Helen R. Saibil

A small heat shock protein stably binds heat-denatured model substrates and can maintain a substrate in a folding-competent state.

The small heat shock proteins (sHSPs) recently have been reported to have molecular chaperone activity in vitro; however, the mechanism of this activity is poorly defined. We found that HSP18.1, a dodecameric sHSP from pea, prevented the aggregation of malate dehydrogenase (MDH) and glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase heated to 45°C. Under conditions in which HSP18.1 prevented aggregation of substrates, size‐exclusion chromatography and electron microscopy revealed that denatured substrates coated the HSP18.1 dodecamers to form expanded complexes. SDS–PAGE of isolated complexes demonstrated that each HSP18.1 dodecamer can bind the equivalent of 12 MDH monomers, indicating that HSP18.1 has a large capacity for non‐native substrates compared with other known molecular chaperones. Photoincorporation of the hydrophobic probe 1,1′‐bi(4‐anilino)naphthalene‐5,5′‐disulfonic acid (bis‐ANS) into a conserved C‐terminal region of HSP18.1 increased reversibly with increasing temperature, but was blocked by prior binding of MDH, suggesting that bis‐ANS incorporates proximal to substrate binding regions and that substrate–HSP18.1 interactions are hydrophobic. We also show that heat‐denatured firefly luciferase bound to HSP18.1, in contrast to heat‐aggregated luciferase, can be reactivated in the presence of rabbit reticulocyte or wheat germ extracts in an ATP‐dependent process. These data support a model in which sHSPs prevent protein aggregation and facilitate substrate refolding in conjunction with other molecular chaperones.

The protofilament structure of insulin amyloid fibrils

Under solution conditions where the native state is destabilized, the largely helical polypeptide hormone insulin readily aggregates to form amyloid fibrils with a characteristic cross-β structure. However, there is a lack of information relating the 4.8 Å β-strand repeat to the higher order assembly of amyloid fibrils. We have used cryo-electron microscopy (EM), combining single particle analysis and helical reconstruction, to characterize these fibrils and to study the three-dimensional (3D) arrangement of their component protofilaments. Low-resolution 3D structures of fibrils containing 2, 4, and 6 protofilaments reveal a characteristic, compact shape of the insulin protofilament. Considerations of protofilament packing indicate that the cross-β ribbon is composed of relatively flat β-sheets rather than being the highly twisted, β-coil structure previously suggested by analysis of globular protein folds. Comparison of the various fibril structures suggests that very small, local changes in β-sheet twist are important in establishing the long-range coiling of the protofilaments into fibrils of diverse morphology.

Cryo‐electron microscopy structure of an SH3 amyloid fibril and model of the molecular packing

Amyloid fibrils are assemblies of misfolded proteins and are associated with pathological conditions such as Alzheimers disease and the spongiform encephalopathies. In the amyloid diseases, a diverse group of normally soluble proteins self‐assemble to form insoluble fibrils. X‐ray fibre diffraction studies have shown that the protofilament cores of fibrils formed from the various proteins all contain a cross‐β‐scaffold, with β‐strands perpendicular and β‐sheets parallel to the fibre axis. We have determined the threedimensional structure of an amyloid fibril, formed by the SH3 domain of phosphatidylinositol‐3′‐kinase, using cryo‐electron microscopy and image processing at 25 Å resolution. The structure is a double helix of two protofilament pairs wound around a hollow core, with a helical crossover repeat of ∼600 Å and an axial subunit repeat of ∼27 Å. The native SH3 domain is too compact to fit into the fibril density, and must unfold to adopt a longer, thinner shape in the amyloid form. The 20×40‐Å protofilaments can only accommodate one pair of flat β‐sheets stacked against each other, with very little inter‐strand twist. We propose a model for the polypeptide packing as a basis for understanding the structure of amyloid fibrils in general.

Mechanism of GroEL action: productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES.

The chaperonin GroEL is a large, double-ring structure that, together with ATP and the cochaperonin GroES, assists protein folding in vivo. GroES forms an asymmetric complex with GroEL in which a single GroES ring binds one end of the GroEL cylinder. Cross-linking studies reveal that polypeptide binding occurs exclusively to the GroEL ring not occupied by GroES (trans). During the folding reaction, however, released GroES can rebind to the GroEL ring containing polypeptide (cis). The polypeptide is held tightly in a proteolytically protected environment in cis complexes, in the presence of ADP. Single turnover experiments with ornithine transcarbamylase reveal that polypeptide is productively released from the cis but not the trans complex. These observations suggest a two-step mechanism for GroEL-mediated folding. First, GroES displaces the polypeptide from its initial binding sites, sequestering it in the GroEL central cavity. Second, ATP hydrolysis induces release of GroES and productive release of polypeptide.

