Helene Westring Hvidman

Ovarian reserve assessment in users of oral contraception seeking fertility advice on their reproductive lifespan

STUDY QUESTION To what extent does oral contraception (OC) impair ovarian reserve parameters in women who seek fertility assessment and counselling to get advice on whether their remaining reproductive lifespan is reduced? SUMMARY ANSWER Ovarian reserve parameters defined by anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), antral follicle count (AFC) and ovarian volume were found to be significantly decreased by 19% (95% CI 9.1-29.3%), 18% (95% CI 11.2-24.8%) and 50% (95% CI 45.1-53.7%) among OC users compared with non-users. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY AMH and AFC have proved to be reliable predictors of ovarian ageing. In women, AMH declines with age and data suggest a relationship with remaining reproductive lifespan and age at menopause. OC may alter parameters related to ovarian reserve assessment but the extent of the reduction is uncertain. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A cross-sectional study of 887 women aged 19-46 attending the Fertility Assessment and Counselling Clinic (FACC) from 2011 to 2014 comparing ovarian reserve parameters in OC users with non-OC users. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The FAC Clinic was initiated to provide individual fertility assessment and counselling. All women were examined on a random cycle day by a fertility specialist. Consultation included; transvaginal ultrasound (AFC, ovarian volume, pathology), a full reproductive history and AMH measurement. Women were grouped into non-users and users of OC (all combinations of estrogen-progestin products and the contraceptive vaginal ring). Non-users included women with an intrauterine device (IUD) or no hormonal contraception. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Of the 887 women, 244 (27.5%) used OC. In a linear regression analyses adjusted for age, ovarian volume was 50% lower (95% CI 45.1-53.7%), AMH was 19% lower (95% CI 9.1-29.3%), and AFC was 18% lower (95% CI 11.2-24.8%) in OC users compared with non-users. Comparison of AMH at values of <10 pmol/l OC was found to have a significant negative influence on AMH (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1; 2.4, P = 0.03). Furthermore, we found a significant decrease in antral follicles sized 5-7 mm (P < 0.001) and antral follicles sized 8-10 mm (P < 0.001) but an increase in antral follicles sized 2-4 mm (P = 0.008) among OC users. The two groups (OC users versus non-users) were comparable regarding age, BMI, smoking and maternal age at menopause. LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION The study population comprised women attending the FAC Clinic. Recruitment was based on self-referral, which could imply a potential selection bias. Ovarian reserve was examined at a random cycle day. However, both AMH and AFC can be assessed independently of the menstrual cycle. The accuracy in predicting residual reproductive lifespan is still needed in both users and non-users of OC. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS OC has a major impact on the ovarian volume, and a moderate impact on AFC and AMH with a shift towards the smaller sized antral follicle subclasses. The most evident reduction occurs in the antral follicles of 5-7 and 8-10 mm with the highest number of AMH secreting granulosa cells. It is essential to be aware of the impact of OC use on ovarian reserve parameters when guiding OC users on their fertility status and reproductive lifespan. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS The FAC Clinic was established in 2011 as part of the ReproHigh collaboration. This study received funding through the Capital Region Research Fund and by EU-regional funding. There are no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER The biobank connected to FAC Clinic is approved by the Scientific Ethical Committee (H-1-2011-081).

Individual fertility assessment and pro-fertility counselling; should this be offered to women and men of reproductive age?

During the 1970s new contraceptive options developed and legal abortions became accessible. Family planning clinics targeting young women and men provided advice and assistance on contraception. Today, delayed childbearing, low total fertility rates and increasing use of social oocyte freezing create a need for pro-fertility initiatives. Three years ago we established a new separate unit: The Fertility Assessment and Counselling (FAC) clinic. The FAC clinic offers free individual counselling based on a clinical assessment including measurement of serum anti-Müllerian hormone and ovarian and pelvic sonography in women, sperm analysis in men, and a review of reproductive risk factors in both sexes. The FAC clinic includes a research programme with the goal to improve prediction and protection of fertility. Our first proposition is that clinics for individual assessment and counselling need to be established, as there is a strong unmet demand among women and men to obtain: (i) knowledge of fertility status, (ii) knowledge of reproductive lifespan (women) and (iii) pro-fertility advice. Addressing these issues is often more challenging than treating infertile patients. Therefore, we propose that fertility assessment and counselling should be developed by specialists in reproductive medicine. There are two main areas of concern: As our current knowledge on reproductive risk factors is primarily based on data from infertile patients, the first concern is how precisely we are able to forecast future reproductive problems. Predictive parameters from infertile couples, such as duration of infertility, are not applicable, diagnostic factors like tubal patency are unavailable and other parameters may be unsuitable when applied to the general population. Therefore, strict validation of reproductive forecasting in women and men from the general population is crucial. The second main concern is that we may turn clients into patients. Screening including reproductive forecasting may induce unnecessary anxiety through false positive predictions and may even result in overtreatment in contrast to the intended preventive concept. False negative findings may create false reassurance and result in postponement of conceptions.

