Hilary Shmeeda

Pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal Doxorubicin: review of animal and human studies.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (doxorubicin HCl liposome injection; Doxil® or Caelyx®) is a liposomal formulation of doxorubicin, reducing uptake by the reticulo-endothelial system due to the attachment of polyethylene glycol polymers to a lipid anchor and stably retaining drug as a result of liposomal entrapment via an ammonium sulfate chemical gradient. These features result in a pharmacokinetic profile characterised by an extended circulation time and a reduced volume of distribution, thereby promoting tumour uptake.Preclinical studies demonstrated one- or two-phase plasma concentration-time profiles. Most of the drug is cleared with an elimination half-life of 20–30 hours. The volume of distribution is close to the blood volume, and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) is increased at least 60-fold compared with free doxorubicin. Studies of tissue distribution indicated preferential accumulation into various implanted tumours and human tumour xenografts, with an enhancement of drug concentrations in the tumour when compared with free drug.Clinical studies of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in humans have included patients with AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma (ARKS) and with a variety of solid tumours, including ovarian, breast and prostate carcinomas. The pharmacokinetic profile in humans at doses between 10 and 80 mg/m2 is similar to that in animals, with one or two distribution phases: an initial phase with a half-life of 1–3 hours and a second phase with a half-life of 30–90 hours. The AUC after a dose of 50 mg/m2 is approximately 300-fold greater than that with free drug. Clearance and volume of distribution are drastically reduced (at least 250-fold and 60-fold, respectively). Preliminary observations indicate that utilising the distinct pharmacokinetic parameters of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in dose scheduling is an attractive possibility.In agreement with the preclinical findings, the ability of pegylated liposomes to extravasate through the leaky vasculature of tumours, as well as their extended circulation time, results in enhanced delivery of liposomal drug and/or radiotracers to the tumour site in cancer patients. There is evidence of selective tumour uptake in malignant effusions, ARKS skin lesions and a variety of solid tumours.The toxicity profile of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is characterised by dose-limiting mucosal and cutaneous toxicities, mild myelosuppression, decreased cardiotoxicity compared with free doxorubicin and minimal alopecia. The mucocutaneous toxicities are dose-limiting per injection; however, the reduced cardiotoxicity allows a larger cumulative dose than that acceptable for free doxorubicin.Thus, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin represents a new class of chemotherapy delivery system that may significantly improve the therapeutic index of doxorubicin.

Pros and Cons of the Liposome Platform in Cancer Drug Targeting

Coating of liposomes with polyethylene-glycol (PEG) by incorporation in the liposome bilayer of PEG-derivatized lipids results in inhibition of liposome uptake by the reticulo-endothelial system and significant prolongation of liposome residence time in the blood stream. Parallel developments in drug loading technology have improved the efficiency and stability of drug entrapment in liposomes, particularly with regard to cationic amphiphiles such as anthracyclines. An example of this new generation of liposomes is a formulation of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin known as Doxil® or Caelyx®, whose clinical pharmacokinetic profile is characterized by slow plasma clearance and small volume of distribution. A hallmark of these long-circulating liposomal drug carriers is their enhanced accumulation in tumors. The mechanism underlying this passive targeting effect is the phenomenon known as enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) which has been described in a broad variety of experimental tumor types. Further to the passive targeting effect, the liposome drug delivery platform offers the possibility of grafting tumor-specific ligands on the liposome membrane for active targeting to tumor cells, and potentially intracellular drug delivery. The pros and cons of the liposome platform in cancer targeting are discussed vis-à-vis nontargeted drugs, using as an example a liposome drug delivery system targeted to the folate receptor.

Intracellular uptake and intracavitary targeting of folate-conjugated liposomes in a mouse lymphoma model with up-regulated folate receptors

The folate receptor is overexpressed in a broad spectrum of malignant tumors and represents an attractive target for selective delivery of anticancer agents to folate receptor–expressing tumors. This study examines folate-lipid conjugates as a means of enhancing the tumor selectivity of liposome-encapsulated drugs in a mouse lymphoma model. Folate-derivatized polyethylene glycol (PEG3350)-distearoyl-phosphatidylethanolamine was post-loaded at various concentrations into the following preparations: radiolabeled PEGylated liposomes, PEGylated liposomes labeled in the aqueous compartment with dextran fluorescein, and PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD, Doxil). We incubated folate-targeted radiolabeled or fluorescent liposomes with mouse J6456 lymphoma cells up-regulated for their folate receptors (J6456-FR) to determine the optimal ligand concentration required in the lipid bilayer for liposomal cell association, and to examine whether folate-targeted liposomes are internalized by J6456-FR cells in suspension. Liposomal association with cells was quantified based on radioactivity and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis, and internalization was assessed by confocal fluorescence microscopy. We found an optimal ligand molar concentration of ∼0.5% using our ligand. A substantial lipid dose-dependent increase in cell-associated fluorescence was found in folate-targeted liposomes compared with nontargeted liposomes. Confocal depth scanning showed that a substantial amount of the folate-targeted liposomes are internalized by J6456-FR cells. Binding and uptake of folate-targeted PLD by J6456-FR cells were also observed in vivo after i.p. injection of folate-targeted PLD in mice bearing ascitic J6456-FR tumors. The drug levels in ascitic tumor cells were increased by 17-fold, whereas those in plasma were decreased by 14-fold when folate-targeted PLD were compared with nontargeted PLD in the i.p. model. Folate-targeted liposomes represent an attractive approach for the intracellular delivery of drugs to folate receptor–expressing lymphoma cells and seem to be a promising tool for in vivo intracavitary drug targeting. [Mol Cancer Ther 2006;5(4):818–24]

Improved therapeutic activity of folate-targeted liposomal doxorubicin in folate receptor-expressing tumor models

PurposeThe folate receptor (FR) is overexpressed in a broad spectrum of malignant tumors and represents an attractive target for selective delivery of anti-cancer agents to FR-expressing tumors. Targeting liposomes to the FR has been proposed as a way to enhance the effects of liposome-based chemotherapy.MethodsFolate–polyethylene glycol–distearoyl–phosphatidyl–ethanolamine conjugate was inserted into pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD). The therapeutic activity of folate-targeted (FT-PLD) and non-targeted (PLD) pegylated liposomal doxorubicin was tested in two human tumor models (KB, KB-V) and in one mouse ascitic tumor model (FR-expressing J6456) by the i.v. systemic route in all models, and by the i.p. intracavitary route in the ascitic tumor model only.ResultsConsistent with previous studies, PLD was clearly superior to free doxorubicin in all tumor models. When targeted and non-targeted liposome formulations were compared, FT-PLD was more effective than PLD in the KB and KB-V xenograft models, and in the J6456 intra-cavitary therapy model. The therapeutic effect was dose-dependent in the KB model and schedule-dependent in the J6456 intra-cavitary therapy model. In some experiments, toxic deaths aggravated by folate-depleted diet were a major confounding factor. In a non-FR expressing J6456 model, FT-PLD was as active as PLD indicating that its activity is not limited to FR-expressing tumors.ConclusionFolate-targeting confers a significant albeit modest therapeutic improvement to PLD in FR-expressing tumor models, which appears particularly valuable in intracavitary therapy. The potential clinical added value of this approach has yet to be determined.

Her2-targeted pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: retention of target-specific binding and cytotoxicity after in vivo passage.

