Henrik Bodén

Periprosthetic proximal bone loss after uncemented hip arthroplasty is related to stem size: DXA measurements in 138 patients followed for 2-7 years.

Background Periprosthetic bone loss occurs around uncemented femoral stems and may be influenced by the stem size. Patients and methods We studied 138 consecutive patients, 3 (2–7) years on average after a total hip arthroplasty operation (THA) for unilateral osteoarthritis with the Bi-Metric uncemented femoral stem. We analyzed Harris hip score and bone mineral density. Results The mean Harris hip score was 97 at follow-up. Bone mineral density decreased proximally by 19% in both Gruen zones 1 and 7. Bone loss in zones 1, 2, 6, and 7 was significantly associated with stem size. Distally, a small gain in bone mass was found in zones 3 and 5 for medium femoral sizes. Interpretation We found a marked proximal BMD loss, especially for the larger stems, which may be specific for this particular implant. Long-term studies should reveal whether this proximal bone loss will affect the longevity of the THA.

Continuous bone loss around a tapered uncemented femoral stem: A long-term evaluation with DEXA

Background Periprosthetic bone loss is a well-docu-mented phenomenon after uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, little is known about how bone mineral density (BMD) changes after 2 years. Patients and methods 14 patients with hip arthrosis (group A) were operated with a proximally porous- and hydroxyapatite-coated stem and followed for 10 years with DEXA, radiographs and Harris hip score (HHS). Another group of 14 patients (group B) was evaluated at 6 and 14 years using the same prosthesis and protocol. Results No stem was revised and all stems were well-Fixed. At final follow-up, HHS was 97 points in group A after 10 years and 94 points in group B after 14 years. Bone mineral changes in group A were greatest in Gruen zones 1 and 7, where the losses were 31% and 26%, respectively, after 2 years on the operated side. The decrease in BMD continued after 2 years and in Gruen zone 7 it was faster than the rate of bone loss on the control side. In group B, the annual change in BMD on the operated side was not significantly different from the bone loss in group A. Interpretation Up to 14 years after implantation of a tapered uncemented stem, the BMD in the calcar region continues to decrease faster than would be expected from normal ageing.

No adverse effects of early weight bearing after uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a randomized study of 20 patients.

BACKGROUND Few guidelines are available whether early weight-bearing after an uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be recommended or not. Stability and ingrowth may be jeopardized by immediate loading of the implant while functional recovery may be promoted and periprosthetic demineralization reduced. PATIENTS AND METHODS We did a prospective study of 20 patients who were operated on with a hydroxyapatite-coated (HA), uncemented total hip arthroplasty with a tapered stem because of unilateral arthrosis, and randomized the patients to the immediate (I) or late (L) weight-bearing (after 3 months) group. The shoe on the operated side was equipped with an auditory device signaling when the patient placed a load on the extremity. The clinical assessment was done with the Harris hip score at the time of the operation and after 12 and 24 months. Radiographs and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) were evaluated for migration, femoral remodeling and bone mineral density (BMD) after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Tc-scintigraphy was done after 6, 12 and 24 months. RESULTS Postoperatively, the Harris hip score showed no group difference. After 3 months, we noted a large reduction in BMD around the stem prosthesis. This was most marked in the proximal regions and the bone loss was significantly larger in zone 1, 4 and 5 in the L group. Distally, the BMD normalized with time, but the loss of bone persisted in the proximal zones after 24 months. An initial increase in the scintigraphic uptake ratio in all zones in both groups declined with time, but it was still increased on the operated side after 24 months. Several radiographic signs of bone remodeling were seen, but the patterns were similar in both groups. INTERPRETATION We found no adverse effect of immediate weight bearing with this prosthesis.

The effect of weekly risedronate on periprosthetic bone resorption following total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND Bone loss leading to late-occurring periprosthetic femoral fracture is a mode of failure in cementless total hip arthroplasty. The aim of this trial was to investigate the effect of a bisphosphonate, risedronate, on femoral periprosthetic bone resorption following total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. METHODS We enrolled seventy-three patients between the ages of forty and seventy years who were scheduled to undergo total hip arthroplasty in a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either 35 mg of risedronate (n = 36) or a placebo (n = 37) orally once weekly for six months. The primary end point was the change in bone mineral density in Gruen femoral zones 1 and 7. Bone mineral density scans were made preoperatively and at two days and three, six, twelve, and twenty-four months postoperatively. Secondary end points included migration of the femoral stem and clinical outcome. RESULTS Seventy of the seventy-three patients (thirty-three in the risedronate group and thirty-seven in the placebo group) were analyzed for the primary end point. The mean bone mineral density in zone 1 was 9.2% higher (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2% to 14.1%) in the risedronate group than in the placebo group at six months postoperatively and 7.2% higher (95% CI, 1.0% to 13.3%) at one year. The mean bone mineral density in zone 7 was 8.0% higher (95% CI, 2.7% to 13.4%) in the risedronate group than in the placebo group at six months postoperatively and 4.3% higher (95% CI, -1.5% to 10.1%) at one year. Migration of the femoral stem, the clinical outcome, and the frequency of adverse events did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS Risedronate taken once weekly for six months following total hip arthroplasty was effective in reducing periprosthetic bone resorption around an uncemented femoral stem up to one year after surgery but had no discernible effect on implant migration or clinical outcome. Future studies of bisphosphonate treatment following total hip arthroplasty should focus on clinically relevant end points such as the risks of fracture and revision arthroplasty.

