Herbert M. Miller
Carnegie Mellon University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Herbert M. Miller.
Materials Science Forum | 2004
Herbert M. Miller; David M. Saylor; Bassem El Dasher; Anthony D. Rollett; Gregory S. Rohrer
Measurements of the grain boundary character distribution in MgAl2O4 (spinel) as a function of lattice misorientation and boundary plane orientation show that at all misorientations, grain boundaries are most frequently terminated on {111} planes. Boundaries with {111} orientations are observed 2.5 times more frequently than boundaries with {100} orientations. Furthermore, the most common boundary type is the twist boundary formed by a 60° rotation about the [111] axis. {111} planes also dominate the external form of spinel crystals found in natural settings, and this suggests that they are low energy and/or slow growing planes. The mechanisms that might lead to a high population of these planes during solid state crystal growth are discussed.
MRS Proceedings | 2004
Gregory S. Rohrer; Bassem S. El-Dasher; Herbert M. Miller; Anthony D. Rollett; David M. Saylor
The grain boundary plane distributions in MgO, SrTiO3, MgAl2O4, and Al are compared at lattice misorientations with a coincident site density of greater than or equal to 1/9. In most situations, the most frequently adopted grain boundary orientation is a habit plane of low index and low surface energy that depends on the particular material. Cases where the most common boundary orientation is a plane of high planar coincident site density instead of a characteristic habit plane are rare. In fact, in most cases, the distributions of grain boundary planes at misorientations with high lattice coincidence are not substantially different from the distributions at other, more general misorientations. The results indicate that a model for grain boundary energy and structure based on grain surface relationships is more appropriate than the widely accepted models based on lattice orientation relationships.
Materials Science Forum | 2007
Herbert M. Miller; Chang-Soo Kim; Jason Gruber; Valerie Randle; Gregory S. Rohrer
The distribution of grain boundary plane orientations in polycrystalline Ni has been measured before and after grain boundary engineering. The grain boundary engineered microstructure has a relatively higher concentration of Σ3 grain boundaries and, when compared to the initial structure, more of these boundaries have orientations that are inclined by more than 10° from the (111) orientation of the ideal coherent twin. Although the conventionally measured grain size is not affected by the grain boundary engineering process, the average size of the regions containing only Σ3n grain boundaries increases by nearly a factor of two. The observations indicate that the increase in the relative population of Σ3 grain boundaries results both from the preferential elimination of random grain boundaries and the generation of new Σ3 grain boundaries which do not have (111) grain boundary plane orientations.
Acta Materialia | 2008
Valerie Randle; Gregory S. Rohrer; Herbert M. Miller; Mark Coleman; Gregory Owen
Journal of the American Ceramic Society | 2004
David M. Saylor; Bassem El Dasher; Ying Pang; Herbert M. Miller; Paul Wynblatt; Anthony D. Rollett; Gregory S. Rohrer
Acta Materialia | 2009
Jason Gruber; Herbert M. Miller; T.D. Hoffmann; Gregory S. Rohrer; Anthony D. Rollett
Acta Materialia | 2011
Elizabeth A. Holm; Gregory S. Rohrer; Stephen M. Foiles; Anthony D. Rollett; Herbert M. Miller; David L. Olmsted
Journal of the American Ceramic Society | 2011
Shen J. Dillon; Lam Helmick; Herbert M. Miller; Lane Wilson; Randall Gemman; Rumyana V. Petrova; K. Barmak; Gregory S. Rohrer; Paul A. Salvador
Acta Materialia | 2010
Gregory S. Rohrer; Herbert M. Miller
Journal of Materials Science | 2007
Steven T. Downey; Nicholas Bembridge; Peter N. Kalu; Herbert M. Miller; Gregory S. Rohrer; Ke Han