Hideaki Kawabata
Memorial Hospital of South Bend
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Hideaki Kawabata.
Digestive Endoscopy | 2010
Kiyohito Tanaka; Kenjiro Yasuda; Koji Uno; Hideaki Kawabata; Takuji Kawamura; Soichiro Morikawa
A case of basket catheter impaction was experienced during treatment for a common bile duct (CBD) stone. In cases of large CBD stones, mechanical basket lithotripsy or extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is usually carried out. However, once basket catheter impaction occurs, ESWL should be performed in the remaining basket catheter, which is passed through the patients nose, and further ESWL basket lithotripsy must be carried out at a later time. On one occasion, a mechanical lithotripter was inserted along‐side the conventional basket catheter through the incised papilla. This procedure is a safe and useful method for the clearance of CBD stones that cannot be removed with standard endoscopic procedures due to an impacted basket catheter.
Endoscopy International Open | 2018
Hideaki Kawabata; Yuji Okazaki; Naonori Inoue; Yukino Kawakatsu; Misuzu Hitomi; Masatoshi Miyata; Shigehiro Motoi
Background and study aims u2002Recently, endoscopic closure of gastrointestinal fistulas using polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheets with fibrin glue (FG) has been attempted. A 70-year-old woman who had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer suffered from a refractory anastomo-cutaneous fistula at the site of gastro-jejunostomy. We attempted endoscopic closure with filling and shielding using PGA sheets and FG. After introducing a guidewire into the fistula, a small piece of PGA sheet was skewered onto the guidewire and then pushed using a tapered catheter over the guidewire and delivered into the fistula. A total of 10 sheets were delivered via the same procedure. Next, the mucosa around the fistula was ablated, and the orifice of the fistula along with the surrounding mucosa was shielded with a piece of PGA sheet fixed with hemoclips and FG. After this procedure, the leakage disappeared and the fistula was undetectable on contrast radiograms. Endoscopic closure of anastomo-cutaneous fistula with filling and shielding using PGA sheets and FG is an effective, safe, low-invasive treatment, and the filling technique using a guidewire ensures a safe, smooth procedure.
Gastroenterology Research | 2017
Hideaki Kawabata; Misuzu Hitomi; Naonori Inoue; Yukino Kawakatsu; Yuji Okazaki; Masatoshi Miyata
Magnetic compression anastomosis (MCA) has been developed as a non-surgical alternative treatment for biliary obstruction without serious complications. A 70-year-old woman who had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy with modified Child reconstruction for pancreatic head cancer suffered from obstructed choledochojejunostomy with no recurrent findings 4 months after the operation. Cholangiography using the percutaneous transhepatic cholangiographic drainage (PTCD) and fluoroscopy revealed complete obstruction of the upper common bile duct, and the length of the obstruction was 7 mm. Intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) showed fibrous heterogenous hyperechoic appearance without fluid collection, vessels or foreign bodies at the site of the obstruction. We performed choledochojejunostomy using the MCA technique. One magnet was inserted into the obstruction of the hepatic side through the PTCD fistula. Another was delivered endoscopically to the obstruction of the jejunal side. The two magnets were immediately attracted towards each other transmurally, and reanastomosis was confirmed 7 days after starting the compression. The magnets were easily retrieved endoscopically. A 16-Fr indwelling drainage tube was placed in the jejunum through the PTCD. The internal tube is still in place 6 months after reanastomosis, and no MCA-related complications have been observed. In conclusion, MCA is a safe, effective, low-invasive treatment for biliary obstruction, and IDUS is useful for the pretreatment assessment of feasibility and safety.
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 2012
Masayuki Kitano; Yukitaka Yamashita; Kiyohito Tanaka; Hideyuki Konishi; Shujiro Yazumi; Yoshitaka Nakai; Osamu Nishiyama; Hiroyuki Uehara; Akira Mitoro; Tsuyoshi Sanuki; Makoto Takaoka; Tatsuya Koshitani; Yoshifumi Arisaka; Masatsugu Shiba; Noriyuki Hoki; Hideki Sato; Yuichi Sasaki; Masako Sato; Kazunori Hasegawa; Hideaki Kawabata; Yoshihiro Okabe; Hidekazu Mukai
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 2003
Hideaki Kawabata; Masatoshi Miyata; Yoshiaki Kawaguchi; Moose Ueda; Koji Uno; Kiyohito Tanaka; Eisai Cho; Kenjiro Yasuda; Masatsugu Nakajima
Digestive Endoscopy | 2002
Eisai Cho; Hideaki Kawabata; Yasuhiro Kohri; Takuji Kawamura; Masatsugu Nakajima
Gastroenterology | 2001
Hideaki Kawabata; Takanobu Hayakumo; Masatugu Nakajima; Masahiro Tada; Shigeto Mizuno; Kunihilfo Kimoto; Masao Kobayashi; Yasuki Habu; Keisuke Kiyota; Hideto Inokuchi; Keiichi Kawai
Journal of Medical Cases | 2018
Hideaki Kawabata; Misuzu Hitomi; Yoshiki Yamamoto; Takashi Fujii; Naonori Inoue; Yukino Kawakatsu; Yuji Okazaki; Masatoshi Miyata; Shigehiro Motoi; Yoshihiro Shimizu
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 2015
Azumi Suzuki; Hideaki Kawabata; Masatoshi Miyata; Koji Uno; Kenjiro Yasuda
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 2009
Hideaki Kawabata; Kenjiro Yasuda; Moose Ueda; Masatsugu Nakajima