Heinrich Kovar
Medical University of Vienna
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Heinrich Kovar.
Cancer | 1991
Inge M. Ambros; Peter F. Ambros; Sabine Strehl; Heinrich Kovar; Helmut Gadner; Mechthild Salzer-Kuntschik
This study reports on the specific expression of the MIC2 gene, a pseudoautosomal gene located on the short arms of the X and Y chromosomes, on Ewings sarcoma (ES) and peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor (pPNET) cells. The gene product, a cell membrane protein, is recognized by the newly established monoclonal antibody (MoAb) HBA‐71 and the previously described MoAb 12E7 and RFB‐1. Furthermore, the reaction pattern of the MIC2 antibodies, especially HBA‐71, with normal tissues and a great number of benign and malignant tumors (70 different tumors, 199 tumor samples), as well as the correlation between the specific chromosomal aberrations, i.e., the t(11;22) and the del(22) and the expression of this antigen, are demonstrated. Both ES and pPNET cells express the MIC2 gene in very high amounts, which represents a highly selective and almost unique feature of these cells, making an assignment of these tumors in one entity even more likely. The MIC2 antibodies are of great value for clinical and research purposes.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1996
Andreas Zoubek; B. Dockhorn-Dworniczak; Olivier Delattre; H Christiansen; F Niggli; I Gatterer-Menz; T L Smith; Heribert Jürgens; Helmut Gadner; Heinrich Kovar
PURPOSE Because of the high heterogeneity of EWS gene fusions with FLI1 and ERG genes due to variable chromosomal breakpoint locations in Ewing tumors (ET) (14 different chimeric transcripts identified so far), we evaluated the clinical impact of the expression of diverse fusion transcripts in ET patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a European multicenter study, 147 ET were analyzed by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the molecular data statistically compared with all clinical data available. RESULTS Most tumors expressed chimeric transcripts with fusion of EWS exon 7 to FLI1 exon 6 (75 of 147) (type I) or five (39 of 147) and EWS exon 10 to FLI1 exon 5 (eight of 147) or 6 (five of 147). In five cases, chimerism between EWS exon 9 and FLI1 exons 4 and EWS exon 7 and FLI1 exon 7 or 8 was observed. Fifteen cases of EWS-ERG rearrangement were identified. In 85 of these patients treated in the European Cooperative Ewing Sarcoma Studies, molecular results were analyzed in comparison to age, sex, tumor localization, tumor volume, and disease extension. No significant correlation between the various fusion types and these features were observed. Relapse-free survival (RFS) for the 31 patients with localized disease and fusion type I tended to be longer compared with the 24 patients with localized tumors bearing other chimeric transcripts (P = .04). CONCLUSION Results suggest a possible advantage in PFS for patients with localized disease and fusion type I transcripts, although this will require prospective validation with a larger number of patients and longer follow-up periods.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2009
Günther H. Richter; Stephanie Plehm; Annette Fasan; Sabine Rössler; Rebekka Unland; Idriss M. Bennani-Baiti; Marc Hotfilder; Diana Löwel; Irene von Luettichau; Ilona Mossbrugger; Leticia Quintanilla-Martinez; Heinrich Kovar; Martin S. Staege; Carsten Müller-Tidow; Stefan Burdach
Ewing tumors (ET) are highly malignant, localized in bone or soft tissue, and are molecularly defined by ews/ets translocations. DNA microarray analysis revealed a relationship of ET to both endothelium and fetal neural crest. We identified expression of histone methyltransferase enhancer of Zeste, Drosophila, Homolog 2 (EZH2) to be increased in ET. Suppressive activity of EZH2 maintains stemness in normal and malignant cells. Here, we found EWS/FLI1 bound to the EZH2 promoter in vivo, and induced EZH2 expression in ET and mesenchymal stem cells. Down-regulation of EZH2 by RNA interference in ET suppressed oncogenic transformation by inhibiting clonogenicity in vitro. Similarly, tumor development and metastasis was suppressed in