Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Herbert C. Wolfsen is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Herbert C. Wolfsen.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2009

Radiofrequency Ablation in Barrett's Esophagus with Dysplasia

Nicholas J. Shaheen; Prateek Sharma; Bergein F. Overholt; Herbert C. Wolfsen; Richard E. Sampliner; Kenneth K. Wang; Joseph A. Galanko; Mary P. Bronner; John R. Goldblum; Ana E. Bennett; Blair A. Jobe; Glenn M. Eisen; M. Brian Fennerty; John G. Hunter; David E. Fleischer; Virender K. Sharma; Robert H. Hawes; Brenda J. Hoffman; Richard I. Rothstein; Stuart R. Gordon; Hiroshi Mashimo; Kenneth J. Chang; V. Raman Muthusamy; Steven A. Edmundowicz; Stuart J. Spechler; Ali Siddiqui; Rhonda F. Souza; Anthony Infantolino; Gary W. Falk; Michael B. Kimmey

BACKGROUND Barretts esophagus, a condition of intestinal metaplasia of the esophagus, is associated with an increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. We assessed whether endoscopic radiofrequency ablation could eradicate dysplastic Barretts esophagus and decrease the rate of neoplastic progression. METHODS In a multicenter, sham-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 127 patients with dysplastic Barretts esophagus in a 2:1 ratio to receive either radiofrequency ablation (ablation group) or a sham procedure (control group). Randomization was stratified according to the grade of dysplasia and the length of Barretts esophagus. Primary outcomes at 12 months included the complete eradication of dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia. RESULTS In the intention-to-treat analyses, among patients with low-grade dysplasia, complete eradication of dysplasia occurred in 90.5% of those in the ablation group, as compared with 22.7% of those in the control group (P<0.001). Among patients with high-grade dysplasia, complete eradication occurred in 81.0% of those in the ablation group, as compared with 19.0% of those in the control group (P<0.001). Overall, 77.4% of patients in the ablation group had complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia, as compared with 2.3% of those in the control group (P<0.001). Patients in the ablation group had less disease progression (3.6% vs. 16.3%, P=0.03) and fewer cancers (1.2% vs. 9.3%, P=0.045). Patients reported having more chest pain after the ablation procedure than after the sham procedure. In the ablation group, one patient had upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and five patients (6.0%) had esophageal stricture. CONCLUSIONS In patients with dysplastic Barretts esophagus, radiofrequency ablation was associated with a high rate of complete eradication of both dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia and a reduced risk of disease progression. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00282672.)


Gastroenterology | 2011

Durability of Radiofrequency Ablation in Barrett's Esophagus With Dysplasia

Nicholas J. Shaheen; Bergein F. Overholt; Richard E. Sampliner; Herbert C. Wolfsen; Kenneth K. Wang; David E. Fleischer; Virender K. Sharma; Glenn M. Eisen; M. Brian Fennerty; John G. Hunter; Mary P. Bronner; John R. Goldblum; Ana E. Bennett; Hiroshi Mashimo; Richard I. Rothstein; Stuart R. Gordon; Steven A. Edmundowicz; Ryan D. Madanick; Anne F. Peery; V. Raman Muthusamy; Kenneth J. Chang; Michael B. Kimmey; Stuart J. Spechler; Ali Siddiqui; Rhonda F. Souza; Anthony Infantolino; John A. Dumot; Gary W. Falk; Joseph A. Galanko; Blair A. Jobe

BACKGROUND & AIMS Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can eradicate dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia in patients with dysplastic Barretts esophagus (BE), and reduce rates of esophageal adenocarcinoma. We assessed long-term rates of eradication, durability of neosquamous epithelium, disease progression, and safety of RFA in patients with dysplastic BE. METHODS We performed a randomized trial of 127 subjects with dysplastic BE; after cross-over subjects were included, 119 received RFA. Subjects were followed for a mean time of 3.05 years; the study was extended to 5 years for patients with eradication of intestinal metaplasia at 2 years. Outcomes included eradication of dysplasia or intestinal metaplasia after 2 and 3 years, durability of response, disease progression, and adverse events. RESULTS After 2 years, 101 of 106 patients had complete eradication of all dysplasia (95%) and 99 of 106 had eradication of intestinal metaplasia (93%). After 2 years, among subjects with initial low-grade dysplasia, all dysplasia was eradicated in 51 of 52 (98%) and intestinal metaplasia was eradicated in 51 of 52 (98%); among subjects with initial high-grade dysplasia, all dysplasia was eradicated in 50 of 54 (93%) and intestinal metaplasia was eradicated in 48 of 54 (89%). After 3 years, dysplasia was eradicated in 55 of 56 of subjects (98%) and intestinal metaplasia was eradicated in 51 of 56 (91%). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that dysplasia remained eradicated in >85% of patients and intestinal metaplasia in >75%, without maintenance RFA. Serious adverse events occurred in 4 of 119 subjects (3.4%); the rate of stricture was 7.6%. The rate of esophageal adenocarcinoma was 1 per 181 patient-years (0.55%/patient-years); there was no cancer-related morbidity or mortality. The annual rate of any neoplastic progression was 1 per 73 patient-years (1.37%/patient-years). CONCLUSIONS In subjects with dysplastic BE, RFA therapy has an acceptable safety profile, is durable, and is associated with a low rate of disease progression, for up to 3 years.


Gut | 2008

Endoscopic tri-modal imaging for detection of early neoplasia in Barrett's oesophagus: a multi-centre feasibility study using high-resolution endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging and narrow band imaging incorporated in one endoscopy system

Wouter L. Curvers; Rajvinder Singh; Louis-Michel Wong Kee Song; Herbert C. Wolfsen; Krish Ragunath; Kenneth K. Wang; Michael B. Wallace; Paul Fockens; Jacques J. Bergman

Objective: To investigate the diagnostic potential of endoscopic tri-modal imaging and the relative contribution of each imaging modality (i.e. high-resolution endoscopy (HRE), autofluorescence imaging (AFI) and narrow-band imaging (NBI)) for the detection of early neoplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus. Design: Prospective multi-centre study. Setting: Tertiary referral centres. Patients: 84 Patients with Barrett’s oesophagus. Interventions: The Barrett’s oesophagus was inspected with HRE followed by AFI. All lesions detected with HRE and/or AFI were subsequently inspected in detail by NBI for the presence of abnormal mucosal and/or microvascular patterns. Biopsies were obtained from all suspicious lesions for blinded histopathological assessment followed by random biopsies. Main outcome measures: (1) Number of patients with early neoplasia diagnosed by HRE and AFI; (2) number of lesions with early neoplasia detected with HRE and AFI; and (3) reduction of false positive AFI findings after NBI. Results: Per patient analysis: AFI identified all 16 patients with early neoplasia identified with HRE and detected an additional 11 patients with early neoplasia that were not identified with HRE. In three patients no abnormalities were seen but random biopsies revealed HGIN. After HRE inspection, AFI detected an additional 102 lesions; 19 contained HGIN/EC (false positive rate of AFI after HRE: 81%). Detailed inspection with NBI reduced this false positive rate to 26%. Conclusions: In this international multi-centre study, the addition of AFI to HRE increased the detection of both the number of patients and the number of lesions with early neoplasia in patients with Barrett’s oesophagus. The false positive rate of AFI was reduced after detailed inspection with NBI.


Gastroenterology | 2008

Prospective, Controlled Tandem Endoscopy Study of Narrow Band Imaging for Dysplasia Detection in Barrett's Esophagus

Herbert C. Wolfsen; Julia E. Crook; Murli Krishna; Sami R. Achem; Kenneth R. DeVault; Ernest P. Bouras; David S. Loeb; Mark E. Stark; Timothy A. Woodward; Lois L. Hemminger; Michael B. Wallace

BACKGROUND & AIMS High-resolution endoscopy with narrow band imaging (NBI) enhances the visualization of mucosal glandular and vascular structures. This study assessed whether narrow band targeted biopsies could detect advanced dysplasia using fewer biopsy samples compared with standard resolution endoscopy. METHODS We conducted a prospective, blinded, tandem endoscopy study in a tertiary care center with 65 patients with Barretts esophagus undergoing evaluation for previously detected dysplasia. Standard resolution endoscopy was used first to detect visible lesions. Narrow band endoscopy was then used by another gastroenterologist to detect and biopsy areas suspicious for dysplasia. The lesions initially detected by standard resolution endoscopy were then disclosed and biopsied, after biopsy of the lesions targeted with NBI. Finally, random 4-quadrant biopsies were taken throughout the segment of Barretts mucosa. RESULTS Higher grades of dysplasia were found by NBI in 12 patients (18%), compared with no cases (0%) in whom standard resolution white light endoscopy with random biopsy detected a higher grade of histology (P < .001). Correspondingly, narrow band directed biopsies detected dysplasia in more patients (n = 37; 57%) compared with biopsies taken using standard resolution endoscopy (n = 28; 43%). In addition, more biopsies were taken using standard resolution endoscopy with random biopsy compared with narrow band targeted biopsies (mean 8.5 versus 4.7; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS In patients evaluated for Barretts esophagus with dysplasia, NBI detected significantly more patients with dysplasia and higher grades of dysplasia with fewer biopsy samples compared with standard resolution endoscopy.


Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 2009

Safety and efficacy of endoscopic spray cryotherapy for Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia.

Nicholas J. Shaheen; Bruce D. Greenwald; Anne F. Peery; John A. Dumot; Norman S. Nishioka; Herbert C. Wolfsen; J.Steven Burdick; Julian A. Abrams; Kenneth K. Wang; Damien Mallat; Mark H. Johnston; Alvin M. Zfass; Jenny O. Smith; James S. Barthel; Charles J. Lightdale

BACKGROUND Endoscopic ablation to treat Barretts esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) is associated with a decreased incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic spray cryotherapy (CRYO) demonstrates promising preliminary data. OBJECTIVE To assess the safety and efficacy of CRYO in BE with HGD. DESIGN Multicenter, retrospective cohort study. SETTING Nine academic and community centers; treatment period, 2007 to 2009. PATIENTS Subjects with HGD confirmed by 2 pathologists. Previous EMR was allowed if residual HGD remained. INTERVENTIONS CRYO with follow-up biopsies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Complete eradication of HGD with persistent low-grade dysplasia, complete eradication of all dysplasia with persistent nondysplastic intestinal metaplasia, and complete eradication of all intestinal metaplasia. RESULTS Ninety-eight subjects (mean age 65.4 years, 83% male) with BE and HGD (mean length 5.3 cm) underwent 333 treatments (mean 3.4 treatments per subject). There were no esophageal perforations. Strictures developed in 3 subjects. Two subjects reported severe chest pain managed with oral narcotics. One subject was hospitalized for bright red blood per rectum. Sixty subjects had completed all planned CRYO treatments and were included in the efficacy analysis. Fifty-eight subjects (97%) had complete eradication of HGD, 52 (87%) had complete eradication of all dysplasia with persistent nondysplastic intestinal metaplasia, and 34 (57%) had complete eradication of all intestinal metaplasia. Subsquamous BE was found in 2 subjects (3%). LIMITATIONS Nonrandomized, retrospective study with no control group, short follow-up (10.5 months), lack of centralized pathology, and use of surrogate outcome for decreased cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS CRYO is a safe and well-tolerated therapy for BE and HGD. Short-term results suggest that CRYO is highly effective in eradicating HGD.


Gastroenterology | 2010

Comparison of Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy With Virtual Chromoendoscopy for Classification of Colon Polyps

Anna M. Buchner; Muhammad W. Shahid; Michael G. Heckman; Murli Krishna; Marwan Ghabril; Muhammad K. Hasan; Julia E. Crook; Victoria Gomez; Massimo Raimondo; Timothy A. Woodward; Herbert C. Wolfsen; Michael B. Wallace

BACKGROUND & AIMS Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) allows in vivo imaging of tissue at micron resolution. Virtual chromoendoscopy systems, such as Fujinon intelligent color enhancement and narrow band imaging, also have potential to differentiate neoplastic colorectal lesions. The accuracy of these systems in clinical practice is, however, unknown. Our primary aim was to compare sensitivity and specificity of pCLE to virtual chromoendoscopy for classification of colorectal polyps using histopathology as a gold standard. A secondary aim was to compare sensitivity and specificity of pCLE to virtual chromoendoscopy using a modified gold standard that assumed that all polyps >/=10 mm had malignant potential and were considered neoplastic or high risk. METHODS Patients underwent colonoscopy using high-resolution colonoscopes. The surface pit pattern was determined with NBI or FICE in all patients. Confocal images were recorded and subsequently analyzed offline, blinded to the endoscopic characteristics and histopathology. Each polyp was diagnosed as benign or neoplastic based on confocal features according to modified Mainz criteria. RESULTS A total of 119 polyps (81 neoplastic, 38 hyperplastic) from 75 patients was assessed. The pCLE had higher sensitivity compared to virtual chromoendoscopy when considering histopathology as gold standard (91% vs 77%; P = .010) and modified gold standard (88% vs 76%; P = .037). There was no statistically significant difference in specificity between pCLE and virtual chromoendoscopy when considering histopathology or modified gold standard. CONCLUSIONS Confocal endomicroscopy demonstrated higher sensitivity with similar specificity in classification of colorectal polyps. These new methods may replace the need for ex vivo histological confirmation of small polyps, but further studies are warranted.


The American Journal of Gastroenterology | 2009

Seasonal distribution in newly diagnosed cases of eosinophilic esophagitis in adults.

Cristina Almansa; Murli Krishna; Anna M. Buchner; Marwan Ghabril; Nicholas J. Talley; Kenneth R. DeVault; Herbert C. Wolfsen; Massimo Raimondo; Juan C. Guarderas; Sami R. Achem

OBJECTIVES:The etiology of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is not well understood. It has been proposed that eosinophils migrate to the esophagus in response to various ingested and inhaled allergens. Recent reports in children found an increased proportion of cases of EoE during months with higher outdoor aeroallergens. To our knowledge, this has not been evaluated in adults. We aimed to determine whether there is a seasonal distribution in the number of newly diagnosed cases of EoE in an adult population.METHODS:We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive adult cases newly diagnosed with EoE in 1 year. Cases were grouped based on the index month when the diagnosis was made at endoscopy. To test the consistency of the observations, a second cohort of consecutive cases of similar sample size diagnosed at a different period in time was also analyzed.RESULTS:In total, 41 patients were diagnosed with EoE at our center during the study period, providing an annual prevalence of 0.98%. More cases were diagnosed with EoE during the months of April and May than any other month (P<0.001). When patients were grouped seasonally, there was a significant increase of EoE cases in spring and summer months (n=28) when compared with the fall and winter months (n=13) (P=0.019). Analysis of the second cohort of cases (n=37) from 2002 to 2006 confirmed a similar seasonal diagnostic pattern for EoE during the outdoor seasons.CONCLUSIONS:Our data demonstrate that EoE has a seasonal prevalence in adults. The seasonal variation pattern found in newly diagnosed EoE cases in adults supports the potential role of aeroallergens in the pathogenesis of EoE.


Cancer Research | 2009

A multicenter, double-blinded validation study of methylation biomarkers for progression prediction in Barrett’s esophagus

Zhe Jin; Yulan Cheng; Wen Gu; Yingye Zheng; Fumiaki Sato; Yuriko Mori; Alexandru Olaru; Bogdan C. Paun; Jian Yang; Takatsugu Kan; Tetsuo Ito; James P. Hamilton; Florin M. Selaru; Rachana Agarwal; Stefan David; John M. Abraham; Herbert C. Wolfsen; Michael B. Wallace; Nicholas J. Shaheen; Kay Washington; Jean Q Wang; Marcia I. Canto; Achyut K. Bhattacharyya; Mark A. Nelson; Paul A. Wagner; Yvonne Romero; Kenneth K. Wang; Ziding Feng; Richard E. Sampliner; Stephen J. Meltzer

Esophageal adenocarcinoma risk in Barretts esophagus (BE) is increased 30- to 125-fold versus the general population. Among all BE patients, however, neoplastic progression occurs only once per 200 patient-years. Molecular biomarkers are therefore needed to risk-stratify patients for more efficient surveillance endoscopy and to improve the early detection of progression. We therefore performed a retrospective, multicenter, double-blinded validation study of eight BE progression prediction methylation biomarkers. Progression or nonprogression were determined at 2 years (tier 1) and 4 years (tier 2). Methylation was assayed in 145 nonprogressors and 50 progressors using real-time quantitative methylation-specific PCR. Progressors were significantly older than nonprogressors (70.6 versus 62.5 years; P < 0.001). We evaluated a linear combination of the eight markers, using coefficients from a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Areas under the ROC curve (AUC) were high in the 2-year, 4-year, and combined data models (0.843, 0.829, and 0.840; P < 0.001, <0.001, and <0.001, respectively). In addition, even after rigorous overfitting correction, the incremental AUCs contributed by panels based on the 8 markers plus age versus age alone were substantial (Delta-AUC = 0.152, 0.114, and 0.118, respectively) in all 3 models. A methylation biomarker-based panel to predict neoplastic progression in BE has potential clinical value in improving both the efficiency of surveillance endoscopy and the early detection of neoplasia.


Gastroenterology | 2010

Endoscopic Tri-Modal Imaging Is More Effective Than Standard Endoscopy in Identifying Early-Stage Neoplasia in Barrett's Esophagus

Wouter L. Curvers; Lorenza Alvarez Herrero; Michael B. Wallace; Louis M. Wong Kee Song; Krish Ragunath; Herbert C. Wolfsen; Ganapathy A. Prasad; Kenneth K. Wang; Venkataraman Subramanian; Bas L. Weusten; Fiebo J. ten Kate; Jacques J. Bergman

BACKGROUND & AIMS Endoscopic tri-modal imaging (ETMI) incorporates high-resolution endoscopy (HRE), autofluorescence imaging (AFI), and narrow band imaging (NBI). A recent uncontrolled study found that ETMI improved the detection of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early carcinoma (Ca) in Barretts esophagus (BE). The aim was to compare ETMI with standard video endoscopy (SVE) for the detection of HGD/Ca with the use of a randomized cross-over design. METHODS Patients referred for work-up of inconspicuous HGD/Ca were eligible and underwent both SVE and ETMI in randomized order within an interval of 6-12 weeks. During ETMI, inspection with HRE was followed by AFI. Detected lesions were inspected in detail with NBI and biopsied, followed by random biopsies. During SVE, any visible lesion was biopsied followed by random biopsies. RESULTS Eighty-seven patients with BE underwent ETMI and SVE. No significant difference was observed in overall histologic yield between ETMI and SVE. ETMI had a significantly higher targeted yield compared with SVE because of AFI. However, the yield of targeted biopsies of ETMI was significantly inferior to the overall yield of SVE. Detailed inspection with NBI reduced the false-positive rate of HRE + AFI from 71% to 48% but misclassified 17% of HGD/Ca lesions as not suspicious. CONCLUSIONS ETMI statistically significant improves the targeted detection of HGD/Ca compared with SVE. Subsequent characterization of lesions with NBI appears to be of limited value. At this stage, ETMI cannot replace random biopsies for detection of lesions or targeted biopsies for characterization of lesions in a high-risk population.


The American Journal of Gastroenterology | 2006

Barrett's esophagus is common in older men and women undergoing screening colonoscopy regardless of reflux symptoms.

Eric M. Ward; Herbert C. Wolfsen; Sami R. Achem; David S. Loeb; Murli Krishna; Lois L. Hemminger; Kenneth R. DeVault

BACKGROUND:Although Barretts esophagus (BE) is the precursor of esophageal adenocarcinoma (ACA), most patients with ACA present outside of a BE surveillance program. This could be due to undiagnosed symptomatic GER and BE or BE/ACA occurring in patients without reflux symptoms. We have, therefore, studied the prevalence of BE and symptom status in older patients referred for colonoscopy.METHODSAll patients referred for outpatient colonoscopy were eligible if they were at least 65 yr old and had not previously undergone esophagoscopy. After informed consent, the patients completed detailed GER questionnaires. During the research endoscopy, the endoscopist recorded the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ) as either long-segment BE (LSBE), short-segment BE (SSBE), or normal. If the SCJ was felt to be “irregular” the endoscopist was asked to predict, in their judgment, if BE was present. All patients had biopsies below the SCJ, which were examined by a gastrointestinal pathologist who was blinded to the endoscopic findings.RESULTSBE esophagus was present in 50 of the 300 patients studied (16.7%). BE was more common in men (35 of 161, 21.7%) than in women (15 of 139, 10.8%) (p < 0.025). GERD symptoms were reported in 106 patients (35%) and BE was present in 19.8% of symptomatic and 14.9% of asymptomatic cases (NS). The majority of the BE in this study was less than 3 cm in length (92%). The questionnaires did not predict the presence of BE.CONCLUSIONSBE is common in unscreened male and female patients at least 65 yr of age who are referred for colonoscopy. Men were more likely than women to have BE although it occurred in both sexes. Reflux symptoms were fairly common but a poor predictor of BE.

Collaboration


Dive into the Herbert C. Wolfsen's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nicholas J. Shaheen

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charles J. Lightdale

Columbia University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge