Helen M. Dodds

Disposition of epirubicin after intraarterial administration in Lipiodol to patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Delivering emulsions of anthracycline drugs in Lipiodol, an iodinated poppy-seed oil, via the hepatic artery for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has become increasingly popular. However, investigations to determine the extent to which the Lipiodol sequesters the anthracycline in the liver have been limited. Concern has been expressed that such emulsions are not stable and that the anthracycline is, therefore, released rapidly into the circulation. We studied the pharmacokinetics of epirubicin (50 mg m-2) in five patients with nonresectable primary hepatocellular carcinoma after infusion of an epirubicin/Lipiodol emulsion via the hepatic artery. We used a reliable and specific high-performance liquid chromatography assay that allows quantitation of plasma concentrations of epirubicin, epirubicinol, epirubicin glucuronide, and epirubicin aglycone. Although a large interpatient variability in pharmacokinetics was observed, our results were similar to historical data after epirubicin intravenous therapy. Only the results from one patient provided evidence of significant retention of the drug in the liver. It would appear that more stable formulations of epirubicin/Lipiodol are required to increase the efficacy of this form of treatment. We suggest that pharmacokinetic studies should accompany clinical evaluation of emulsions of epirubicin/Lipiodol for the treatment of HCC.

Toxicity of irinotecan (CPT-11) and hepato-renal dysfunction.

Various clinical and laboratory parameters have been investigated for their ability to predict toxicity arising from the use of the anticancer drug, irinotecan (CPT-11). In particular, patients deficient in the conjugation of SN-38, a metabolite of CPT-11, are known to be at greater risk. We describe one case of a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with a single dose of CPT-11 at 125 mg/m2. Although this patient lacked any known predictive factors for toxicity, he experienced severe side-effects several days later. We hypothesized that the toxicity in this patient was due to compromised SN-38 conjugation. Plasma samples were analyzed by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography assay for CPT-11 and its metabolites at 96, 144, 168, 192 and 288 h post-administration. We observed that the concentrations of both the parent drug and its metabolites were markedly raised (11- to 60-fold expected). Additionally the estimated terminal half-lives were 1.5-7 times those expected (29.5, 101, 39.6 and 41.8 h for CPT-11, APC, SN-38G and SN-38, respectively). We conclude that the toxicity in this patient was not caused by deficient SN-38 conjugation, but by decreased drug excretion through both hepatic and renal routes.

Plasma indomethacin assay using high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry: application to therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic studies.

The authors report the use of high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-MS/MS) for the quantification of indomethacin (IND) in plasma with microscale sample preparation. Plasma samples (100 microL) and mefanamic acid (internal standard [IS]), buffered to pH 3.5, were prepared using solid phase extraction and chromatographed using a C8 column. The mobile phase composition was 80% methanol to 20% ammonium acetate buffer (40 mM, pH 5.1). A flow rate of 300 microL per minute was used with a 1-to-12 postcolumn split into the mass spectrometer. Selected reaction monitoring with mass transitions m/z 357.9-->139.0 and m/z 242-->209.0 were used for IND and IS, respectively. The chromatographic analysis time was 4 minutes. The assay was linear from 5 microg/L to 2000 microg/L with interday imprecision (n=5) over the analytic range (5%). At four concentrations (10 microg/L, 25 microg/L, 250 microg/L, 1500 microg/L), assay imprecision was 9% (total coefficient of variation [CV]) and accuracy ranged between 96.5% and 102.8% (n=16). The absolute recovery of IND and IS was 74% (n=8) and 95% (n=24), respectively. This method was developed and validated in less than 10 working days, had a lower limit of quantification than reported HPLC-ultraviolet (UV) methods, and uses small sample volumes. These factors illustrate the power of HPLC-ESI-MS/MS for drug analysis. Furthermore, the ability of this method to measure IND over a wide concentration range makes it suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic studies.