immunodeficient Rag2−/−γC−/− mice. EZH2-mediated gene silencing was shown to be dependent on histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity. Subsequent microarray analysis of EZH2 knock down, HDAC-inhibitor treatment and confirmation in independent assays revealed an undifferentiated phenotype maintained by EZH2 in ET. EZH2 regulated stemness genes such as nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR), as well as genes involved in neuroectodermal and endothelial differentiation (EMP1, EPHB2, GFAP, and GAP43). These data suggest that EZH2 might have a central role in ET pathology by shaping the oncogenicity and stem cell phenotype of this tumor.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1999
Jill P. Ginsberg; Enrique de Alava; Marc Ladanyi; Leonard H. Wexler; Heinrich Kovar; Michael Paulussen; Andreas Zoubek; B. Dockhorn-Dworniczak; Herbert Juergens; Jay S. Wunder; Irene L. Andrulis; Rajesh Malik; Poul H. Sorensen; Richard B. Womer; Frederic G. Barr
PURPOSE There are a variety of solid tumors in which alternative chromosomal translocations generate related fusion products. In alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma and synovial sarcoma, these variant fusions have been found to have major clinical significance. We investigated whether the two alternative gene fusion products, EWS-FLI1 and EWS-ERG, define different clinical subsets within the Ewings sarcoma family of tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS We selected 30 cases of Ewings sarcoma with the EWS-ERG gene fusion and 106 cases with the EWS-FLI1 fusion. Clinical data were obtained for each case and compared with the molecular diagnostic findings. RESULTS There were no significant clinical differences observed between the two groups in age of diagnosis, sex, metastasis at diagnosis, primary site, event-free survival, or overall survival. CONCLUSION Differences in the C-terminal partner in the Ewings sarcoma family gene fusions are not associated with significant phenotypic differences.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2010
Marie-Cécile Le Deley; Olivier Delattre; Karl-Ludwig Schaefer; Sue Burchill; Gabriele Koehler; Pancras C.W. Hogendoorn; Thomas Lion; Christopher Poremba; Julien Marandet; Stelly Ballet; Gaëlle Pierron; Samantha C. Brownhill; Michaela Nesslböck; Andreas Ranft; Uta Dirksen; Odile Oberlin; Ian J. Lewis; Alan W. Craft; Heribert Jürgens; Heinrich Kovar
PURPOSE EWS-ETS fusion genes are the driving force in Ewings sarcoma pathogenesis. Because of the variable breakpoint locations in the involved genes, there is heterogeneity in fusion RNA and protein architecture. Since previous retrospective studies suggested prognostic differences among patients expressing different EWS-FLI1 fusion types, the impact of fusion RNA architecture on disease progression and relapse was studied prospectively within the Euro-E.W.I.N.G. 99 clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Among 1,957 patients who registered before January 1, 2007, 703 primary tumors were accessible for the molecular biology study. Fusion type was assessed by polymerase chain reaction on frozen (n = 578) or paraffin-embedded materials (n = 125). The primary end point was the time to disease progression or relapse. Results After exclusion of noninformative patients, 565 patients were entered into the prognostic factor analysis comparing type 1 (n = 296), type 2 (n = 133), nontype 1/nontype 2 EWS-FLI1 (n = 91) and EWS-ERG fusions (n = 45). Median follow-up time was 4.5 years. The distribution of sex, age, tumor volume, tumor site, disease extension, or histologic response did not differ between the four fusion type groups. We did not observe any significant prognostic value of the fusion type on the risk of progression or relapse. The only slight difference was that the risk of progression or relapse associated with nontype 1/nontype 2 EWS-FLI1 fusions was 1.38 (95% CI, 0.96 to 2.0) times higher than risk associated with other fusion types, but it was not significant (P = .10). CONCLUSION In contrast to retrospective studies, the prospective evaluation did not confirm a prognostic benefit for type 1 EWS-FLI1 fusions.
