Helge Servatius

Long-term single- and multiple-procedure outcome and predictors of success after catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND Stepwise ablation is an effective treatment for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), although it often requires multiple procedures to eliminate recurrent arrhythmias. OBJECTIVE This study evaluated single- and multiple-procedure long-term success rates and potential predictors of a favorable single-procedure outcome of stepwise ablation for persistent AF. METHODS This study comprised 395 patients with persistent AF (duration 16 months) undergoing de novo catheter ablation using the stepwise approach. Procedural success was defined as the absence of any arrhythmia recurrence. Patient characteristics and electrophysiological parameters were analyzed with respect to single- and multiple-procedure outcomes. RESULTS After a follow-up of 27 ± 7 months, 108 (27%) patients were free of arrhythmia recurrences with a single procedure. After 2.3 ± 0.6 procedures, 312 (79%) patients were free of arrhythmia with concomitant antiarrhythmic treatment in 38% (23% on β-blocker). Female gender, duration of persistent AF, and congestive heart failure were predictive for the outcome after first ablation. However, the strongest predictors for single-procedure success were longer baseline AF cycle length (CL) and procedural AF termination. Moreover, procedural AF termination during the index procedure also predicted a favorable outcome after the last procedure, while the existence of congestive heart failure was associated with an increased risk for eventual arrhythmia recurrences. CONCLUSIONS Single-procedure long-term success is anticipated in approximately a quarter of patients undergoing de novo ablation of persistent AF. Baseline AFCL emerged as the strongest predictor of single-procedure success, while AF termination during index ablation predicts the overall outcome. However, an overall success rate of 79% is achievable with multiple procedures.

Chronic atrial fibrillation is a biatrial arrhythmia: data from catheter ablation of chronic atrial fibrillation aiming arrhythmia termination using a sequential ablation approach.

Background— Termination of chronic atrial fibrillation (CAF) can be achieved by catheter ablation using a stepwise approach. However, there are limited data on the contribution of the right atrium to the CAF process. Furthermore, the prognostic value of CAF termination remains unclear. Methods and Results— Eighty-eight patients (61±10 years of age) underwent de novo ablation of CAF in 2006 at our institution. The ablation procedure was performed sequentially in the following order: pulmonary vein isolation, defragmentation of the left atrium, coronary sinus, and right atrium. Attempted procedural end point was termination of CAF. Consecutive arrhythmias occurring after AF termination were mapped, and ablation was attempted. AF termination was achieved in 68 (77%) patients: in 37 (55%) patients it occurred in the left atrium, in 18 (26%) patients in the right atrium, and in 13 (19%) patients in the coronary sinus. In 54 patients, at least one redo was performed (total number of procedures: 154). After the first redo, another 30 patients were in sinus rhythm (total 63), 8 patients were in atrial tachycardia (AT), and 17 patients were in AF. Another 11 patients underwent a second redo. After a mean follow-up of 20±4 months, 71 (81%) patients were in sinus rhythm, 1 (1%) patient was in AT, and 16 (18%) patients were in AF. Patients with CAF termination had predominantly ATs as recurrent arrhythmias (83%), whereas those without mainly presented with recurrent CAF (85%). The overall success rate in patients with CAF termination was 95% compared with 5% of patients without CAF termination in 2 procedures (n=12). In almost all redo procedures attributable to AT, at least 1 AT during redo was documented previously. Conclusions— AF termination is a prognostic important end point of catheter ablation for CAF. Termination of AF was achieved in both atria and the coronary sinus, suggesting a biatrial substrate of CAF. Subsequent arrhythmias often recur during follow-up and, therefore, should be targeted for ablation. Received February 11, 2008; accepted September 15, 2008. # CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE {#article-title-2}Background—Termination of chronic atrial fibrillation (CAF) can be achieved by catheter ablation using a stepwise approach. However, there are limited data on the contribution of the right atrium to the CAF process. Furthermore, the prognostic value of CAF termination remains unclear. Methods and Results—Eighty-eight patients (61±10 years of age) underwent de novo ablation of CAF in 2006 at our institution. The ablation procedure was performed sequentially in the following order: pulmonary vein isolation, defragmentation of the left atrium, coronary sinus, and right atrium. Attempted procedural end point was termination of CAF. Consecutive arrhythmias occurring after AF termination were mapped, and ablation was attempted. AF termination was achieved in 68 (77%) patients: in 37 (55%) patients it occurred in the left atrium, in 18 (26%) patients in the right atrium, and in 13 (19%) patients in the coronary sinus. In 54 patients, at least one redo was performed (total number of procedures: 154). After the first redo, another 30 patients were in sinus rhythm (total 63), 8 patients were in atrial tachycardia (AT), and 17 patients were in AF. Another 11 patients underwent a second redo. After a mean follow-up of 20±4 months, 71 (81%) patients were in sinus rhythm, 1 (1%) patient was in AT, and 16 (18%) patients were in AF. Patients with CAF termination had predominantly ATs as recurrent arrhythmias (83%), whereas those without mainly presented with recurrent CAF (85%). The overall success rate in patients with CAF termination was 95% compared with 5% of patients without CAF termination in 2 procedures (n=12). In almost all redo procedures attributable to AT, at least 1 AT during redo was documented previously. Conclusions—AF termination is a prognostic important end point of catheter ablation for CAF. Termination of AF was achieved in both atria and the coronary sinus, suggesting a biatrial substrate of CAF. Subsequent arrhythmias often recur during follow-up and, therefore, should be targeted for ablation.

Persistence of Pulmonary Vein Isolation After Robotic Remote-Navigated Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation and its Relation to Clinical Outcome

Robotic Remote Ablation for AF. Aims: A robotic navigation system (RNS, Hansen™) has been developed as an alternative method of performing ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). Despite the growing application of RNS‐guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), its consequences and mechanisms of subsequent AF recurrences are unknown. We investigated the acute procedural success and persistence of PVI over time after robotic PVI and its relation to clinical outcome.

Pulmonary Vein Isolation Versus Defragmentation: The CHASE-AF Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND Long-term success rates using ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) are disappointing and usually do not exceed 60%. OBJECTIVES This study sought to compare arrhythmia-free survival between pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and a stepwise approach (full defrag) consisting of PVI, ablation of complex fractionated electrograms, and additional linear ablation lines in the setting of atrial tachycardias (AT) in patients with persistent AF after PVI. METHODS From November 2010 to February 2013, 205 patients (151 men; 61.7 ± 10.2 years of age) underwent de novo ablation for persistent AF. Subsequently, patients were prospectively randomized to either PVI alone (n = 78) or full defrag (n = 75), with 52 patients not randomized due to AF termination with the original PVI. The primary endpoint was recurrence of any AT after a blanking period of 3 months. RESULTS During the entire study, 241 ablations were performed (mean: 1.59 in the PVI-alone group, 1.55 in the full-defrag group). With the stepwise approach, termination of AF occurred in 45 (60%) patients. However, arrhythmia-free survival did not differ whether patients underwent single or multiple procedures (p = 0.468). Procedure duration, fluoroscopy time, and radiofrequency duration were significantly longer in the full-defrag group (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS A stepwise approach aimed at AF termination does not seem to provide additional benefit over PVI alone in patients with persistent AF, but it is associated with significantly longer procedural and fluoroscopic duration as well as radiofrequency application time. (The Randomized Catheter Ablation of Persist End Atrial Fibrillation Study [CHASE-AF]; NCT01580124).

Reduced fluoroscopy during atrial fibrillation ablation: benefits of robotic guided navigation.

Reduced Fluoroscopy in PVI Using RN. Background: Recently, a nonmagnetic robotic navigation system (RN, Hansen‐Sensei™) has been introduced for remote catheter manipulation.

Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation improves cardiac function: a prospective study on the impact of atrial fibrillation ablation on left ventricular function assessed by magnetic resonance imaging

AIMS Beneficial effects of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation have been demonstrated in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and significantly impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, the impact of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) on cardiac function in patients with paroxysmal AF and impaired LVEF remains under discussion. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of PVI for paroxysmal AF on cardiac function in patients with impaired LVEF using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI). METHODS AND RESULTS A total number of 70 patients with paroxysmal AF and episodes < or = 24 h were scanned on a 1.5-T-CMRI before and 6 months after PVI during sinus rhythm. End-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and LVEF were determined by epicardial and endocardial measurements. Patients were categorized into two groups regarding cardiac function as assessed by CMRI: group 1 patients (n = 18) with an LVEF < 50% and patients with an LVEF > 50% (group 2, n = 52). Group 1 patients demonstrated a significant lower success rate than patients of group 2 after a follow-up of 152 +/- 40 days (50 vs. 73%, P < 0.05). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in group 1 patients demonstrated a significant improvement in cardiac function after AF ablation (41 +/- 6 vs. 51 +/- 12%, P = 0.004), whereas group 2 patients did not show significant differences (60 +/- 6 vs. 59 +/- 9%, P = 0.22) after a 6 months follow-up. CONCLUSION Pulmonary vein isolation improves cardiac function in patients with paroxysmal AF and impaired LVEF. These data suggest that an impaired LV function can be partially attributed to AF with short-lasting paroxysms.

Characterization, Mapping, and Catheter Ablation of Recurrent Atrial Tachycardias After Stepwise Ablation of Long-Lasting Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Background—Atrial tachycardias (AT) often occur after ablation of long-lasting persistent AF (CAF) and are difficult to treat conservatively. This study evaluated mechanisms and success rates of conventional mapping and catheter ablation of recurrent ATs occurring late after stepwise ablation of CAF. Methods and Results—A total of 320 patients underwent de novo ablation of CAF using a stepwise ablation approach in 2006 to 2007 at our institution. This study comprised patients who presented with recurrent ATs at their first redo procedure after initial de novo CAF ablation. All procedures were guided by conventional mapping techniques exclusively. Sixty-one patients (63±10 years, 14 women) presented with their clinical AT at their redo procedure 7.7±4.4 months after initial de novo CAF ablation. A total of 133 ATs (2.2±0.9 per patient) were mapped. Forty-four (72%) were due to reentry; 17 (28%) were focal ATs. Reentry ATs were mainly characterized as roof and perimitral flutter (43% and 34%, respectively). Focal ATs mainly originated from the great thoracic veins (pulmonary veins: 41%, coronary sinus: 23%). Forty-five (74%) patients had conduction recovery of at least 1 pulmonary vein (mean, 1.2±0.8). Overall, 124 (93%) ATs could be ablated successfully. The mean procedure duration was 181±59 minutes, with a mean fluoroscopy time of 45±21 minutes. After a mean follow-up of 21±4 months, 50 (82%) patients were free of any arrhythmia recurrences after a single redo procedure. Conclusions—Although late recurrent ATs may have complex mechanisms, catheter ablation guided exclusively by conventional techniques is highly effective with excellent acute and long-term success rates.

Five-Year Follow-Up After Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Using the Stepwise Approach and Prognostic Factors for Success

Background—In the meantime, catheter ablation is widely used for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). There is a paucity of data about long-term outcomes. This study evaluates (1) 5-year single and multiple procedure success and (2) prognostic factors for arrhythmia recurrences after catheter ablation of persistent AF using the stepwise approach aiming at AF termination. Methods and Results—A total of 549 patients with persistent AF underwent de novo catheter ablation using the stepwise approach (2007–2009). A total of 493 patients were included (Holter ECGs ≥every 6 months). Mean follow-up was 59±16 months with 2.1±1.1 procedures per patient. Single and multiple procedure success rates were 20.1% and 55.9%, respectively (80% off antiarrhythmic drug). Antiarrhythmic drug–free multiple procedure success was 46%. Long-term recurrences (n=171) were paroxysmal AF in 48 patients (28%) and persistent AF/atrial tachycardia in 123 patients (72%). Multivariable recurrent event analysis revealed the following factors favoring arrhythmia recurrence: failure to terminate AF during index procedure (hazard ratio [HR], 1.279; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.093–1.497; P=0.002), number of procedures (HR, 1.154; 95% CI, 1.051–1.267; P=0.003), female sex (HR, 1.263; 95% CI, 1.027–1.553; P=0.027), and the presence of structural heart disease (HR, 1.236; 95% CI, 1.003–1.524; P=0.047). AF termination was correlated with a higher rate of consecutive procedures because of atrial tachycardia recurrences (P=0.003; HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.20–2.43). Conclusions—Catheter ablation of persistent AF using the stepwise approach provides limited long-term freedom of arrhythmias often requiring multiple procedures. AF termination, the number of procedures, sex, and the presence of structural heart disease correlate with outcome success. AF termination is associated with consecutive atrial tachycardia procedures.

