Helen S. Barold

Testing different biphasic waveforms and capacitances: Effect on atrial defibrillation threshold and pain perception

OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to compare the effect of different tilts and capacitances for biphasic shocks on atrial defibrillation efficacy and pain threshold. BACKGROUND Although biphasic shocks have been shown to be superior to monophasic shocks, the effect of tilt and capacitance on atrial defibrillation success and pain perception has not been studied in patients. METHODS Atrial defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing was performed using a right atrial appendage/coronary sinus lead configuration in 38 patients with a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing an invasive electrophysiologic study. Biphasic waveforms with 40%, 50%, 65%, 80%, 30%/50% and 40%/50% were tested randomly in 22 patients (Group 1). In 16 patients (Group 2), a 65% tilt waveform with 50- and 120-microF capacitance was tested. Before sedation, pain sensation was graded by 15 patients in Group 1 after delivery of a 0.5-J shock and by 10 patients in Group 2 after two 1.5-J shocks with 50- and 120-microF capacitance were delivered. RESULTS The DFT energy for the 50% tilt waveform was significantly lower than the 65%, 80% and 30%/50% tilt waveforms. The 40%/50% tilt waveform provided slightly lower energy requirements than the 50% tilt waveform. Nine patients (60%) described the 0.5-J shock as very painful, and four (26.6%) complained of slight pain. The 50-microF capacitor lowered energy requirements compared with the 120-microF capacitor. Six patients (60%) perceived the 1.5-J 50-microF capacitor shock as more painful, whereas three (30%) perceived both shocks as equally painful. CONCLUSIONS Biphasic waveforms with 50% tilt in both phases and a smaller tilt in the positive phase than that in the negative phase (40%/50%) provided a decrease in energy requirements at atrial DFT. In addition, stored energy was reduced by biphasic shocks with 50-microF capacitance compared with 120-microF capacitance. Despite the reduction in energy requirements, shocks < 1 J continued to be perceived as painful in the majority of patients.

Prospective Evaluation of New and Old Criteria to Discriminate Between Supraventricular and Ventricular Tachycardia in Implantable Defibrillators

This study was designed to evaluate the ability to distinguish between supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) and ventricular tachycardias (VTs) based on onset, stability, and width criteria in an implantable defibrillator. Inappropriate detection of atrial fibrillation and sinus tachycardia is a common problem in patients with implantable defibrillators. The onset, stability, and width criteria were studied in 17 patients who underwent implantation of a Medtronic 7218C implantable defibrillator by inducing sinus tachycardia and atrial fibrillation. Additional data on the width criteria was obtained by pacing at separate sites in both the left and right ventricle. Patients were studied at different times for up to 6 months to determine any changes in the criteria. The onset and stability criteria caused inappropriate detections in 36% and 12% of the episodes, respectively. The addition of the width criteria decreased the inappropriate detection using the onset and stability criteria to 5% and 2%, respectively. Pacing from the RV apex, RV outflow tract, and LV apex was appropriately detected as wide in 76%, 41%, and 94%, respectively. The width criteria changed over time in individual patients, but was stable by 6 months in all but one patient. No single criterion is satisfactory for distinguishing between SVT and VT in this patient population, but the combination of criteria seems to provide better discrimination. The width criteria can change dramatically over time and needs to be monitored carefully. Newer algorithms will need to be developed to allow better detection of supraventricular tachycardias.

Ventricular Fibrillation Resulting from Synchronized Internal Atrial Defibrillation in a Patient with Ventricular Preexcitation

VF After Synchronized Internal Atrial Defibrillation. This case describes ventricular proarrhythmia as a result of a synchronized internal atrial defibrillation shock in a 29‐year‐old man with Ebsteins anomaly referred for radiofrequency ablation of a right posterior accessory pathway. During the electrophysiologic study, atrial fibrillation was induced and 3/3 msec shocks of various strengths were delivered between two decapolar defibrillation catheters in the coronary sinus and right atrial appendage. A 2.0‐J biphasic shock synchronized to an R wave after a short‐long‐short ventricular cycle length pattern with a preshock coupling interval of 245 msec induced ventricular fibrillation, which was externally defibrillated with 200 J. This observation has implications for the development of implantable atrial defibrillators.