Oncogene | 1997
Heinrich Kovar; Gunhild Jug; Dave N. T. Aryee; Andreas Zoubek; Peter F. Ambros; Bernadette Gruber; Reinhard Windhager; Helmut Gadner
The pRB cell cycle regulatory cascade is frequently perturbed in neoplasia by overexpression of a component of the pRB-phosphorylating cyclin D1/CDK4 complex or by inactivation of pRB or the CDK4 inhibitors p16 and p15. We investigated the status and expression of p16, p15, CCND1, CDK4 and RB genes in the Ewing family of tumors. P16 loss was observed in 8 of 27 tumors (30%) and in 12 of 23 (52%) tumor cell lines from unrelated patients. There were no discrepancies in the p16 status between primary tumors and the corresponding cell lines and between cell lines established from consecutive tumor samples. p15 was codeleted in most cases but p15 mRNA was absent also in cell lines retaining the gene. In addition, posttranscriptional p16 inactivation was observed in two cases. Although no evidence for CDK4 or CCND1 amplification was obtained, expression of these genes varied considerably in the cell lines in a case specific manner. In wild-type p16 cell lines, pRB expression was lost in one case. Our data indicate that, despite the absence of cytogenetically detectable 9p21 chromosomal aberrations, p16 deletions constitute the most frequent secondary molecular aberration in Ewing tumors so far. These results are discussed in the context of the stage of disease and the clinical outcome of the patients. The potential prognostic impact of these findings remains to be further evaluated.
Cancer Research | 2006
Oscar M. Tirado; Silvia Mateo-Lozano; Joaquín Villar; Luis E. Dettin; Anna Llort; Soledad Gallego; Jozef Ban; Heinrich Kovar; Vicente Notario
Tumors of the Ewings sarcoma family (ESFT), such as Ewings sarcoma (EWS) and primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNET), are highly aggressive malignancies predominantly affecting children and young adults. ESFT express chimeric transcription factors encoded by hybrid genes fusing the EWS gene with several ETS genes, most commonly FLI-1. EWS/FLI-1 proteins are responsible for the malignant phenotype of ESFT, but only few of their transcriptional targets are known. Using antisense and short hairpin RNA-mediated gene expression knockdown, array analyses, chromatin immunoprecipitation methods, and reexpression studies, we show that caveolin-1 (CAV1) is a new direct target of EWS/FLI-1 that is overexpressed in ESFT cell lines and tumor specimens and is necessary for ESFT tumorigenesis. CAV1 knockdown led to up-regulation of Snail and the concomitant loss of E-cadherin expression. Consistently, loss of CAV1 expression inhibited the anchorage-independent growth of EWS cells and markedly reduced the growth of EWS cell-derived tumors in nude mice xenografts, indicating that CAV1 promotes the malignant phenotype in EWS carcinogenesis. Reexpression of CAV1 or E-cadherin in CAV1 knockdown EWS cells rescued the oncogenic phenotype of the original EWS cells, showing that the CAV1/Snail/E-cadherin pathway plays a central role in the expression of the oncogenic transformation functions of EWS/FLI-1. Overall, these data identify CAV1 as a key determinant of the tumorigenicity of ESFT and imply that targeting CAV1 may allow the development of new molecular therapeutic strategies for ESFT patients.
PLOS ONE | 2009
Maximilian Kauer; Jozef Ban; Reinhard Kofler; Bob Walker; Sean Davis; Paul S. Meltzer; Heinrich Kovar
Background EWS-FLI1 is a chimeric ETS transcription factor that is, due to a chromosomal rearrangement, specifically expressed in Ewings sarcoma family tumors (ESFT) and is thought to initiate the development of the disease. Previous genomic profiling experiments have identified EWS-FLI1–regulated genes and genes that discriminate ESFT from other sarcomas, but so far a comprehensive analysis of EWS-FLI1–dependent molecular functions characterizing this aggressive cancer is lacking. Methodology/Principal Findings In this study, a molecular function map of ESFT was constructed based on an integrative analysis of gene expression profiling experiments following EWS-FLI1 knockdown in a panel of five ESFT cell lines, and on gene expression data from the same platform of 59 primary ESFT. Out of 80 normal tissues tested, mesenchymal progenitor cells (MPC) were found to fit the hypothesis that EWS-FLI1 is the driving transcriptional force in ESFT best and were therefore used as the reference tissue for the construction of the molecular function map. The interrelations of molecular pathways were visualized by measuring the similarity among annotated gene functions by gene sharing. The molecular function map highlighted distinct clusters of activities for EWS-FLI1 regulated genes in ESFT and revealed a striking difference between EWS-FLI1 up- and down-regulated genes: EWS-FLI1 induced genes mainly belong to cell cycle regulation, proliferation, and response to DNA damage, while repressed genes were associated with differentiation and cell communication. Conclusions/Significance This study revealed that EWS-FLI1 combines by distinct molecular mechanisms two important functions of cellular transformation in one protein, growth promotion and differentiation blockage. By taking MPC as a reference tissue, a significant EWS-FLI1 signature was discovered in ESFT that only partially overlapped with previously published EWS-FLI1–dependent gene expression patterns, identifying a series of novel targets for the chimeric protein in ESFT. Our results may guide target selection for future ESFT specific therapies.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2015
Nathalie Gaspar; Douglas S. Hawkins; Uta Dirksen; Ian J. Lewis; Stefano Ferrari; Marie Cécile Le Deley; Heinrich Kovar; Robert Grimer; Jeremy Whelan; L. Claude; Olivier Delattre; Michael Paulussen; Piero Picci; Kirsten Sundby Hall; Hendrik van den Berg; Ruth Ladenstein; Jean Michon; Lars Hjorth; Ian Judson; Roberto Luksch; Mark Bernstein; Perrine Marec-Berard; Bernadette Brennan; Alan W. Craft; Richard B. Womer; Heribert Juergens; Odile Oberlin
Ewing sarcoma (ES) is an aggressive sarcoma of bone and soft tissue occurring at any age with a peak incidence in adolescents and young adults. The treatment of ES relies on a multidisciplinary approach, coupling risk-adapted intensive neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapies with surgery and/or radiotherapy for control of the primary site and possible metastatic disease. The optimization of ES multimodality therapeutic strategies has resulted from the efforts of several national and international groups in Europe and North America and from cooperation between pediatric and medical oncologists. Successive first-line trials addressed the efficacy of various cyclic combinations of drugs incorporating doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, etoposide, and dactinomycin and identified prognostic factors now used to tailor therapies. The role of high-dose chemotherapy is still debated. Current 5-year overall survival for patients with localized disease is 65% to 75%. Patients with metastases have a 5-year overall survival < 30%, except for those with isolated pulmonary metastasis (approximately 50%). Patients with recurrence have a dismal prognosis. The many insights into the biology of the EWS-FLI1 protein in the initiation and progression of ES remain to be translated into novel therapeutic strategies. Current options and future approaches will be discussed.
International Journal of Cancer | 1998
Andreas Zoubek; Ruth Ladenstein; R. Windhager; Gabriele Amann; G Fischmeister; Leo Kager; D. Jugovic; Peter F. Ambros; Helmut Gadner; Heinrich Kovar
EWS/ets‐oncogene fusion transcripts can be detected in at least 98% of Ewing tumors [(ET) Ewing sarcoma and peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor] by reverse transcriptase‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR), thus confirming the histopathologic diagnosis. To detect minimal amounts of tumor cells in the bone marrow (BM), we used an RT‐PCR assay with a high sensitivity, revealing one tumor cell in a background of 106 normal cells. We examined BM samples from 35 newly diagnosed ET patients (23 with localized and 12 with metastatic disease). At diagnosis, tumor cells in the BM were detected in 7/23 patients with localized disease (30%). Fifty percent of patients with isolated lung metastasis were RT‐PCR positive (3/6), whereas 6/6 patients with bone metastases showed positive signals (100%). All patients with initial PCR positivity in the BM became negative during treatment. After a median follow‐up of 30 months, relapses were observed in both groups of patients with localized disease (3/7 RT‐PCR positive and 2/16 RT‐PCR negative). The only recurrence in the group with isolated lung metastases occurred as progressive lung disease in 1 of the 2 RT‐PCR‐negative patients, whereas among the 6 patients with bone metastases 2 remain in complete remission. So far, RT‐PCR screening for BM involvement did not allow prediction of early relapse in ET. To assess better the significance of this test in the evaluation of long‐term prognosis and in monitoring the effectiveness of systemic therapy, long observation periods are warranted before it becomes a tool for treatment stratification. Int. J. Cancer (Pred. Oncol.) 79:56–60, 1998.