Hideki Tsurugaya

Impact of lesion calcification on clinical and angiographic outcome after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in real-world patients

BACKGROUND Previous studies have demonstrated similar efficacy of the drug-eluting stent (DES) in patients with and without calcified lesions. However, most of the randomized trials have excluded patients with severe calcified lesions. This study aimed to examine the impact of lesion calcium on clinical and angiographic outcome after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation in real-world patients. METHODS Consecutive 380 patients with 556 lesions treated with SES were enrolled. Lesions were divided into Calc lesions (moderate or sever calcification; 195 lesions) and non-Calc lesions (none or mild calcification; 361 lesions) according to the lesion calcium. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) parameters, binary restenosis rate (%restenosis), target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during follow-up were compared between the two groups. All patients were contacted at 1, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. RESULTS Lesion success rate was similar in the two groups. %Restenosis (9.2% vs. 3.6%; P<.05) and TLR (7.3% vs. 2.8%; P<.05) were significantly higher in Calc lesions. Stent thrombosis was observed in 0.7% of overall lesions with no difference between the two groups. The MACE rate in Calc patients (13.8%) was significantly higher than in non-Calc patients (6.1%). By multivariate analysis, hemodialysis (HD) and requirement of rotational atherectomy (RA) were predictive factors of TLR in the Calc lesions. CONCLUSIONS Coronary lesions with calcification comprise a high-risk cohort and are associated with a higher TLR and binary restenosis rates in real-world patients treated with SES. Moreover, patients with calcified lesions and on HD are associated with higher MACE rate.

Development of a sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for measurement of DNase I in human serum.

BACKGROUND Serum deoxyribonuclease I (DNase I) activity was reported to increase in the early phase after onset of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Up to now, DNase I activity has been quantified by the single radial enzyme diffusion (SRED) method, which unfortunately requires a long incubation time. Therefore it is necessary to develop another assay suitable for measurement of serum DNase I concentrations in a clinical setting. METHODS A sandwich ELISA was established for measurement of DNase I protein using a polyclonal antibody directed against DNase I protein and a biotinylated monoclonal for subsequent detection. Concentrations of serum DNase I protein were measured in healthy individuals and patients with AMI. RESULTS This method was as precise as SRED, and took less time than SRED. A significant correlation was observed between DNase I concentration and enzyme activity (r=0.839; P<0.001). The average of serum DNase I in AMI patients within 0-12 h of chest pain was significantly higher than that in healthy individuals (P<0.001), and decreased with time. CONCLUSIONS We have developed a sensitive ELISA capable of measuring DNase I protein concentrations. This method may be a useful alternative to SRED as an aid to diagnosis of AMI based on the serum DNase I level.