Hélène Dufresne

Family burden in inherited ichthyosis: creation of a specific questionnaire

BackgroundThe concept of individual burden, associated with disease, has been introduced recently to determine the “disability” caused by the pathology in the broadest sense of the word (psychological, social, economic, physical). Inherited ichthyosis belong to a large heterogeneous group of Mendelian Disorders of Cornification. Skin symptoms have a major impact on patients’ Quality of Life but little is known about the burden of the disease on the families of patients.ObjectivesTo develop and validate a specific burden questionnaire for the families of patients affected by ichthyosis.MethodsTwo steps were required. First, the creation of the questionnaire which followed a strict methodological process involving a multidisciplinary team and families. Secondarily, the validation of the questionnaire, including the assessment of its reliability, external validity, reproducibility and sensitivity, was carried out on a population of patients affected by autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis. A population of parents of patients affected by ichthyosis was enrolled to answer the new questionnaire in association with the Short Form Q12 questionnaire (SF-12) and a clinical severity score was filled for each patient.ResultsNinety four families were interviewed to construct the verbatim in order to create the questionnaire and a cognitive debriefing was realized. The concept of burden could be structured around five components: “economic”, “daily life”, “familial and personal relationship”, “work”, and “psychological impact”. As a result, “Family Burden Ichthyosis” (FBI) reproducible questionnaire of 25 items was created.Forty two questionnaires were analyzable for psychometric validation. Reliability (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient = 0.89), reflected the good homogeneity of the questionnaire. The correlation between mental dimensions of the SF-12 and the FBI questionnaire was statistically significant which confirmed the external validity. The mean FBI score was 71.7 ± 18.8 and a significant difference in the FBI score was shown between two groups of severity underlining a good sensitivity of the questionnaire.ConclusionsThe internal and external validity of the “FBI” questionnaire was confirmed and it is correlated to the severity of ichtyosis. Ichthyoses, and other chronic pathologies, are difficult to assess by clinical or Quality of Life aspects alone as their impact can be multidimensional. “FBI” takes them all into consideration in order to explain every angle of the handicap generated.

Cognitive profile of school‐age children and teenagers with hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (HED)

Anhidrotic/hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (HED) is the most common of the ectodermal dysplasias characterized by a triad of absent or reduced sweat, hypodontia and misshapen teeth, and missing or sparse hair. As the central nervous system is primarily ectodermal in origin, it has long been a concern that HED may be associated with developmental delay and/or intellectual disabilities. While published reviews report abnormalities in mental or motor development in 15–25% of HED‐affected patients, there is no report in the literature including a systematic assessment of intellectual abilities in a cohort of patients with this rare disorder. During yearly health care updates, many of our clinic families report attention difficulties in young HED patients without evidence of a significant impact on school performance. In an exploratory study to identify and quantify intellectual abnormalities that may be associated with HED, we performed a psychological examination of 23 HED patients by means of the Wechsler Intelligence Scales, WPPSI‐III, and WISC‐IV. The interpretation of the tests shows no significant impairment in the achievements of the sample group compared with normative values (full scale scores, and index scale scores of the WISC‐IV). At an individual level, the HED‐affected patients were characterised by higher scores on the Verbal Comprehension Index, on Perceptual Reasoning and Working Memory Indices, and lower scores on the Processing Speed Index. As all of the Indices were within normal limits for the study population, in the absence of major mental/motor disabilities these findings support the mainstream education of HED‐affected children.