BACKGROUND Receptor-directed targeting of ligand-bearing liposomes to tumor cells may enhance therapeutic efficacy by intracellular delivery of a concentrated payload of liposomal drug. The goal of this study was to assess whether Her2-targeted pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) retains its binding ability to Her2-expressing target cells through circulation in the blood and extravasation to tumor interstitial fluid. METHODS PLD was grafted with a lipophilic conjugate of an anti-Her2 scFv antibody fragment at an approximate ratio of 7.5, 15, or 30 ligands per liposome. BALB/c mice were injected with J6456 lymphoma cells into the peritoneal cavity to generate malignant ascites used as a model for tumor interstitial fluid. When abdominal swelling developed, Her2-targeted (HT-) PLD and non-targeted PLD were injected into the mice i.v. at a dose of 15 mg/kg. The ascitic fluid was collected 48 h later, ascitic tumor cells were removed, and the doxorubicin levels in the cell-free ascitic fluid and plasma were determined. Binding of the cell-free ascitic fluid was tested in vitro against two Her2-expressing human tumor cell lines (N87, SKBR-3) and compared to the binding of shelf formulations (not passaged in vivo) of HT-PLD and PLD, by measuring the amount of cell-associated doxorubicin. RESULTS Plasma and ascitic fluid levels of HT-PLD were only slightly below those of PLD indicating that, the Her2 ligand did not cause any significant change in the clearance rate of PLD. The in vitro binding of HT-PLD containing ascitic fluid to Her2-expressing cells was increased 10 to 20-fold above that of PLD-containing ascitic fluid, similarly to the 20-fold difference in binding between shelf Her2-PLD and PLD. The in vitro cytotoxicity of ascitic fluid containing HT-PLD tested against Her2-expressing tumor cells was far greater than that of PLD, and similar to that of the shelf formulations, indicating that the selective pharmacological activity of HT-PLD is preserved after in vivo passage. Optimal results were obtained with HT-PLD formulated with 15 ligands per liposome. CONCLUSIONS HT-PLD retains most of its original binding capacity to Her2-expressing cells after in vivo passage indicating that the ligand is stably maintained in vivo in association with the doxorubicin liposomal carrier, and confirming the validity of the post-formulation ligand grafting approach for liposome targeting. Targeting of PLD using a Her2 antibody fragment provides an important means of in vivo selective drug delivery to tumors expressing the Her2 receptor.

Delivery of zoledronic acid encapsulated in folate-targeted liposome results in potent in vitro cytotoxic activity on tumor cells

INTRODUCTION Zoledronic acid (ZOL), a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, is a potent inhibitor of farnesyl-pyrophosphate synthase with poor in vitro cytotoxic activity as a result of its limited diffusion into tumor cells. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether liposomes targeted to the folate receptor (FR) can effectively deliver ZOL to tumor cells and enhance its in vitro cytotoxicity. METHODS ZOL was entrapped in the water phase of liposomes of various compositions with or without a lipophilic folate ligand. Stability and blood levels after i.v. injection were checked. The in vitro cytotoxic activity and cell uptake of liposomal ZOL (L-ZOL) were examined on various human and mouse cell lines. RESULTS All formulations were highly stable and resulted in high blood levels in contrast to free ZOL which was rapidly cleared from plasma. Non-targeted L-ZOL was devoid of any in vitro activity at concentrations up to 200 microM. In contrast, potent cytotoxic activity of folate-targeted L-ZOL (FTL-ZOL) was observed, with optimal activity, reaching the sub-micromolar range, for dipalmitoyl-phosphatidylglycerol (DPPG)-containing liposomes and relatively lower activity for pegylated (PEG) formulations. IC50 values of FTL-ZOL on FR-expressing tumor cells were >100-fold lower than those of free ZOL. Compared to doxorubicin, the cytotoxicity of DPPG-FTL-ZOL was equivalent in drug-sensitive cell lines, and greatly superior in drug-resistant cell lines. When tested on the non-FR upregulated cell lines, the cytotoxicity of FTL-ZOL was lower but still superior to that of L-ZOL. The uptake of ZOL by FR-expressing tumor cells was enhanced approximately 25-fold with DPPG-FTL-ZOL, and only approximately 4-fold with PEG-FTL-ZOL. CONCLUSIONS FR targeting of ZOL using liposomes is an effective means to exploit the tumor cell growth inhibitory properties of ZOL. DPPG-FTL-ZOL is significantly more efficient at intracellular delivery of ZOL than PEG-FTL-ZOL in FR-expressing tumor cells.

Reduced Toxicity and Superior Therapeutic Activity of a Mitomycin C Lipid-Based Prodrug Incorporated in Pegylated Liposomes

Purpose: A lipid-based prodrug of mitomycin C [MMC; 2,3-(distearoyloxy)propane-1-dithio-4′-benzyloxycarbonyl-MMC] was designed for liposome formulation. The purpose of this study was to examine the in vitro cytotoxicity, pharmacokinetics, in vivo toxicity, and in vivo antitumor activity of this new lipid-based prodrug formulated in polyethylene glycol–coated (pegylated) liposomes. Experimental Design: MMC was released from the MMC lipid–based prodrug (MLP) by thiolytic-induced cleavage with a variety of thiol-containing reducing agents. MLP was incorporated with nearly 100% efficiency in cholesterol-free pegylated liposomes with hydrogenated phosphatidylcholine as the main component and a mean vesicle size of ∼90 nm. This formulation was used for in vitro and in vivo tests in rodents. Results:In vitro, the cytotoxic activity of pegylated liposomal MLP (PL-MLP) was drastically reduced compared with free MMC. However, in the presence of reducing agents, such as cysteine or N-acetyl-cysteine, its activity increased to nearly comparable levels to those of free MMC. Intravenous administration of PL-MLP in rats resulted in a slow clearance indicating stable prodrug retention in liposomes and long circulation time kinetics, with a pharmacokinetic profile substantially different from that of free MMC. In vivo, PL-MLP was ∼3-fold less toxic than free MMC. The therapeutic index and absolute antitumor efficacy of PL-MLP were superior to that of free MMC in the three tumor models tested. In addition, PL-MLP was significantly more active than a formulation of doxorubicin in pegylated liposomes (DOXIL) in the M109R tumor model, a mouse tumor cell line with a multidrug-resistant phenotype. Conclusions: Delivery of MLP in pegylated liposomes is a potential approach for effective treatment of multidrug-resistant tumors while significantly buffering the toxicity of MMC.

Pharmacological basis of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: impact on cancer therapy.

We review here various pharmacological aspects of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) which have important implications on the safety and efficacy profile of this important agent. Particularly, the formulation properties of PLD and its long circulation time and the relationship between the high microvascular permeability of tumors and the selective accumulation of PLD in tumors are addressed. Emphasis is given to the correlation of pharmacokinetic parameters with pharmacodynamic effects of PLD. The evidence for drug interference with PLD clearance and its clinical relevance are discussed. We propose a simplified plasma PLD testing protocol for monitoring PLD clearance, as a tool for the clinician to control the safety and therapeutic dose level of PLD at an individual patient level. The enriched clinical experience with PLD has further strengthened its added value with regard to both safety and efficacy in the management of a broad variety of malignancies.

A comparative study of folate receptor-targeted doxorubicin delivery systems: dosing regimens and therapeutic index.

