Hillegonda A. Stallinga
University Medical Center Groningen
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Hillegonda A. Stallinga.
Disability and Rehabilitation | 2018
Yvonne Heerkens; Marjolein de Weerd; Machteld Huber; Carin P.M. de Brouwer; Sabina van der Veen; R.J.M. Perenboom; Coen H. van Gool; Huib ten Napel; Marja van Bon-Martens; Hillegonda A. Stallinga; Nico L. U. van Meeteren
Abstract Purpose: The ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health) framework (used worldwide to describe ‘functioning’ and ‘disability’), including the ICF scheme (visualization of functioning as result of interaction with health condition and contextual factors), needs reconsideration. The purpose of this article is to discuss alternative ICF schemes. Method: Reconsideration of ICF via literature review and discussions with 23 Dutch ICF experts. Twenty-six experts were invited to rank the three resulting alternative schemes. Results:The literature review provided five themes: 1) societal developments; 2) health and research influences; 3) conceptualization of health; 4) models/frameworks of health and disability; and 5) ICF-criticism (e.g. position of ‘health condition’ at the top and role of ‘contextual factors’). Experts concluded that the ICF scheme gives the impression that the medical perspective is dominant instead of the biopsychosocial perspective. Three alternative ICF schemes were ranked by 16 (62%) experts, resulting in one preferred scheme. Conclusions: There is a need for a new ICF scheme, better reflecting the ICF framework, for further (inter)national consideration. These Dutch schemes should be reviewed on a global scale, to develop a scheme that is more consistent with current and foreseen developments and changing ideas on health. Implications for Rehabilitation We propose policy makers on community, regional and (inter)national level to consider the use of the alternative schemes of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health within their plans to promote functioning and health of their citizens and researchers and teachers to incorporate the alternative schemes into their research and education to emphasize the biopsychosocial paradigm. We propose to set up an international Delphi procedure involving citizens (including patients), experts in healthcare, occupational care, research, education and policy, and planning to get consensus on an alternative scheme of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. We recommend to discuss the alternatives for the present scheme of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in the present update and revision process within the World Health Organization as a part of the discussion on the future of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework (including ontology, title and relation with the International Classification of Diseases). We recommend to revise the definition of personal factors and to draft a list of personal factors that can be used in policy making, clinical practice, research, and education and to put effort in the revision of the present list of environmental factors to make it more useful in, e.g., occupational health care.
Clinical Rehabilitation | 2014
Hillegonda A. Stallinga; Pieter U. Dijkstra; Isaäc Bos; Yvonne Heerkens; Petrie F. Roodbol
Objective: This study explores, based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, the consequences of different operationalizations of participation in regression models predicting participation in one sample of patients. Design: Cross-sectional, comparative study. Setting: Department of Neurology of a University Hospital. Subjects: A total of 677 patients with a Neuromuscular Disease. Measures: Participation was measured using the Neuromuscular Disease Impact Profile questionnaire, the RAND-36 Item Health Survey (social functioning, role limitations—physical, role limitations—emotional) and the Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire (autonomy outdoors, social relations). Potential predictors of participation included type of neuromuscular disease, body functions (measured with Neuromuscular Disease Impact Profile), activities (measured with Neuromuscular Disease Impact Profile), environmental factors (measured with Neuromuscular Disease Impact Profile), and personal factors (measured with the 13-item Sense of Coherence questionnaire). The results were controlled for patient characteristics. Results: Participation was statistically predicted by different determinants depending on the operationalization used for participation. Additionally, the regression coefficients differed significantly. Body functions and activities were predictors in five out of six operationalizations of participation. Sense of coherence predicted participation in all of the operationalizations. The explained variance of the different models ranged from 25% (RAND-36 role limitations—emotional) to 65% (Neuromuscular Disease Impact Profile). Conclusions: Different operationalizations of participation result in different prediction models. Lack of conceptual consensus makes participation an ambiguous concept in research, and this ambiguity makes evidence-based decisions directed at enhancing participation difficult. Participation needs to be operationalized in an unambiguous and standard way in order to improve the comparability of outcomes.
Disability and Rehabilitation | 2018
Yvonne Heerkens; Marjolein de Weerd; Machteld Huber; Carin P.M. de Brouwer; Sabina van der Veen; R.J.M. Perenboom; Coen H. van Gool; Huib ten Napel; Marja van Bon-Martens; Hillegonda A. Stallinga; Nico L. U. van Meeteren
In January 2017 our article “Reconsideration of the scheme of the international classification of functioning, disability and health” was published in Disability & Rehabilitation (D&R) [1]. With th...
Tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen | 2017
Yvonne Heerkens; M. de Weerd; Machteld Huber; C.P. de Brouwer; S. van der Veen; R.J.M. Perenboom; C.H. van Gool; H.M.T.D. ten Napel; M. von Bon-Martens; Hillegonda A. Stallinga; N.L.U. van Meeteren
De International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) wordt sinds de publicatie in 2001 in toenemende mate gebruikt om het functioneren van mensen en de daarbij relevante factoren te beschrijven, zowel in de zorg als in onderzoek, onderwijs en beleid. Het ICF-begrippenkader bestaat uit: (1) een schema dat de componenten van de ICF weergeeft, inclusief het onderliggende biopsychosociale perspectief; en (2) een standaardterminologie: de verschillende classificaties (functies, anatomische eigenschappen, activiteiten/participatie, externe factoren), bestaande uit hoofdstukken met daaronder categorieen op verschillend detailniveau.
Journal of Advanced Nursing | 2005
Theo van Achterberg; Gerda Holleman; Yvonne Heijnen-Kaales; Ype van der Brug; Gabriel Roodbol; Hillegonda A. Stallinga; Fokje Hellema; Carla M. A. Frederiks
European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine | 2013
Isaäc Bos; Hillegonda A. Stallinga; Berrie Middel; Jan B. M. Kuks; Klaske Wynia
Journal of Clinical Nursing | 2014
Hillegonda A. Stallinga; Petrie F. Roodbol; Coby Annema; Gerard Jansen; Klaske Wynia
Journal of Clinical Nursing | 2015
Hillegonda A. Stallinga; Huib ten Napel; Gerard Jansen; Jan H. B. Geertzen; Pieter F. de Vries Robbé; Petrie F. Roodbol
Journal of Advanced Nursing | 2016
Hillegonda A. Stallinga; Gerard Jansen; Marijke C. Kastermans; Albert Pranger; Pieter U. Dijkstra; Petrie F. Roodbol
Nurse Education in Practice | 2018
Hillegonda A. Stallinga; Pieter U. Dijkstra; Huib ten Napel; Gabriël Roodbol; Jeroen W.B. Peters; Yvonne Heerkens; Petrie F. Roodbol