Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Henry H. Woo is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Henry H. Woo.


European Urology | 2015

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Functional Outcomes and Complications Following Transurethral Procedures for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Resulting from Benign Prostatic Obstruction: An Update

Jean-Nicolas Cornu; Sascha Ahyai; Alexander Bachmann; Jean de la Rosette; Peter J. Gilling; Christian Gratzke; Kevin T. McVary; Giacomo Novara; Henry H. Woo; Stephan Madersbacher

CONTEXT A number of transurethral ablative techniques based on the use of innovative medical devices have been introduced in the recent past for the surgical treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transurethral ablative procedures for BPO. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic literature search was performed for all RCTs comparing any transurethral surgical technique for BPO to another between 1992 and 2013. Efficacy was evaluated after a minimum follow-up of 1 yr based on International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum flow rate, and postvoid residual volume. Efficacy at midterm follow-up, prostate volume, perioperative data, and short-term and long-term complications were also assessed. Data were analyzed using RevMan software. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 69 RCTs (8517 enrolled patients) were included. No significant difference was found in terms of short-term efficacy between bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (M-TURP). However, B-TURP was associated with a lower rate of perioperative complications. Better short-term efficacy outcomes, fewer immediate complications, and a shorter hospital stay were found after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) compared with M-TURP. Compared with M-TURP, GreenLight photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) was associated with a shorter hospital stay and fewer complications but no different short-term efficacy outcomes. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis shows that HoLEP is associated with more favorable outcomes than M-TURP in published RCTs. B-TURP and PVP have resulted in better perioperative outcomes without significant differences regarding efficacy parameters after short-term follow-up compared with M-TURP. Further studies are needed to provide long-term comparative data and head-to head comparisons of emerging techniques. PATIENT SUMMARY Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate, photovaporization of the prostate, and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate have shown efficacy outcomes comparable with conventional techniques yet reduce the complication rate. The respective role of these new options in the surgical armamentarium needs to be refined to propose tailored surgical treatment for benign prostatic obstruction relief.


European Urology | 2012

180-W XPS GreenLight Laser Therapy for Benign Prostate Hyperplasia: Early Safety, Efficacy, and Perioperative Outcome After 201 Procedures

Alexander Bachmann; Gordon Muir; Edward Collins; Benjamin B. Choi; Shahin Tabatabaei; Oliver Reich; Fernando Gomez-Sancha; Henry H. Woo

BACKGROUND Photoselective vaporisation of the prostate has evolved from the GreenLight 80-W KTP powered laser to the latest 180-W XPS laser involving a MoXy fibre. OBJECTIVE Evaluate the prevalence of perioperative complications and short-term outcome for the first time with the XPS laser in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Prospective data were collected from consecutive patients at seven centres worldwide during June 2010 and March 2011. Indication for surgery was based on the European Association of Urology and the American Urological Association guidelines. Patients receiving anticoagulants or those with retention were included and analysed separately. INTERVENTION 180-W XPS GreenLight laser prostatectomy using the MoXy fibre. MEASUREMENTS Standard parameters associated with transurethral prostate surgery and perioperative prevalence of surgery-associated problems or complications were documented. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 201 patients were included in the study. Mean follow-up was 5.8 mo (standard deviation [SD]: 2.8; range: 1-12 mo). A quarter of the patients had a prostate volume≥80 ml. For prostates between 51 and 60 ml, a mean of 300 kJ (SD: 112) of energy was applied (lasing time: 35.0 min; SD: 15). Statistically significant improvements were noted in all key parameters postoperatively. The prevalence of perioperative complications was low. Limitations of the study are short duration of follow-up and limited number of available patients for the functional follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The 180-W GreenLight XPS laser is a new effective treatment option with a low prevalence of perioperative complications for patients suffering from LUTS due to BPE.


