Henning Rud Andersen

Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome

BACKGROUND In a previous study of 225 patients with sick-sinus syndrome randomised to either single-chamber atrial pacing (n=110) or single-chamber ventricular pacing (n=115), we found that after a mean follow-up of 3.3 years, atrial pacing was associated with significantly less atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism whereas there was no significant difference in mortality and heart failure between the two groups. We aimed to find out whether this beneficial effect of atrial pacing is maintained during extended follow-up of up to 8 years. METHODS Follow-up visits for all patients were at 3 months, 12 months, then once a year at which patients had a physical examination, ECG recording, and pacemaker check-up. Endpoints were mortality, cardiovascular death, atrial fibrillation, thromboembolic events, heart failure, and atrioventricular block. Data was analysed on Dec 31, 1996. FINDINGS At long-term follow-up, 39 patients from the atrial group had died versus 57 from the ventricular group (relative risk 0.66 [95% CI 0.44-0.99]; p=0.045). 19 patients from the atrial group and 39 patients from the ventricular group died from a cardiovascular cause (0.47 [0.27-0.82]; p=0.0065). The cumulative incidences of atrial fibrillation and chronic atrial fibrillation were also significantly lower in the atrial group than in the ventricular group (0.54 [0.33-0.89], p=0.012 and 0.35 [0.16-0.76], p=0.004, respectively). Thromboembolic events occurred in 13 patients in the atrial group and 26 in the ventricular group (0.47 [0.24-0.92], p=0.023). Heart failure was less severe in the atrial group than in the ventricular group (p<0.05). In multivariate analysis, atrial pacing was significantly associated with freedom from thromboembolic events (0.47 [0.24-0.92], p=0.028) and survival from cardiovascular death (0.52 [0.30-0.91], p=0.022), but no longer with overall survival (0.71 [0.46-1.08], p=0.11) or chronic atrial fibrillation (0.45 [0.20-1.05], p=0.063). Atrioventricular block occurred in four patients in the atrial group (0.6% annual risk). INTERPRETATION The beneficial effect of atrial pacing found in our previous study is enhanced substantially over time. Patients with sick-sinus syndrome should be treated with an atrial rather than ventricular-pacing system because after long-term follow-up, atrial pacing is associated with a significantly higher survival, less atrial fibrillation, fewer thromboembolic complications, less heart failure, and a low-risk of atrioventricular block.

A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: echocardiographic and clinical outcome

OBJECTIVES A randomized trial was done to compare single-chamber atrial (AAI) and dual-chamber (DDD) pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS). Primary end points were changes in left atrial (LA) size and left ventricular (LV) size and function as measured by M-mode echocardiography. BACKGROUND In patients with SSS and normal atrioventricular conduction, it is still not clear whether the optimal pacing mode is AAI or DDD pacing. METHODS A total of 177 consecutive patients (mean age 74 +/- 9 years, 73 men) were randomized to treatment with one of three rate-adaptive (R) pacemakers: AAIR (n = 54), DDDR with a short atrioventricular delay (n = 60) (DDDR-s), or DDDR with a fixed long atrioventricular delay (n = 63) (DDDR-l). Before pacemaker implantation and at each follow-up, M-mode echocardiography was done to measure LA and LV diameters. Left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS) was calculated. Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS Mean follow-up was 2.9 +/- 1.1 years. In the AAIR group, no significant changes were observed in LA or LV diameters or LVFS from baseline to last follow-up. In both DDDR groups, LA diameter increased significantly (p < 0.05), and in the DDDR-s group, LVFS decreased significantly (p < 0.01). Atrial fibrillation was significantly less common in the AAIR group, 7.4% versus 23.3% in the DDDR-s group versus 17.5% in the DDDR-l group (p = 0.03, log-rank test). Mortality, thromboembolism, and congestive heart failure did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS During a mean follow-up of 2.9 +/- 1.1 years, DDDR pacing causes increased LA diameter, and DDDR pacing with a short atrioventricular delay also causes decreased LVFS. No changes occur in LA or LV diameters or LVFS during AAIR pacing. Atrial fibrillation is significantly less common during AAIR pacing.

Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndrome

In patients with sick-sinus syndrome, single-chamber atrial pacing has been reported, in retrospective studies, to be associated with lower frequencies of atrial fibrillation, thromboembolism, heart failure, and mortality than ventricular pacing; although single-chamber ventricular pacing is most commonly used. We did a prospective randomised trial in 225 consecutive patients (142 women, 83 men; mean age 76 years) with the sick-sinus syndrome, randomised to atrial (n = 110) or ventricular (n = 115) pacing and followed for up to 5 years (mean 40 [SD 18] months). During follow-up, the frequency of atrial fibrillation was higher in the ventricular group, except at the first follow-up at 3 months. Thromboembolic events (stroke or peripheral arterial embolus) occurred in 20 patients in the ventricular group and in 6 patients in the atrial group (p = 0.0083). 25 patients died in the ventricular group compared with 21 in the atrial group (p = 0.74). Heart failure estimated by the New York Heart Association classification and by the daily doses of diuretics did not differ between the two groups. Atrioventricular block occurred in 2 patients in the atrial group. Patients with sick-sinus syndrome should be treated with atrial pacing rather than ventricular pacing because atrial pacing is associated with lower frequencies of atrial fibrillation, thromboembolic complications, and a low risk of atrioventricular block.

Routine thrombectomy in percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized, controlled trial.

Background— Distal embolization during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction may result in reduced myocardial perfusion, infarct extension, and impaired prognosis. Methods and Results— In a prospective randomized trial, we studied the effect of routine thrombectomy in 215 patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction lasting <12 hours undergoing primary PCI. Patients were randomized to thrombectomy pretreatment or standard PCI. The primary end point was myocardial salvage measured by sestamibi SPECT, calculated as the difference between area at risk and final infarct size determined after 30 days (percent). Secondary end points included final infarct size, ST-segment resolution, and troponin T release. Baseline variables, including ST-segment elevation and area at risk, were similar. Salvage was not statistically different in the thrombectomy and control groups (median, 13% [interquartile range, 9% to 21%] and 18% [interquartile range, 7% to 25%]; P=0.12), but 24 patients in the thrombectomy group and 12 patients in the control group did not have an early SPECT scan, mainly because of poor general or cardiac condition (P=0.04). In the thrombectomy group, final infarct size was increased (median, 15%; [interquartile range, 4% to 25%] versus 8% [interquartile range, 2% to 18%]; P=0.004). Conclusions— Thrombectomy performed as routine therapy in primary PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction does not increase myocardial salvage. The study suggests a possible deleterious effect of thrombectomy, resulting in an increased final infarct size, and does not support the use of thrombectomy in unselected primary PCI patients.

Remodeling Rather Than Neointimal Formation Explains Luminal Narrowing After Deep Vessel Wall Injury Insights From a Porcine Coronary (Re)stenosis Model

BACKGROUND Oversized balloon dilatation of normal porcine coronary arteries usually heals without stenosis formation. METHODS AND RESULTS With the purpose of developing a stenotic model and examining the mechanisms of luminal narrowing after angioplasty, we produced a circumferential deep vessel wall injury by inflating and withdrawing an oversized chain-encircled angioplasty balloon in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) of 20 pigs. Three pigs died and did not complete the study. In 8 pigs (group 1), serial coronary arteriography was performed. The lumen diameter (mean+/-SD) before dilation was 3.4 +/- .4 mm; after dilation, 4.2 +/- 0.6 mm; and at follow-ups 2 and 4 weeks later, 1.6 +/- 0.4 mm (P<.0001). In 9 pigs (group 2) examined postmortem 3 weeks after dilatation, histology revealed that the injury was deep (out to adventitia) in all arteries and completely circumferential (360 degrees) in all but two arteries. Adventitia was markedly thickened as a result of neoadventitial formation. Injury correlated strongly with neointimal formation (middle LAD, r=.71, P=.00001, but neither injury nor neointima correlated with lumen size (r=.14, P=.46 and r=.34, P=.07, respectively); ie, neointimal formation did not explain late luminal narrowing. Lumen size, however, did correlate strongly with vessel size (r=.74, P=000005). The late loss in lumen diameter observed angiographically in group 1 substantially exceeded that caused by neointimal formation seen by histology in group 2. CONCLUSIONS The chain-encircled angioplasty balloon produced a circumferential deep vessel wall injury that healed by luminal narrowing. In this porcine model, arterial remodeling was more important than neointimal formation in late luminal narrowing.

Cardiovascular Outcomes With Atrial-Based Pacing Compared With Ventricular Pacing Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials, Using Individual Patient Data

Background— Several randomized trials have compared atrial-based (dual-chamber or atrial) pacing with ventricular pacing in patients with bradycardia. No trial has shown a mortality reduction, and only 1 small trial suggested a reduction in stroke. The goal of this review was to determine whether atrial-based pacing prevents major cardiovascular events. Methods and Results— A systematic review was performed of publications since 1980. For inclusion, trials had to compare an atrial-based with a ventricular-based pacing mode; use a randomized, controlled, parallel design; and have data on mortality, stroke, heart failure, or atrial fibrillation. Individual patient data were obtained from 5 of the 8 identified studies, representing 95% of patients in the 8 trials, and a total of 35 000 patient-years of follow-up. There was no significant heterogeneity among the results of the individual trials. There was no significant reduction in mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.03; P=0.19) or heart failure (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.03; P=0.15) with atrial-based pacing. There was a significant reduction in atrial fibrillation (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.89; P=0.00003) and a reduction in stroke that was of borderline significance (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.99; P=0.035). There was no convincing evidence that any patient subgroup received special benefit from atrial-based pacing. Conclusions— Compared with ventricular pacing, the use of atrial-based pacing does not improve survival or reduce heart failure or cardiovascular death. However, atrial-based pacing reduces the incidence of atrial fibrillation and may modestly reduce stroke.

Heart Failure and Echocardiographic Changes During Long-term Follow-up of Patients With Sick Sinus Syndrome Randomized to Single-Chamber Atrial or Ventricular Pacing

BACKGROUND In patients with sick sinus syndrome, choice of pacing mode has been implicated in the development of congestive heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 225 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome and intact atrioventricular conduction were randomized to either single-chamber atrial pacing (n = 110) or single-chamber ventricular pacing (n = 115). Clinical assessment included New York Heart Association classification, medication, and M-mode echocardiography before pacemaker implantation, after 3 months, and subsequently once every year. At long-term follow-up (mean, 5.5+/-2.4 years), NYHA class was higher in the ventricular group than in the atrial group (NYHA class I/II/III/IV: 65/44/4/0 versus 84/22/2/1 patients, P=.010). Increase in NYHA class during follow-up was observed in 35 of 113 patients in the ventricular group versus 10 of 109 in the atrial group (P<.0005). Increase in dose of diuretics from randomization to last follow-up was significantly higher in the ventricular group than in the atrial group (21+/-49 versus 8+/-42 mg furosemide/d, P=.033). The left ventricular fractional shortening decreased significantly in the ventricular group (from 0.36+/-0.12 to 0.31+/-0.08, P<.0005) but not in the atrial group (from 0.35+/-0.13 to 0.33+/-0.09, P=.087). The left atrial diameter increased significantly in both treatment groups (ventricular group: from 34+/-7 to 41+/-7 mm, P<.0005; atrial group: from 34+/-6 to 37+/-7 mm, P=.002), but the increase was significantly higher in the ventricular group than in the atrial group (P<.0005). CONCLUSIONS During long-term follow-up, ventricular pacing is associated with a higher incidence of congestive heart failure and consumption of diuretics than atrial pacing. This is accompanied by a decrease in left ventricular fractional shortening and an increased dilatation of the left atrium in the ventricular paced patients.

Muscular atrophy in diabetic neuropathy: a stereological magnetic resonance imaging study

Summary Diabetic patients with polyneuropathy develop motor dysfunction. To establish whether motor dysfunction is associated with muscular atrophy the ankle dorsal and plantar flexors of the non-dominant leg were evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging in 8 patients with symptomatic neuropathy, in 8 non-neuropathic patients and in 16 individually matched control subjects. In the neuropathic patients the muscle strength of the ankle dorsal and plantar flexors was reduced by 41 % as compared to the non-neuropathic patients (p < 0.005). Volume of the ankle dorsal and plantar flexors was estimated with stereological techniques from consecutive cross-sectional images of the lower leg. The neuropathic patients had a 32 % reduction in volume as compared with the non-neuropathic patients (p < 0.005). To determine the regional distribution of atrophy cross-sectional magnetic resonance images were performed at predetermined levels of the lower leg in relation to bone landmarks. In the neuropathic patients there was an insignificant increase of 3 % of muscle area at the proximal lower leg level, whereas the atrophy was 43 % (p < 0.002) at the mid lower leg level and 65 % (p < 0.002) distally. Analysis of individual muscles confirmed that the atrophy predominated distally. We conclude that muscular atrophy underlies motor weakness at the ankle in diabetic patients with polyneuropathy and that the atrophy is most pronounced in distal muscles of the lower leg indicating that a length dependent neuropathic process explains the motor dysfunction. [Diabetologia (1997) 40: 1062–1069]

A comparison of single-lead atrial pacing with dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome

AIMS In patients with sick sinus syndrome, bradycardia can be treated with a single-lead pacemaker or a dual-chamber pacemaker. Previous trials have revealed that pacing modes preserving atrio-ventricular synchrony are superior to single-lead ventricular pacing, but it remains unclear if there is any difference between single-lead atrial pacing (AAIR) and dual-chamber pacing (DDDR). METHODS AND RESULTS We randomly assigned 1415 patients referred for first pacemaker implantation to AAIR (n = 707) or DDDR (n = 708) pacing and followed them for a mean of 5.4 ± 2.6 years. The primary outcome was death from any cause. Secondary outcomes included paroxysmal and chronic atrial fibrillation, stroke, heart failure, and need for pacemaker reoperation. In the AAIR group, 209 patients (29.6%) died during follow-up vs. 193 patients (27.3%) in the DDDR group, hazard ratio (HR) 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88-1.29, P = 0.53. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was observed in 201 patients (28.4%) in the AAIR group vs. 163 patients (23.0%) in the DDDR group, HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.03-1.56, P = 0.024. A total of 240 patients underwent one or more pacemaker reoperations during follow-up, 156 (22.1%) in the AAIR group vs. 84 (11.9%) in the DDDR group (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.53-2.59, P < 0.001). The incidence of chronic atrial fibrillation, stroke, and heart failure did not differ between treatment groups. CONCLUSION In patients with sick sinus syndrome, there is no statistically significant difference in death from any cause between AAIR pacing and DDDR pacing. AAIR pacing is associated with a higher incidence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and a two-fold increased risk of pacemaker reoperation. These findings support the routine use of DDDR pacing in these patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00236158.

Regional myocardial blood flow in patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to long-term single chamber atrial or dual chamber pacing—effect of pacing mode and rate

OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate regional myocardial blood flow (MBF) and global left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during chronic pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) randomized to either single chamber atrial (AAI) or dual chamber (DDD) pacing. BACKGROUND Experimental studies indicate that chronic pacing in the right ventricular apex changes regional MBF, thereby compromising left ventricular function. METHODS Thirty patients (age 74 +/- 10 years) were randomized to AAI (n = 15) or DDD (n = 15) pacemakers. After 22 +/- 7 months of pacing, MBF was quantified with 13N-labeled ammonia positron emission tomography scanning at 60 beats per min and 90 beats per min. Patients in the DDD group furthermore underwent MBF measurement at temporary AAI pacing, 60 beats per min. Myocardial blood flow was assessed in the anterior, lateral, inferior and septal regions, and the global mean MBF was calculated. Left ventricular ejection fraction was determined by echocardiography at pacemaker implantation and at the time of MBF measurements. RESULTS Myocardial blood flow at rates 60 and 90 beats per min did not differ between the AAI and DDD groups. During temporary AAI pacing in the DDD group, MBF was significantly higher than during DDD pacing in both the inferior (p = 0.001) and septal (p = 0.004) regions and also globally (0.61 +/- 0.15 vs. 0.53 +/- 0.13 mL x g(-1) x min(-1), p = 0.005). In the DDD group, LVEF decreased from pacemaker implantation to time of MBF measurements (0.61 +/- 0.09 vs. 0.56 +/- 0.07, p = 0.013). Left ventricular ejection fraction during temporary AAI pacing at time of MBF measurements was not different from LVEF at pacemaker implantation. CONCLUSIONS In patients with SSS, chronic DDD pacing reduced inferior, septal and global mean MBF as well as LVEF, as compared with temporary AAI pacing. The LVEF reversed to baseline level during temporary AAI pacing despite 22 months of permanent ventricular pacing preceding it. Augmenting pace rate to 90 beats per min increased MBF equally in the two treatment groups.