Herre Jelger Risselada

How SNARE molecules mediate membrane fusion: Recent insights from molecular simulations.

SNARE molecules are the core constituents of the protein machinery that facilitate fusion of synaptic vesicles with the presynaptic plasma membrane, resulting in the release of neurotransmitter. On a molecular level, SNARE complexes seem to play a quite versatile and involved role during all stages of fusion. In addition to merely triggering fusion by forcing the opposing membranes into close proximity, SNARE complexes are now seen to also overcome subsequent fusion barriers and to actively guide the fusion reaction up to the expansion of the fusion pore. Here, we review recent advances in the understanding of SNARE-mediated membrane fusion by molecular simulations.

Caught in the Act: Visualization of SNARE-Mediated Fusion Events in Molecular Detail

Neurotransmitter release at the synapse requires fusion of synaptic vesicles with the presynaptic plasma membrane. SNAREs are the core constituents of the protein machinery responsible for this membrane fusion, but the actual fusion mechanism remains unclear. Here, we have simulated neuronal SNARE‐mediated membrane fusion in molecular detail. In our simulations, membrane fusion progresses through an inverted micelle fusion intermediate before reaching the hemifused state. We show that at least one single SNARE complex is required for fusion, as has also been confirmed in a recent in vitro single‐molecule fluoresence study. Further, the transmembrane regions of the SNAREs were found to play a vital role in the initiation of fusion by causing distortions of the lipid packing of the outer membrane leaflets, and the C termini of the transmembrane regions are associated with the formation of the fusion pores. The inherent mechanical stress in the linker region of the SNARE complex was found to drive both the subsequent formation and expansion of fusion pores. Our simulations also revealed that the presence of homodimerizations between the transmembrane regions leads to the formation of unstable fusion intermediates that are under high curvature stress. We show that multiple SNARE complexes mediate membrane fusion in a cooperative and synchronized process. Finally, we show that after fusion, the zipping of the SNAREs extends into the membrane region, in agreement with the recently resolved X‐ray structure of the fully assembled state.

Hydrophobic mismatch sorts SNARE proteins into distinct membrane domains

The clustering of proteins and lipids in distinct microdomains is emerging as an important principle for the spatial patterning of biological membranes. Such domain formation can be the result of hydrophobic and ionic interactions with membrane lipids as well as of specific protein–protein interactions. Here using plasma membrane-resident SNARE proteins as model, we show that hydrophobic mismatch between the length of transmembrane domains (TMDs) and the thickness of the lipid membrane suffices to induce clustering of proteins. Even when the TMDs differ in length by only a single residue, hydrophobic mismatch can segregate structurally closely homologous membrane proteins in distinct membrane domains. Domain formation is further fine-tuned by interactions with polyanionic phosphoinositides and homo and heterotypic protein interactions. Our findings demonstrate that hydrophobic mismatch contributes to the structural organization of membranes.

Expansion of the fusion stalk and its implication for biological membrane fusion.

Significance We focus on computing lipidic fusion pathway energetics and interpret them in a biological context. We illustrate that the progression of fast synaptic fusion may not rely on the point-like forces that are being transmitted to the membrane via the transmembrane domains of SNARE molecules. Our work bridges the many present gaps between diverse but related experiments and their interpretation, thus providing a coherent and integrative picture. Over the past 20 years, it has been widely accepted that membrane fusion proceeds via a hemifusion step before opening of the productive fusion pore. An initial hourglass-shaped lipid structure, the fusion stalk, is formed between the adjacent membrane leaflets (cis leaflets). It remains controversial if and how fusion proteins drive the subsequent transition (expansion) of the stalk into a fusion pore. Here, we propose a comprehensive and consistent thermodynamic understanding in terms of the underlying free-energy landscape of stalk expansion. We illustrate how the underlying free energy landscape of stalk expansion and the concomitant pathway is altered by subtle differences in membrane environment, such as leaflet composition, asymmetry, and flexibility. Nonleaky stalk expansion (stalk widening) requires the formation of a critical trans-leaflet contact. The fusion machinery can mechanically enforce trans-leaflet contact formation either by directly enforcing the trans-leaflets in close proximity, or by (electrostatically) condensing the area of the cis leaflets. The rate of these fast fusion reactions may not be primarily limited by the energetics but by the forces that the fusion proteins are able to exert.

Line-tension controlled mechanism for influenza fusion.

Our molecular simulations reveal that wild-type influenza fusion peptides are able to stabilize a highly fusogenic pre-fusion structure, i.e. a peptide bundle formed by four or more trans-membrane arranged fusion peptides. We rationalize that the lipid rim around such bundle has a non-vanishing rim energy (line-tension), which is essential to (i) stabilize the initial contact point between the fusing bilayers, i.e. the stalk, and (ii) drive its subsequent evolution. Such line-tension controlled fusion event does not proceed along the hypothesized standard stalk-hemifusion pathway. In modeled influenza fusion, single point mutations in the influenza fusion peptide either completely inhibit fusion (mutants G1V and W14A) or, intriguingly, specifically arrest fusion at a hemifusion state (mutant G1S). Our simulations demonstrate that, within a line-tension controlled fusion mechanism, these known point mutations either completely inhibit fusion by impairing the peptide’s ability to stabilize the required peptide bundle (G1V and W14A) or stabilize a persistent bundle that leads to a kinetically trapped hemifusion state (G1S). In addition, our results further suggest that the recently discovered leaky fusion mutant G13A, which is known to facilitate a pronounced leakage of the target membrane prior to lipid mixing, reduces the membrane integrity by forming a ‘super’ bundle. Our simulations offer a new interpretation for a number of experimentally observed features of the fusion reaction mediated by the prototypical fusion protein, influenza hemagglutinin, and might bring new insights into mechanisms of other viral fusion reactions.

A tethering complex drives the terminal stage of SNARE-dependent membrane fusion

Membrane fusion in eukaryotic cells mediates the biogenesis of organelles, vesicular traffic between them, and exo- and endocytosis of important signalling molecules, such as hormones and neurotransmitters. Distinct tasks in intracellular membrane fusion have been assigned to conserved protein systems. Tethering proteins mediate the initial recognition and attachment of membranes, whereas SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) protein complexes are considered as the core fusion engine. SNARE complexes provide mechanical energy to distort membranes and drive them through a hemifusion intermediate towards the formation of a fusion pore. This last step is highly energy-demanding. Here we combine the in vivo and in vitro fusion of yeast vacuoles with molecular simulations to show that tethering proteins are critical for overcoming the final energy barrier to fusion pore formation. SNAREs alone drive vacuoles only into the hemifused state. Tethering proteins greatly increase the volume of SNARE complexes and deform the site of hemifusion, which lowers the energy barrier for pore opening and provides the driving force. Thereby, tethering proteins assume a crucial mechanical role in the terminal stage of membrane fusion that is likely to be conserved at multiple steps of vesicular traffic. We therefore propose that SNAREs and tethering proteins should be considered as a single, non-dissociable device that drives fusion. The core fusion machinery may then be larger and more complex than previously thought.

Gold-Induced Fibril Growth: The Mechanism of Surface-Facilitated Amyloid Aggregation

Abstract The question of how amyloid fibril formation is influenced by surfaces is crucial for a detailed understanding of the process in vivo. We applied a combination of kinetic experiments and molecular dynamics simulations to elucidate how (model) surfaces influence fibril formation of the amyloid‐forming sequences of prion protein SUP35 and human islet amyloid polypeptide. The kinetic data suggest that structural reorganization of the initial peptide corona around colloidal gold nanoparticles is the rate‐limiting step. The molecular dynamics simulations reveal that partial physisorption to the surface results in the formation of aligned monolayers, which stimulate the formation of parallel, critical oligomers. The general mechanism implies that the competition between the underlying peptide–peptide and peptide–surface interactions must strike a balance to accelerate fibril formation.

