Heidi Giordano

Rucaparib in relapsed, platinum-sensitive high-grade ovarian carcinoma (ARIEL2 Part 1): an international, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have activity in ovarian carcinomas with homologous recombination deficiency. Along with BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) mutations genomic loss of heterozygosity (LOH) might also represent homologous recombination deficiency. In ARIEL2, we assessed the ability of tumour genomic LOH, quantified with a next-generation sequencing assay, to predict response to rucaparib, an oral PARP inhibitor. METHODS ARIEL2 is an international, multicentre, two-part, phase 2, open-label study done at 49 hospitals and cancer centres in Australia, Canada, France, Spain, the UK, and the USA. In ARIEL2 Part 1, patients with recurrent, platinum-sensitive, high-grade ovarian carcinoma were classified into one of three predefined homologous recombination deficiency subgroups on the basis of tumour mutational analysis: BRCA mutant (deleterious germline or somatic), BRCA wild-type and LOH high (LOH high group), or BRCA wild-type and LOH low (LOH low group). We prespecified a cutoff of 14% or more genomic LOH for LOH high. Patients began treatment with oral rucaparib at 600 mg twice per day for continuous 28 day cycles until disease progression or any other reason for discontinuation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. All patients treated with at least one dose of rucaparib were included in the safety analyses and all treated patients who were classified were included in the primary endpoint analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01891344. Enrolment into ARIEL2 Part 1 is complete, although an extension (Part 2) is ongoing. FINDINGS 256 patients were screened and 206 were enrolled between Oct 30, 2013, and Dec 19, 2014. At the data cutoff date (Jan 18, 2016), 204 patients had received rucaparib, with 28 patients remaining in the study. 192 patients could be classified into one of the three predefined homologous recombination deficiency subgroups: BRCA mutant (n=40), LOH high (n=82), or LOH low (n=70). Tumours from 12 patients were established as BRCA wild-type, but could not be classified for LOH, because of insufficient neoplastic nuclei in the sample. The median duration of treatment for the 204 patients was 5·7 months (IQR 2·8-10·1). 24 patients in the BRCA mutant subgroup, 56 patients in the LOH high subgroup, and 59 patients in the LOH low subgroup had disease progression or died. Median progression-free survival after rucaparib treatment was 12·8 months (95% CI 9·0-14·7) in the BRCA mutant subgroup, 5·7 months (5·3-7·6) in the LOH high subgroup, and 5·2 months (3·6-5·5) in the LOH low subgroup. Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the BRCA mutant (hazard ratio 0·27, 95% CI 0·16-0·44, p<0·0001) and LOH high (0·62, 0·42-0·90, p=0·011) subgroups compared with the LOH low subgroup. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events were anaemia or decreased haemoglobin (45 [22%] patients), and elevations in alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase (25 [12%]). Common serious adverse events included small intestinal obstruction (10 [5%] of 204 patients), malignant neoplasm progression (10 [5%]), and anaemia (nine [4%]). Three patients died during the study (two because of disease progression and one because of sepsis and disease progression). No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION In patients with BRCA mutant or BRCA wild-type and LOH high platinum-sensitive ovarian carcinomas treated with rucaparib, progression-free survival was longer than in patients with BRCA wild-type LOH low carcinomas. Our results suggest that assessment of tumour LOH can be used to identify patients with BRCA wild-type platinum-sensitive ovarian cancers who might benefit from rucaparib. These results extend the potential usefulness of PARP inhibitors in the treatment setting beyond BRCA mutant tumours. FUNDING Clovis Oncology, US Department of Defense Ovarian Cancer Research Program, Stand Up To Cancer-Ovarian Cancer Research Fund Alliance-National Ovarian Cancer Coalition Dream Team Translational Research Grant, and V Foundation Translational Award.