European Urology | 2012

Photoselective Vaporisation of the Prostate Using 80-W and 120-W Laser Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis from 2002 to 2012

Isaac Thangasamy; Venu Chalasani; Alexander Bachmann; Henry H. Woo

CONTEXT Photoselective vaporisation (PVP) of the prostate is being used increasingly to treat symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia, due to the associated lower morbidity. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate was considered to be the treatment with the highest evidence; however, evidence for PVP has dramatically increased recently. OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of level 1 evidence studies to determine the effectiveness of PVP versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Outcomes reviewed included perioperative data, complications, and functional outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Biomedical databases from 2002 to 2012 and American Urological Association and European Association of Urology conference proceedings from 2007 to 2011 were searched. Trials were included if they were randomised controlled trials, had PVP as the intervention, and TURP as control. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Nine trials were identified with 448 patients undergoing PVP (80 W in five trials and 120 W in four trials) and 441 undergoing TURP. Catheterisation time and length of stay were shorter in the PVP group by 1.91 d (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47-2.35; p<0.00001) and 2.13 d (95% CI, 1.78-2.48; p<0.00001), respectively. Operation time was shorter in the TURP group by 19.64 min (95% CI, 9.05-30.23; p=0.0003). Blood transfusion was significantly less likely in the PVP group (risk ratio: 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05-0.53; p=0.003). There were no significant differences between PVP and TURP when comparing other complications. Regarding functional outcomes, six studies found no difference between PVP and TURP, two favoured TURP, and one favoured PVP. CONCLUSIONS Perioperative outcomes of catheterisation time and length of hospital stay were shorter with PVP, whereas operative time was longer with PVP. Postoperative complications of blood transfusion and clot retention were significantly less likely with PVP; no difference was noted in other complications. Overall, no difference was noted in intermediate-term functional outcomes.


The Journal of Urology | 2006

Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies

Rebecca Tooher; Peter Swindle; Henry H. Woo; John Miller; Guy J. Maddern

PURPOSE We compared the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy through a systematic assessment of the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS Literature databases were searched from 1996 to December 2004 inclusive. Studies comparing transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy or robot assisted radical prostatectomy with open radical retropubic prostatectomy or radical perineal prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer were included. Comparisons between different laparoscopic approaches were also included. RESULTS We identified 30 comparative studies, of which none were randomized controlled trials. There were 21 studies comparing laparoscopic with open prostatectomy with a total of 2,301 and 1,757 patients, respectively, and 9 comparing different laparoscopic approaches with a total of 1,148 patients. In terms of safety there did not appear to be any important differences in the complication rate between laparoscopic and open approaches. However, blood loss and transfusions were lower for laparoscopic approaches. In terms of efficacy operative time was longer for laparoscopic than for open prostatectomy but length of stay and duration of catheterization were shorter. Positive margin rates and recurrence-free survival were similar. Continence and potency were not well reported but they appeared similar for the 2 approaches. There were no important differences between laparoscopic approaches. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is emerging as an alternative to open radical prostatectomy but randomized, controlled trials considering patient relevant outcomes, such as survival, continence and potency, with sufficient followup are required to determine relative safety and efficacy.


European Urology | 2014

International Urology Journal Club via Twitter: 12-Month Experience

Isaac Thangasamy; Michael J. Leveridge; Benjamin J. Davies; Antonio Finelli; Brian Stork; Henry H. Woo

BACKGROUND Online journal clubs have increasingly been utilised to overcome the limitations of the traditional journal club. However, to date, no reported online journal club is available for international participation. OBJECTIVE To present a 12-mo experience from the International Urology Journal Club, the worlds first international journal club using Twitter, an online micro-blogging platform, and to demonstrate the viability and sustainability of such a journal club. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS #urojc is an asynchronous 48-h monthly journal club moderated by the Twitter account @iurojc. The open invitation discussions focussed on papers typically published within the previous 2-4 wk. Data were obtained via third-party Twitter analysis services. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Outcomes analysed included number of total and new users, number of tweets, and qualitative analysis of the relevance of tweets. Analysis was undertaken using GraphPad software, Microsoft Excel, and thematic qualitative analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The first 12 mo saw a total of 189 unique users representing 19 countries and 6 continents. There was a mean of 39 monthly participants that included 14 first-time participants per month. The mean number of tweets per month was 195 of which 62% represented original tweets directly related to the topic of discussion and 22% represented retweets of original posts. A mean of 130 832 impressions, or reach, were created per month. The @iurojc moderator account has accumulated >1000 followers. The study is limited by potentially incomplete data extracted by third-party Twitter analysers. CONCLUSIONS Social media provides a potential for enormous international communication that has not been possible in the past. We believe the pioneering #urojc is both viable and sustainable. There is unlimited scope for journal clubs in other fields to follow the example of #urojc and utilise online portals to revitalise the traditional journal club while fostering international relationships.


International Journal of Molecular Sciences | 2013

Current Status of Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer

Vicki M. Velonas; Henry H. Woo; Cristobal G. dos Remedios; Stephen J. Assinder

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a leading cause of cancer-related death of men globally. Since its introduction, there has been intense debate as to the effectiveness of the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test as a screening tool for PCa. It is now evident that the PSA test produces unacceptably high rates of false positive results and is not prognostic. Here we review the current status of molecular biomarkers that promise to be prognostic and that might inform individual patient management. It highlights current efforts to identify biomarkers obtained by minimally invasive methods and discusses current knowledge with regard to gene fusions, mRNA and microRNAs, immunology, and cancer-associated microparticles.


BJUI | 2014

Use of social media in urology: data from the American Urological Association (AUA)

Stacy Loeb; Christopher E. Bayne; Christine Frey; Benjamin J. Davies; Timothy D. Averch; Henry H. Woo; Brian Stork; Matthew R. Cooperberg

To characterise the use of social media among members of the American Urological Association (AUA), as the use of social media in medicine has greatly expanded in recent years.


BJUI | 2014

A Phase III trial to investigate the timing of radiotherapy for prostate cancer with high-risk features: background and rationale of the Radiotherapy – Adjuvant Versus Early Salvage (RAVES) trial

Maria Pearse; Carol Fraser-Browne; Ian D. Davis; Gillian Duchesne; Richard Fisher; Mark Frydenberg; Annette Haworth; Chakiath C Jose; David Joseph; Teesin Lim; John H.L. Matthews; Jeremy Millar; Mark Sidhom; Nigel Spry; Colin Tang; Sandra Turner; Scott Williams; Kirsty Wiltshire; Henry H. Woo; Andrew Kneebone

To test the hypothesis that observation with early salvage radiotherapy (SRT) is not inferior to ‘standard’ treatment with adjuvant RT (ART) with respect to biochemical failure in patients with pT3 disease and/or positive surgical margins (SMs) after radical prostatectomy (RP).


Urology | 2012

Prostatic Urethral Lift: Two-year Results After Treatment for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Peter T. Chin; Damien Bolton; Greg Jack; Prem Rashid; Jeffrey Thavaseelan; R. James Yu; Claus G. Roehrborn; Henry H. Woo

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of the prostatic urethral lift in relieving lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. METHODS A total of 64 men, aged≥55 years, with moderate to severe symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia were treated and followed up at 6 Australian institutions. The treatment consisted of transurethral delivery of small implants to secure the prostatic lobes in an open condition, thereby reducing obstruction of the urethral lumen. The effectiveness, including International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, benign prostatic hyperplasia Impact Index, and peak urethral flow rate were assessed at 2 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The effect of this treatment on erectile and ejaculatory function was assessed using the Sexual Health Inventory for Men and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire for Ejaculatory Dysfunction. RESULTS The prostatic urethral lift improved LUTS symptoms rapidly and durably. The International Prostate Symptom Score was reduced 42% at 2 weeks, 49% at 6 months, and 42% at 2 years in evaluable patients. The peak flow rate improved by ≥30% (2.4 mL/s) at all intervals compared with baseline. No compromise in sexual function was observed after this treatment. CONCLUSION The present study demonstrated that LUTS and flow improvements without compromising sexual function. Although this was an early study with a small cohort, this therapy shows promise as a new option for patients with LUTS.


BJUI | 2011

Safety and feasibility of the prostatic urethral lift: a novel, minimally invasive treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Henry H. Woo; Peter T. Chin; Thomas McNicholas; Harcharan Gill; Mark K. Plante; Reginald C. Bruskewitz; Claus G. Roehrborn

Study Type – Therapy (case series) 
Level of Evidence 4

Collaboration


Dive into the Henry H. Woo's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gordon Muir

University of Cambridge

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter T. Chin

University of Wollongong

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Edward Collins

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gillian Duchesne

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Prem Rashid

University of New South Wales

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge