Heschi H. Rotmensch

Amiodarone therapy: Role of early and late electrophysiologic studies

Forty-two patients with a history of symptomatic ventricular tachycardia or cardiac arrest underwent electrophysiologic testing at control and early in the course of amiodarone therapy (mean 12 +/- 7 days). Late electrophysiologic studies (mean 17 +/- 4 weeks) were repeated in 23 patients on a maintenance dose of 400 mg/day. At control study, all patients had inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias (sustained ventricular tachycardia in 35, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 4, ventricular fibrillation in 3), while after amiodarone loading (1,200 mg daily) 4 (10.5%) of the 42 patients developed noninducible ventricular arrhythmias. At late study, an additional 6 (26%) of the 23 patients with inducible arrhythmias at early study developed noninducible arrhythmias. The cycle length of induced ventricular tachycardia increased from 275 +/- 61 ms at control study to 340 +/- 58 ms at early study (p = 0.001). A further increase in ventricular tachycardia cycle length was noted in patients who underwent both early and late study (341 +/- 38 versus 375 +/- 63 ms, p less than 0.05). The percent of induced tachycardias that were clinically tolerated increased as patients were treated longer with amiodarone (control = 22%, early = 34%, late = 53%, p less than 0.001). Of the 23 patients who had both early and late electrophysiologic studies and were followed up for a mean of 21.7 months (range 4 to 47), there were no recurrences among the 6 patients with noninducible arrhythmias, but there were five recurrences among the 17 patients with persistently inducible arrhythmias. None of the four patients with noninducible arrhythmias at early study had a recurrence. On the basis of these findings, it is concluded that: 1) The timing of programmed electrical stimulation will affect the results of the study in patients treated with oral amiodarone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparative Antihypertensive Effects of Enalapril Maleate and Hydrochlorothiazide, Alone and in Combination

Abstract: Enalapril maleate is an investigational oral prodrug whose hydrolyzed diacid metabolite is a potent angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor. Fourteen patients with mild to moderate hypertension were evaluated after receiving placebo, and two weeks of treatment with each of the following: enalapril maleate (20 mg b.i.d.), hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg b.i.d.), and the two in combination. In comparison to placebo, the magnitudes of the blood pressure reduction after enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide alone were comparable. The reduction in blood pressure following enalapril was evident throughout the 12‐hour dosing interval. The combination of enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide resulted in a marked further reduction in blood pressure that was greater than that predicted from the responses to the individual drugs (P < 0.05). Biochemical parameters confirmed inhibition of angiotensin‐converting enzyme during enalapril treatment; serum angiotensin‐converting enzyme activity proved an excellent monitor of compliance. Enalapril was generally well tolerated. Adverse effects included symptomatic hypotension in three patients when enalapril was first added to hydrochlorothiazide and hyperesthesia of the oral mucosa without a loss of taste in one patient on enalapril. Enalapril maleate alone and especially in combination with hydrochlorothiazide appears to be an effective, well‐tolerated converting enzyme inhibitor with at least a 12‐hour duration of action.

Amiodarone: individualizing dosage with serum concentrations.

The purpose of the present report is to review the available pharmacokinetic informaation on amiodarone with an emphasis on our own experience in monitoring serum amiodarone concentrations. We have found that 400 mg should be the maximal maintenance dose; if that treatment fails, careful addition of other antiarrhythmic agents is preferable over an increase in amiodarone dosage. Serum concentrations below 2.5 mg/L will significantly improve amiodarones benefit‐to‐risk ratio.