Steric hindrance of SNARE transmembrane domain organization impairs the hemifusion‐to‐fusion transition

SNAREs fuse membranes in several steps. Trans‐SNARE complexes juxtapose membranes, induce hemifused stalk structures, and open the fusion pore. A recent penetration model of fusion proposed that SNAREs force the hydrophilic C‐termini of their transmembrane domains through the hydrophobic core of the membrane(s). In contrast, the indentation model suggests that the C‐termini open the pore by locally compressing and deforming the stalk. Here we test these models in the context of yeast vacuole fusion. Addition of small hydrophilic tags renders bilayer penetration by the C‐termini energetically unlikely. It preserves fusion activity, however, arguing against the penetration model. Addition of large protein tags to the C‐termini permits SNARE activation, trans‐SNARE pairing, and hemifusion but abolishes pore opening. Fusion proceeds if the tags are detached from the membrane by a hydrophilic spacer or if only one side of the trans‐SNARE complex carries a protein tag. Thus, both sides of a trans‐SNARE complex can drive pore opening. Our results are consistent with an indentation model in which multiple SNARE C‐termini cooperate in opening the fusion pore by locally deforming the inner leaflets.

Free energy landscape of rim-pore expansion in membrane fusion.

The productive fusion pore in membrane fusion is generally thought to be toroidally shaped. Theoretical studies and recent experiments suggest that its formation, in some scenarios, may be preceded by an initial pore formed near the rim of the extended hemifusion diaphragm (HD), a rim-pore. This rim-pore is characterized by a nontoroidal shape that changes with size. To determine this shape as well as the free energy along the pathway of rim-pore expansion, we derived a simple analytical free energy model. We argue that dilation of HD material via expansion of a rim-pore is favored over a regular, circular pore. Further, the expanding rim-pore faces a free energy barrier that linearly increases with HD size. In contrast, the tension required to expand the rim-pore decreases with HD size. Pore flickering, followed by sudden opening, occurs when the tension in the HD competes with the line energy of the rim-pore, and the rim-pore reaches its equilibrium size before reaching the critical pore size. The experimental observation of flickering and closing fusion pores (kiss-and-run) is very well explained by the observed behavior of rim-pores. Finally, the free energy landscape of rim-pore expansion/HD dilation may very well explain why some cellular fusion reactions, in their attempt to minimize energetic costs, progress via alternative formation and dilation of microscopic hemifusion intermediates.

Interbilayer repulsion forces between tension-free lipid bilayers from simulation

Here we report studies on biologically important intermembrane repulsion forces using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and experimental (osmotic stress) investigations of repulsion forces between 1-palmitoyl-2-oleyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine bilayers. We show that the repulsion between tension-free membranes can be determined from MD simulations by either (i) simulating membrane stacks under different hydration conditions (unrestrained setup) and monitoring the change in the area per lipid upon dehydration or (ii) simulating two single punctured membranes immersed in a water reservoir and controlling the center-of-mass distance between the bilayers using an external potential (umbrella sampling setup). Despite the coarse-grained nature of the (MARTINI) model employed, the disjoining pressure profiles obtained from the simulations are in good agreement with our experiments. Remarkably, the two setups behave very differently in terms of membrane structure, as explained by considerations using elasticity theory, and the balance of interactions. In the unrestrained setup, dehydration decreases the area per lipid and lipid entropy. Dehydration in the umbrella sampling setup, in contrast, leads to an increase in area per lipid and lipid entropy. Hence, in the latter case, entropic effects from protrusion and zippering forces appear to be overcompensated by the entropy gain due to the disorder emerging from the expansion of the bilayers. The balance of interactions involves near cancellation of large opposing terms, for which also intramembrane and water–water interactions are important, and which appears to be largely a consequence, rather than the cause, of the intermembrane repulsion. Hence, care must be taken when drawing conclusions on the origin of intermembrane repulsion from thermodynamic analyses.