Heikki Mäkisalo

A prospective randomised, open-labeled, trial comparing sirolimus-containing versus mTOR-inhibitor-free immunosuppression in patients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

BackgroundThe potential anti-cancer effects of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are being intensively studied. To date, however, few randomised clinical trials (RCT) have been performed to demonstrate anti-neoplastic effects in the pure oncology setting, and at present, no oncology endpoint-directed RCT has been reported in the high-malignancy risk population of immunosuppressed transplant recipients. Interestingly, since mTOR inhibitors have both immunosuppressive and anti-cancer effects, they have the potential to simultaneously protect against immunologic graft loss and tumour development. Therefore, we designed a prospective RCT to determine if the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus can improve hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-free patient survival in liver transplant (LT) recipients with a pre-transplant diagnosis of HCC.Methods/DesignThe study is an open-labelled, randomised, RCT comparing sirolimus-containing versus mTOR-inhibitor-free immunosuppression in patients undergoing LT for HCC. Patients with a histologically confirmed HCC diagnosis are randomised into 2 groups within 4-6 weeks after LT; one arm is maintained on a centre-specific mTOR-inhibitor-free immunosuppressive protocol and the second arm is maintained on a centre-specific mTOR-inhibitor-free immunosuppressive protocol for the first 4-6 weeks, at which time sirolimus is initiated. A 21/2 -year recruitment phase is planned with a 5-year follow-up, testing HCC-free survival as the primary endpoint. Our hypothesis is that sirolimus use in the second arm of the study will improve HCC-free survival. The study is a non-commercial investigator-initiated trial (IIT) sponsored by the University Hospital Regensburg and is endorsed by the European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association; 13 countries within Europe, Canada and Australia are participating.DiscussionIf our hypothesis is correct that mTOR inhibition can reduce HCC tumour growth while simultaneously providing immunosuppression to protect the liver allograft from rejection, patients should experience less post-transplant problems with HCC recurrence, and therefore could expect a longer and better quality of life. A positive outcome will likely change the standard of posttransplant immunosuppressive care for LT patients with HCC.Trial RegisterTrial registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00355862(EudraCT Number: 2005-005362-36)

Treatment Options in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Today

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer related death worldwide. As over 90% of HCCs arise in cirrhotic livers preventive methods and surveillance policies have been adopted in most countries with high prevalence of hepatitis B or C infected people. Poor prognosis of HCC has shown some improvement during the last years. Targeted therapy with radiofrequency ablation (RFA), hepatic resection (HR), liver transplantation (LT), and transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) seems to have an influence on this development. The heterogeneity of cirrhotic patients with HCC is still a big challenge. A patient with a small tumour in a cirrhotic liver may have a worse prognosis than a patient with a large tumor in a relatively preserved liver after “curative” HR. The choice of the treatment modality depends on the size and the number of tumours, the stage and the cause of cirrhosis and finally on the availability of various modalities in each centre.

A comparison of gasless mechanical and conventional carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum methods for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation with increased intraabdominal pressure (IAP) has adverse hemodynamic, pulmonary, and renal effects.To avoid these problems, an abdominal wall lift method with a retractor was used to provide the surgical view without CO2 insufflation. Twenty-six patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to either the gasless, retractor group, or conventional CO2 pneumoperitoneum group (CPP). Hemodynamic data, ventilatory variables, urine output, urine oxygen tension, and blood samples for determining stress hormones were collected throughout the perioperative period. Patients in the retractor group had lower mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and central venous pressure (P < 0.001). They also had higher pulmonary dynamic compliance and needed a lower minute volume of ventilation to achieve normocarbia (P < 0.001). Urine output and oxygen tension in urine were higher (P < 0.05) with the retractor method than with CPP. Increase in plasma renin activity (P < 0.05) and decrease in core temperature (P < 0.001) were smaller with the gasless method than with CPP. The gasless method for laparoscopic cholecystectomy might be beneficial, especially in patients with compromised cardiorespiratory or renal function. Implications: Totally gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy was compared with conventional pressure pneumoperitoneum with CO (2) insufflation. The gasless method resulted in more stable hemodynamics and pulmonary function, as well as higher urine, output than conventional pressure pneumoperitoneum. No changes in renal oxygenation was seen with the gasless method, compared with conventional pressure pneumoperitoneum.

Sirolimus Use in Liver Transplant Recipients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Phase 3 Trial.

