Helena Canhão

FRI0298 The Impact of DMARD Co-Therapy on Abatacept Effectiveness in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. A Pan-European Analysis of RA Registries

Background Biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bioDMARDs) are generally used in combination with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Anti-TNF agents are more effective in combination with csDMARDs (COMBO) than as monotherapy (MONO), while this is debated with some of the newer bioDMARDs.(1) In particular, no difference was found in patients (pts) with insufficient response to TNF-inhibitors taking abatacept (ABA) in MONO vs. COMBO.(2) Objectives To compare the effectiveness of ABA started as MONO or in COMBO in RA pts treated in routine care. Methods This is a pooled observational database analysis of 9 prospective cohorts of RA pts (Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Italy, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland). We included all RA pts treated with ABA with information on concomitant csDMARDs use at initiation of ABA treatment. Primary endpoint was drug retention of ABA, defined as the time between drug initiation and last administration plus one dispensation interval, and analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model. A secondary endpoint was EULAR good or moderate response rate at one year, estimated by longitudinal interpolation and corrected for drug retention (Lundex (3)). All analyses were adjusted for potential confounders, e.g. calendar year, demographics, country and disease characteristics. Results We identified 3461 pts initiating ABA with 5475 pt-years of follow-up. Of these, 2314 pts (67%) received ABA in COMBO (53% - methotrexate, 8% - leflunomide, 6% - other csDMARDs) and 1147 pts (33%) in MONO. Pts on MONO were older (mean 59 vs. 57 years, p<0.001) and had longer disease duration (mean 11 vs. 12 years, p=0.005). Other demographic and disease characteristics were balanced. The median retention time of ABA in MONO was 2.02 years (IQR: 1.76 – 2.27) compared to 2.05 years (IQR: 1.90 – 2.22) in COMBO (p=0.76). No significant difference in ABA retention rates was found with or without sDMARD cotherapy (Hazard Ratio (HR) MONO vs COMBO: 1.02 (95%CI: 0.92 – 1.13)). Furthermore, ABA drug retention did not differ between the various sDMARDs cotherapy combinations. Results remained similar when examining only ABA treatment discontinuations for ineffectiveness (HR MONO vs COMBO: 0.97 (95%CI: 0.84 – 1.13)). Furthermore, both the EULAR response rates and the Lundex based on EULAR response rates at one year were similar with or without sDMARD cotherapy (81% EULAR good or moderate responses on ABA MONO vs. 80% on COMBO, p=0.55. Lundex responders 55% on ABA MONO vs. 55% on COMBO, p=0.91). We found no effect modification by country. Conclusions The results of this large pooled RA population of mostly inadequate responders to anti-TNFs, suggest that ABA retention and response to ABA treatment are not influenced by csDMARDs cotherapy. References Emery P. et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Dec;72(12):1897-904. Schiff M et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:1708–14. Kristensen LE. et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Feb;54(2):600-6. Disclosure of Interest A. Finckh Grant/research support: Unrestricted Research grant from BMS, D. Neto Grant/research support: Unrestricted Research grant from BMS, J. Gomez-Reino: None declared, F. Iannone: None declared, E. Lie: None declared, H. Canhão: None declared, K. Pavelka: None declared, C. Turesson: None declared, X. Mariette: None declared, J.-E. Gottenberg: None declared, M. Hetland: None declared DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.3004

Multinational evidence-based recommendations for the use of methotrexate in rheumatic disorders with a focus on rheumatoid arthritis: integrating systematic literature research and expert opinion of a broad international panel of rheumatologists in the 3E Initiative

Objectives: To develop evidence-based recommendations for the use of methotrexate in daily clinical practice in rheumatic disorders. Methods: 751 rheumatologists from 17 countries participated in the 3E (Evidence, Expertise, Exchange) Initiative of 2007–8 consisting of three separate rounds of discussions and Delphi votes. Ten clinical questions concerning the use of methotrexate in rheumatic disorders were formulated. A systematic literature search in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and 2005–7 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism meeting abstracts was conducted. Selected articles were systematically reviewed and the evidence was appraised according to the Oxford levels of evidence. Each country elaborated a set of national recommendations. Finally, multinational recommendations were formulated and agreement among the participants and the potential impact on their clinical practice was assessed. Results: A total of 16 979 references was identified, of which 304 articles were included in the systematic reviews. Ten multinational key recommendations on the use of methotrexate were formulated. Nine recommendations were specific for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), including the work-up before initiating methotrexate, optimal dosage and route, use of folic acid, monitoring, management of hepatotoxicity, long-term safety, mono versus combination therapy and management in the perioperative period and before/during pregnancy. One recommendation concerned methotrexate as a steroid-sparing agent in other rheumatic diseases. Conclusions: Ten recommendations for the use of methotrexate in daily clinical practice focussed on RA were developed, which are evidence based and supported by a large panel of rheumatologists, enhancing their validity and practical use.

Interleukin-6 as a key player in systemic inflammation and joint destruction.