Double-blind comparison of captopril and enalapril in mild to moderate hypertension

To compare the antihypertensive and humoral effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors captopril and enalapril, 20 patients with essential hypertension, not receiving treatment for 2 weeks and consuming a prescribed sodium ion intake, were randomly assigned to two parallel, double-blind treatment groups with stratification based on race and untreated seated diastolic blood pressure. These groups received a placebo (day -1) followed by either captopril, 200 mg every 12 hours (n = 9), or enalapril maleate, 20 mg every 12 hours (n = 11), alone (days 1 to 14) and then with hydrochlorothiazide, 25 mg every 12 hours (days 16 to 28). Captopril and enalapril were coadministered alone (day 15) and with hydrochlorothiazide (day 29) to assess whether further decreases in blood pressure would occur. Captopril and enalapril alone caused comparable decreases (p less than 0.05) in the mean 12 hour time-averaged seated diastolic blood pressure from values on day -1 (placebo), on day 1 (11 and 9 mm Hg, respectively) and day 14 (8 and 7 mm Hg, respectively). The addition of hydrochlorothiazide further decreased (p less than 0.05) blood pressure in each group (7 and 8 mm Hg, respectively) from values on day 14. Combined use of captopril and enalapril did not result in further reduction. Coupled with the comparable changes observed in each treatment group in serum angiotensin-converting enzyme activity, plasma renin activity and plasma aldosterone concentration, these data support the view that captopril and enalapril have similar antihypertensive effects and mechanisms.

Effect of captopril and hydrochlorothiazide on the response to pressor agents in hypertensives

SummaryThe effect on arterial pressure of incremental doses of norepinephrine (2 to 10 µg/min) and angiotensin II (50 to 800 ng/min) administered over 10 min periods was studied in sodium-replete hypertensive patients after crossover oral treatments with placebo, captopril 50 mg in a single dose, captopril 50 mg three times daily for one week and hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg daily for a week. Neither captopril nor hydrochlorothiazide affected the dose response to infusions of angiotensin II. In comparison to placebo responses, however, both single and multiple-dose captopril therapy, and hydrochlorothiazide attenuated the pressor responses to infusions of norepinephrine. Captopril significantly depressed angiotensin converting enzyme activity from predose levels and angiotensin II infusions significantly elevated plasma aldosterone concentrations. These results confirm findings reported for single dose captopril in normotensive volunteers and indicate that attenuation of the vascular responsiveness to sympathetic stimulation may contribute to the antihypertensive effects of captopril and hydrochlorothiazide therapy.

Bucindolol, a beta-adrenoceptor blocker with vasodilatory action: Its effect in systemic hypertension

Bucindolol is a newly developed, nonselective beta-adrenergic blocking agent with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity and direct vasodilator properties. In 14 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, the effects of bucindolol, hydrochlorothiazide and their combination on blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and parameters of the renin-aldosterone system were compared with those after placebo. Bucindolols antihypertensive effect was evident within the first hour after drug administration, maximal at 2 to 3 hours, and lasted for as long as 12 hours. Compared with placebo values (108 +/- 5 mm Hg), both bucindolol (97 +/- 9 mm Hg) and hydrochlorothiazide (99 +/- 10 mm Hg) alone significantly and comparably reduced the 12-hour averaged standing diastolic BP, with the combination resulting in approximately additive effects (91 +/- 9 mm Hg). Although bucindolol alone did not affect HR, it attenuated the hydrochlorothiazide-induced increase in HR. There was a tendency for bucindolol to decrease plasma renin activity. Except for transient postural hypotension in 2 patients, bucindolol was well tolerated.

Sulindac and Ibuprofen Inhibit Furosemide-Stimulated Renin Release but not Natriuresis in Men on a Normal Sodium Diet

We compared the effect of two commonly prescribed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ibuprofen and sulindac, and placebo on intravenous furosemide-induced natriuresis and renin stimulation in 11 healthy male volunteers, consuming a 100 mEq sodium, 80 mEq potassium diet. Chronic (6-day) therapy with each agent was followed by a 1-week washout period. There were no significant treatment-related differences in either urine volume or sodium excretion for any of the designated collection periods or for the cumulative value for the 4 h after furosemide administration. Similarly, differences among groups were not observed for creatinine clearance, urinary potassium and urinary chloride excretion. Mean basal plasma renin activity levels prior to furosemide administration on day 6 were significantly lower in the presence of ibuprofen (1.5 +/- 2.0 ng/ml/h;p less than 0.01) and sulindac (2,3 +/- 0.9 ng/ml/h; p less than 0.05), compared with placebo (3.3 +/- 1.1 ng/ml/h); the difference between the two NSAIDs was also significant (p less than 0.05). Mean plasma renin activity levels in the 4 h after furosemide increased significantly at all time points in comparison to basal values, but were significantly less for ibuprofen and sulindac groups in the first hour. Our data suggest that the natriuresis following intravenous furosemide in men consuming a normal sodium intake is not prostaglandin-dependent. Furthermore, the observation that sulindac suppressed basal and stimulated plasma renin activity levels, albeit to a lesser extent than ibuprofen, questions the claim that sulindac spares the kidney and compels further evaluation of this issue.

Crossover comparison of captopril and propranolol as step 2 agents in hypertension

The efficacy of captopril treatment was compared with that of propranolol in a single-blind crossover study in 14 patients with essential hypertension uncontrolled on diuretic alone. Both captopril (37.5 to 75 mg daily) and propranolol (60 to 120 mg daily), in combination with hydrochlorothiazide (50 mg daily), caused a significant fall in sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Heart rate, plasma renin activity, and plasma aldosterone data were consistent with the effects of converting enzyme inhibition or beta blockade. Both drugs were well tolerated. Captopril appeared to be equivalent in efficacy and safety to propranolol when added to hydrochlorothiazide. It may be considered as an alternative step 2 antihypertensive agent, especially in patients experiencing unwanted effects on beta blockers.

Effect of repeated doses of L-5-hydroxytryptophan and carbidopa on prolactin and aldosterone secretion in man.

To evaluate changes in serum prolactin and plasma and urine aldosterone after a serotonergic challenge, 8 healthy men (19 to 42 yr), taking dexamethasone (0.75 mg qid), received the serotonin precursor L-5-hydroxytryptophan (L5HTP; 100 mg qid) with the peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor carbidopa (C; 50 mq qid) or matching placebos in a randomized, crossover manner. Serum prolactin concentration increased in all subjects after L5HTP/C in comparison to placebo, mean (SD) prolactin (ng/ml) at 8 h after dosing was 19.8 ± 6.3 after L5HTP/C and 12.0 ± 3.1 after placebo (p < 0.05). In contrast, in comparison to values on placebo, L5HTP/C had no apparent effect on mean plasma concentration at all observation times; mean (SD) aldosterone (ng/dl) at 8 h after dosing was 12.0 ± 5.1 and 12.0 ± 3.8 after placebo (NS). Mean (SD) urinary aldosterone (μg/24 h), Na+(mEq/24 h) and K+(mEq/24 h) excretion were 7.0 ± 4.4,49.3 ± 30.6, 30.1 ±11.2, after L5HTP/C and 7.4 ± 5.8, 59.7 ± 23.9, 33.3 ± 7.4 after placebo (NS). Under these study conditions, subacute serotonergic stimulation with oral L5HTP/C resulted in prolactin but not aldosterone release.

A Dose‐Titration Trial of Guanadrel as Step‐Two Therapy in Essential Hypertension

The efficacy and safety of low‐dose guanadrel sulfate were evaluated in 20 patients with essential hypertension based on seated diastolic blood pressures (SDBP) ranging from 95 to 115 mm Hg despite a trial dosage of hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg/d for up to five weeks. These patients had been resistant to, or intolerant of, one or more step‐two antihypertensive drugs in the past (i.e., methyldopa, beta‐adrenergic blocking agents, clonidine, or prazosin). The majority of patients demonstrated a satisfactory response (SDBP 95 mm Hg or reduction in SDBP of 10 mm Hg) to guanadrel. Nine patients responded at a low dosage, 10 to 20 mg/d and remained free from adverse effects throughout the study (up to 12 weeks of treatment). Of the remaining 11 patients titrated to higher dosages of guanadrel (30 to 60 mg/d), three had no discernible response while six developed adverse effects. The results of the study suggest that guanadrel has an acceptable benefit‐to‐risk ratio only when used in low dosages (10 to 30 mg/d) and may be successfully employed as step‐two antihypertensive therapy in patients resistant to, or intolerant of, other step‐two agents.