Background We investigated whether sirolimus-based immunosuppression improves outcomes in liver transplantation (LTx) candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods In a prospective-randomized open-label international trial, 525 LTx recipients with HCC initially receiving mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor–free immunosuppression were randomized 4 to 6 weeks after transplantation into a group on mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor–free immunosuppression (group A: 264 patients) or a group incorporating sirolimus (group B: 261). The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS); intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was conducted after 8 years. Overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint. Results Recurrence-free survival was 64.5% in group A and 70.2% in group B at study end, this difference was not significant (P = 0.28; hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.62; 1.15). In a planned analysis of RFS rates at yearly intervals, group B showed better outcomes 3 years after transplantation (HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.48-1.00). Similarly, OS (P = 0.21; HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.58-1.13) was not statistically better in group B at study end, but yearly analyses showed improvement out to 5 years (HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.49-1.00). Interestingly, subgroup (Milan Criteria-based) analyses revealed that low-risk, rather than high-risk, patients benefited most from sirolimus; furthermore, younger recipients (age ⩽60) also benefited, as well sirolimus monotherapy patients. Serious adverse event numbers were alike in groups A (860) and B (874). Conclusions Sirolimus in LTx recipients with HCC does not improve long-term RFS beyond 5 years. However, a RFS and OS benefit is evident in the first 3 to 5 years, especially in low-risk patients. This trial provides the first high-level evidence base for selecting immunosuppression in LTx recipients with HCC.

A prospective, randomized, multi-centre trial of systemic adjuvant chemotherapy versus no additional treatment in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

The role of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy in liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial. Here, we report the results of a Nordic prospective, randomized, multi‐centre trial of systemic low‐dose doxorubicin in patients with HCC. Between February 1996 and April 2004, 46 patients were randomized to receive either neoadjuvant doxorubicin in combination with LT (chemo group; n = 19) or LT alone (control group; n = 27). In the chemo group, doxorubicin was administered intravenously, 10 mg/m2 weekly, starting from acceptance onto the waiting list for LT. One intraoperative dose of 15 mg/m2 was given, and postoperatively doxorubicin was given weekly at a dose of 10 mg/m2, depending on the clinical course, up to a cumulative dose of 400 mg/m2. Actuarial, 3‐year overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS) in the control group were 70% and 50%, respectively. In the chemo group, both OS and DFS were 63%. Freedom from recurrence at 3 years was 55% in the control group and 74% in the chemo group. None of the differences was statistically significant. Neoadjuvant treatment with systemic low‐dose doxorubicin seems not to improve either survival or freedom from recurrence in patients with HCC undergoing LT.

High Mobility Group Box 1 Protein as a Marker of Hepatocellular Injury in Human Liver Transplantation

High mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1), a cytokine actively secreted by phagocytes and passively released from necrotic cells, is an inflammatory mediator in experimental hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury. We characterized its expression in human liver transplantation. In 20 patients, in addition to systemic samples, blood was drawn from portal and hepatic veins during and after reperfusion to assess changes within the graft. Plasma HMGB1, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF‐α), and interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) levels were measured, and HMGB1 immunohistochemistry was performed on biopsies taken before and after reperfusion. Plasma HMGB1 was undetectable before reperfusion, and levels in systemic circulation peaked after graft reperfusion. At portal declamping, HMGB1 levels were substantially higher in the caval effluent [188 (80‐371) ng/mL] than in portal venous blood [0 (0‐3) ng/mL, P < 0.001]. HMGB1 release from the graft continued thereafter. HMGB1 levels were not related to TNF‐α or IL‐6 levels. HMGB1 expression was up‐regulated in biopsies taken after reperfusion (P = 0.020), with intense hepatocyte and weak neutrophil staining. HMGB1 levels in hepatic venous blood correlated with graft steatosis (r = 0.497, P = 0.03) and peak postoperative alanine aminotransferase levels (r = 0.588, P = 0.008). Our results indicate that HMGB1 originates from the graft and is a marker of hepatocellular injury in human liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 14:1517–1525, 2008.

Sildenafil for portopulmonary hypertension in a patient undergoing liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) may be indicated in cirrhotic patients with underlying pulmonary artery hypertension. However, severe pulmonary artery hypertension with mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) above 50 mmHg has even been considered a contraindication to LT. We present a cirrhotic patient with an mPAP of 56 mmHg measured using right heart catheterization (RHC) and with severely compromised physical capacity. She was first treated with sildenafil (Viagra®), a potent novel vasodilator, and successfully transplanted later. The mPAP decreased with sildenafil to the level of 28–31 mmHg and her general condition improved markedly. An LT using piggyback technique was performed 16 weeks later. Despite 2 reoperations for bleeding, the outcome has been excellent. In conclusion, treatment of severe portopulmonary hypertension (PHT) with sildenafil is effective. If a decrease in mPAP is achieved with sildenafil, it may improve the result of LT, even though no evidence of reversibility of PPHTN exists. (Liver Transpl 2004;10:945–950.)

