Hilary Thomas

A multicenter Phase I gene therapy clinical trial involving intraperitoneal administration of E1A-lipid complex in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer overexpressing HER-2/neu oncogene.

Purpose: HER-2/neu oncogene is overexpressed in 10–30% of epithelial ovarian cancers and is associated with a poor prognosis. The E1A gene product of adenovirus type 5 down-regulates HER-2/neu and causes tumor regression in animal models. In the current study, we sought to determine the toxicity and biological activity of E1A-lipid complex in ovarian cancer patients. Experimental Design: A Phase I trial involving intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of E1A-lipid complex was initiated in ovarian cancer patients to assess biological activity (E1A gene transfer/transcription/translation and HER-2/neu expression) and to determine the maximum tolerated dose. Successive cohorts received E1A-lipid complex at doses of 1.8, 3.6, and 7.2 mg DNA/m2, given as weekly i.p. infusions for 3 of 4 weeks (each cycle) up to a maximum of six cycles. Peritoneal fluid was sampled at baseline and twice monthly for cellularity, cytology, CA-125, and biological activity Results: Fifteen patients, with a median age of 57 years (range, 43–81) were recruited. Three (1.8 mg DNA/m2), 4 (3.6 mg DNA/m2), and 8 patients (7.2 mg DNA/m2) received i.p. E1A. A total of 91 infusions (range, 1–18) was administered. Abdominal pain was the dose-limiting toxicity, and the maximum-tolerated dose was 3.6 mg DNA/m2. E1A gene transfer and expression was observed in all of the patients and at all of the dose levels. HER-2/neu down-regulation could be demonstrated in the tumor cells of 2 patients (18%). There was no correlation between dose and biological activity. Conclusions: I.P. EIA-lipid complex gene therapy is feasible and safe. Future studies, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, particularly in patients with minimal residual disease, should be evaluated.

Integrated care: Utilisation of complementary and alternative medicine within a conventional cancer treatment centre

OBJECTIVES To estimate the proportion of cancer outpatients who visit a Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) unit that is located within a conventional cancer treatment centre; to compare the characteristics of CAM unit visitors with those of all outpatients; to monitor the demand for 20 CAM therapies delivered by professionals, and the use of the CAM unit for waiting, gathering information and informal support from volunteer staff. DESIGN Prospective, observational, over a six month period. SETTING CAM unit within a NHS cancer treatment centre. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Utilisation of the CAM unit for 20 complementary therapies, and for waiting, gathering information, informal support; characteristics of CAM users compared with those of all cancer outpatients attending the cancer centre; predictors of CAM therapy use and frequent use. RESULTS 761 (95% of those approached) people were recruited, 498 (65.4%) cancer patients, 202 (26.5%) relatives, 37 (4.8%) friends/carers, 24 (3.2%) staff. Women predominated (n=560, 73.6%). Of all outpatients attending the cancer centre, 498 (15.8%) visited the CAM unit, 290 (9.2%) accessed therapies. Compared to all outpatients, those visiting the CAM unit were: younger (mean 63.7 vs. 58.4 years), more likely to be female (57.9% vs. 78.7%), have breast (14.8% vs. 51.9%), gynaecological (5.0% vs. 9.1%) cancer, live in local postal district (57.3% vs. 61.6%). Significant predictors of therapy use and frequent visits were being a patient, female, higher education, living closer to the cancer centre. CONCLUSIONS Despite easy access to CAM therapies, a relatively small number of people regularly used them, whilst a larger number selectively tried a few. The integrated CAM unit meets a demand for information and informal support. The findings inform emerging policy on integrating CAM and conventional cancer treatment to address psychosocial needs of people with cancer. More research is needed on why people do not use integrated CAM services and how charges affect demand.

A phase II trial of ZD0473 in platinum-pretreated ovarian cancer.

The primary aim of this phase II trial was to assess the antitumour activity of ZD0473 in ovarian cancer patients who had failed initial platinum-based therapy. Patients (n=94) were classified as either platinum-sensitive (n=35) or platinum-resistant (n=59) depending on whether they had relapsed or progressed within 26 weeks of completing first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients initially received 120 mg/m(2) ZD0473 as a 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion on day 1 of a 3-week cycle. If well tolerated, the dose could be escalated to 150 mg/m(2). Few patients (9%) withdrew because of treatment-related adverse events and no clinically significant oto-, nephro- or neurotoxicity was observed. Objective response rates for platinum-resistant and sensitive patients were 8.3 and 32.4%, respectively, and clinical benefit was observed in 76.5% of the sensitive patients. Median time to progression was 57 and 180 days, and median time to death was 242 and 402 days, for resistant and sensitive patients, respectively. In conclusion, ZD0473 has a manageable toxicity profile and encouraging activity in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients.

Intravenous administration of CP-4055 (ELACYT™) in patients with solid tumours. A phase I study

Purpose. Cytarabine (ara-C) has limited activity in solid tumours. CP-4055 (ELACYT™) is a novel ara-C-5’-elaidic acid ester that may circumvent this limitation. CP-4055 maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity have been investigated in patients with solid tumours. Material and methods. Thirty-four patients (19 malignant melanoma, 8 ovarian cancers and 7 NSCLC) received CP-4055 as a 30 min, or 2 hr intravenous (IV) infusion daily for 5 consecutive days every 3 or 4 weeks (D1-5 q3w or D1-5 q4w) in a dose escalation designed study with doses ranging from 30 to 240 mg/m2/day. Results. The most frequent CTC grade 1-2 adverse events (AEs) were nausea, fatigue, vomiting, anorexia and pyrexia. Most of the grade 3–4 AEs were neutropenia. The MTD was 200 mg/m2/day and 240 mg/m2/day for D1-5 q3w and D1-5 q4w, respectively. The MTD was independent of infusion time in the 4 week schedule. CP-4055 was maintained in plasma for up to 5-10 hr at dose levels >150 mg/m2/day. One objective partial response (PR) with time to progression (TTP) of 22 months was reported in an advanced malignant melanoma patient. Conclusion. CP-4055 was well tolerated; the majority of the AEs were of CTC grade 1. The 3 week schedule was not recommended due to neutropenic nadir between days 18–26. The recommended dose was 200 mg/m2/day in a D1-5 q4w schedule. Efficacy data suggest that CP-4055 might be active in treatment of solid tumours.

Results of ZD0473 in platinum-pretreated ovarian cancer: analysis according to platinum free interval.

Resistance to platinum-containing regimens can develop in many women with ovarian cancer and may lead to relapse in > 80% of patients. ZD0473 is a new-generation platinum agent that, in preclinical studies, shows evidence of antitumour activity and overcomes platinum-resistance mechanisms. This Phase II trial has evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of ZD0473 in second-line ovarian cancer patients. Patients received ZD0473 120 mg/m2 (1-h iv infusion, day 1 q 3-weeks); the starting dose was increased to 150 mg/m2 after a safety review. We report here on results when patients are divided into four cohorts depending upon whether they were considered platinum-resistant or -sensitive. Patients were placed into one of 3 cohorts if they were platinum resistant (relapsed/progressed < or = 26 weeks after completion of prior platinum-based chemotherapy) or cohort 4 if this period was > 26 weeks (sensitive). Ninety-four patients were recruited to the trial (59 resistant, 35 sensitive; median age 58 [range 27-75] years; 86 with performance status [PS] < or = 1). Forty-nine patients received a starting dose of 120 mg/m2, of which 15 escalated to 150 mg/m2, and 45 received a starting dose of 150 mg/m2. Overall, the median number of treatment cycles received was 3 (range 1-8). Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was the most common haematological adverse event occurring in 62% of patients overall. Grade 3/4 lethargy, vomiting and nausea were the most common non-haematological toxicities. No clinically significant oto-, nephro- or neurotoxicity was observed. Overall response rates for all platinum-resistant and -sensitive patients were 8.3% and 32.4%, respectively. Stable disease occurred in 17 resistant and 15 sensitive patients.