Robotic versus conventional ablation for common-type atrial flutter: A prospective randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of remote catheter navigation

BACKGROUND Conventional catheter ablation for common-type atrial flutter (AFL) is a widely established therapy but has not been compared with the use of a robotic navigation system (RNS) thus far. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a new, nonmagnetic RNS with regard to safety, efficacy, and X-ray exposure to investigator and patient compared with the conventional ablation approach in patients with AFL. METHODS Fifty patients (65.7 +/- 9.3 years, 40 male) undergoing de novo catheter ablation for AFL were randomly assigned to conventional or RNS-guided cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation. RESULTS Complete bidirectional isthmus block was achieved for all patients without occurrence of procedure-related complications. The fluoroscopy time and the investigator X-ray exposure (8.2 +/- 4.6 vs. 5.8 +/- 3.6, P = .038; and 8.2 +/- 4.6 vs. 1.9 +/- 1.1 minutes, P<.001) as well as the mean radiofrequency (RF) duration and the energy delivered were significantly higher in the conventional than in the RNS group (321.7 +/- 214.6 vs. 496.4 +/- 213.9 seconds, P = .006; 8279 +/- 5767 vs. 16,308 +/- 6870 J, P<.001, respectively). The overall procedure time in the RNS group was significantly longer than in the conventional group (79.2 +/- 30.6 vs. 58.4 +/- 17.7 minutes; P = .04) but significantly decreased comparing the first 10 with the last 10 patients in the RNS group (105.3 +/- 34.8 vs. 60.6 +/- 6.3 minutes; P = .003). Starting ablation during AFL, bidirectional block instantly after termination was observed in 90% of the RNS and 50% of the conventionally treated patients (P = .03). CONCLUSION The present study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of RNS for performing CTI ablation in patients with common-type AFL for use in the clinical routine. As a result of the remote navigation, X-ray exposure and RF duration to achieve bidirectional block were significantly decreased and occurred more often immediately after AFL termination. These findings are consistent with increased catheter stability and RF application efficacy using RNS compared with conventional catheter manipulation.

Atrial fibrillation cycle length is a sole independent predictor of a substrate for consecutive arrhythmias in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

Background—Termination of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) can be achieved through ablation, with the majority of patients terminating to an atrial tachycardia (AT) and fewer directly to sinus rhythm (SR). We aimed to identify potential predictors for the existence of a substrate for AT on termination to SR. Methods and Results—We assessed 95 persistent AF patients (age, 60±10 years) who underwent catheter ablation to the end point of AF termination. Forty patients terminated directly to SR (SRterm) and 55 to ATs (ATterm). Compared with the ATterm group, the SRterm group were younger (56±10 versus 63±9 years, P=0.001), had shorter durations of AF before ablation (9±26 versus 14±20 months, P<0.001), smaller left atrial diameters (41±5 versus 45±5 mm, P=0.015), and longer baseline AF cycle lengths (178±23 versus 159±31 ms, P=0.005). However, AF cycle length was the sole independent predictor of direct termination to SR. The most frequent AF termination site in SRterm patients was the pulmonary veins (53%), whereas in ATterm patients this was within the left atrium (58%). After follow-up of 12±6 months, there was a trend toward a greater proportion of patients in SR among those who terminated directly to SR after a single procedure. The most frequent type of recurrence was paroxysmal AF in SRterm patients and AT in ATterm patients. Conclusions—Patients who terminate to SR through ablation without an intermediate AT are characterized by a less altered arrhythmogenic substrate. Baseline AF cycle lengths emerged as a sole independent predictor of a substrate for consecutive arrhythmias.