Incidence of Merkel cell carcinoma in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND The risk factors for Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), a rare type of skin cancer, are poorly understood. Some evidence suggests that MCC is more common in individuals with abnormal immune function resulting from viral infection, autoimmune disease or organ trans- plantation. METHODS The national Renal Transplant Registry and the Finnish Cancer Registry data were searched for recipients of a renal transplant who were diagnosed with MCC. The MCC diagnoses were confirmed using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS Three cases of MCC were detected among 4200 individuals who underwent renal transplantation from 1967 to 2005 [expected number 0.05, standardized incidence ratio (SIR) 66, 95% CI 14-194, P <0.001]. The latency period between the transplant and detection of MCC ranged from 6 to 19 years. In all three cases, the cause of transplantation was an autoimmune disease. All three died from aggressive MCC with a survival time ranging from 0.5 to 2.1 years. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that the risk of MCC is greatly increased among subjects who have undergone renal transplantation. The course of the disease appears aggressive in this patient population. The physicians who treat recipients of a kidney transplant should be aware of the substantially increased risk of MCC.

Circulating xanthine oxidase and neutrophil activation during human liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS Oxygen free radicals, generated by xanthine oxidase (XO) and activated leukocytes, are involved in reperfusion injury in experimental liver transplantation. The roles of XO and neutrophil activation during reperfusion in clinical liver transplantation were studied. METHODS In 10 patients undergoing liver transplantation, we assessed plasma concentrations of circulating XO by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the purine metabolites hypoxanthine, xanthine, and urate by high-performance liquid chromatography, lactoferrin by ELISA, and malondialdehyde fluorometrically up to 48 hours postoperatively. RESULTS During reperfusion after portal vein declamping, elevated plasma concentrations of XO (52.1 ng/mL [range, 8.0-440.1]), hypoxanthine (81.62 micromol/L [48.2-108.7]), xanthine (21.01 micromol/L [8.7-22.3]), and lactoferrin (532.6 ng/mL [370.4-1326.6]) were observed compared with the preoperative levels (0 ng/mL [0-12], 1.88 micromol/L [0.62-3.15], 0.95 micromol/L [0-0.41], and 164.3 ng/mL [73.7-334.1], respectively; all P < 0.05). No changes occurred in urate or malondialdehyde. After portal vein declamping, XO, hypoxanthine, and xanthine levels were substantially greater in the hepatic than portal vein (all P < 0.05). Marginal transhepatic differences occurred in lactoferrin. CONCLUSIONS Reperfusion during liver transplantation is associated with liberation of xanthine oxidase, hypoxanthine, and xanthine from the liver into the circulation. During reperfusion, intravascular neutrophil activation takes place in the hepatic circulation.

Outcome following liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis in the Nordic countries

Background: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is the most common indication for liver transplantation in the Nordic countries. Because these patients are difficult to evaluate with regard to timing of liver transplantation, it is important to establish predictors of post‐transplant survival. Methods: Data from two groups of patients receiving liver allografts during 1982–2001 were recorded: (a) PSC patients and (b) comparison patients. Outcome following transplantation has been recorded for all patients. Regression analyses have been performed for PSC patients to analyse predictors of patient and graft survival. Results: A total of 245 PSC and 618 comparison patients received a first liver allograft in the period 1982 until the end of the study. The overall 1‐, 3‐ and 5‐year patient survival rates were 82%, 77% and 75%, and 80%, 77% and 74% in the PSC group and comparison group, respectively. Survival following transplantation has increased with time in both the PSC and the comparison group. Recent year of transplantation, no previous hepatobiliary surgery and a lower MELD score were predictors of survival following transplantation for PSC patients. PSC patients had a higher rate of re‐transplantations (13% versus 8%, P = 0.01). Predictors of re‐transplantation in PSC patients were an episode of early rejection and vascular thrombosis. Conclusion: In PSC patients, year of transplantation, previous hepatobiliary surgery and MELD score are predictors of survival following transplantation and these patients are more frequently in need of re‐transplantation compared to the comparison group.