Ligand-receptor mediated targeting may affect differently the performance of supramolecular drug carriers depending on the nature of the nanocarrier. In this study, we compare the selectivity, safety and activity of doxorubicin (Dox) entrapped in liposomes versus Dox conjugated to polymeric nanocarriers in the presence or absence of a folic acid (FA)-targeting ligand to cancer cells that overexpress the folate receptor (FR). Two pullulan (Pull)-based conjugates of Dox were synthesized, (FA-PEG)-Pull-(Cyst-Dox) and (NH2-PEG)-Pull-(Cyst-Dox). The other delivery systems are Dox loaded PEGylated liposomes (PLD, Doxil®) and the FR-targeted version (PLD-FA) obtained by ligand post-insertion into the commercial formulation. Both receptor-targeted drug delivery systems (DDS) were shown to interact in vitro specifically with cells via the folate ligand. Treatment of FR-overexpressing human cervical carcinoma KB tumor-bearing mice with three-weekly injections resulted in slightly enhanced anticancer activity of PLD-FA compared to PLD and no activity for both pullulan-based conjugates. When the DDS were administered intravenously every other day, the folated-Pull conjugate and the non-folated-Pull conjugate displayed similar and low antitumor activity as free Dox. At this dosing regimen, the liposome-based formulations displayed enhanced antitumor activity with an advantage to the non-folated liposome. However, both liposomal formulations suffered from toxicity that was reversible following treatment discontinuation. Using a daily dosing schedule, with higher cumulative dose, the folated-Pull conjugate strongly inhibited tumor growth while free Dox was toxic at this regimen. For polymeric constructs, increasing dose intensity and cumulative dose strongly affects the therapeutic index and reveals a major therapeutic advantage for the FR-targeted formulation. All DDS were able to abrogate doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. This study constitutes the first side-by-side comparison of two receptor-targeted ligand-bearing systems, polymer therapeutics versus nanoparticulate systems, evaluated in the same mouse tumor model at several dosing regimens.

Liposome encapsulation of zoledronic acid results in major changes in tissue distribution and increase in toxicity

BACKGROUND Zoledronic acid (Zol) is a potent inhibitor of farnesyl-pyrophosphate synthase with broad clinical use in the treatment of osteoporosis, and bone metastases. We have previously shown that encapsulation of Zol in liposomes targeted to the folate receptor (FR) greatly enhances its in vitro cytotoxicity. To examine whether targeted liposomal delivery of Zol could be a useful therapeutic approach, we investigated here the in vivo pharmacology of i.v. administered liposomal Zol (L-Zol) in murine models. METHODS Zol was passively entrapped in the water phase of liposomes containing a small fraction of either dipalmitoyl-phosphatidylglycerol (DPPG) or a polyethylene-glycol (PEG)-conjugated phospholipid with or without insertion of a folate lipophilic conjugate. Radiolabeled formulations were used for pharmacokinetic (PK) and biodistribution studies. Toxicity was evaluated by clinical, hematological, biochemical, and histopathological parameters. Therapeutic studies comparing free Zol, nontargeted and folate targeted L-Zol were performed in FR-expressing human tumor models. RESULTS Encapsulation of Zol in liposomes resulted in major PK changes including sustained high plasma levels and very slow clearance. DPPG-L-Zol was cleared faster than PEG-L-Zol. Grafting of folate lipophilic conjugates on liposomes further accelerated the clearance of Zol. L-Zol caused a major shift in drug tissue distribution when compared to free Zol, with a major increase (20 to 100-fold) in liver and spleen, a substantial increase (7 to 10-fold) in tumor, and a modest increase (2-fold) in bone. Liposomal formulations proved to be highly toxic, up to 50-fold more than free Zol. PEG-L-Zol was more toxic than DPPG-L-Zol. Toxicity was non-cumulative and appears to involve macrophage/monocyte activation and release of cytokines. Co-injection of L-Zol with a large dose of blank liposomes, or injection of a very low Zol-to-phospholipid ratio liposome formulation reduced toxicity by 2-4-fold suggesting that diluting macrophage exposure below a threshold Zol concentration is important to overcome toxicity. L-Zol failed to significantly enhance the therapeutic activity of Zol vis-à-vis free ZOL and doxorubicin. Folate-targeted L-Zol was marginally better than other treatment modalities in the KB tumor model but toxic deaths greatly affected the outcome. CONCLUSIONS Liposome delivery of Zol causes a major change in tissue drug distribution and an increase in tumor Zol levels. However, the severe in vivo toxicity of L-Zol seriously limits its dose and its utility for in vivo tumor cell targeting. This strategy is under evaluation using liposomes carrying less toxic bisphosphonates.