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a cytokine that can facilitate autoimmune phenomena, amplify acute inflammation and promote the evolution into a chronic inflammatory state. In addition, it is a major promoter of bone resorption in pathological conditions. In particular, IL-6 has a pivotal role in synovitis, bone erosions and in the systemic features of inflammation. This cytokine specifically binds to IL-6 receptor (IL-6R), forming the IL-6/IL-6R complex that binds to gp130, a membrane-bound protein, which is involved in non-ligand-binding signal transduction. Targeting IL-6R in both animal models of arthritis and in rheumatoid arthritis patients with a humanized anti IL-6R monoclonal antibody (tocilizumab) effectively controls local and systemic inflammatory manifestations and blocks cartilage and bone destruction. Given the pleiotropic function of IL-6 it can be anticipated that other inflammatory diseases and bone metabolic conditions might benefit from selective IL-6 signaling inhibition.

Genome-wide association study and gene expression analysis identifies CD84 as a predictor of response to etanercept therapy in rheumatoid arthritis.

Anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF) biologic therapy is a widely used treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is unknown why some RA patients fail to respond adequately to anti-TNF therapy, which limits the development of clinical biomarkers to predict response or new drugs to target refractory cases. To understand the biological basis of response to anti-TNF therapy, we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis of more than 2 million common variants in 2,706 RA patients from 13 different collections. Patients were treated with one of three anti-TNF medications: etanercept (n = 733), infliximab (n = 894), or adalimumab (n = 1,071). We identified a SNP (rs6427528) at the 1q23 locus that was associated with change in disease activity score (ΔDAS) in the etanercept subset of patients (P = 8×10−8), but not in the infliximab or adalimumab subsets (P>0.05). The SNP is predicted to disrupt transcription factor binding site motifs in the 3′ UTR of an immune-related gene, CD84, and the allele associated with better response to etanercept was associated with higher CD84 gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (P = 1×10−11 in 228 non-RA patients and P = 0.004 in 132 RA patients). Consistent with the genetic findings, higher CD84 gene expression correlated with lower cross-sectional DAS (P = 0.02, n = 210) and showed a non-significant trend for better ΔDAS in a subset of RA patients with gene expression data (n = 31, etanercept-treated). A small, multi-ethnic replication showed a non-significant trend towards an association among etanercept-treated RA patients of Portuguese ancestry (n = 139, P = 0.4), but no association among patients of Japanese ancestry (n = 151, P = 0.8). Our study demonstrates that an allele associated with response to etanercept therapy is also associated with CD84 gene expression, and further that CD84 expression correlates with disease activity. These findings support a model in which CD84 genotypes and/or expression may serve as a useful biomarker for response to etanercept treatment in RA patients of European ancestry.

Integration of Sequence Data from a Consanguineous Family with Genetic Data from an Outbred Population Identifies PLB1 as a Candidate Rheumatoid Arthritis Risk Gene

Integrating genetic data from families with highly penetrant forms of disease together with genetic data from outbred populations represents a promising strategy to uncover the complete frequency spectrum of risk alleles for complex traits such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Here, we demonstrate that rare, low-frequency and common alleles at one gene locus, phospholipase B1 (PLB1), might contribute to risk of RA in a 4-generation consanguineous pedigree (Middle Eastern ancestry) and also in unrelated individuals from the general population (European ancestry). Through identity-by-descent (IBD) mapping and whole-exome sequencing, we identified a non-synonymous c.2263G>C (p.G755R) mutation at the PLB1 gene on 2q23, which significantly co-segregated with RA in family members with a dominant mode of inheritance (P = 0.009). We further evaluated PLB1 variants and risk of RA using a GWAS meta-analysis of 8,875 RA cases and 29,367 controls of European ancestry. We identified significant contributions of two independent non-coding variants near PLB1 with risk of RA (rs116018341 [MAF = 0.042] and rs116541814 [MAF = 0.021], combined P = 3.2×10−6). Finally, we performed deep exon sequencing of PLB1 in 1,088 RA cases and 1,088 controls (European ancestry), and identified suggestive dispersion of rare protein-coding variant frequencies between cases and controls (P = 0.049 for C-alpha test and P = 0.055 for SKAT). Together, these data suggest that PLB1 is a candidate risk gene for RA. Future studies to characterize the full spectrum of genetic risk in the PLB1 genetic locus are warranted.

Osteoimmunology — The hidden immune regulation of bone

Osteoimmunology is an emerging field of research dedicated to the investigation of the interactions between the immune and skeletal systems. These interactions are not only mediated by the release of cytokines and chemokines but also by direct cell-cell contact. Recently, it was proposed that immunoreceptors found in the immune cells are also an essential signal for osteoclasts activation, along with receptor activator NF-kappaB (RANK) ligand (RANKL) and macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF). In addition, adipose tissue also produces several factors (adipokines) that are known to interfere with the immune system and bone homeostasis. Chronic inflammation strongly influences osteoimmunology determining profound metabolic, structural and functional changes in bone.