Reduced dislocation rate after hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures when changing from posterolateral to anterolateral approach

Background and purpose Recent studies have shown that compared to the posterolateral approach, the anterolateral approach reduces the risk of dislocation after hip arthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fractures. We have therefore started to use the anterolateral approach on these patients and we now report the consequences of this change for the dislocation rate. Patients and methods We chose two 1-year time periods, 2007 (n = 199) and 2008 (n = 173), the former being before and the latter after the implementation of the anterolateral approach as the standard incision for hip arthroplasties in patients with femoral neck fractures. During 2007, 77% of the hips were operated on with the posterolateral approach and in 2008, 78% of the hips were operated on using the anterolateral approach. Results The dislocation rate was reduced from 8% (16/199) in 2007 to 2% (3/173) in 2008. A multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the posterolateral approach was the only factor associated with an increased risk of dislocation, with an odds ratio of 8 (2–35). Age, sex, ASA classification, type of arthroplasty, cognitive dysfunction, or the experience of the surgeon had no effect on the risk of dislocation. Interpretation Since most of our surgeons had earlier used the posterolateral approach when performing hip arthroplasties in patients with a femoral neck fracture, this study shows our surgical learning curve. We conclude that a collective policy change regarding surgical approach for these patients is both feasible and to be recommended, as it leads to a substantial reduction in dislocation rate.

Lower periprosthetic bone loss and good fixation of an ultra-short stem compared to a conventional stem in uncemented total hip arthroplasty: A randomized clinical trial with DXA and RSA in 51 patients

Background and purpose — We hypothesized that an ultra-short stem would load the proximal femur in a more physiological way and could therefore reduce the adaptive periprosthetic bone loss known as stress shielding. Patients and methods — 51 patients with primary hip osteoarthritis were randomized to total hip arthroplasty (THA) with either an ultra-short stem or a conventional tapered stem. The primary endpoint was change in periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD), measured with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), in Gruen zones 1 and 7, two years after surgery. Secondary endpoints were change in periprosthetic BMD in the entire periprosthetic region, i.e. Gruen zones 1 through 7, stem migration measured with radiostereometric analysis (RSA), and function measured with self-administered functional scores. Results — The periprosthetic decrease in BMD was statistically significantly lower with the ultra-short stem. In Gruen zone 1, the mean difference was 18% (95% CI: −27% to −10%). In zone 7, the difference was 5% (CI: −12% to −3%) and for Gruen zones 1–7 the difference was also 5% (CI: −9% to −2%). During the first 6 weeks postoperatively, the ultra-short stems migrated 0.77 mm more on average than the conventional stems. 3 months after surgery, no further migration was seen. The functional scores improved during the study and were similar in the 2 groups. Interpretation — Up to 2 years after total hip arthroplasty, compared to the conventional tapered stem the ultra-short uncemented anatomical stem induced lower periprosthetic bone loss and had equally excellent stem fixation and clinical outcome.

High risk of early periprosthetic fractures after primary hip arthroplasty in elderly patients using a cemented, tapered, polished stem: An observational, prospective cohort study on 1,403 hips with 47 fractures after mean follow-up time of 4 years

Background and purpose — Postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPF) after hip arthroplasty is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. We assessed the incidence and characteristics of periprosthetic fractures in a consecutive cohort of elderly patients treated with a cemented, collarless, polished and tapered femoral stem (CPT). Patients and methods — In this single-center prospective cohort study, we included 1,403 hips in 1,357 patients (mean age 82 (range 52–102) years, 72% women) with primary osteoarthritis (OA) or a femoral neck fracture (FNF) as indication for surgery (367 hips and 1,036 hips, respectively). 64% of patients were ASA class 3 or 4. Hip-related complications and need for repeat surgery were assessed at a mean follow-up time of 4 (1–7) years. A Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate risk factors associated with PPF. Results — 47 hips (3.3%) sustained a periprosthetic fracture at median 7 (2–79) months postoperatively; 41 were comminute Vancouver B2 or complex C-type fractures. The fracture rate was 3.8% for FNF patients and 2.2% for OA patients (hazard ratio (HR) = 4; 95% CI: 1.3–12). Patients > 80 years of age also had a higher risk of fracture (HR = 2; 95% CI: 1.1–4.5). Interpretation — We found a high incidence of early PPF associated with the CPT stem in this old and frail patient group. A possible explanation may be that the polished tapered stem acts as a wedge, splitting the femur after a direct hip contusion. Our results should be confirmed in larger, registry-based studies, but we advise caution when using this stem for this particular patient group.

A new uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated femoral component for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: two-year radiostereometric and bone densitometric evaluation in 50 hips.

Our aim in this pilot study was to evaluate the fixation of, the bone remodelling around, and the clinical outcome after surgery of a new, uncemented, fully hydroxyapatite-coated, collared and tapered femoral component, designed specifically for elderly patients with a fracture of the femoral neck. We enrolled 50 patients, of at least 70 years of age, with an acute displaced fracture of the femoral neck in this prospective single-series study. They received a total hip replacement using the new component and were followed up regularly for two years. Fixation was evaluated by radiostereometric analysis and bone remodelling by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Hip function and the health-related quality of life were assessed using the Harris hip score and the EuroQol-5D. Up to six weeks post-operatively there was a mean subsidence of 0.2 mm (-2.1 to +0.5) and a retroversion of a mean of 1.2° (-8.2° to +1.5°). No component migrated after three months. The patients had a continuous loss of peri-prosthetic bone which amounted to a mean of 16% (-49% to +10%) at two years. The mean Harris hip score was 82 (51 to 100) after two years. The two-year results from this pilot study indicate that this new, uncemented femoral component can be used for elderly patients with osteoporotic fractures of the femoral neck.

Good results with an uncemented proximally HA-coated stem in hip revision surgery: 62 hips followed for 2–13 years

Background and purpose Proximal bone loss due to stress-shielding is a matter of concern after uncemented femoral hip revision. We have used short, proximally hydroxyapatite-coated prostheses in revision since 1989, and we now report the results. Methods 60 patients (62 hips) were revised because of aseptic loosening. Bone defects prior to revision were mostly of type II according to the Gustilo-Pasternak and Endo-Klinik classifications. Follow-up time was 73 (24–161) months. 9 patients had died before follow-up; 8 of these still had the stem in place. Clinical assessment was performed with the Harris hip score. Radiographs were evaluated for bone defects at revision, postoperative stem fixation, and periprosthetic bone remodeling. Results Mean Harris hip score was 75 (30–100) points. There was no stem loosening or progressive subsidence. 8 patients had mild to moderate thigh pain. Osteolysis, present at revision, had diminished, partially or completely, in four-fifths of the hips at follow-up. 4 hips had required re-revision due to fracture or dislocation. The 6-year prosthesis survival rate was 95% (95% CI: 0.83–0.98). Interpretation Uncemented revision with a short, proximally hydroxyapatite-coated prosthesis is a reliable procedure with encouraging results in the medium term if bone defects at revision are moderate.

Good stability but high periprosthetic bone mineral loss and late-occurring periprosthetic fractures with use of uncemented tapered femoral stems in patients with a femoral neck fracture

Background and purpose— We previously evaluated a new uncemented femoral stem designed for elderly patients with a femoral neck fracture and found stable implant fixation and good clinical results up to 2 years postoperatively, despite substantial periprosthetic bone mineral loss. We now present the medium-term follow-up results from this study. Patients and methods— In this observational prospective cohort study, we included 50 patients (mean age 81 (70–92) years) with a femoral neck fracture. All patients underwent surgery with a cemented cup and an uncemented stem specifically designed for fracture treatment. Outcome variables were migration of the stem measured with radiostereometry (RSA) and periprosthetic change in bone mineral density (BMD), measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Hip function and health-related quality of life were assessed using the Harris hip score (HHS) and the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). DXA and RSA data were collected at regular intervals up to 4 years, and data concerning reoperations and hip-related complications were collected during a mean follow-up time of 5 (0.2–7.5) years. Results— At 5 years, 19 patients had either passed away or were unavailable for further participation and 31 could be followed up. Of the original 50 patients, 6 patients had suffered a periprosthetic fracture, all of them sustained after the 2-year follow-up. In 19 patients, we obtained complete RSA and DXA data and no component had migrated after the 2-year follow-up. We also found a continuous total periprosthetic bone loss amounting to a median of –19% (–39 to 2). No changes in HHS or EQ-5D were observed during the follow-up period. Interpretation— In this medium-term follow-up, the stem remained firmly fixed in bone despite considerable periprosthetic bone mineral loss. However, this bone loss might explain the high number of late-occurring periprosthetic fractures. Based on these results, we would not recommend uncemented femoral stems for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly.