Hideki Mizu-uchi

The evaluation of post-operative alignment in total knee replacement using a CT-based navigation system

We compared the alignment of 39 total knee replacements implanted using the conventional alignment guide system with 37 implanted using a CT-based navigation system, performed by a single surgeon. The knees were evaluated using full-length weight-bearing anteroposterior radiographs, lateral radiographs and CT scans. The mean hip-knee-ankle angle, coronal femoral component angle and coronal tibial component angle were 181.8 degrees (174.2 degrees to 188.3 degrees), 88.5 degrees (84.0 degrees to 91.8 degrees) and 89.7 degrees (86.3 degrees to 95.1 degrees), respectively for the conventional group and 180.8 degrees (178.2 degrees to 185.1 degrees), 89.3 degrees (85.8 degrees to 92.0 degrees) and 89.9 degrees (88.0 degrees to 93.0 degrees), respectively for the navigated group. The mean sagittal femoral component angle was 85.5 degrees (80.6 degrees to 92.8 degrees) for the conventional group and 89.6 degrees (85.5 degrees to 94.0 degrees) for the navigated group. The mean rotational femoral and tibial component angles were -0.7 degrees (-8.8 degrees to 9.8 degrees) and -3.3 degrees (-16.8 degrees to 5.8 degrees) for the conventional group and -0.6 degrees (-3.5 degrees to 3.0 degrees) and 0.3 degrees (-5.3 degrees to 7.7 degrees) for the navigated group. The ideal angles of all alignments in the navigated group were obtained at significantly higher rates than in the conventional group. Our results demonstrated significant improvements in component positioning with a CT-based navigation system, especially with respect to rotational alignment.

Effect of Total Knee Arthroplasty Implant Position on Flexion Angle Before Implant-Bone Impingement

We generated patient-specific computer models of total knee arthroplasty from 10 patients to compute maximum flexion angle before implant-bone impingement. Motion was simulated for 5 different femoral implant positions and 11 different tibial insert positions at 4 different tibial posterior slopes. In the neutral position, the mean maximum flexion angle was 136.3°. The range because of anatomical variation among patients was 13.0°. A combination of 2-mm posterior translation of the femoral component with a 10-mm anterior translation of the insert and a 7° posterior slope increased flexion by a mean of 14° relative to the neutral position. The rate of change in flexion angle was 0.4°/mm to 1.5°/mm with respect to implant position and 1.5°/mm increase in the posterior condylar offset.

The effect of ankle rotation on cutting of the tibia in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND Extramedullary alignment guides are commonly used to prepare the tibia during total knee arthroplasty. One disadvantage is that the guide is easily affected by the position of the ankle joint. The tibia may have a rotational mismatch between its proximal and distal ends. We hypothesized that a rotational mismatch might cause incorrect positioning of an extramedullary alignment guide and evaluated such a mismatch on the predicted postoperative coronal alignment of the tibia. METHODS Fifty-three osteoarthritic knees with varus deformity in fifty-one patients were evaluated with use of computerized tomography scans before total knee arthroplasty. We defined one anteroposterior axis of the ankle joint and five different anteroposterior axes of the proximal aspect of the tibia using three-dimensional bone models from the computerized tomography data. We measured the rotational angle between the anteroposterior axis of the ankle joint and the proximal part of the tibia. The distal end of the extramedullary guide was placed in front of the center of the ankle joint (on the line of the extended anteroposterior axis of the ankle joint), and the proximal end was placed on the line of the extended anteroposterior axis of the proximal part of the tibia. We established spatial coordinates to evaluate the effect of the rotational angle on the predicted postoperative coronal alignment of the tibia and calculated the presumed tibial coronal alignment. RESULTS The rotational angle was positive (3.6 degrees to 19.7 degrees) for all of the anteroposterior axes of the proximal aspect of the tibia, indicating that the ankle joint was externally rotated relative to the proximal part of the tibia. The predicted tibial coronal alignment was varus (0.5 degrees to 5.1 degrees) for all of the anteroposterior axes of the proximal part of the tibia. CONCLUSIONS When an extramedullary alignment guide is used to prepare the tibia in total knee arthroplasty, varus alignment of the tibial component can occur because of a rotational mismatch between the proximal part of the tibia and the ankle joint.

Three-dimensional Analysis of Computed Tomography–Based Navigation System for Total Knee Arthroplasty : The Accuracy of Computed Tomography–Based Navigation System

We evaluated the postoperative alignment of 37 primary total knee arthroplasties performed using a computed tomography-based navigation system (Vector Vision Knee 1.5; Brain Lab, Germany) with a new 3-dimensional analysis. The mean coronal femoral angle was 89.0 degrees +/- 1.4 degrees (85.5 degrees -92.8 degrees ), and the coronal tibial component was 89.2 degrees +/- 1.0 degrees (87.4 degrees -91.6 degrees ). The hip-knee-ankle angle was observed to be 178.2 degrees +/- 1.5 degrees (173.9 degrees -181.8 degrees ). The external rotational alignment of the femoral component relative to the surgical epicondylar axis was -0.5 degrees +/- 1.7 degrees (-3.2 degrees to 3.4 degrees ). The results demonstrated that a computed tomography-based navigation system provided a reasonably satisfactory component alignment. The discrepancy between the 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional evaluations was 1.0 degrees +/- 0.9 degrees (0.1 degrees -3.4 degrees ). Three-dimensional analysis is necessary to evaluate the accuracy of the navigation system.

Correlations between patient satisfaction and ability to perform daily activities after total knee arthroplasty: why aren't patients satisfied?

BackgroundPatient satisfaction has become an important parameter for assessing overall outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The level of difficulty in performing activities of daily life that affects overall patient satisfaction is unknown. We therefore evaluated the influence of difficulty in performing activities of daily life on patient satisfaction and expectations.MethodsThe 2011 Knee Society Knee Scoring System Questionnaire was mailed to patients who had undergone TKA with 375 patients completing and returning it. We evaluated the relationship between the ability to perform daily activities, as assessed via the questionnaire, and patient satisfaction and expectations of the same score in each patient using linear regression analysis. We also determined which activities affected patient satisfaction and expectations using multivariate linear regression analyses.ResultsAll patient-derived functional activities correlated significantly with the patient satisfaction score. In particular, “climbing up or down a flight of stairs” followed by “getting into or out of a car,” “moving laterally (stepping to the side)” and “walking and standing” correlated strongly with patient satisfaction by linear regression analysis and were revealed to have significant contributions to patient satisfaction by multivariate linear regression analysis. Regarding expectations, all patient-derived functional activities correlated significantly with the patient expectation score, although none of the correlation coefficients was very high. “Squatting,” followed by “walking and standing,” contributed to the patient expectation score by multivariate linear regression analysis.ConclusionActivities related to walking and standing are some of the most basic movements and basic demands for patients. In addition, “climbing up or down a flight of stairs,” “getting into and out of a car” and “squatting” are very important and distressing activities that significantly correlate with patient satisfaction after TKA.

Total knee arthroplasty following failed high tibial osteotomy: mid-term comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized prosthesis

This study evaluated the mid-term results of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) following high tibial osteotomy (HTO), comparing posterior cruciate-retaining prostheses to posterior stabilized prostheses. The Knee Society score for the entire group (20 knees) improved significantly from 62 (median) preoperatively to 87 at the latest follow-up. The postoperative Knee Society score of 85 in posterior cruciate-retaining prostheses (8 knees) was significantly inferior to the 94 score in posterior stabilized prostheses (12 knees). Of Knee Society score, Stability and ROM scores (17 and 21, respectively) in posterior cruciate-retaining TKA were inferior to those in posterior stabilized TKA (25 and 24, respectively). Since postoperative knee instability due to posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) insufficiency is thought to contribute to the inferior results of posterior cruciate-retaining prostheses after HTO, PCL-substituting TKA would be suitable for use after HTO.

Two-dimensional planning can result in internal rotation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty

PurposeThe first purpose of this study was to compare the reproducibility of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) measurements for preoperative planning of the femoral side in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The second purpose was to evaluate the factors affecting the differences between the 2D and 3D measurements.MethodsTwo-dimensional and 3D measurements for preoperative planning of the femoral side in TKA were evaluated in 75 varus knees with osteoarthritis. The femoral valgus angle, defined as the angle between the mechanical and anatomical axes of the femur, and the clinical rotation angle and surgical rotation angle, defined by the angles between the posterior condylar line and the clinical or surgical transepicondylar axes, respectively, were analysed using 2D (radiographs and axial CT slices) and 3D (3D bone models reconstructed from CT images) measurements.ResultsFor all variables, 3D measurements were more reliable and reproducible than 2D measurements. The medians and ranges of the clinical rotation angle and surgical rotation angle were 6.6° (−1.7° to 12.1°) and 2.3° (−2.5° to 8.6°) in 2D, and 7.1° (2.7° to 11.4°) and 3.0° (−2.0° to 7.5°) in 3D. Varus/valgus alteration of the CT scanning direction relative to the mechanical axis affected the difference in clinical rotation angles between 2D and 3D measurements.ConclusionSignificantly, smaller values of the clinical rotation angle and surgical rotation angle were obtained by 2D compared to 3D measurements, which could result in internal rotation of the femoral component even if the surgeon performs the bone cutting precisely. Regarding clinical relevance, first, this study confirmed the reliability of 3D measurements. Second, it underscored the risk of internal rotation of the femoral component when using 2D measurement, even with precise bone cutting technique. These results will help surgeons avoid malpositioning of the femoral component if 2D measurements are used for preoperative planning in TKA.Level of evidenceProspective comparative study, Level Ш.

Effect of Tibial Posterior Slope on Knee Kinematics, Quadriceps Force, and Patellofemoral Contact Force After Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty

We used a musculoskeletal model validated with in vivo data to evaluate the effect of tibial posterior slope on knee kinematics, quadriceps force, and patellofemoral contact force after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. The maximum quadriceps force and patellofemoral contact force decreased with increasing posterior slope. Anterior sliding of the tibial component and anterior impingement of the anterior aspect of the tibial post were observed with tibial posterior slopes of at least 5° and 10°, respectively. Increased tibial posterior slope contributes to improved exercise efficiency during knee extension, however excessive tibial posterior slope should be avoided to prevent knee instability. Based on our computer simulation we recommend tibial posterior slopes of less than 5° in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

The Importance of Bony Impingement in Restricting Flexion After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Computer Simulation Model With Clinical Correlation

We constructed patient-specific models from computed tomography data after total knee arthroplasty to predict knee flexion based on implant-bone impingement. The maximum flexion before impingement between the femur and the tibial insert was computed using a musculoskeletal modeling program (KneeSIM; LifeModeler, Inc, San Clemente, California) during a weight-bearing deep knee bend. Postoperative flexion was measured in a clinical cohort of 21 knees (low-flex group: 6 knees with <100° of flexion and high-flex group: 15 size-matched knees with >125° of flexion at 2 years). Average predicted flexion angles were within 2° of clinical measurements for the high-flex group. In the low-flex group, 4 cases had impingement involving the bone cut at the posterior condyle, and the average predicted knee flexion was 102° compared with 93° measured clinically. These results indicate that the level of the distal femoral resection should be carefully planned and that exposed bone proximal to the tips of the posterior condyles of the femoral component should be removed if there is risk of impingement.

Accuracy of Implant Placement Utilizing Customized Patient Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Customized patient instrumentation (CPI) combines preoperative planning with customized cutting jigs to position and align implants during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We compared postoperative implant alignment of patients undergoing surgery with CPI to traditional TKA instrumentation for accuracy of implant placement. Twenty-five consecutive TKAs using CPI were analyzed. Preoperative CT scans of the lower extremities were segmented using a computer program. Limb alignment and mechanical axis were computed. Virtual implantation of computer-aided design models was done. Postoperative coronal and sagittal view radiographs were obtained. Using 3D image-matching software, relative positions of femoral and tibial implants were determined. Twenty-five TKAs implanted using traditional instrumentation were also analyzed. For CPI, difference in alignment from the preoperative plan was calculated. In the CPI group, the mean absolute difference between the planned and actual femoral placements was 0.67° in the coronal plane and 1.2° in the sagittal plane. For tibial alignment, the mean absolute difference was 0.9° in the coronal plane and 1.3° in the sagittal plane. For traditional instrumentation, difference from ideal placement for the femur was 1.5° in the coronal plane and 2.3° in the sagittal plane. For the tibia, the difference was 1.8° in the coronal plane. CPI achieved accurate implant positioning and was superior to traditional TKA instrumentation.