Phase I Study of Oral Azacitidine in Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia, and Acute Myeloid Leukemia

PURPOSE To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, and clinical activity of an oral formulation of azacitidine in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received 1 cycle of subcutaneous (SC) azacitidine (75 mg/m2) on the first 7 days of cycle 1, followed by oral azacitidine daily (120 to 600 mg) on the first 7 days of each additional 28-day cycle. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles were evaluated during cycles 1 and 2. Adverse events and hematologic responses were recorded. Cross-over to SC azacitidine was permitted for nonresponders who received ≥ 6 cycles of oral azacitidine. RESULTS Overall, 41 patients received SC and oral azacitidine (MDSs, n = 29; CMML, n = 4; AML, n = 8). Dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3/4 diarrhea) occurred at the 600-mg dose and MTD was 480 mg. Most common grade 3/4 adverse events were diarrhea (12.2%), nausea (7.3%), vomiting (7.3%), febrile neutropenia (19.5%), and fatigue (9.8%). Azacitidine exposure increased with escalating oral doses. Mean relative oral bioavailability ranged from 6.3% to 20%. Oral and SC azacitidine decreased DNA methylation in blood, with maximum effect at day 15 of each cycle. Hematologic responses occurred in patients with MDSs and CMML. Overall response rate (i.e., complete remission, hematologic improvement, or RBC or platelet transfusion independence) was 35% in previously treated patients and 73% in previously untreated patients. CONCLUSION Oral azacitidine was bioavailable and demonstrated biologic and clinical activity in patients with MDSs and CMML.

A Phase I-II Study of the Oral PARP Inhibitor Rucaparib in Patients with Germline BRCA1/2-Mutated Ovarian Carcinoma or Other Solid Tumors

Purpose: Rucaparib is a potent, oral, small-molecule PARP inhibitor. This phase I–II study was the first to evaluate single-agent oral rucaparib at multiple doses. Experimental Design: Part 1 (phase I) sought to determine the MTD, recommended phase II dose (RP2D), and pharmacokinetics of oral rucaparib administered in 21-day continuous cycles in patients with advanced solid tumors. Part 2A (phase II) enrolled patients with platinum-sensitive, high-grade ovarian carcinoma (HGOC) associated with a germline BRCA1/2 mutation who received two to four prior regimens and had a progression-free interval of 6 months or more following their most recent platinum therapy. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST version 1.1. Results: In part 1, 56 patients received oral rucaparib (40 to 500 mg once daily and 240 to 840 mg twice daily). No MTD was identified per protocol-defined criteria; 600 mg twice daily was selected as the RP2D based on manageable toxicity and clinical activity. Pharmacokinetics were approximately dose-proportional across all dose levels. In part 2A, 42 patients with germline BRCA1/2–mutated HGOC received rucaparib 600 mg twice daily. Investigator-assessed ORR was 59.5%. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (all grades) were asthenia/fatigue (85.7%; 36/42), nausea (83.3%; 35/42), anemia (71.4%; 30/42), alanine transaminase and/or aspartate transaminase elevations (57.1%; 24/42), and vomiting (54.8%; 23/42). Among 98 patients, 5 (5.1%) discontinued because of an adverse event (excluding disease progression). Conclusions: Rucaparib was tolerable and had activity in patients with platinum-sensitive germline BRCA1/2–mutated HGOC. Clin Cancer Res; 23(15); 4095–106. ©2017 AACR.

Secondary Somatic Mutations Restoring RAD51C and RAD51D Associated with Acquired Resistance to the PARP Inhibitor Rucaparib in High-Grade Ovarian Carcinoma

High-grade epithelial ovarian carcinomas containing mutated BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) homologous recombination (HR) genes are sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors (PARPi), while restoration of HR function due to secondary mutations in BRCA1/2 has been recognized as an important resistance mechanism. We sequenced core HR pathway genes in 12 pairs of pretreatment and postprogression tumor biopsy samples collected from patients in ARIEL2 Part 1, a phase II study of the PARPi rucaparib as treatment for platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian carcinoma. In 6 of 12 pretreatment biopsies, a truncation mutation in BRCA1, RAD51C, or RAD51D was identified. In five of six paired postprogression biopsies, one or more secondary mutations restored the open reading frame. Four distinct secondary mutations and spatial heterogeneity were observed for RAD51CIn vitro complementation assays and a patient-derived xenograft, as well as predictive molecular modeling, confirmed that resistance to rucaparib was associated with secondary mutations.Significance: Analyses of primary and secondary mutations in RAD51C and RAD51D provide evidence for these primary mutations in conferring PARPi sensitivity and secondary mutations as a mechanism of acquired PARPi resistance. PARPi resistance due to secondary mutations underpins the need for early delivery of PARPi therapy and for combination strategies. Cancer Discov; 7(9); 984-98. ©2017 AACR.See related commentary by Domchek, p. 937See related article by Quigley et al., p. 999See related article by Goodall et al., p. 1006This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 920.

