Hideyo Amioka

Periarteritis of coronary arteries with severe eosinophilic infiltration. A new pathologic entity (eosinophilic periarteritis)

A 40 year-old male presented symptoms of angina pectoris for about nine years and expired with symptoms of unstable angina, changing pattern at the terminal stage. At autopsy, both right and left coronary arteries of the subepicardial region were grayish white and elastic hard. Histologically, inflammatory infiltration was localized in adventitia of coronary arteries located in the subepicardial region. Inflammatory cells infiltrated into the adventitia were mostly eosinophiles. The medial smooth muscle cells were well preserved and the intima showed irregular thickening with fibrosis. Vascular obstruction or recanalization could not be observed. As a result of these findings, it was considered that these inflammatory changes of the coronary arteries could be termed eosinophilic periarteritis. These inflammatory changes could not be found in the intramural coronary arteries. Rather extensive fibrosis could be seen in the muscle layer centering about the posterior wall of the left ventricle. No findings of angiitis could be detected in the blood vessels except subepicardial coronary arteries.

Assessment of supra-valvular abnormal signal with color Doppler flow mapping in patients with aortic regurgitation

A supra-aortic abnormal flow signal (proximal acceleration) was studied in 62 patients with aortic regurgitation with the use of color Doppler flow mapping. The proximal acceleration signal was detected in 28 of the 62 patients and was shaped like a V or a teardrop. In the 29 patients who underwent aortography, a proximal acceleration signal was observed in all 18 patients with severe and moderate regurgitation and in only one of the 11 patients with mild regurgitation. The sensitivity for the diagnosis of severe regurgitation from the existence of a proximal acceleration signal was 100%, specificity 50%, and predictive accuracy 47%. A close correlation between the area of the proximal acceleration signal and the width of the aortic regurgitant jet signal was observed (r = 0.81). An acceleration area of 45 mm2 or more was observed in eight of the nine patients with severe regurgitation, in four of the nine patients with moderate regurgitation, and in none of the patients with mild regurgitation. Sensitivity for the diagnosis of severe regurgitation from an area of proximal acceleration of more than 45 mm2 was 89%, specificity 80%, and accuracy 67%. These results suggest that evaluation of the area of the supra-aortic abnormal signal may be a useful auxiliary aid in estimating the severity of aortic regurgitation.