Hilde Bondevik

(Un)doing gender in a rehabilitation context: a narrative analysis of gender and self in stories of chronic muscle pain

Abstract Purpose: To explore how gender appears in the stories of self-told by men and women undergoing rehabilitation for chronic muscle pain. Method: The material, which consists of qualitative interviews with 10 men and 6 women with chronic neck pain, was analyzed from a gender sensitive perspective using narrative method. The analysis was inspired by Arthur Frank’s typologies of illness narratives (restitution, chaos and quest). Findings: The women’s stories displayed selves that were actively trying to transcend their former identity and life conditions, in which their pain was embedded. Their stories tended to develop from “chaos”, towards a quest narrative with a more autonomous self. The selves in the men’s stories appeared to be actively seeking a solution to the pain within a medical context. Framed as a restitution narrative, rooted in a biomedical model of disease, the voice often heard in the men’s stories was of a self-dependent on future health care. Our findings contribute greater nuance to a dominant cultural conception that men are more independent than women in relation to health care. Conclusion: Understanding the significance of gender in the construction of selves in stories of chronic pain may help to improve the health care offered to patients suffering from chronic pain. Implications for Rehabilitation Patients tell stories that powerfully communicate their particular illness experiences. Cultural expectations of femininity and masculinity play a significant role with regard to how the patients construct their stories, which may be important to health professionals’ perceptions of the patients’ problem. Health care professionals should listen carefully to the patient’s own story and be sensitive to the significance of gender when trying to understand these people’s health problem.

Medical constructions of long-term exhaustion, past and present

Culture and history affect the ways in which medical knowledge is shaped, sustained and changed. The less knowledge we have, the larger the space for the cultural imprint becomes. Based on these assumptions, we ask: how have medical constructions of long-term exhaustion changed over time, and how are changing constructions related to societal change? To discuss these questions we conducted a comparative study of medical texts from two historical periods: 1860-1930 and 1970-2013. Our data are limited to two diagnoses: neurasthenia and encephalomyelitis. After comparing the two periods by identifying diverging and converging aspects, we interpreted observed continuities and interruptions in relation to historical developments. We found that in the medical literature, long-term exhaustion became transformed from a somatic ailment bred by modern civilisation to a self-inflicted psychiatric ailment. At the same time, it changed from being a male-connoted high-status condition to a female-connoted low-status condition. We interpret these changes as contingent upon culturally available modes of interpretations. Medical knowledge thereby becomes infused with cultural norms and values which give them a distinct cultural bias. The historical controversies surrounding this medically contested condition neatly display the socially contingent factors that govern the social construction of medical knowledge.

Cured of Primary Bone Cancer, But at What Cost: A Qualitative Study of Functional Impairment and Lost Opportunities

Purpose. Our study aims to explore how former cancer patients experience physical and psychosocial late effects 3–7 years after they underwent treatment for primary bone sarcoma in the hip/pelvic region. A qualitative, phenomenological, and hermeneutic design was applied. Methods. Sarcoma survivors (n = 10) previously treated at Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital were selected to participate. In-depth and semistructured interviews were conducted. The interviews were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results. The participants reported that the late effects had three core spheres of impact: “their current daily life,” “their future opportunities,” and “their identity.” They expressed negative changes in activity, increased dependence on others, and exclusion from participation in different areas. Their daily life, work, sports activities, and social life were all affected. Several of their experiences are similar to those described by people with functional impairment or disability. Conclusion. Patients cured of bone cancer in the hip/pelvic region pay a significant price in terms of functional impairment, practical challenges, exclusion from important aspects of life, and loss of previous identity. It is important to appreciate this in order to help bone cancer survivors who struggle to reorient their life and build a secure new identity.

Absent organs—Present selves: Exploring embodiment and gender identity in young Norwegian women's accounts of hysterectomy

In this paper, we explore how younger women in Norway construct their embodiment and sense of self after hysterectomy. To do this, we conducted in-depth interviews with eight ethnic Norwegian women aged between 25 and 43 who had undergone hysterectomy. In line with a broad phenomenological approach to illness, the study was designed to explore the trajectories of the womens illness with a specific focus on concrete human experience and identity claims from a subjective point of view. In analysing the stories, we encountered feelings of suffering due to the loss of the uterus as well as profound side-effects, such as menopause. However, we also found evidence of relief from being treated for heavy bleeding and serious illness. In order to accentuate the individual voices in these illness stories, we chose a case-oriented analysis in line with Radley and Chamberlain (2001) and Riessman (2008). From this, two main seemingly contradictory storylines stood out: They have removed what made me a woman versus Without a uterus, I feel more like a woman. We also identified heteronormativity as an unstated issue in both these storylines and in the research data as a whole. Acknowledging diversity in the way women experience hysterectomy is important for a better understanding of the ways in which hysterectomy may affect women as humans as well as for developing more cultural competent healthcare services for this group.In this paper, we explore how younger women in Norway construct their embodiment and sense of self after hysterectomy. To do this, we conducted in-depth interviews with eight ethnic Norwegian women aged between 25 and 43 who had undergone hysterectomy. In line with a broad phenomenological approach to illness, the study was designed to explore the trajectories of the womens illness with a specific focus on concrete human experience and identity claims from a subjective point of view. In analysing the stories, we encountered feelings of suffering due to the loss of the uterus as well as profound side-effects, such as menopause. However, we also found evidence of relief from being treated for heavy bleeding and serious illness. In order to accentuate the individual voices in these illness stories, we chose a case-oriented analysis in line with Radley and Chamberlain (2001) and Riessman (2008). From this, two main seemingly contradictory storylines stood out: They have removed what made me a woman versus Without a uterus, I feel more like a woman. We also identified heteronormativity as an unstated issue in both these storylines and in the research data as a whole. Acknowledging diversity in the way women experience hysterectomy is important for a better understanding of the ways in which hysterectomy may affect women as humans as well as for developing more cultural competent healthcare services for this group.

Changes in the body image of bone sarcoma survivors following surgical treatment - A qualitative study

Among several long‐term effects, people treated for cancer may experience an altered appearance. Our study aims to identify how visible body changes following surgical treatment affect the life and identity of primary bone sarcoma survivors 3–10 years after diagnosis. A qualitative, phenomenological, and hermeneutic design was applied.

Physiotherapists as detectives: investigating clues and plots in the clinical encounter

This article investigates the clinical reasoning process of physiotherapists working with patients with chronic muscle pain. The article demonstrates how physiotherapists work with clues and weigh up different plots as they seek to build consistent stories about their patient’s illness. The material consists of interviews with 10 Norwegian physiotherapists performed after the first clinical encounter with a patient. Using a narrative approach and Lonergan’s theory of interpretation, the study highlights how, like detectives, the therapists work with clues by asking a number of interpretive questions of their data. They interrogate what they have observed and heard during the first session, they also question how the patient’s story was told, including the contextual and relation aspects of clue production, and they ask why the patient’s story was told to them in this particular way at this particular time. The article shows how the therapists configure clues into various plots on the basis of their experience of working with similar cases and how their detective work is pushed forward by uncertainty and persistent questioning of the data.

Fragments of illness: The Death of a Beekeeper as a literary case study of cancer

The first decisive steps of medicine towards becoming a science in its present shape happen to coincide with “the rise of the novel” in the eighteenth century. Before this well known and in our days still growing scientific specialization of medicine, the connections between literature and medicine were both many and close. By reading and analyzing a contemporary novel, The Death of a Beekeeper by the Swedish author Lars Gustafsson (1978), this article is an attempt to explore to which extent a fictional narrative about a unique case of cancer may illuminate challenges associated with the experience of serious illness. Our claim is that medicine might draw wisdom from literature, its ability to create connections through narrative, to illuminate the complexity of ethical dilemmas, and to intertwine symptoms, life stories, and contexts. We argue that by being in the company of literary narratives and philosophical questions, physicians as well as other health care professionals may acquire clinically relevant skills which help them reach the ethically defined goals of their profession.

Medically unexplained physical symptoms, misunderstood and wrongly treated? A semiotic perspective on chronic pain

ABSTRACT Medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) are a significant and increasing health issue in the western world. Chronic pain constitutes a considerable element of these symptoms, and the lack of a biomedical explanation of their cause challenges the clinical encounter. The limitations of biomedicine become evident in these encounters and expose the need for an expanded understanding of body and symptom. Semiotics, as an anti-dualistic meta-theory, closes the gap between natural science and the humanities and views the human body in an evolutionary and existential perspective. By focusing on interpretation and communication of signs as ongoing processes at all levels of life, biology and experience, the subjective and the measurable will be integrated. A special type of sign, the self-referential, is part of the body’s internal communication. These signs may be viewed as the body’s warnings to itself, for instance when the individual’s consciousness, thought and action run counter to the organism’s physiological and psychological needs. In a semiotic perspective, existential conditions may also activate the body’s defense systems. In this context, the unexplained pain may be understood as a functional warning sign. The enhanced understanding of body and symptom that a semiotic approach calls for is relevant for the work of physiotherapists and may lead to more constructive clinical encounters with patients with unexplained chronic pain.

Asylum-seeking Children: Affiliation to Norway or the ‘Home Country’

ABSTRACT The strengthening in recent years of the legal position of children in the asylum regulations and the United Nations (UN) Convention on the Rights of the Child has been accompanied by a renewed emphasis on immigration control throughout Europe. In this article, we shall shed light upon the growing conflict between asylum seeking children’s rights on the one hand and immigration control on the other, by analysing asylum applications involving children with long residency in Norway. Based on a deconstructive analysis of asylum cases, qualitative interviews and legal texts, we investigate the Norwegian Immigration Appeals Board’s assessments of asylum-seeking children’s affiliation (ie attachment) to Norway. We explore in what way the Board’s understanding of children’s affiliation to a given society is tied to the child’s age. The analysis reveals a contradiction in the Board’s decisions. Preschool children are regarded as affiliated to the broader society whilst living in their ‘home country’, but not while living in Norway. In order to understand this discrepancy, we explore and discuss the Board’s presuppositions about children’s affiliation to a society. The assumption that children do not affiliate to Norwegian society until they reach school age seems to stem from a simplified ‘common-sense’ understanding of attachment theories, even though this has been disputed in more recent theories of childhood, which state that even preschool children are capable of affiliating to the society in which they live. The Immigration Appeals Board underestimates the significance of affiliation to the society that the children develop by attending kindergarten. By automatically concluding that preschool children do not affiliate to Norwegian society, the Board avoids the difficult task of assessing whether depriving these children of their social network and the society in which they have grown up, is in the best interests of the child.