Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Hero van Urk is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Hero van Urk.


Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 1989

Arterial wall characteristics determined by intravascular ultrasound imaging: An in vitro study☆

Elma J. Gussenhoven; Catherina E. Essed; Charles T. Lancée; Frits Mastik; Peter Frietman; Frans C. van Egmond; Johannes Hc Reiber; Hans Bosch; Hero van Urk; Jos R.T.C. Roelandt; N. Bom

The feasibility of assessing arterial wall configuration with an intravascular 40 MHz ultrasound imaging device was investigated in an in vitro study of 11 autopsy specimens of human arteries. The system consists of a single element transducer, rotated with a motor mounted on an 8F catheter tip. Cross sections obtained with ultrasound were matched with the corresponding histologic sections. The arterial specimens were histologically classified as of the muscular or elastic type. Muscular arteries interrogated with ultrasound presented with a hypoechoic media, coinciding with the smooth muscle cells. In contrast, the media of an elastic artery densely packed with elastin fibers was as echogenic as the intima and the adventitia. On the basis of the cross-sectional image, it was possible to determine the nature of the atherosclerotic plaque. The location and thickness of the lesion measured from the histologic sections correlated well with the data derived from the corresponding ultrasound images. This study indicates that characterization of the type of artery and detection of arterial wall disease are possible with use of an intravascular ultrasound imaging technique.


Circulation | 2003

Statins Are Associated With a Reduced Incidence of Perioperative Mortality in Patients Undergoing Major Noncardiac Vascular Surgery

Don Poldermans; Jeroen J. Bax; Miklos D. Kertai; Boudewijn J. Krenning; Cynthia M. Westerhout; Arend F.L. Schinkel; Ian R. Thomson; Peter J. Lansberg; Lee A. Fleisher; Jan Klein; Hero van Urk; Jos R.T.C. Roelandt; Eric Boersma

Background—Patients undergoing major vascular surgery are at increased risk of perioperative mortality due to underlying coronary artery disease. Inhibitors of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (statins) may reduce perioperative mortality through the improvement of lipid profile, but also through the stabilization of coronary plaques on the vascular wall. Methods and Results—To evaluate the association between statin use and perioperative mortality, we performed a case-controlled study among the 2816 patients who underwent major vascular surgery from 1991 to 2000 at the Erasmus Medical Center. Case subjects were all 160 (5.8%) patients who died during the hospital stay after surgery. From the remaining patients, 2 controls were selected for each case and were stratified according to calendar year and type of surgery. For cases and controls, information was obtained regarding statin use before surgery, the presence of cardiac risk factors, and the use of other cardiovascular medication. A vascular complication during the perioperative phase was the primary cause of death in 104 (65%) case subjects. Statin therapy was significantly less common in cases than in controls (8% versus 25%;P <0.001). The adjusted odds ratio for perioperative mortality among statin users as compared with nonusers was 0.22 (95% confidence interval 0.10 to 0.47). Similar results were obtained in subgroups of patients according to the use of cardiovascular therapy and the presence of cardiac risk factors. Conclusion—This case-controlled study provides evidence that statin use reduces perioperative mortality in patients undergoing major vascular surgery.


Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 1995

Improved cardiac risk stratification in major vascular surgery with dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography

Don Poldermans; Mariarosaria Arnese; Paolo M. Fioretti; Alessandro Salustri; Eric Boersma; Ian R. Thomson; Jos R.T.C. Roelandt; Hero van Urk

OBJECTIVES This study sought to optimize preoperative cardiac risk stratification in a large group of consecutive candidates for vascular surgery by combining clinical risk assessment and semiquantitative dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography. BACKGROUND Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography has been used for the prediction of perioperative cardiac risk in a small group of patients scheduled for elective major vascular surgery on the basis of the presence or absence of stress-induced regional left ventricular wall motion abnormalities. METHODS Clinical risk assessment and dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography were performed in 302 consecutive patients presenting for major vascular surgery. The extent and severity of stress wall motion abnormalities and the heart rate at which they occurred, in addition to the presence of wall motion abnormalities at rest, were assessed. RESULTS The absence of clinical risk factors (angina, diabetes, Q waves on the electrocardiogram, symptomatic ventricular tachyarrhythmias, age > 70 years) identified a low risk group of 100 patients with a 1% cardiac event rate (unstable angina). Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiographic findings were positive in 72 patients. Twenty-seven patients had a perioperative cardiac event (cardiac death in 5, nonfatal infarction in 12, unstable angina pectoris in 10); all 27 patients had positive stress test results (positive predictive value 38%, negative predictive value 100%). The semiquantitative assessment of the extent and severity of ischemia did not provide additional prognostic information in patients with positive test results. In contrast, the heart rate at which ischemia occurred defined a high risk group with a low ischemic threshold (38 patients with 20 events [53%]) and an intermediate risk group with a high ischemic threshold (34 patients with 7 events [21%]). All 5 patients with a fatal outcome and 8 of 12 with a nonfatal myocardial infarction were in the high risk group with a low ischemic threshold. CONCLUSIONS Clinical variables identify 33% of patients at very low risk for perioperative complications of vascular surgery in whom further testing is redundant. In all other candidates, dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography is a powerful tool that identifies those patients at intermediate risk and a small group at very high risk. Risk stratification with a combination of clinical assessment and pharmacologic stress echocardiography has the potential to facilitate clinical decision making and conserve resources.


American Journal of Cardiology | 1994

Safety of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography in patients with suspected or proven coronary artery disease

Don Poldermans; Paolo M. Fioretti; Eric Boersma; Tamas Forster; Hero van Urk; Jan H. Cornel; Mariarosaria Arnese; Jos R.T.C.

The purpose of this study was to establish the safety of high-dose dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography in patients with suspected or proven coronary artery disease. Six hundred fifty consecutive examinations were completed. Mean age of patients was 61 years; 300 had a previous myocardial infarction. Heart rate increased from 73 to 129 beats/min during stress testing, blood pressure did not change significantly (from 140/81 to 150/80 mm Hg). Atropine was added to dobutamine in 239 patients when no ischemia was induced with dobutamine alone and the peak heart rate was < 85% of the theoretical maximal heart rate. Atropine was more frequently administered to patients taking beta blockers (77 vs 27%, p < 0.001). New wall motion abnormalities developed in 243 patients (37%). Significant or symptomatic cardiac tachyarrhythmias, or both, developed during 24 examinations: 1 patient developed ventricular fibrillation, 3 patients developed sustained ventricular tachycardia, 12 patients experienced nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (< 10 beats) and 8 patients had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Cardiac arrhythmias were more frequent in patients with a history of ventricular arrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation) (odds ratio 9.9, 2.0 to 45) or left ventricular dysfunction at rest (wall motion score > 1.12) (odds ratio 2.9, 1.1-7.6), but not associated with atropine addition. No death or myocardial infarction occurred. The full dose was not given to 13 patients despite absence of signs or markers of ischemia for limiting side effect, yielding an overall feasibility of the stress test of 98%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


The Lancet | 1999

Spinal-cord stimulation in critical limb ischaemia: a randomised trial

Houke M. Klomp; Geert Hjj Spincemaille; Ewout W. Steyerberg; J. Dik F. Habbema; Hero van Urk

Summary Background For patients with critical limb ischaemia, spinal-cord stimulation has been advocated for the treatment of ischaemic pain and the prevention of amputation. We compared the efficacy of the addition of spinal-cord stimulation to best medical treatment in a randomised controlled trial. Methods 120 patients with critical limb ischaemia not suitable for vascular reconstruction were randomly assigned either spinal-cord stimulation in addition to best medical treatment or best medical treatment alone. Primary outcomes were mortality and amputation. The primary endpoint was limb survival at 2 years. Findings The mean (SD) age of the patients was 72·6 years (10·3). Median (IQR) follow-up was 605 days (244–1171). 40 (67%) of 60 patients in the spinal-cordstimulator group and 41 (68%) of 60 patients in the standard group were alive at the end of the study, (p=0·96). There were 25 major amputations in the spinalcord-stimulator group and 29 in the standard group, (p=0·47). The hazard ratio for survival at 2 years without major amputation in the spinal-cord stimulation group compared with the standard group was 0·96 (95% CI 0·61–1·51). Interpretation Spinal-cord-stimulation in addition to best medical care does not prevent amputation in patients with critical limb ischaemia.