The Chaperonin ATPase Cycle: Mechanism of Allosteric Switching and Movements of Substrate-Binding Domains in GroEL

Chaperonin-assisted protein folding proceeds through cycles of ATP binding and hydrolysis by the large chaperonin GroEL, which undergoes major allosteric rearrangements. Interaction between the two back-to-back seven-membered rings of GroEL plays an important role in regulating binding and release of folding substrates and of the small chaperonin GroES. Using cryo-electron microscopy, we have obtained three-dimensional reconstructions to 30 A resolution for GroEL and GroEL-GroES complexes in the presence of ADP, ATP, and the nonhydrolyzable ATP analog, AMP-PNP. Nucleotide binding to the equatorial domains of GroEL causes large rotations of the apical domains, containing the GroES and substrate protein-binding sites. We propose a mechanism for allosteric switching and describe conformational changes that may be involved in critical steps of folding for substrates encapsulated by GroES.

Hsp26: a temperature-regulated chaperone

Small heat shock proteins (sHsps) are a conserved protein family, with members found in all organisms analysed so far. Several sHsps have been shown to exhibit chaperone activity and protect proteins from irreversible aggregation in vitro. Here we show that Hsp26, an sHsp from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is a temperature‐regulated molecular chaperone. Like other sHsps, Hsp26 forms large oligomeric complexes. At heat shock temperatures, however, the 24mer chaperone complex dissociates. Interestingly, chaperone assays performed at different temperatures show that the dissociation of the Hsp26 complex at heat shock temperatures is a prerequisite for efficient chaperone activity. Binding of non‐native proteins to dissociated Hsp26 produces large globular assemblies with a structure that appears to be completely reorganized relative to the original Hsp26 oligomers. In this complex one monomer of substrate is bound per Hsp26 dimer. The temperature‐dependent dissociation of the large storage form of Hsp26 into a smaller, active species and the subsequent re‐association to a defined large chaperone–substrate complex represents a novel mechanism for the functional activation of a molecular chaperone.

Chaperone machines for protein folding, unfolding and disaggregation

Molecular chaperones are diverse families of multidomain proteins that have evolved to assist nascent proteins to reach their native fold, protect subunits from heat shock during the assembly of complexes, prevent protein aggregation or mediate targeted unfolding and disassembly. Their increased expression in response to stress is a key factor in the health of the cell and longevity of an organism. Unlike enzymes with their precise and finely tuned active sites, chaperones are heavy-duty molecular machines that operate on a wide range of substrates. The structural basis of their mechanism of action is being unravelled (in particular for the heat shock proteins HSP60, HSP70, HSP90 and HSP100) and typically involves massive displacements of 20–30 kDa domains over distances of 20–50 Å and rotations of up to 100°.

Structural Basis of Pore Formation by the Bacterial Toxin Pneumolysin

The bacterial toxin pneumolysin is released as a soluble monomer that kills target cells by assembling into large oligomeric rings and forming pores in cholesterol-containing membranes. Using cryo-EM and image processing, we have determined the structures of membrane-surface bound (prepore) and inserted-pore oligomer forms, providing a direct observation of the conformational transition into the pore form of a cholesterol-dependent cytolysin. In the pore structure, the domains of the monomer separate and double over into an arch, forming a wall sealing the bilayer around the pore. This transformation is accomplished by substantial refolding of two of the four protein domains along with deformation of the membrane. Extension of protein density into the bilayer supports earlier predictions that the protein inserts beta hairpins into the membrane. With an oligomer size of up to 44 subunits in the pore, this assembly creates a transmembrane channel 260 A in diameter lined by 176 beta strands.

GroEL-GroES Cycling: ATP and Nonnative Polypeptide Direct Alternation of Folding-Active Rings

The double-ring chaperonin GroEL mediates protein folding in the central cavity of a ring bound by ATP and GroES, but it is unclear how GroEL cycles from one folding-active complex to the next. We observe that hydrolysis of ATP within the cis ring must occur before either nonnative polypeptide or GroES can bind to the trans ring, and this is associated with reorientation of the trans ring apical domains. Subsequently, formation of a new cis-ternary complex proceeds on the open trans ring with polypeptide binding first, which stimulates the ATP-dependent dissociation of the cis complex (by 20- to 50-fold), followed by GroES binding. These results indicate that, in the presence of nonnative protein, GroEL alternates its rings as folding-active cis complexes, expending only one round of seven ATPs per folding cycle.

Structural basis for the regulated protease and chaperone function of DegP

All organisms have to monitor the folding state of cellular proteins precisely. The heat-shock protein DegP is a protein quality control factor in the bacterial envelope that is involved in eliminating misfolded proteins and in the biogenesis of outer-membrane proteins. Here we describe the molecular mechanisms underlying the regulated protease and chaperone function of DegP from Escherichia coli. We show that binding of misfolded proteins transforms hexameric DegP into large, catalytically active 12-meric and 24-meric multimers. A structural analysis of these particles revealed that DegP represents a protein packaging device whose central compartment is adaptable to the size and concentration of substrate. Moreover, the inner cavity serves antagonistic functions. Whereas the encapsulation of folded protomers of outer-membrane proteins is protective and might allow safe transit through the periplasm, misfolded proteins are eliminated in the molecular reaction chamber. Oligomer reassembly and concomitant activation on substrate binding may also be critical in regulating other HtrA proteases implicated in protein-folding diseases.