Henrique Hon

Second-Hand Smoke As a Predictor of Smoking Cessation Among Lung Cancer Survivors

PURPOSE Second-hand smoke (SHS; ie, exposure to smoking of friends and spouses in the household) reduces the likelihood of smoking cessation in noncancer populations. We assessed whether SHS is associated with cessation rates in lung cancer survivors. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with lung cancer were recruited from Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models evaluated the association of sociodemographics, clinicopathologic variables, and SHS with either smoking cessation or time to quitting. RESULTS In all, 721 patients completed baseline and follow-up questionnaires with a mean follow-up time of 54 months. Of the 242 current smokers at diagnosis, 136 (56%) had quit 1 year after diagnosis. Exposure to smoking at home (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 6.18; 95% CI, 2.83 to 13.5; P < .001), spousal smoking (aOR, 6.01; 95% CI, 2.63 to 13.8; P < .001), and peer smoking (aOR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.33 to 4.66; P = .0043) were each associated with decreased rates of cessation. Individuals exposed to smoking in all three settings had the lowest chances of quitting (aOR, 9.57; 95% CI, 2.50 to 36.64; P < .001). Results were similar in time-to-quitting analysis, in which 68% of patients who eventually quit did so within 6 months after cancer diagnosis. Subgroup analysis revealed similar associations across early- and late-stage patients and between sexes. CONCLUSION SHS is an important factor associated with smoking cessation in lung cancer survivors of all stages and should be a key consideration when developing smoking cessation programs for patients with lung cancer.

Association of two BRM promoter polymorphisms with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma risk.

The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex is an important regulator of gene expression that has been linked to cancer development. Expression of Brahma (BRM), a critical catalytic subunit of SWI/SNF, is lost in a variety of solid tumors. Two novel BRM promoter polymorphisms (BRM-741 and BRM-1321) have been correlated with BRM loss and elevated cancer risk. The aim(s) of this study were to examine BRM expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and to correlate BRM polymorphisms with HNSCC risk. BRM expression studies were performed on eight HNSCC cell lines and 76 surgically resected tumor samples. A case-control study was conducted on 668 HNSCC patients (oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx and hypopharynx) and 700 healthy matched controls. BRM expression was lost in 25% of cell lines and 16% of tumors. The homozygous genotype of each polymorphism was significantly associated with increased HNSCC risk [BRM-741: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.75, 95% CI 1.2-2.3, P < 0.001; BRM-1321: aOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.2-2.2, P < 0.001]. Individuals that were homozygous for both BRM polymorphisms had a more than 2-fold increase in the risk of HNSCC (aOR 2.23, 95% CI 1.5-3.4, P < 0.001). A particularly elevated risk was seen within the oropharynx, human papillomavirus-positive subgroup for carriers of both homozygous variants (aOR 3.09, 95% CI 1.5-6.8, P = 0.004). BRM promoter polymorphisms appear to act as susceptibility markers of HNSCC with potential utility in screening, prevention and treatment.

Cancer patients acceptance, understanding, and willingness-to-pay for pharmacogenomic testing.

Background Pharmacogenomics is gaining increasing importance in the therapeutics of cancer; yet, there is little knowledge of cancer patients’ attitudes toward the use of pharmacogenomic testing in clinical practice. We carried out this study to explore cancer patients’ acceptance, understanding, and willingness-to-pay for pharmacogenomic testing. Materials and methods A broad cross-section of gastrointestinal, lung, breast, and other cancer patients were interviewed in terms of their acceptance of pharmacogenomic testing using hypothetical time, efficacy, and toxicity trade-off and willingness-to-pay scenarios. Results Among the 96% of 123 adjuvant patients accepting chemotherapy under optimal conditions, 99% wanted pharmacogenomic testing that could identify a subset of patients benefiting from chemotherapy, accepting median incurred costs of

Canadian cancer site-specific health utility values: Creating the basis for measuring value and costs of therapy.

2000 (range

Assessment of accuracy of data obtained from patient-reported questionnaire (PRQ) compared to electronic patient records (EPR) in patients with lung cancer.

0–25 000) and turnaround time for test results of 16 days (range 0–90 days). Among the 97% of 121 metastatic patients accepting chemotherapy, 97.4% wanted pharmacogenomic testing that could detect the risk of severe toxicity, accepting median incurred costs of

Use of iPad technology to determine cancer patient-reported preferences for and understanding of pharmacogenetic testing (PGT).

1000 (range

Patterns, perceptions, and perceived barriers to physical activity in adult cancer survivors

0–10 000) and turnaround time for results of 14 days (range 1–90 days). The majority of patients wanted to be involved in decision-making on pharmacogenomic testing; however, one in five patients lacked a basic understanding of pharmacogenomic testing. Conclusion Among cancer patients willing to undergo chemotherapy, almost all wanted pharmacogenomic testing and were willing-to-pay for it, waiting several weeks for results. Although patients had a strong desire to be involved in decision-making on pharmacogenomic testing, a considerable proportion lacked the necessary knowledge to make informed choices.

Involving clinic patients in systematic symptom reporting to improve cancer care: Exploring prevalence of sleep disturbances (SD) and fatigue (FAT).

7 Background: Health utility values (HUVs) play an integral role when conducting health economic analyses, but a paucity of reference HUVs exists for cancer patients. Using EQ-5D, we generated reference HUVs for multiple malignancies. We further assessed patient willingness to compete the instrument on a regular basis by adding the EQ-5D to an Ontario-wide patient-reported symptom tool mandated by Cancer Care Ontario, the provincial cancer government agency. METHODS 1,831 cancer patients across all non-CNS solid and hematologic cancer sites at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre completed the EQ-5D instrument; a subset (n=618) were asked about the acceptability of regularly completing the EQ-5D. HUVs were calculated using Canadian valuations. RESULTS The mean±SD HUV for all patients was 0.81±0.15, but were significantly different across different disease sites (p<0.0001): Testicular cancer, 0.87±0.13; prostate, 0.87±0.15; colorectal, 0.83±0.12; head/neck, 0.82±0.15; lymphoma, 0.82±0.15; breast, 0.81±0.17; esophageal, 0.81±0.16; ovarian, 0.79±0.15; leukemia, 0.78±0.15; lung, 0.78±0.13 and myeloma, 0.77±0.14. Confirming the validity of these HUVs, patients with PRO-ECOG scores of 0, 1, 2 and 3 had HUVs of 0.90±0.14, 0.77±0.11, 0.65±0.14 and 0.59±0.19, respectively (p<0.0001). In patients with solid tumors, those with local disease had HUVs of 0.82±0.15; metastatic disease, 0.80±0.15; p=0.015. 88% of patients reported that the EQ-5D was easy to complete, 92% took less than 5 minutes, 89% were satisfied with its length and 86% were satisfied with the types of questions asked. Importantly, 92% reported that they would complete the EQ-5D, even if it was used solely for research purposes and 73% agreed with the notion of completing it regularly at their clinic visits. CONCLUSIONS We present the first Canadian reference dataset of HUVs for common cancers; stage-and site-specific reference values will be presented at the meeting. Mean HUVs varied by disease site, performance status, and disease severity. Furthermore, a majority of patients surveyed were willing to complete the EQ-5D on a regular basis, suggesting that routine administration is feasible across Ontario.

Effect of physical activity (PA) perceptions in cancer survivors on PA behaviors: Helping health care providers improve patient communication.

40 Background: Cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption and co-morbidities are important determinants of health in lung cancer patients. The gold standard for obtaining accurate data is PRQ. The purpose of this study is to ascertain the accuracy of abstracting health-related behaviour data from retrospective chart review compared to data directly obtained from PRQ in a lung cancer patient population. METHODS 731 lung cancer patients completed a PRQ related to lifetime tobacco use, alcohol consumption and co-morbidity. Relevant smoking, alcohol and co-morbidity data was collected independently from EPR. RESULTS Ever/never status for smoking showed almost perfect agreement (k=0.95) between PRQ and EPR and surpassed all other health behavioural measures and co-morbidity agreement values. Both the sensitivity and specificity were high (0.94 and 0.99 respectively). The calculation of pack-years from EPR and PRQ showed substantial agreement (k=0.77); However, categorizing the smoking status into current/ former / never, resulted in moderate agreement (k=0.46). Alcohol ever/ never status agreement was moderate (0.43) with high sensitivity (0.90) but low specificity (0.50). Agreement for co-morbidities varied by condition showing moderate to substantial agreement for hypertension (K=0.57), heart attack (K=0.80) and diabetes (K=0.76) while fair to slight agreement (K<0.4) was seen in the others. Specificity was 0.86 or higher for co-morbidity conditions and was consistently higher than the sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS EPR may be used as a reliable surrogate to PRQ in determining ever/never smoking status and lifetime smoking exposure. Evaluation of current/former/never smoking status and alcohol consumption is best determined by PRQ. Diabetes, hypertension and heart attack are more accurately reported in the PRQ than other co-morbidities. Patients tend to report absence of a medical condition more accurately than the presence of it. Missing EPR data related to smoking pack years, alcohol consumption and lung co-morbidities is concerning and suggests more synoptic reporting by physicians would improve opportunities for research.

Developing a comprehensive smoking cessation program in patients with lung cancer: The role of social smoking environments.

319 Background: PGT in oncology can be used to predict the efficacy and toxicity of a particular treatment in an individual. Previous work by our group has demonstrated that among cancer patients willing to undergo chemotherapy, >98% wanted PGT testing if it could identify patients who would respond to chemo. However, in the original study using a paper questionnaire, 22% of patients did not understand the concept of PGT and its clinical implications. Therefore, we have devised a simpler, more visual questionnaire in electronic format using iPad technology and simple animations. We are assessing if patient understanding using this format is increased and also if patients prefer completing the survey with this novel technology. METHODS An interim analysis of a broad cross-section of cancer patients using an iPad was performed. PGT questions related to hypothetical efficacy, toxicity, time to test results, willingness to pay as well as understanding of PGT scenarios were assessed. RESULTS 135 cancer patients (87% adjuvant, 12% metastatic; 27% breast, 25% colon, 22% heme malignancy, 23% other) attending Princess Margaret Hosptial participated. 85% of patients accepted chemo that had a 5% absolute improvement in survival and <10% chance of side effects. 94% of patients chose to have PGT if it could identify subsets of patients who would benefit from chemo. The median that patients were willing to pay for PGT was