Antitumor activity and safety of the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in patients with high-grade ovarian carcinoma and a germline or somatic BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: Integrated analysis of data from Study 10 and ARIEL2

OBJECTIVE An integrated analysis was undertaken to characterize the antitumor activity and safety profile of the oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor rucaparib in patients with relapsed high-grade ovarian carcinoma (HGOC). METHODS Eligible patients from Study 10 (NCT01482715) and ARIEL2 (NCT01891344) who received a starting dose of oral rucaparib 600mg twice daily (BID) with or without food were included in these analyses. The integrated efficacy population included patients with HGOC and a deleterious germline or somatic BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutation who received at least two prior chemotherapies and were sensitive, resistant, or refractory to platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS). The integrated safety population included patients with HGOC who received at least one dose of rucaparib 600mg BID, irrespective of BRCA1/2 mutation status and prior treatments. RESULTS In the efficacy population (n=106), ORR was 53.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 43.8-63.5); 8.5% and 45.3% of patients achieved complete and partial responses, respectively. Median DOR was 9.2months (95% CI, 6.6-11.6). In the safety population (n=377), the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were nausea, asthenia/fatigue, vomiting, and anemia/hemoglobin decreased. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AE was anemia/hemoglobin decreased. Treatment-emergent AEs led to treatment interruption, dose reduction, and treatment discontinuation in 58.6%, 45.9%, and 9.8% of patients, respectively. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS Rucaparib has antitumor activity in advanced BRCA1/2-mutated HGOC and a manageable safety profile.

A phase I study of intravenous and oral rucaparib in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumours

Background:This study evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity of intravenous and oral rucaparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumours.Methods:Initially, patients received escalating doses of intravenous rucaparib combined with carboplatin, carboplatin/paclitaxel, cisplatin/pemetrexed, or epirubicin/cyclophosphamide. Subsequently, the study was amended to focus on oral rucaparib (once daily, days 1–14) combined with carboplatin (day 1) in 21-day cycles. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed in cycle 1 and safety in all cycles.Results:Eighty-five patients were enrolled (22 breast, 15 ovarian/peritoneal, and 48 other primary cancers), with a median of three prior therapies (range, 1–7). Neutropenia (27.1%) and thrombocytopenia (18.8%) were the most common grade ⩾3 toxicities across combinations and were DLTs with the oral rucaparib/carboplatin combination. Maximum tolerated dose for the combination was 240 mg per day oral rucaparib and carboplatin area under the curve 5 mg ml−1 min−1. Oral rucaparib demonstrated dose-proportional kinetics, a long half-life (≈17 h), and good bioavailability (36%). Pharmacokinetics were unchanged by carboplatin coadministration. The rucaparib/carboplatin combination had radiologic antitumour activity, primarily in BRCA1- or BRCA2-mutated breast and ovarian/peritoneal cancers.Conclusions:Oral rucaparib can be safely combined with a clinically relevant dose of carboplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours (Trial registration ID: NCT01009190).

Rucaparib Monotherapy in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer and a Known Deleterious BRCA Mutation

Purpose Pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Approximately 9% of pancreatic cancers harbor a germline or somatic BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutation. Because poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors have significant activity in BRCA1/2-mutant ovarian and breast cancers, RUCAPANC investigated the efficacy and safety of rucaparib in BRCA1/2-mutant pancreatic cancer. Patients and Methods RUCAPANC enrolled patients with measurable locally advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer who had received one to two prior chemotherapy regimens. Patients received oral rucaparib (600 mg twice daily) until disease progression. The primary end point was objective response rate. Results Nineteen patients were enrolled. Sixteen of 19 BRCA1/2 mutations were germ-line; three were somatic. Patients had received a median of two prior chemotherapy regimens. Four patients achieved a response; two partial responses and one complete response (CR) were confirmed (objective response rate, 15.8%; 3 of 19), with an additional CR unconfirmed. The disease control rate (CR, partial response, or stable disease for ≥ 12 weeks) was 31.6% (6 of 19) in all patients and 44.4% (4 of 9) in those who had received one prior chemotherapy regimen. As prespecified in the protocol, enrollment was stopped because of an insufficient response rate among the first 15 patients. Treatment-emergent adverse events included nausea (63.2%) and anemia (47.4%). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events included anemia (31.6%), fatigue (15.8%), and ascites (15.8%). Secondary resistance mutations were detected in circulating free tumor DNA in two patients with a germline BRCA2 mutation. These mutations are predicted to lead to the reversion of a somatic-not germline-mutation. Conclusion Rucaparib provided clinical benefit to patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and a BRCA1/2 mutation, and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. Additional trials of rucaparib in this population are warranted.