Effect of Increased Parasympathetic and Sympathetic Tone on Internal Atrial Defibrillation Thresholds in Humans

Although changes in autonomic tone affect ventricular defibrillation, little is known about the effect of increased parasympathetic or sympathetic tone on the atrial defbrillation threshold. Methods: To evaluate the effect of reflexly increased parasympathetic and increase α‐ and β‐adrenergic tone on the atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT), atrial fibrillation was induced in 14 patients. ADFTs, right atrial refractory period (RARP), and monophasic action potential duration (MAPD) were determined before and after autonomic intervention. ADFTs were determined with a step‐up protocol using 3/3‐ms biphasic shocks delivered through decapolar catheters in the right atrial appendage and coronary sinus. Two groups were studied. Group I (N = 8) had ADFTs determined at baseline, after receiving phenylephrine (PE), and with PE plus atropine (A). Group 2 (N = 6) had ADFTs determined at baseline and after receiving isoproterenol (ISO). Results: Group I: PE significantly increased sinus cycle length (SR‐CL) compared to baseline (742 ± 123 to 922 ± 233 ms) without significantly changing RARP, MAPD, or ADFT (2.3 ± 1.3 J vs 2.3 ± 0.8 J). With PE + A, SR‐CL significantly decreased (529 ± 100 ms vs 742 ± 123 ms) and MAPD shortened (231 ± 41 ms vs 279 ± 49 ms) without altering RARP or ADFT (1.94 ± 0.9 J vs 2.25 ± 1.25 J). Group 2: ISO decreased SR‐CL (486 ± 77 ms vs 755 ± 184 ms) and MAPD (169 ± 37 ms vs 226 + 58 ms) but not RARP or ADFT (2.25 ± 1.21 J vs 2.33 ± 1.75 J). Conclusions: Increasing parasympathetic, α‐, or β‐adrenergic tone does not affect the ADFT despite causing significant electrophysiological changes in the atria.

Optimal Cardiac Pacing in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Pacemaker patients with coronary artery disease and angina pectoris fare better with devices providing AV synchrony and rate increase on exercise provided the programmed upper rate is not excessive. Optimal programming requires knowledge of the factors influencing pacemaker rate response, MVO2 and cardiac sympathetic activity. Inappropriately high rates during rate adaptive pacing can be controlled by new multisensor systems with sensor cross‐checking to avoid false positive responses with inappropriate increases in the pacing rate. Permanent pacing in patients with intractable angina who are unsuitable for interventional procedures permits more aggressive pharmacological therapy.

Demonstration of a His-Purkinje Fatigue Phenomenon with Programmed Stimulation of the Right Ventricular Outflow Tract

This report describes the development of atrioventricular block by programmed stimulation of the right ventricular (RV) outflow tract in a patient with undiagnosed syncope. Burst pacing from the RV apex and outflow tract and programmed stimulation from the RV apex were unsuccessful. The observations were consistent with the fatigue phenomenon of the His-Purkinje system and illustrate the importance of an appropriate stimulation protocol in the electrophysiological evaluation of syncope.

Should the split format in the third position of the pacemaker code be resurrected

It is possible to characterize some of the sensing functions of new multisite pacing systems by resurrecting the split format in the third position of the standard pacemaker code. This approach permits accurate representation of the horizontal and vertical triggering functions of multisite dual-chamber pacemakers without creating a new code.

Acquired Atrioventricular Block: Should the Revised ACC/AHA Guidelines for Pacemaker Implantation be Revised?

The last few years have generated relatively little new knowledge in conduction system disease. Consequently, this discussion of acquired AV block focuses mostly on the shortcomings and inconsistencies of the revised 1998 ACC/AHA guidelines for implantation of pacemakers [1]. We believe that some of the recommendations in the guidelines need clari~cation to better re_ect current and changing clinical practice.