Family intentions and personal considerations on postponing childbearing in childless cohabiting and single women aged 35–43 seeking fertility assessment and counselling

STUDY QUESTION What characterizes childless women aged 35 years and above seeking fertility assessment and counselling in relation to their reproduction and are there significant differences between single and cohabiting women? SUMMARY ANSWER Despite the womens advanced age and knowledge of the age-related decline in fecundity, 70% of the single women sought fertility assessment and counselling to gain knowledge regarding the possibility of postponing pregnancy. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Recent studies have indicated an increasing demand for ovarian reserve testing in women without any known fertility problem to obtain knowledge on their reproductive lifespan and pro-fertility advice. Women postpone their first pregnancy, and maternal age at first birth has increased in western societies over the past two to four decades. Postponed childbearing implies a higher rate of involuntary childlessness, smaller families than desired and declining fertility rates. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, AND DURATION Baseline data from a cross-sectional cohort study of 340 women aged 35-43 years examined at the Fertility Assessment and Counselling (FAC) Clinic at Copenhagen University Hospital from 2011 to 2014. The FAC Clinic was initiated to provide individual fertility assessment and counselling. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Eligible women were childless and at least 35 years of age. All completed a web-based questionnaire before and after the consultation including socio-demographic, reproductive, medical, lifestyle and behavioural factors. Consultation by a fertility specialist included transvaginal ultrasound, full reproductive history and AMH measurement. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The study comprised 140 cohabiting and 200 single women. The majority (82%) were well-educated and in employment. Their mean age was 37.4 years. Nonetheless, the main reasons for attending were to obtain knowledge regarding the possibility of postponing pregnancy (63%) and a concern about their fecundity (52%). The majority in both groups (60%) wished for two or more children. The women listed their ideal age at birth of first child and last child as 33 (±4.7) years and 39 (±3.5) years, respectively. Of the single women, 70% would accept use of sperm donation compared with 25% of the cohabiting women (P < 0.001). In general, 45% considered oocyte vitrification for social reasons, yet only 15% were positive towards oocyte donation. The two groups were comparable regarding lifestyle factors, number of previous sexual partners, pregnancies, and ovarian reserve parameters. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The women in the present study were conscious of the risk of infertility with increasing age and attended the FAC Clinic due to a concern about their remaining reproductive lifespan, which in combination with their high educational level could impair the generalizability to the background population. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The results indicate that in general women overestimate their own reproductive capacity and underestimate the risk of future childlessness with the continuous postponement of pregnancies.

The Fertility Assessment and Counseling Clinic – does the concept work? A prospective 2‐year follow‐up study of 519 women

The Fertility Assessment and Counseling (FAC) Clinic was initiated to provide women with information about their current fertility status to prevent infertility and smaller families than desired. The aim was to study the predictive value of a risk assessment score based on known fertility risk factors in terms of time to pregnancy.

Anti-Mullerian hormone levels and fecundability in women with a natural conception

OBJECTIVES To investigate the association between anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), a well-established marker of the ovarian reserve, and time-to-pregnancy (TTP) in natural conceptions, and to assess changes in serum-AMH in early pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN A cross sectional study comprising 279 women aged 21-42 years with a natural conception recruited during 2012-2014. AMH was measured in gestational week 10-19. AMH z-scores (z-AMH) adjusted for gestational week at blood sampling were categorised in the 1st, 2nd-4th (reference), and 5th quintile. Data were analysed by discrete-time survival-analysis and results presented as odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI); OR <1 indicating a longer TTP and OR >1 indicating a shorter TTP. RESULTS The median AMH-level was 23.0 (range:<3.0;144.0)pmol/l, and serum-AMH decreased by 7.5% (95% CI:-12.0%;-2.8%) per gestational week. Mean±SD female age was 30.9±3.6years. The median TTP was 2 (range: 1-32) months. After adjustment for possible confounders including total sperm count, TTP was unrelated to female age (aOR:1.0, 95% CI:0.9;1.0) and continuous z-AMH (aOR:0.8, 95% CI:0.7;1.0), but women in the low z-AMH group had a shorter TTP than the reference group (aOR:1.7, 95% CI:1.1;2.7). TTP was prolonged in preconception oral contraceptive (OC) users (aOR:0.7, 95% CI:0.5;1.0, p=0.04). Compared with women having used OC <2 years, TTP was significantly longer in women having used OC for 2-12 years (aOR:0.5, 95% CI:0.2;1.0, p=0.048) and >12 years (aOR:0.4, 95% CI:0.2;0.9, p=0.022) after age-adjustment. CONCLUSIONS TTP was unrelated with z-AMH when modelled as a continuous covariate. Unexpectedly, TTP was shorter in the low z-AMH group. Natural conception was observed in women with a wide range of AMH-levels including women with undetectable serum-AMH. A continuous decrease in serum-AMH was observed during first and second trimester. Preconception OC-use was identified as an independent predictor of a prolonged TTP, and the duration of OC-use appeared to influence the delay in conception. Although this is presently one of the largest studies investigating the association between AMH and fecundability in fertile women, the study has some limitation including a relatively low participation rate and a risk of selection bias in addition to AMH assessment in pregnancy and a retrospective collection of TTP and OC-use associated with a risk of recall bias. These limitations may explain the unexpected finding of a shorter TTP in the low z-AMH group.

Investigation of anti-Müllerian hormone concentrations in relation to natural conception rate and time to pregnancy

The objectives of this study were to investigate whether anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentrations can predict pregnancy rates and time to pregnancy (TTP) in women attempting to conceive naturally/having an unplanned conception, and whether there is a lower AMH threshold compatible with natural conception. This prospective cohort study included 260 women aged 25-42 years in two subcohorts: (A) healthcare workers at Rigshospitalet (2008-2010), and (B) women consulting the Fertility Assessment and Counselling Clinic (2011-2014), Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Pregnancy rates and TTP at 2-year follow-up were stratified into AMH groups: low: < 9.5 pmol/l, intermediate: 9.5-33 pmol/l, high: > 33 pmol/l. Pregnancy rates increased with increasing AMH: 60.1% (low) versus 70.0% (intermediate) versus 78.3% (high) (P = 0.03). The highest pregnancy rate (84.1%) was seen in regular cycling women with high AMH. TTP was reduced in women with high AMH compared with intermediate or low AMH (stepwise trend test P = 0.01). Natural conceptions were observed with AMH concentrations down to 1.2 pmol/l. In conclusion, high AMH, especially in ovulatory women, was associated with higher pregnancy rates. Nonetheless, TTP reflected a large variation in fecundity within similar AMH concentrations and natural conceptions occurred with AMH down to 1.2 pmol/l.

Left–right differences in ovarian volume and antral follicle count in 1423 women of reproductive age

Abstract The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate side differences in antral follicle count (AFC) and ovarian volume in left versus right ovaries in relation to chronological and “biological” age, the latter estimated by anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels. The cohort comprised 1423 women: 1014 fertile and 409 infertile. All were examined by transvaginal sonography and serum AMH. Overall the right ovary contained 8.1% more antral follicles (p = 0.002) and had 10.7% larger volume compared with the left (p < 0.001). In all AMH quartiles, the right ovarian volume was larger than the left (p ≤ 0.003). AFC was significantly higher in the right compared to the left ovary in the three upper AMH quartiles (p ≤ 0.005). The findings were similar when stratified in age quartiles. More than half (54.8%) had polycystic ovarian (PCO) morphology in at least one ovary. Of these women, 46.3% (n = 361) had PCO morphology unilateral – most frequently on the right side (27.6%) compared to the left (18.7%, p < 0.001). The consistent difference in AFC and ovarian volume found in AMH and age quartiles may be explained by presence of a larger pool of primordial follicles in the right ovary established during fetal life.