Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Hetal Buckhurst is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Hetal Buckhurst.


Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics | 2013

Ocular biometric correlates of ciliary muscle thickness in human myopia

Hetal Buckhurst; Bernard Gilmartin; Robert P. Cubbidge; Manbir Nagra; Nicola S. Logan

Anterior segment optical coherent tomography (AS‐OCT) is used to further examine previous reports that ciliary muscle thickness (CMT) is increased in myopic eyes. With reference to temporal and nasal CMT, interrelationships between biometric and morphological characteristics of anterior and posterior segments are analysed for British‐White and British‐South‐Asian adults with and without myopia.


Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery | 2015

Tablet App halometer for the assessment of dysphotopsia.

Phillip J. Buckhurst; Shehzad A. Naroo; Leon N. Davies; Sunil Shah; Hetal Buckhurst; Alec Kingsnorth; Tom Drew; James S. Wolffsohn

Purpose To assess the validity and repeatability of the Aston Halometer. Setting University clinic, United Kingdom. Design Prospective, repeated‐measures experimental study. Methods The halometer comprises a bright light‐emitting‐diode (LED) glare source in the center of an iPad4. Letters subtending 0.21° (˜0.3 logMAR) were moved centrifugally from the LED in 0.05 degree steps in 8 orientations separated by 45 degrees for each of 4 contrast levels (1000, 500, 100, and 25 Weber contrast units [Cw]) in random order. Bangerter occlusion foils were inserted in front of the right eye to simulate monocular glare conditions in 20 subjects (mean age 27.7 ± 3.1 years). Subjects were positioned 2 meters from the screen in a dark room with the iPad controlled from an iPhone via Bluetooth operated by the researcher. The C‐Quant straylight meter was also used with each of the foils to measure the level of straylight over the retina. Halometry and straylight repeatability was assessed at a second visit. Results Halo size increased with the different occlusion foils and target contrasts (F = 29.564, P < .001) as expected and in a pattern similar to straylight measures (F = 80.655, P < 0.001). Lower contrast letters showed better sensitivity but larger glare‐obscured areas, resulting in ceiling effects caused by the screen’s field‐of‐view, with 500 Cw being the best compromise. Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of the Aston Halometer was good (500Cw: 0.84 to 0.93 and 0.53 to 0.73) and similar to the straylight meter. Conclusion The halometer provides a sensitive, repeatable way of quantifying a patient‐recognized form of disability glare in multiple orientations to add objectivity to subjectively reported discomfort glare.


Clinical and Experimental Optometry | 2016

Comparison of reliability and repeatability of corneal curvature assessment with six keratometers

Catriona Hamer; Hetal Buckhurst; Christine Purslow; Gary L. Shum; Nabil Habib; Phillip J. Buckhurst

Keratometric methodology varies between instruments and the differences may have a clinical impact. We investigated the agreement and reproducibility of six keratometers.


PLOS ONE | 2015

Measurement of Scleral Thickness in Humans Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherent Tomography.

Hetal Buckhurst; Bernard Gilmartin; Robert P. Cubbidge; Nicola S. Logan

Anterior segment optical coherent tomography (AS-OCT, Visante; Zeiss) is used to examine meridional variation in anterior scleral thickness (AST) and its association with refractive error, ethnicity and gender. Scleral cross-sections of 74 individuals (28 males; 46 females; aged between 18-40 years (27.7±5.3)) were sampled twice in random order in 8 meridians: [superior (S), inferior (I), nasal (N), temporal (T), superior-temporal (ST), superior-nasal (SN), inferior-temporal (IT) and inferior-nasal (IN)]. AST was measured in 1mm anterior-to-posterior increments (designated the A-P distance) from the scleral spur (SS) over a 6mm distance. Axial length and refractive error were measured with a Zeiss IOLMaster biometer and an open-view binocular Shin-Nippon autorefractor. Intra- and inter-observer variability of AST was assessed for each of the 8 meridians. Mixed repeated measures ANOVAs tested meridional and A-P distance differences in AST with refractive error, gender and ethnicity. Only right eye data were analysed. AST (mean±SD) across all meridians and A-P distances was 725±46μm. Meridian SN was the thinnest (662±57μm) and I the thickest (806±60μm). Significant differences were found between all meridians (p<0.001), except S:ST, IT:IN, IT:N and IN:N. Significant differences between A-P distances were found except between SS and 6 mm and between 2 and 4 mm. AST measurements at 1mm (682±48 μm) were the thinnest and at 6mm (818±49 μm) the thickest (p<0.001); a significant interaction occurred between meridians and A-P distances (p<0.001). AST was significantly greater (p<0.001) in male subjects but no significant differences were found between refractive error or ethnicity. Significant variations in AST occur with regard to meridian and distance from the SS and may have utility in selecting optimum sites for pharmaceutical or surgical intervention.


Vision | 2018

Validation of Novel Metrics from the Accommodative Dynamic Profile

Nicola Szostek; Hetal Buckhurst; Christine Purslow; Tom Drew; A. Collinson; Phillip J. Buckhurst

Objective and subjective methods of assessing time taken for accommodative change (ToAC) include accommodative dynamics (AD) and accommodative facility (AF). This study investigates the validity of novel metrics derived from the AD-profile and explores their relationship with AF. AD were assessed using a modified open-field autorefractor in 43 healthy adults. Non-linear regression curves were fitted to the data to derive: latency-of-accommodation (nLoA) and -disaccomodation (nLoD), Time-for-accommodation (ToA) and -disaccommodation (ToD), and objective-ToAC (oToAC). Latencies were also calculated through visual inspection of the AD data as in previous studies (pLoA and pLoD). AF was used to assess subjective-ToAC. Statistical analysis explored the relationships between the AD-metrics and AF. Subjects were assessed on three visits to examine intra- and inter-observer repeatability. nLoA and nLoD were greater than pLoA (p = 0.001) and pLoD (p = 0.004) respectively. nLoA and nLoD also demonstrated greater intra- and inter-observer repeatability than pLoA and pLoD. AF demonstrated a moderate, inverse correlation with ToA (p = 0.02), ToD (p = 0.007), and oToAC (p = 0.007). ToD was the single best accommodative predictor of AF (p = 0.011). The novel method for deriving latency was more repeatable, but not interchangeable with the techniques used in previous studies. ToD was the most repeatable metric with the greatest association with AF.


Archive | 2016

An introduction to nutrition for an optometrist

Nicola Szostek; Hetal Buckhurst; Phillip J. Buckhurst; Christine Purslow; A. Collinson


Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2016

The Effect of Loss of Contrast and Distortion on Vision and Mobility Tasks

Catriona Hamer; Gary Shum; Lisa Bunn; Jonathan Marsden; Hetal Buckhurst; Christine Purslow; Nabil Habib; Phillip J. Buckhurst


Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2016

Validity of prediction models used to determine post-operative corneal shape following cataract surgery.

Phillip J. Buckhurst; Catriona Hamer; Hetal Buckhurst; Christine Purslow; Nabil Habib


Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2015

Do toric IOL calculators accurately predict the shift in orientation of the steepest corneal meridian following cataract surgery

Catriona Hamer; Nabil Habib; Hetal Buckhurst; Christine Purslow; Phillip J. Buckhurst


Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2015

Relationship between the subjective measurement of accommodative facility and the objective assessment of the dynamic accommodative response

Nicola Szostek; Hetal Buckhurst; Christine Purslow; A. Collinson; Phillip J. Buckhurst

Collaboration


Dive into the Hetal Buckhurst's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Catriona Hamer

Plymouth State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Collinson

Plymouth State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nicola Szostek

Plymouth State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge