Methods One hundred patients were recruited from a heart function clinic and randomized into telemonitoring and control groups. The telemonitoring group (N = 50) took daily weight and blood pressure readings and weekly single-lead ECGs, and answered daily symptom questions on a mobile phone over 6 months. Readings were automatically transmitted wirelessly to the mobile phone and then to data servers. Instructions were sent to the patients’ mobile phones and alerts to a cardiologist’s mobile phone as required. Results Baseline questionnaires were completed and returned by 94 patients, and 84 patients returned post-study questionnaires. About 70% of telemonitoring patients completed at least 80% of their possible daily readings. The change in quality of life from baseline to post-study, as measured with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, was significantly greater for the telemonitoring group compared to the control group (P = .05). A between-group analysis also found greater post-study self-care maintenance (measured with the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index) for the telemonitoring group (P = .03). Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels, self-care management, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improved significantly for both groups from baseline to post-study, but did not show a between-group difference. However, a subgroup within-group analysis using the data from the 63 patients who had attended the heart function clinic for more than 6 months revealed the telemonitoring group had significant improvements from baseline to post-study in BNP (decreased by 150 pg/mL, P = .02), LVEF (increased by 7.4%, P = .005) and self-care maintenance (increased by 7 points, P = .05) and management (increased by 14 points, P = .03), while the control group did not. No differences were found between the telemonitoring and control groups in terms of hospitalization, mortality, or emergency department visits, but the trial was underpowered to detect differences in these metrics. Conclusions Our findings provide evidence of improved quality of life through improved self-care and clinical management from a mobile phone-based telemonitoring system. The use of the mobile phone-based system had high adherence and was feasible for patients, including the elderly and those with no experience with mobile phones. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00778986

Usefulness of the INTERMACS Scale to Predict Outcomes After Mechanical Assist Device Implantation

BACKGROUND The Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) scale classifies advanced heart failure patients according to hemodynamic status. This study assessed the usefulness of the INTERMACS scale to predict outcomes in advanced heart failure patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support (MCS). METHODS Fifty-four patients underwent MCS implantation from 2001 to 2007. Group A included 27 patients at INTERMACS level 1 and 2. Group B included 27 at INTERMACS level 3 and 4. Patient characteristics pre-MCS implant, incidence of complications during support, and survival between groups were compared. RESULTS Before MCS implantation, Group A had significantly lower cardiac index, mean arterial blood pressure, systolic pulmonary pressure, higher central venous pressure, and lower urine output (p < .05). After MCS, Group A had a lower incidence of infections (17% vs 46%; odds ratio [OR], 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-0.6) and a higher incidence of liver injury (39% vs 11%; OR 5, 95% CI, 1.15-25). Mortality at 30 days was higher in Group A (38% vs 11%; OR, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.1-21); however, the mortality after 30 days post-MCS support was significantly higher in Group B (0% vs 18%, p < .05). Cox model showed overall survival was poorer in Group A (hazard ratio, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1-7). CONCLUSION INTERMACS levels identified patients at risk for developing complications after MCS support. INTERMACS is a valid score system that should be considered as a tool to assess patient profile and predict complications and mortality after MCS implantation.

Everolimus Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Heart Transplantation: A Randomized, Multicenter Trial

In an open‐label, 24‐month trial, 721 de novo heart transplant recipients were randomized to everolimus 1.5 mg or 3.0 mg with reduced‐dose cyclosporine, or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 3 g/day with standard‐dose cyclosporine (plus corticosteroids ± induction). Primary efficacy endpoint was the 12‐month composite incidence of biopsy‐proven acute rejection, acute rejection associated with hemodynamic compromise, graft loss/retransplant, death or loss to follow‐up. Everolimus 1.5 mg was noninferior to MMF for this endpoint at month 12 (35.1% vs. 33.6%; difference 1.5% [97.5% CI: –7.5%, 10.6%]) and month 24. Mortality to month 3 was higher with everolimus 1.5 mg versus MMF in patients receiving rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) induction, mainly due to infection, but 24‐month mortality was similar (everolimus 1.5 mg 10.6% [30/282], MMF 9.2% [25/271]). Everolimus 3.0 mg was terminated prematurely due to higher mortality. The mean (SD) 12‐month increase in maximal intimal thickness was 0.03 (0.05) mm with everolimus 1.5 mg versus 0.07 (0.11) mm with MMF (p < 0.001). Everolimus 1.5 mg was inferior to MMF for renal function but comparable in patients achieving predefined reduced cyclosporine trough concentrations. Nonfatal serious adverse events were more frequent with everolimus 1.5 mg versus MMF. Everolimus 1.5 mg with reduced‐dose cyclosporine offers similar efficacy to MMF with standard‐dose cyclosporine and reduces intimal proliferation at 12 months in de novo heart transplant recipients.

The 2011 Canadian Cardiovascular Society heart failure management guidelines update: focus on sleep apnea, renal dysfunction, mechanical circulatory support, and palliative care.

The 2011 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Heart Failure (HF) Guidelines Focused Update reviews the recently published clinical trials that will potentially impact on management. Also reviewed is the less studied but clinically important area of sleep apnea. Finally, patients with advanced HF represent a group of patients who pose major difficulties to clinicians. Advanced HF therefore is examined from the perspectives of HF complicated by renal failure, the role of palliative care, and the role of mechanical circulatory support (MCS). All of these topics are reviewed from a perspective of practical applications. Important new studies have demonstrated in less symptomatic HF patients that cardiac resynchronization therapy will be of benefit. As well, aldosterone receptor antagonists can be used with benefit in less symptomatic HF patients. The important role of palliative care and the need to address end-of-life issues in advanced HF are emphasized. Physicians need to be aware of the possibility of sleep apnea complicating the course of HF and the role of a sleep study for the proper assessment and management of the conditon. Patients with either acute severe or chronic advanced HF with otherwise good life expectancy should be referred to a cardiac centre capable of providing MCS. Furthermore, patients awaiting heart transplantation who deteriorate or are otherwise not likely to survive until a donor organ is found should be referred for MCS.

Canadian Cardiovascular Society Consensus Conference guidelines on heart failure - 2008 update: Best practices for the transition of care of heart failure patients, and the recognition, investigation and treatment of cardiomyopathies

Heart failure is a clinical syndrome that normally requires health care to be provided by both specialists and nonspecialists. This is advantageous because patients benefit from complementary skill sets and experience, but can present challenges in the development of a common, shared treatment plan. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society published a comprehensive set of recommendations on the diagnosis and management of heart failure in January 2006, and on the prevention, management during intercurrent illness or acute decompensation, and use of biomarkers in January 2007. The present update builds on those core recommendations. Based on feedback obtained through a national program of heart failure workshops during 2006 and 2007, several topics were identified as priorities because of the challenges they pose to health care professionals. New evidence-based recommendations were developed using the structured approach for the review and assessment of evidence that was adopted and previously described by the Society. Specific recommendations and practical tips were written for best practices during the transition of care of heart failure patients, and the recognition, investigation and treatment of some specific cardiomyopathies. Specific clinical questions that are addressed include: What information should a referring physician provide for a specialist consultation? What instructions should a consultant provide to the referring physician? What processes should be in place to ensure that the expectations and needs of each physician are met? When a cardiomyopathy is suspected, how can it be recognized, how should it be investigated and diagnosed, how should it be treated, when should the patient be referred, and what special tests are available to assist in the diagnosis and treatment? The goals of the present update are to translate best evidence into practice, apply clinical wisdom where evidence for specific strategies is weaker, and aid physicians and other health care providers to optimally treat heart failure patients, resulting in a measurable impact on patient health and clinical outcomes in Canada.

Medical management to optimize donor organ potential: review of the literature.

PurposeOver the past two decades, the demand for donor organs continues to outpace the number of organs available for transplantation. Parallel with this has been a change in the demographics of organ donors with an increase in older donors and donors with marginal organs as a proportion of the total organ donor pool. Consequently, efforts have been made to improve the medical care delivered to potential organ donors to improve the conversion rate and graft survival of available organs. The purpose of this literature review is to provide updated recommendations for the contemporary management of organ donors after the neurological determination of death in order to maximize the probability of recipient graft survival.SourcesA comprehensive review of the literature obtained through searches of MEDLINE/PubMed, and personal reference files.Principal findingsContemporary management of the organ donor after neurological determination of death includes therapies to prevent the detrimental effects of the autonomic storm, the use of invasive hemodynamic monitoring and aggressive respiratory therapy including therapeutic bronchoscopy in marginal heart and lung donors, and the use of hormonal therapy including vasopressin, corticosteroids, triiodothyronine or thyroxine, and insulin for the pituitary failure and inflammation seen in brain dead organ donors. The importance of normalizing donor physiology to optimize all available organs is stressed.ConclusionAggressive hemodynamic and respiratory management of solid organ donors, coupled with the use of hormonal therapy improves the rate of conversion and graft survival in solid organ recipients.RésuméObjectifDepuis plus de deux décennies, il y a une disproportion croissante entre les demandes de transplantation et la pénurie d’organes disponibles. En même temps, les données démographiques des donneurs ont changé, car une partie de leur nombre total compte plus de gens âgés dont les organes sont marginaux. Par conséquent, on tente d’améliorer les soins médicaux prodigués aux donneurs potentiels pour augmenter le taux de conversion et la survie du greffon des organes disponibles. Notre revue visait la mise à jour de recommandations de traitement aux donneurs d’organes, chez qui la mort neurologique a été établie, pour maximiser la probabilité de survie du greffon chez le receveur.SourcesUne revue documentaire étendue obtenue par des recherches dans MEDLINE/PubMed et des fichiers de référence personnels.Constatations principalesLe traitement actuel du donneur d’organe, après la détermination de la mort neurologique, comprend la prévention d’effets nuisibles du choc subi par le système nerveux autonome, l’usage d’un monitorage hémodynamique effractifet une thérapie respiratoire énergique dont la bronchoscopie thérapeutique chez des donneurs marginaux de cœur et de poumons et l’usage d’hormonothérapie dont la vasopressine, les corticostéroïdes, la triiodothyronine ou thyroxine et l’insuline pour la défaillance hypophysaire et l’inflammation observée lors de la mort encéphalique des donneurs. L’accent est mis sur la normalisation physiologique du donneur afin de mieux protéger tout organe disponible.ConclusionLe traitement hémodynamique et respiratoire énergique des donneurs d’organes pleins, couplé à l’usage d’hormonothérapie, améliore le taux de conversion et la survie du greffon chez les receveurs.