Heidrun Zuckermann-Becker

Pilot study on the effects of high cutoff hemofiltration on the need for norepinephrine in septic patients with acute renal failure

Objective:High cutoff hemofilters are characterized by an increased effective pore size designed to facilitate the elimination of inflammatory mediators in sepsis. Clinical data on this new renal replacement modality are lacking. Design:Prospective, randomized clinical trial. Setting:University hospital, intensive care units. Patients:Thirty patients with sepsis-induced acute renal failure. Intervention:Patients were allocated to high cutoff (n = 20) or conventional (n = 10) hemofiltration in a 2:1 ratio. Median renal replacement dose was 31 mL/kg/hr. For high cutoff hemofiltration, a high-flux hemofilter with an in vivo cutoff point of approximately 60 kilodaltons was used. Conventional hemofiltration was performed with a standard high-flux hemofilter (PF11S). The impacts of high cutoff hemofiltration on the need for norepinephrine and on plasma levels and clearance rates for interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) were analyzed. Absolute values, but also adjusted values (expressed as proportion of baseline), were analyzed. The observation period was restricted to 48 hrs. Main Results:Apart from higher antithrombin III levels at entry into the study, main clinical and laboratory parameters were comparable between both groups. The median norepinephrine dose at entry into the study was 0.30 &mgr;g/kg/min in the high cutoff group and 0.21 &mgr;g/kg/min in the conventional hemofiltration group (p = .448). Only the high cutoff group showed a significant decline (p = .0002) in “adjusted” norepinephrine dose over time. Clearance rates for IL-6 and IL-1ra were significantly higher in the high cutoff hemofiltration group (p < .0001), which translated into a significant decline of the corresponding plasma levels (p = .0465 for IL-6; p = .0293 for IL-1ra). Conclusion:In this pilot study, high cutoff hemofiltration has been shown to exert a beneficial effect on the need for norepinephrine in septic patients with acute renal failure. In addition, we demonstrate that high cutoff hemofiltration is superior to conventional hemofiltration in the elimination of IL-6 and IL-1ra from the circulating blood of septic patients.

A safe citrate anticoagulation protocol with variable treatment efficacy and excellent control of the acid-base status.

Objective:Citrate anticoagulation is an excellent alternative to heparin anticoagulation for critically ill patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy. In this article, we provide a safe and an easy-to-handle citrate anticoagulation protocol with variable treatment doses and excellent control of the acid–base status. Design:Prospective observational study. Setting:University hospital. Patients:One hundred sixty-two patients with acute renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy were enrolled in the study. Intervention:A continuous venovenous hemodialysis-based citrate anticoagulation protocol using a 4% trisodium solution, a specially designed dialysate fluid, and a continuous calcium infusion were used. The study period was 6 days. Hemofilters were changed routinely after 72 hours of treatment. The patients were grouped according to body weight, with patients below 60 kg body weight in group 1, patients with at least 60 kg and up to 90 kg body weight in group 2, and patients with a body weight of above 90 kg in group 3. Dialysate flow was adapted according to body size and matched approximately 2 L/hr for a patient with average body size. Blood flow, citrate flow, and calcium flow were adjusted according to the dialysate flow used. Measurements and Main Results:Median filter run time was 61.5 hours (interquartile range: 34.5–81.1 hours). Only 5% of all hemofilters had to be changed because of clotting. The prescribed treatment dose was achieved in all patients. Acid–base and electrolyte control were excellent in all groups. In the rare cases of metabolic disarrangement during citrate anticoagulation, acid–base values were rapidly corrected by modifying either the dialysate flow or alternatively the blood flow rate. Eight patients (5%) developed signs of citrate accumulation indicated by an increase of the total calcium >3 mmol/L or a need for high calcium substitution. Conclusions:We provide a safe and an easy-to-handle citrate anticoagulation protocol that allows an excellent acid–base and electrolyte control in critically ill patients with acute renal failure. The protocol can be adapted to patients’ need, allowing a wide spectrum of treatment doses.

Metabolic Complications during Regional Citrate Anticoagulation in Continuous Venovenous Hemodialysis: Single-Center Experience

Background: Regional anticoagulation with trisodium citrate is an effective form of anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in patients at a high risk of bleeding. In a prospective, observational study we compared an established regional citrate anticoagulation protocol [Mehta R et al: Kidney Int 1990;38:976–981] versus a standard heparin anticoagulation protocol focusing on acid-base and electrolyte derangements as well as on cost effectiveness. Methods and Results: 209 patients were included in the study. In 37 patients, citrate was used as the sole anticoagulant, 87 patients received low-dose heparin plus citrate, and 85 patients received only heparin as anticoagulant. A customized dialysate solution was used for citrate-anticoagulated CRRT (no buffer, no calcium, reduced sodium concentration). Filter life was significantly higher during citrate anticoagulation compared to heparin anticoagulation (80.2 ± 60 vs. 30.2 ± 32 h; p < 0.001). No difference was found between citrate and citrate-heparin anticoagulation (p = 0.310). Metabolic alkalosis was observed in more than 50% of patients on citrate anticoagulation. Alkalosis developed within the first 72 h after initiating treatment and could be reversed in almost all cases by increasing the dialysate flow rate. Hypercalcemia was observed in 13 patients on citrate anticoagulation. Patients with impaired liver function were particularly at risk. Systemic hypocalcemia, hypernatremia, and anion gap acidosis were not observed. Citrate anticoagulation was well tolerated hemodynamically. A longer filter life during citrate anticoagulation translated into a significant cost reduction compared to standard heparin anticoagulation (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Regional anticoagulation with trisodium citrate in combination with a customized calcium-free dialysate is a safe and effective alternative to a heparin-based anticoagulation regimen.

Regional Citrate Anticoagulation in Continuous Hemodialysis – Acid-Base and Electrolyte Balance at an Increased Dose of Dialysis

Background: Citrate anticoagulation is an excellent alternative to heparin anticoagulation for patients at high risk of bleeding requiring continuous renal replacement therapy. However, citrate anticoagulation has some potential adverse effects such as metabolic alkalosis and acidosis, hypernatremia, hypo- and hypercalcemia. Thus, most citrate anticoagulation protocols use specially designed dialysis fluids to compensate for most of these disarrangements. This study aimed at establishing a citrate anticoagulation protocol designed for a dialysate flow rate of about 2 l/h. Methods: Based on theoretical considerations we composed a dialysis fluid suitable for a 2 l/h dialysis flow rate. The dialysate contained 133 mmol/l sodium, 2 mmol/l potassium, 1.1 mmol/l magnesium, 25 mmol/l lactate, and 112.2 mmol/l chloride. Results: Twenty-three patients were included in the study. During the treatments minor flow rate adaptations were needed and the treatments were well tolerated. Filter life was appropriate (51.3 ± 24.6 h). Thirteen patients developed a mild metabolic alkalosis (pH > 7.45 plus BE > +3) which was easily counteracted by increasing the dialysis fluid flow (by increments of 500 ml). Acid-base values returned to normal within 24 h after increasing the dialysate flow. The maximum dialysate flow was 3,000 ml/h. Hypernatremia and hypocalcemia were not observed. The systemic ionized calcium concentration was successfully controlled by adjustments of a continuous calcium infusion made with respect to the results of 6-hourly measurements. Conclusion: The analyzed citrate anticoagulation protocol was well tolerated and filter lifetime was appropriate. Regional anticoagulation with trisodium citrate in combination with a customized calcium-free dialysate is a safe and effective alternative to a heparin-based anticoagulation regimen.

Reduced monocyte CD86 expression in postinflammatory immunodeficiency.

Objective:Major surgery, polytrauma, stroke, and pancreatitis frequently lead to a compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome that often predisposes patients to lethal infections. This temporary postinflammatory immunodeficiency is characterized by altered function of blood monocytes. These cells show strongly reduced inflammatory and antigen-presentation capacity. Diminished monocyte expression of the major histocompatibility complex class II molecule human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR is a well-established diagnostic marker of this immunodeficiency. To further characterize the monocytic cells in this clinical state, we analyzed their expression of CD86, the most important co-stimulatory molecule. Design:Analysis of blood samples that entered the clinical immunologic diagnostics and of cells from an in vitro model of postinflammatory immunodeficiency. Setting:University laboratory. Subjects:Healthy donors and intensive care unit (ICU) patients at the university hospital. Interventions:None. Measurements and Main Results:The expression of HLA-DR on monocytes and of CD86 and CD80 on monocytes and B cells was analyzed by flow cytometry. Messenger RNA expression of CD86 was analyzed in isolated monocytes by real-time polymerase chain reaction on reverse transcribed. The normal range of monocyte CD86 expression in healthy subjects was established to be from 2128 to 5102 surface molecules per cell and was independent of age, gender, and leukocyte and monocyte count. The CD86 expression on monocytes in ICU patients correlated with HLA-DR expression. Approximately 40% of the ICU patients with long-term reduced monocyte HLA-DR expression had a long-term reduction of CD86 expression. Patients in whom the expression of both molecules was diminished had an unfavorable prognosis. The diminished number of CD86 surface molecules on monocytes was associated with reduced CD86 messenger RNA levels in these cells. The expression of CD86 in B cells was not diminished in immunodeficient patients. The expression of CD80 in both monocytes and B-cells was minimal in healthy donors and not clearly changed in patients. Conclusions:The monocyte CD86 expression may be a helpful diagnostic variable in ICU patients.