Henry A. Gremillion

Clinical Findings and Pain Symptoms as Potential Risk Factors for Chronic TMD: Descriptive Data and Empirically Identified Domains from the OPPERA Case-Control Study

Clinical characteristics might be associated with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) because they are antecedent risk factors that increase the likelihood of a healthy person developing the condition or because they represent signs or symptoms of either subclinical or overt TMD. In this baseline case-control study of the multisite Orofacial Pain: Prospective Evaluation and Risk Assessment (OPPERA) project, 1,633 controls and 185 cases with chronic, painful TMD completed questionnaires and received clinical examinations. Odds ratios measuring association between each clinical factor and TMD were computed, with adjustment for study-site as well as age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Compared to controls, TMD cases reported more trauma, greater parafunction, more headaches and other pain disorders, more functional limitation in using the jaw, more nonpain symptoms in the facial area, more temporomandibular joint noises and jaw locking, more neural or sensory medical conditions, and worse overall medical status. They also exhibited on examination reduced jaw mobility, more joint noises, and a greater number of painful masticatory, cervical, and body muscles upon palpation. The results indicated that TMD cases differ substantially from controls across almost all variables assessed. Future analyses of follow-up data will determine whether these clinical characteristics predict increased risk for developing first-onset pain-related TMD PERSPECTIVE: Clinical findings from OPPERAs baseline case-control study indicate significant differences between chronic TMD cases and controls with respect to trauma history, parafunction, other pain disorders, health status, and clinical examination data. Future analyses will examine their contribution to TMD onset.

The effects of depression and chronic pain on psychosocial and physical functioning

OBJECTIVE The present study employed causal modeling to examine the impact of somatic and cognitive symptoms of depression on the functioning of patients with chronic pain. DESIGN Path analyses were conducted to determine whether pain level is directly related to the psychosocial and physical dimensions of functional status or whether this relationship is mediated by depression. SETTING Subjects were recruited from a facial pain clinic at the University of Florida, an outpatient clinic associated with a tertiary-care health center. PATIENTS Subjects were 70 patients with chronic pain, 53 of whom had primary facial pain. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES All subjects completed a packet of self-report questionnaires, including the Beck Depression Inventory, McGill Pain Questionnaire, and Sickness Impact Profile. RESULTS Results of path analyses indicated that both somatic and cognitive symptoms of depression significantly correlate with psychosocial functioning even after controlling for the effects of pain level, trait anxiety, and trait anger. Somatic symptoms of depression were significantly correlated with physical functioning after pain level, anxiety and anger were controlled. CONCLUSIONS This study indicates that depression is directly related to both the physical and the psychosocial functioning of facial pain patients, while self-reported level of pain is not. A better understanding of the impact of depression on chronic pain and the relationship of these two disorders could lead to improved assessment and treatment of chronic pain disorders.

Sleep Disturbance in Orofacial Pain Patients: Pain-Related or Emotional Distress?

ABSTRACT Associations between pain, depression, and sleep disturbance have been documented in several chronic pain patient samples. The current study assessed the prevalence and magnitude of sleep disturbance in a sample of 128 orofacial pain patients referred for clinical evaluation and tested linkages between sleep, depression, anxiety, and pain using cross-sectional and longitudinal data. Seventy-seven percent of the patients reported reduced sleep quantity since pain onset. In cross-sectional analyses, reduced sleep quantity was associated with depression and pain. Reduced sleep quality was associated with negative affect. Longitudinally, initial depression and pain predicted sleep at time two and initial pain predicted negative affect. Sleep did not predict pain. Results support the hypothesis that pain, rather than sleep disturbance, increases negative affect across time, whereas negative affect is more a cause of concurrent reduced sleep quality than is pain. The results highlight the importance of assessing for sleep disturbance in orofacial pain patients.

Intraindividual variability in daily sleep and pain ratings among chronic pain patients: Bidirectional association and the role of negative mood

ObjectivesSleep disturbance is a common problem among chronic pain patients. Cross-sectional data from clinical populations and experimental studies have shown an association between sleep disturbance and pain. However, there has been little prospective research into the relationship between daily variability between sleep and pain among chronic pain patients. MethodsTwenty-two women with chronic pain (back pain, facial pain, fibromyalgia) completed a sleep diary and wore an actigraph for a 2-week period. Self-report measures of pain, mood, and sleep were also completed at baseline. Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) was used to examine intraindividual variability in sleep and pain ratings among these women. The impact of mood and baseline pain ratings was also examined as potential moderators. ResultsHierarchical linear modeling analyses supported a bidirectional relationship between sleep and pain, such that a night of poor sleep was followed by increased pain ratings the following day and a day of increased pain was followed by a night of poor sleep. Depression scores further influenced these relationships. DiscussionProspective examination supported a bidirectional relationship between sleep and pain among a group of women with chronic pain. Depressive symptoms had a moderating impact on these relationships. These findings suggest that addressing sleep is important in the treatment of individuals with chronic pain.

Sex differences in response to cutaneous anesthesia: a double blind randomized study.

Abstract The existing literature on experimentally induced pain indicates that there are sex differences, with females displaying greater sensitivity. In epidemiological studies, sex differences are also noted in the prevalence of a number of pain syndromes, with females reporting more severe pain, more frequent pain, and pain of longer duration. Complicating the interpretation of pain differences between men and women in clinical samples are reports of sex differences in response to pain‐reducing medications. Studies in human subjects suggest that women respond better to certain opioid analgesics than men following third molar extraction, but few studies have assessed sex effects in effectiveness of topical anesthetics. The purpose of this study was to test for sex differences in response to a topical anesthetic, Lidocaine, using double blind, placebo controlled experimental methodology, in combination with a magnitude matching psychophysical protocol using a pressure algometer. The subjects were 21 female and 23 male adult volunteers. Twenty‐four subjects (12 males and 12 females) were randomly assigned to the Lidocaine condition and 20 subjects were randomly assigned to the placebo control condition (9 males and 11 females). The effect size across sex for subjects in the Lidocaine treatment condition on the response bias variable was large indicating the males rated the stimuli as less painful than the females. Sex differences were not observed for discriminability in the Lidocaine treatment condition. This study did not show sex differences in the placebo condition. These results are particularly interesting in light of previous work that has shown similar pain stimuli (pressure pain) to be the stimulation most sensitive to sex differences. Results of this study suggest that the protocol employed (pressure pain stimulus with magnitude matching task) is sensitive to both anesthetic treatment and sex differences and represents an improvement in pain assessment methodology for use in experimental studies and in the clinic.

Effects of physical and sexual abuse in facial pain: direct or mediated?

Research has identified a relationship between a history of physical and/or sexual abuse and a range of psychological, functional, and physical factors; however, the nature of this relationship has not been tested. We hypothesize two different mechanisms through which an abuse history could influence later life distress and dysfunction. A history of abuse could increase an individuals vulnerability to emotional distress or could increase an individuals tendency to attend, amplify, and over-interpret somatic symptoms. The purpose of this study was to test the influence of emotional distress and somatic focus on the relationship between a history of physical and/or sexual abuse and later chronic painrelated disability in patients with temporomandibular disorders. The subjects were 139 female patients evaluated at a facial pain clinic. Of the 139 subjects, 49% (n = 69) reported a history of physical and/or sexual abuse. Abused subjects reported significantly higher levels of anxiety, depression, and somatic symptoms than nonabused subjects. Path analysis with latent variables, using the LISREL-8 (Scientific Software International, Inc., Chicago, Illinois) statistical program was used to test the hypothesized relationships. When emotional distress and somatic focus were tested as mediators, the path coefficient from somatic focus to physical functioning was significant (beta = -0.38) while the path coefficient from negative emotion to physical functioning was not significant. These results favor somatization as the hypothesized mechanism over the emotional distress vulnerability hypotheses.

Pain severity, negative affect, and microstressers as predictors of life interference in TMD patients.

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships among negative affect (depression, anxiety, and anger), microstressors (hassles), temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain severity, and life interference, using structural equations modeling. One hundred four subjects were recruited from the Parker Mahan Facial Pain Clinic at the University of Florida. Significant positive direct effects were found for paths between pain severity and life interference; pain severity and negative affect; and negative affect and life interference. These results are consistent with a learning or behavioral model of suffering and suggest that negative affect is an important mediating variable in the relationship between pain and life interference. Microstressors were not a significant predictor and may not be a relevant issue in the TMD population. The results suggest that the impact of chronic pain conditions is influenced by both pain and negative affect, and assessment and treatment of chronic TMD disorders may better benefit from a multidisciplinary approach.

Somatic focus/awareness: Relationship to negative affect and pain in chronic pain patients

Somatic focus refers to the tendency to notice and report physical symptoms, and has been investigated in relation to chronically painful conditions. This study investigated the relationship between somatic focus, as measured by the Pennebaker Inventory of Limbic Languidness (PILL), negative affect and pain. A secondary purpose of the present study was to examine sex differences in these relationships. Participants included 280 chronic pain patients (69.6% females, 88.9% Caucasian), who completed a battery of self‐report measures on somatic focus, pain, negative affect, coping, and dysfunction. Results for the overall sample revealed that the PILL shares considerable variance with measures of negative affect, particularly with the physiological components of anxiety and depression. When the results were analyzed separately for male and female patients, it was found that several components of negative affect and cognitive factors play a stronger role in predicting somatic focus among men compared to women. Additional analyses then examined whether somatic focus was predictive of male and female patients’ pain reports. Results indicated that somatic focus explained a small, but unique amount of variance in female patients’ pain reports, which differed from the relationship observed among male patients.

The medial capsule of the human temporomandibular joint

PURPOSE Attachments of the medial capsule of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) to structures other than the medial fossa wall are thought to exist and to have functional significance. This study evaluated these relationships. MATERIALS AND METHODS The anatomic relationships between the medial capsule and other medial structures, the sphenomandibular ligament, discomalleolar ligament, and auriculotemporal nerve, were examined in 14 cadaver heads. RESULTS The results showed that the sphenomandibular ligament attaches separately from the medial capsule of the TMJ and therefore has no functional significance to the biomechanics of the joint. The discomalleolar ligament was found to be a continuation of the retrodiscal tissues and minimally associated with the medial capsule. The auriculotemporal nerve was not found to be in a relationship with the medial aspect of the condyle to the extent that mechanical irritation is possible during TMJ movement or disc displacement.

Predicting treatment compliance following facial pain evaluation.

The purpose of this study was to document compliance to treatment follow-up for facial pain patients referred for outside services. In addition, we generated a multidimensional model of the psychosocial constructs associated with chronic pain to determine whether these factors were predictive of compliance across recommended therapy modalities or with an overall measure of compliance. These constructs included pain report, depressive symptoms, anxiety, cognitive coping strategies, and physical activity reduction. The sample consisted of 80 facial pain patients evaluated at a tertiary care, facial pain clinic at a large university medical center. Compliance ratings ranged from 93% to 50% and are consistent with the literature that indicates that compliance differs across treatment modality. Furthermore, compliance rates were lower for the more nontraditional facial pain treatments performed by physical therapists or psychologists. Depression was negatively associated with compliance to medication changes, therapeutic injections, and splint therapy, but not psychological counseling or physical therapy. Increased pain was only associated with physical therapy. Measures of psychological distress (depression and anxiety) and pain were predictive of the overall measure of compliance. These results suggest that psychological distress can be a barrier for positive patient outcomes through reduced treatment compliance.