International Journal of Cardiac Imaging | 1991

Validation of quantitative analysis of intravascular ultrasound images

Li Wenguang; W. J. Gussenhoven; Yin Zhong; Carlo Di Mario; Guno Madretsma; Frans C. van Egmond; Pim J. de Feyter; Herman Pieterman; Hero van Urk; H. Rijsterborgh; Klaas Bom

This study investigated the accuracy and reproducibility of a computer-aided method for quantification of intravascular ultrasound. The computer analysis system was developed on an IBM compatible PC/AT equipped with a framegrabber. The quantitative assessment of lumen area, lesion area and percent area obstruction was performed by tracing the boundaries of the free lumen and original lumen.Accuracy of the analysis system was tested in a phantom study. Echographic measurements of lumen and lesion area derived from 16 arterial specimens were compared with data obtained by histology. The differences in lesion area measurements between histology and ultrasound were minimal (mean ± SD: −0.27±1.79 mm2, p>0.05). Lumen area measurements from histology were significantly smaller than those with ultrasound due to mechanical deformation of histologic specimens (−5.38±5.09 mm2, p<0.05). For comparison with angiography, 18 ultrasound cross-sections were obtainedin vivo from 8 healthy peripheral arteries. Luminal areas obtained by angiography were similar to those by ultrasound (−0.52±5.15 mm2, p>0.05). Finally, intra- and interobserver variability of our quantitative method was evaluated in measurements of 100in vivo ultrasound images. The results showed that variations in lumen area measurements were low (5%) whereas variations in lesion area and percent area obstruction were relatively high (13%, 10%, respectively).Results of this study indicate that our quantitative method provides accurate and reproducible measurements of lumen and lesion area. Thus, intravascular ultrasound can be used for clinical investigation, including assessment of vascular stenosis and evaluation of therapeutic intervention.


Circulation | 1997

Sustained Prognostic Value of Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography for Late Cardiac Events After Major Noncardiac Vascular Surgery

Don Poldermans; Mariarosaria Arnese; Paolo M. Fioretti; Eric Boersma; Ian R. Thomson; Riccardo Rambaldi; Hero van Urk

BACKGROUND Late cardiac events after major noncardiac vascular surgery are an important cause of morbidity and mortality. We studied the prognostic value of preoperative dobutamine stress echocardiography, relative to clinical risk assessment, in predicting late cardiac events. METHODS AND RESULTS Three hundred sixteen patients undergoing major vascular surgery were studied. All patients underwent clinical evaluation for the presence of cardiac risk factors (smoking, hypertension, angina, diabetes, history of heart failure, previous infarction, and age > 70 years) and dobutamine stress echocardiography. Left ventricular wall motion was evaluated at rest, and the extent and severity of stress-induced new wall motion abnormalities were quantified. The heart rate threshold at which new wall motion abnormalities occurred was noted. Patients were followed perioperatively and for 19 +/- 11 months postoperatively, and the occurrence of cardiac events was noted. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify predictors of late cardiac events. Thirty-two cardiac events occurred (11 cardiac deaths, 11 nonfatal myocardial infarctions, and 10 incidents of unstable angina). By multivariate regression analysis, the occurrence of extensive (three or more segments) or limited (one or two segments) stress-induced new wall motion abnormalities and previous infarction independently predicted late cardiac events, elevating the risk by 6.5-, 2.9-, and 3.8-fold, respectively. The severity of ischemia during stress and the heart rate threshold for ischemia were not independently predictive. CONCLUSIONS Patients with a history of myocardial infarction or stress-induced ischemia have a high risk of fatal and nonfatal cardiac events after vascular surgery. Patients with both a history of infarction and extensive stress-induced ischemia are at especially high risk and deserve intensive management.


American Journal of Cardiology | 1991

Assessment of medial thinning in atherosclerosis by intravascular ultrasound

Elma J. Gussenhoven; Peter Frietman; Robert J. van Suylen; Frans C. van Egmond; Charles T. Lancée; Hero van Urk; Jos R.T.C. Roelandt; Theo Stijnen; N. Bom

This study investigated the in vitro (40 MHz) and in vivo (30 MHz) feasibility of intravascular ultrasound to document the influence of atherosclerotic lesions on the typical 3-layered appearance of muscular arteries. The in vitro images of 39 arteries were compared with the corresponding histologic sections. Media and lesion thickness were measured at the areas of minimal and maximal lesion thickness. The median media thickness was 0.8 mm in the absence of a lesion, decreasing to 0.3 mm in the area of maximal atherosclerosis. The ultrasonic data correlated closely with histologic measurements (0.6 and 0.3 mm, respectively). The in vivo study was performed in 29 patients undergoing coronary or peripheral vascular procedures. A total of 150 still-frames were selected for quantitative analysis. The median media thickness was 0.6 mm in the absence of a lesion, decreasing to 0.1 mm in the area with maximal atherosclerosis. This study revealed that intravascular ultrasound imaging accurately determines that media thickness of muscular arteries is inversely related to lesion thickness. In vitro data, verified with histology, can be translated to humans in vivo.


Coronary Artery Disease | 2006

A meta-analysis of safety and effectiveness of perioperative beta-blocker use for the prevention of cardiac events in different types of noncardiac surgery

Olaf Schouten; Leslee J. Shaw; Eric Boersma; Jeroen J. Bax; Miklos D. Kertai; Harm H.H. Feringa; Elena Biagini; Niels F.M. Kok; Hero van Urk; Abdou Elhendy; Don Poldermans

ObjectivePerioperative &bgr;-blocker therapy has been proposed to improve outcome. Most of the trials conducted, however, lacked statistical power to evaluate the incidence of hard cardiac events and the relationship to the type of surgery. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials in which &bgr;-blocker therapy was evaluated. MethodsAn electronic search of published reports on Medline was undertaken to identify studies published between January 1980 and November 2004 in English language journals. All studies reported on at least one of three endpoints: perioperative myocardial ischemia, perioperative nonfatal myocardial infarction, and cardiac mortality. Type of surgery, defined as low, intermediate, and high risk according to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, was noted. ResultsIn total, 15 studies were identified, which enrolled 1077 patient. No significant differences were observed in baseline clinical characteristics between patients randomized to &bgr;-blocker therapy and control/placebo. Beta-blocker therapy was associated with a 65% reduction in perioperative myocardial ischemia (11.0% vs. 25.6%; odds ratio 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.23–0.54; P<0.001). Furthermore, a 56% reduction in myocardial infarction (0.5% vs. 3.9%, odds ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.20–0.97; P=0.04) and a 67% reduction (1.1% vs. 6.1%, odds ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.17–0.67; P=0.002) in the composite endpoint of cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction were observed. No statistical evidence was observed for heterogeneity in the treatment effect in subgroups according to type of surgery (P for heterogeneity 0.2). ConclusionThis meta-analysis shows that &bgr;-blocker use in noncardiac surgical procedures is associated with a significant reduction of perioperative cardiac adverse events.


Circulation-cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes | 2009

Medication Underuse During Long-Term Follow-Up in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease

Sanne E. Hoeks; Wilma Scholte op Reimer; Yvette R.B.M. van Gestel; Olaf Schouten; Mattie J. Lenzen; Willem-Jan Flu; Jan-Peter van Kuijk; Corine Latour; Jeroen J. Bax; Hero van Urk; Don Poldermans

Background—Patients with peripheral arterial disease constitute a high-risk population. Guideline-recommended medical therapy use is therefore of utmost importance. The aims of our study were to establish the patterns of guideline-recommended medication use in patients with PAD at the time of vascular surgery and after 3 years of follow up, and to evaluate the effect of these therapies on long-term mortality in this patient group. Methods and Results—Data on 711 consecutive patients with peripheral arterial disease undergoing vascular surgery were collected from 11 hospitals in the Netherlands (enrollment between May and December 2004). After 3.1±0.1 years of follow-up, information on medication use was obtained by a questionnaire (n=465; 84% response rate among survivors). Guideline-recommended medical therapy use for the combination of aspirin and statins in all patients and β-blockers in patients with ischemic heart disease was 41% in the perioperative period. The use of perioperative evidence-based medication was associated with a reduction of 3-year mortality after adjustment for clinical characteristics (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.94). After 3 years of follow-up, aspirin was used in 74%, statins in 69%, and β-blockers in 54% of the patients respectively. Guideline-recommended medical therapy use for the combination of aspirin, statins, and β-blockers was 50%. Conclusions—The use of guideline recommended therapies in the perioperative period was associated with reduction in long-term mortality in patients with peripheral arterial disease. However, the proportion of patients receiving these evidence-based treatments—both at baseline and 3 years after vascular surgery—was lower than expected based on the current guidelines. These data highlight a clear opportunity to improve the quality of care in this high-risk group of patients.

Collaboration


Dive into the Hero van Urk's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Don Poldermans

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric Boersma

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeroen J. Bax

Erasmus University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elma J. Gussenhoven

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Olaf Schouten

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jos R.T.C. Roelandt

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Aad van der Lugt

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Herman Pieterman

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge