Helmut Seitz

The diagnostic dilemma of traumatic rupture of the diaphragm.

BackgroundTraumatic rupture of diaphragm is caused by blunt or penetreting trauma. Early diagnosis is difficult, and complications such as visceral herniation may arise. A 10-year evaluation of all diagnostic procedures used in patients with surgically proved traumatic rupture of the diaphragm is presented.MethodsA review of all patients with surgically proved diaphragmatic injury from 1988 to 1998 was conducted. All diagnostic methods were analyzed in terms of their ability to identify diaphragmatic rupture.ResultsDuring the study period, 31 patients with a mean age of 34 years were treated. Of these patients, 20 sustained blunt trauma and 11 experienced penetrating trauma. The initial chest x-ray was diagnostic for 6 of the 31 patients, nonspecific for 15 of the patients, and normal for 10 of the patients. In no case was sonography diagnostic. Thoracoabdominal computed tomography (CT), performed in 22 of the patients, led to diagnosis for 5 patients and unspecific findings for 17 patients. Statistical analyses showed no significant difference between initial chest x-ray and thoracoabdominal CT. No significant difference between blunt or penetrating trauma or between left-side and right-side ruptures could be recognized with any diagnostic tool.ConclusionsAll the diagnostic methods investigated in this study showed unsatisfying results, and traumatic rupture of the diaphragm seems to remain a diagnostic dilemma. Endoscopic techniques not tested in this study and discussed controversially may offer a good chance for early diagnosis and repair of the injured diaphragm.

Biocompatibility of polyethylene terephthalate (Trevira® hochfest) augmentation device in repair of the anterior cruciate ligament

The biocompatibility of a 3 mm band made of polyethylene terephthalate (Trevira hochfest) has been tested in an experimental study within right knee joints of 60 sheep. After transsecting the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), two randomized groups were formed. In group I, the ACL was repaired according to the Marshall technique whilst in group II an additional 3 mm polyethylene terephthalate (PET) augmentation band was implanted using the through-the-condyle (TTC) procedure. To assess the biocompatibility of the augmentation device the knee joints of both groups were punctured and the synovial fluids were analyzed before, as well as 2, 6, 16, 26, and 52 weeks after the operation. In addition, the histologic appearance of excised suprapatellar pouches and ipsilateral inguinal and popliteal lymphatic noduli were examined. Comparing both groups no significant differences were found neither before nor after the augmented and non-augmented ACL repair. No pathological increase in the total protein concentration occurred after operation and no significant differences versus the preoperative analysis were found. No synovitis signalling a decrease in the glucose concentration was observed. The cytological examination revealed no increase of the leukocyte cell count results. Within the synovial specimen neither free nor phagocytosed PET wearparticles could be detected. In groups I and II the histological appearance of excised popliteal and inguinal lymphatic noduli showed a normal result. In 25% of the PET augmented ACL repairs, a slight concentration of PET wearparticles and solitary, multinuclear giant foreign body cells could be seen in the histological preparations of suprapatellar pouches.

Load sharing in augmented anterior cruciate ligament repair: a mathematical analysis based on in vitro measurements

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the stress on a reinserted anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) we studied the load sharing between the ACL and a 3.7 mm polyethylene terephthalate (PET) band in 10 knees of fresh human cadavers. DESIGN: The load sharing between the Marshall sutures-ACL complex and the PET band and between the ACL and the PET band was calculated by means of a mathematical model. BACKGROUND: Augmentation of a reinserted ACL with a synthetic band is an accepted treatment for a ruptured ACL. METHODS: After transsecting the ACL at its femoral origin and reinserting it with four sutures using the Marshall technique we augmented it with the PET band. The augmentation device was inserted by the through-the-condyle (TTC) procedure and attached without preload to the femoral and the tibial condyle with 4 mm staples. Then the length of the ACL, the lengths of the Marshall sutures, the partial lengths and the angles between the different directions, and the adherence-friction force of the PET band were measured. RESULTS: In the beginning the Marshall sutures-ACL complex takes over 40% of an externally applied load and the PET band 60%. After the hypothetical ACL healing phase the PET band takes over 27% and the ACL 73% of the load. CONCLUSIONS: An external force of 40 N acting on the knee will therefore lead to an elongation of the Marshall sutures-ACL complex and result in movement of the proximal end of the ACL away from the femoral condyle of at least 0.5 mm, which is highly undesirable in the early postoperative healing phase.