Multinational evidence-based recommendations on how to investigate and follow-up undifferentiated peripheral inflammatory arthritis: integrating systematic literature research and expert opinion of a broad international panel of rheumatologists in the 3E Initiative

Objective To develop evidence-based recommendations on how to investigate and follow-up undifferentiated peripheral inflammatory arthritis (UPIA). Methods 697 rheumatologists from 17 countries participated in the 3E (Evidence, Expertise, Exchange) Initiative of 2008–9 consisting of three separate rounds of discussions and modified Delphi votes. In the first round 10 clinical questions were selected. A bibliographic team systematically searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library and ACR/EULAR 2007–2008 meeting abstracts. Relevant articles were reviewed for quality assessment, data extraction and synthesis. In the second round each country elaborated a set of national recommendations. Finally, multinational recommendations were formulated and agreement among the participants and the potential impact on their clinical practice was assessed. Results A total of 39 756 references were identified, of which 250 were systematically reviewed. Ten multinational key recommendations about the investigation and follow-up of UPIA were formulated. One recommendation addressed differential diagnosis and investigations prior to establishing the operational diagnosis of UPIA, seven recommendations related to the diagnostic and prognostic value of clinical and laboratory assessments in established UPIA (history and physical examination, acute phase reactants, autoantibodies, radiographs, MRI and ultrasound, genetic markers and synovial biopsy), one recommendation highlighted predictors of persistence (chronicity) and the final recommendation addressed monitoring of clinical disease activity in UPIA. Conclusions Ten recommendations on how to investigate and follow-up UPIA in the clinical setting were developed. They are evidence-based and supported by a large panel of rheumatologists, thus enhancing their validity and practical use.

Cross-Sectional Study of 50 Patients with Calcium Pyrophosphate Dihydrate Crystal Arthropathy

Abstract: Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal arthropathy (CPPA) is a well known but heterogeneous disease with a variable presentation and course. We present a cross-sectional study undertaken in a Portuguese rheumatology unit with the aim of analysing clinical and radiological patterns of CPPA in our population. The study population included 50 patients, 34 (68%) women and 16 (32%) men. The mean age was 69.8 ± 8.8 years. The onset features were acute arthritis in 19 (38%) patients and chronic joint complaints in 26 (52%); five (10%) patients were asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis, which was based only on radiological findings. The diagnosis was established in 37 (74%) cases by clinical and radiographic features, in eight (16%) by clinical, X-ray and synovial fluid analysis, and in five (10%) by clinical features and fluid analysis. The disease course was characterised by acute episodic arthritis in 16 (32%) patients and by persistent symptoms (with or without synovitis) in 34 (68%). The pattern of CPPA in 20 (40%) patients was pseudo-osteoarthritis with synovitis, pseudo-osteoarthritis without synovitis in nine (18%), pseudogout in nine (18%), monoarthropathy in eight (16%) and pseudorheumatoid arthritis in four (8%). The phosphocalcium balance was altered in nine (18%) cases: six patients had hypercalciuria two hyperphosphaturia, two hypocalciuria, one hypophosphaturia and one hypercalcemia. Five patients had abnormal thyroid hormone levels, but only one presented with clinical hypothyroidism. Four patients showed increased parathormone levels, but only one presented with clinical hyperparathyroidism. Radiographic findings showed that 43 (86%) patients had meniscus calcifications, 20 (40%) radiocarpal and 16 (32%) calcification of the symphysis pubis. The study confirms the clinical variability of the disease in a population of Portuguese patients. The knee meniscus calcifications were the most sensitive single finding for establishing the diagnosis of CPPA. Almost all our patients had sporadic idiopathic CPPA without associated pathological conditions.

Classification of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Versus American College of Rheumatology Criteria. A Comparative Study of 2,055 Patients From a Real-Life, International Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Cohort.

The new Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) 2012 classification criteria aimed to improve the performance of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) classification over the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1997 criteria. However, the SLICC 2012 criteria need further external validation. Our objective was to compare the sensitivity for SLE classification between the ACR 1997 and the SLICC 2012 criteria sets in a real‐life, multicenter, international SLE population.

Alterations on peripheral blood B-cell subpopulations in very early arthritis patients

OBJECTIVE To characterize circulating B-cell subpopulations of arthritis patients with <6 weeks of disease duration. METHODS Peripheral blood samples were collected from very early untreated polyarthritis patients, with <6 weeks of disease duration, for flow cytometric evaluation of B-cell subpopulations. Samples from patients who were later diagnosed as RA [very early RA (VERA)] were also collected 4-6 weeks after starting a low dose of prednisone (5-10 mg) and 4 months after reaching the minimum effective dose of MTX. A matched healthy group was used as a control. RESULTS VERA patients have a lower percentage of total peripheral blood memory B cells (CD19(+)CD27(+)) and a significant decrease in the frequency of circulating pre-switch memory B cells (CD19(+)IgD(+)CD27(+)) as compared with controls. Therapy with corticosteroids or MTX was unable to restore the normal frequencies of these B-cell subpopulations. A significant decrease in peripheral pre-switch memory B cells is equally observed in other early arthritis patients. Furthermore, no significant differences are found in the frequencies of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells in all patient groups. CONCLUSIONS In very early polyarthritis patients, there is a reduction in circulating pre-switch memory B cells. The reasons that may account for this effect are still unknown. Short-term corticosteroids and MTX do not seem to have a direct effect on circulating B-cell subpopulations in VERA patients.