Pharmacokinetic Study of Rucaparib in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

The phase 1‐2 study CO‐338‐010 (Study 10; NCT01482715) is evaluating single‐agent rucaparib, a poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase inhibitor, administered orally to patients with an advanced solid tumor. In the dose escalation phase (Part 1), we characterized the single‐dose and steady‐state pharmacokinetic profiles of rucaparib administered once daily (QD; dose range, 40‐500 mg; n = 16) or twice daily (BID; dose range, 240‐840 mg; n = 30). Across all dosing schedules examined, the plasma exposure of rucaparib was approximately dose proportional; half‐life was approximately 17 hours, and median time to maximum concentration (tmax) ranged from 1.5 to 6.0 hours after a single dose and 1.5 to 4.0 hours following repeated dosing. The steady‐state accumulation ratio ranged from 1.60 to 2.33 following QD dosing and 1.47 to 5.44 following BID dosing. No effect of food on rucaparib pharmacokinetics was observed with a single dose of 40 mg (n = 3) or 300 mg (n = 6). In a phase 2 portion of the study (Part 3), the pharmacokinetic profile of rucaparib was further evaluated at the recommended phase 2 dose of 600 mg BID (n = 26). The mean (coefficient of variation) steady‐state maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration‐time curve from time zero to 12 hours (AUC0‐12h) were 1940 ng/mL (54%) and 16 900 ng ⋅ h/mL (54%), respectively. A high‐fat meal moderately increased rucaparib exposure. The fed‐to‐fasted geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval [CI]) for AUC0‐24h and Cmax were 138% (117%‐162%) and 120% (99.1%‐146%); the median (90%CI) tmax delay was 2.5 (0.5‐4.4) hours.

Abstract AP27: FEASIBILITY OF MONITORING RESPONSE TO THE PARP INHIBITOR RUCAPARIB WITH TARGETED DEEP SEQUENCING OF CIRCULATING TUMOR DNA (CTDNA) IN WOMEN WITH HIGH GRADE OVARIAN CARCINOMA ON THE ARIEL2 TRIAL

BACKGROUND:TP53 mutations are present in >97% cases of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Detection of TP53 mutations in ctDNA extracted from plasma has the potential to monitor disease course and treatment response. We have developed targeted amplicon deep sequencing (TADS) to detect low frequency mutations throughout the TP53 gene in ctDNA. Rucaparib is a PARP inhibitor in development for treatment of tumors with HR pathway deficiency. We used TADS to assess TP53 mutant allele fraction (MAF) in ctDNA from patients in ARIEL2, a phase 2 study of rucaparib for treatment of relapsed high-grade ovarian cancer (NCT01891344). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Plasma samples (n=65) from 18 patients were collected during screening, on day 1 of each cycle, and at the end of rucaparib treatment. DNA extracted from plasma underwent TADS of TP53 (median depth 6916×). FFPE tumor specimens were profiled using an NGS-based assay with a targeted gene panel including TP53. Investigator-assessed clinical response rates were evaluated by RECIST v1.1 and GCIG CA-125 criteria. RESULTS: Concordant TP53 mutations were detected in tumor and ctDNA from plasma for all 18 patients. Median TP53 MAF at screening and cycle 1 day 1 was 5.1% (interquartile range: 1.1–17.5, n=16) and 3.8% (IQR: 0.68–10.3, n=16), respectively. Fourteen patients were evaluable for response measured by quantification of TP53 MAF between cycle 1 and 2 (missing sample: n=2; TP53 MAF 50% reduction of TP53 MAF in ctDNA at cycle 2 achieved a RECIST confirmed PR (see Table); this included 5/6 patients with either a germline or somatic mutation in BRCA1/BRCA2. No patients with CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive detection of TP53 mutations by TADS is feasible, using plasma samples collected from women with relapsed platinum-sensitive high-grade ovarian cancer participating in an international multicenter trial. Circulating tumor DNA is a promising biomarker for monitoring response to the PARP inhibitor rucaparib. We are now testing the pre-specified hypothesis that a >50% reduction in TP53 MAF between baseline and cycle 2 is predictive of response to rucaparib using 560 plasma samples from 139 ARIEL2 subjects. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Anna Piskorz, Kevin K. Lin, James Morris, Elaina Mann, Amit Oza, Robert L. Coleman, David M. O9Malley, Michael Friedlander, Janiel M. Cragun, Ling Ma, Heidi Giordano, Nitzan Rosenfeld, Mitch Raponi, Iain A. McNeish, Elizabeth Swisher, James D. Brenton. FEASIBILITY OF MONITORING RESPONSE TO THE PARP INHIBITOR RUCAPARIB WITH TARGETED DEEP SEQUENCING OF CIRCULATING TUMOR DNA (CTDNA) IN WOMEN WITH HIGH GRADE OVARIAN CARCINOMA ON THE ARIEL2 TRIAL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Ovarian Cancer Research Symposium; Sep 12-13, 2016; Seattle, WA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2017;23(11 Suppl):Abstract nr AP27.

Abstract 4676: DNA repair protein expression and response of homologous recombination deficient ovarian cancer to the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor rucaparib in the ARIEL2 Part 1 study

Background: PARP inhibitors (PARPis) are active in cancers with homologous recombination (HR) defects. Preclinical studies have shown that secondary mutations or alterations in gene expression (e.g., downregulation of 53BP1, Ku70, Ku80 or DNA-PKcs) restore HR and confer PARPi resistance. In addition, low PARP1 expression can diminish PARP trapping and cause PARPi resistance. ARIEL2 Part 1 is a phase 2 study of the PARPi rucaparib in platinum sensitive, relapsed high grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer (OC). Pretreatment OC biopsies were previously assayed for HR gene mutations and loss of heterozygosity (LOH), a genomic scar that reflects HR deficiency. Two tumor groups (BRCA wildtype [wt]/LOH high and BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutant) have objective response rates of 29.3% and 80%, respectively, as well as progression free survival (PFS) of 5.7 and 12.8 months, respectively, on rucaparib (E. Swisher et al., Lancet Oncol., in press). Common AEs included nausea (80%), asthenia/fatigue (78%), constipation (46%), and vomiting (44%). The present studies tested the hypotheses that i) lower PARP1 expression and/or ii) lower expression of NHEJ components 53BP1, DNA-PKcs, Ku80, Ku70, or LIG4, may correlate with diminished response rate as well as PFS in pts treated with rucaparib on ARIEL2. Methods: Immunohistochemical assays were developed for 53BP1, DNA-PKcs, Ku80, Ku70, LIG4, and PARP1 and validated in formalin fixed, paraffin embedded cell lines differing in analyte expression. Available pretreatment OC biopsies from ARIEL2 Part 1 were stained and scored for % of tumor nuclei that were negative (0), weak (1+), moderate (2+) or strong (3+). Modified H-scores were correlated with clinical characteristics and outcome measures. Results: Pretreatment biopsies from 62-68 pts were successfully stained for each repair protein. Across the samples, PARP1 H-scores varied from 0 to 300 (median 160). Focusing on the BRCA wt/LOH high group (n = 38), there was no significant difference in PFS of pts with low ( 200) PARP1 H-score (p = 0.57). Expression of DNA-PKcs, Ku70, Ku80, and LIG4 was generally lower (median H-scores 20-60) and did not individually correlate with response or PFS. In contrast, there was a trend toward improved PFS in BRCA wt/LOH high OC pts expressing intermediate or high 53BP1 (H-score ≥ 100, n = 10) compared to pts with low 53BP1 (H-score Conclusions: In the BRCA wt/LOH high group, pretreatment PARP1 expression does not correlate with rucaparib response. In contrast, BRCA wt/LOH high OC pts with low 53BP1 have a trend toward shorter PFS with rucaparib, suggesting that 53BP1 downregulation might correlate with clinical PARPi resistance in BRCA wt/LOH high OC. Citation Format: Andrea E. Wahner Hendrickson, Kevin K. Lin, Daniel W. Visscher, Rachel M. Hurley, Mitch Raponi, Thomas C. Harding, Linda M. Murphy, Jill M. Wagner, Heidi Giordano, Iain McNeish, Elizabeth M. Swisher, Scott Kaufmann. DNA repair protein expression and response of homologous recombination deficient ovarian cancer to the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor rucaparib in the ARIEL2 Part 1 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4676. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4676