Herbert Stutz

Morphology and properties of blends with different thermoplastic polyurethanes and polyolefines

Unmodified blends of two thermoplastic polyurethanes (TPU) and six polyolefines were used to study the influence of the component viscosities on the blend morphology and mechanical properties. Blends were produced by melt mixing using a twin screw extruder. Interactions between the blend components could not be detected by DSC, DMA, selective extraction, and SEM micrographs of cryofractures. The variation in tensile strength with blend composition produce a U-shaped curve with the minimum between 40 and 60 wt % of polyolefine. At similar viscosity ratios (ηd/ηm), blends with polyether based TPU (TPU-eth) have a finer morphology than blends with polyester based TPU (TPU-est). This is due to the lower surface free energy of the polyether soft segments compared to the polyester soft segments. Different morphologies also lead to changes in mechanical behavior. Blends with TPU-eth show a lower decrease in tensile strength with blend composition than blends with TPU-est. The viscosity ratio between TPU and polyolefines can be directly correlated to the blend morphology obtained under similar blending conditions. TPU/PE blends show a lower dispersity than TPU/PP blends, due to the higher viscosity ratios of TPU/PE blends. This results in a greater reduction in tensile strength with the disperse phase content.

Determination of particle size in multiphase blends by different methods

Abstract Different methods for characterizing the morphology of multiphase blends were applied to a blend of thermoplastic polyurethane with 20 wt% polypropylene as the dispersed phase. Optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and light scattering were compared. The microscopy methods were evaluated with respect to their suitability for quantitative image analysis for determination of the particle size distribution. Comparison of the particle size distributions revealed that the dependence of the measured particle size on the method of preparation and technique was not very pronounced. The main difference resulted from cutting the particles outside their maximum diameter. The measured particle sizes determined with methods that analyze the whole particles, such as SEM on separated particles and laser light scattering, are larger than those measured on cut specimens. The factor 4/π valid in monodisperse systems for the ra...