Hilton Ling

Reoperation in biological and mechanical valve populations: Fate of the reoperative patient

From 1975 through 1992 inclusive, reoperative valve replacement (REOP) was required by 12.9% of patients (708/5,499). Of 1,355 patients with mechanical prostheses (MP), 46 (3.4%) came to REOP versus 662 of 4,144 patients (16%) with biological prostheses (BP). Early REOP mortality rate was 17.4% (8/46) for MP and 10.6% (70/662) for BP (p = not significant). It was higher with age greater than 75 years (p < 0.05) and trended higher with concomitant procedures and with increasing number of REOPs (p = not significant). The percentage freedom from REOP at 5 and 10 years for all BP was 96.0% +/- 0.4% and 74.9% +/- 1.1% compared with 93.6% +/- 1.2% and 87.9% +/- 2.5% for MP. The most common cause of REOP in the BP patients was structural valve deterioration, which was uncommon in patients with MP (72% versus 2% of REOP but only 15% versus 0.1% of initial implants). Nonstructural dysfunction was the leading cause of REOP in the MP group (65% versus 11%). Prosthetic valve endocarditis (18% versus 10%) and thromboembolic complications (10% versus 1%) were also more frequent causes of REOP in MP patients. However, the increased relative role of these factors with MP is due to the minimal incidence of structural valve deterioration. When related to the original choice of MP versus BP, only thromboembolic complication (3.8 times) was more prevalent as a cause of REOP in patients receiving MP at their previous procedure (p = not significant). For patients who previously received BP, structural valve deterioration (69 times) was more likely to lead to REOP than with MP (p < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Performance of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses assessed by composites of valve-related complications to 15 years after aortic valve replacement

OBJECTIVE Predominant concerns of patients undergoing valve replacement surgery are risks of death, stroke, antithrombotic bleeding, and reoperation related to the replacement prosthesis. The purpose of this study was to compare valve-related reoperation, morbidity (permanent impairment), and mortality between bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses for mitral valve replacement. METHODS Between 1982 and 1998, a total of 959 bioprostheses were implanted in 943 patients, and a total of 961 mechanical prostheses were implanted in 839 patients. Total follow-ups were 5730 years for bioprostheses and 5271 years for mechanical prostheses. Eight variables were considered as predictors of risk for the composites of valve-related complications. RESULTS The linearized occurrence rates for valve-related reoperation were 3.7 events/100 patient-years for bioprostheses and 0.5 events/100 patient-years for mechanical prostheses ( P < .001), with all age groups differentiated except older than 70 years. Valve-related morbidity was undifferentiated for bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses. Valve-related mortalities were 1.7 events/100 patient-years for bioprostheses and 0.7 events/100 patient-years for mechanical prostheses ( P < .001). Predictors of valve-related reoperation were age and valve type. The only predictor of valve-related morbidity was age, whereas age and valve type were predictors for valve-related mortality. Actual freedom from valve-related reoperation favored mechanical prostheses in all age groups except older than 70 years (91.7% +/- 2.0% for bioprostheses at 15 years and 96.7% +/- 1.5% at 12 years for mechanical prostheses). Actual freedom from valve-related morbidity was not different between bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses. Actual freedom from valve-related mortality favored mechanical prostheses in all groups except older than 70 years. CONCLUSION Comparative evaluation gives high priority in mitral valve replacement for mechanical prostheses relative to bioprostheses for freedom from valve-related reoperation and valve-related mortality but not valve-related morbidity. Freedom from valve-related reoperation and valve-related mortality favors mechanical prostheses for all age groups except older than 70 years. Valve-related morbidity, due to neurologic or functional impairments, does not differentiate between bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses.

Reoperation for Bioprosthetic Mitral Structural Failure: Risk Assessment

Background—The predominant complication of bioprostheses is structural valve deterioration and the consequences of reoperation. The purpose of the study was to determine the mortality and risk assessment of that mortality for mitral bioprosthetic failure. Methods and Results—From 1975 to 1999, 1 973 patients received a heterograft bioprosthesis in 2 152 operations. The procedures were performed with concomitant coronary artery bypass (CAB) in 694 operations and without in 1 458 operations. There were 481 reoperations for structural valve deterioration performed in 463 patients with 34 fatalities (7.1%). Of the 481 re-replacements, 67 had CAB and 414 had isolated replacement; the mortality was 11.9% (8) and 6.3% (26), respectively. Eleven predictive factors inclusive of age, concomitant CAB, urgency status, New York Heart Association (NYHA; reoperation), and year of reoperation (year periods) were considered. The mortality from 1975 to 1986 was 9.8% (6/61), from 1987 to 1992 it was 10.8% (20/185), and from 1993 to 2000 it was 3.4% (8/235) (I versus III P =0.0458, II versus III P =0.0047). The mortality by urgency status was elective/urgent 6.0% (26/436) and emergent 17.8% (8/45) (P =0.00879). The mortality was NYHA I/II 0.00% (0/37), III 5.1% (14/273), and IV 11.7% (20/171) (P =0.0069). The predictive risk factors by multivariate regression analysis were age at implant, odds ratio (OR) 0.84 (P =0.0113); age at explant, OR 1.2 (P =0.0089); urgency, OR 2.8 (P =0.0264); NYHA, OR 2.5 (P =0.015); 1975–1986 versus 1993–2000 of reoperations, OR 5.8 (P =0.0062); and 1987–19 92 versus 1993–2000, OR 4.0 (P =0.0023). For the period 1993 to 2000 of reoperations, only age at implant and age at explant were significant; NYHA class, urgency status, and concomitant CAB were not significant. Conclusion—Bioprosthetic mitral reoperative mortality can be lowered by reoperations on an elective/urgent basis in low to medium NYHA functional class. The routine evaluation of patients can achieve earlier low risk reoperative surgery.

Mitral valve injury late after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

CLINICAL SUMMARY An 88-year-old man with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis underwent percutaneous TAVI with a 26-mm SAPIEN valve (Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, Calif). Comorbid conditions included coronary artery bypass with patent retrosternal grafts, transient ischemic attacks, bilateral carotid endarterectomies, atrial fibrillation, repaired abdominal aneurysm, prostate cancer, and renal failure. Estimated 30day mortality for AVR was 35% by means of logistic EuroSCORE and 11.1% by means of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database Risk Calculator. The procedure was performed without difficulty, but the final valve position was suboptimal, being slightly low (ventricularly), with the ventricular aspect of the stent abutting the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve (MV). Moderate paravalvular aortic regurgitation (AR) was treated with repeated balloon redilation without altering the valve position. Six-month transthoracic echocardiographic analysis showed trivial AR and mitral regurgitation. The patient presented 11 months after implantation with fever and Streptococcus angiosus in blood cultures. Also noted were a dental visit 6 weeks before and lack of compliance with endocarditis prophylaxis. Transesophageal echocardiographic analysis demonstrated mild-to-moderate paravalvular AR, a 13 3 8–mm ruptured anterior mitral leaflet aneurysm contiguous with the aortic prosthesis, and severe mitral regurgitation (Figure 1). Redo sternotomy was performed during cardiopulmonary bypass after cannulating the right axillary artery and right internal jugular vein. The bioprosthesis was well-seated below the coronary arteries with incomplete endothelialization of the uppermost struts and covered with nodular excrescences (Figure 2). It withstood extraction while fully expanded but was removable when grasped with forceps, which were

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in young women

Spontaneous dissection of the coronary arteries is quite rare. It is usually a catastrophic event with fatal outcome. We report two interesting cases of spontaneous dissection whose presentations exemplify the variable course the disorder may take. The first is the only report to our knowledge associated with aerobic exercise; the second is the only reported attempt at treatment with intracoronary thrombolysis.

Carpentier-Edwards supraannular porcine bioprosthesis: second-generation prosthesis in aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND The Carpentier-Edwards supraannular porcine bioprosthesis experience for more than 18 years has been evaluated by actuarial and actual analysis to determine the clinical performance in aortic valve replacement. METHODS From 1981 to 1998, 1,823 patients (mean age 68.5 years, range 20 to 90 years) underwent 1,846 procedures. Previous coronary artery bypass was performed in 3.1% (56) and previous valve repair/replacement in 6.0% (110). Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 41.5% (756). RESULTS The overall valve-related complication rate was 4.5%/patient-year (567 patients) with a fatality rate of 0.9%/patient-year (110 patients). The patient survival, at 15 years, was 33.0%+/-3.7% for the 61 to 70 years age group and 13.5%+/-2.4% for the older than 70 years group. At 15 years, the overall actual, cumulative freedom from reoperation was 83.2%+/-1.4%, valve-related mortality was 88.0%+/-1.2%, and valve-related residual morbidity was 92.0%+/-0.8%. The actual freedom from structural valve deterioration at 15 years was 84.2%+/-2.8% for the 61 to 70 years group and 97.1%+/-0.9% for the older than 70 years group. CONCLUSIONS The Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis provides excellent freedom from structural valve deterioration, and overall freedom from valve-related morbidity, mortality, and reoperation for aortic valve replacement for up to 15 years. The prosthesis is recommended for patients older than 70 years and for patients 61 to 70 years, especially when extended survival is not anticipated.

Carpentier-Edwards supraannular porcine bioprosthesis evaluation over 15 years

BACKGROUND The Carpentier-Edwards supraannular porcine bioprosthesis experience during 15 years has been evaluated to determine the incidence of structural valve deterioration by valve position in various age groupings. METHODS From 1981 to 1995, 2,943 patients older than 20 years had the prosthesis implanted in 3,024 procedures. The mean age of the population was 65.5+/-11.9 years (range, 21 to 89 years). Aortic valve replacement was performed in 1,657 patients (54.8%); mitral valve replacement, 1,092 (36.1%); multiple valve replacement, 253 (8.3%); pulmonary valve replacement, 2 (0.1%); and tricuspid valve replacement, 20 (0.7%). Concomitant procedures were performed in 1,332 patients (45.3%), and 352 (12.0%) had previous procedures. RESULTS The early mortality was 8.9% (270), only 0.4% (11) valve-related. The total follow-up was 17,471 years (mean, 5.9+/-4.1 years). The late mortality was 5.2%/ patient-year (901) with the valve-related component 1.0%/patient-year (171). The reoperation rate was 2.1%/ patient-year (369) with 4.3% mortality (16). The linearized rate of structural valve deterioration was 2.0%/patient-year (341), and overall complications, 5.9%/patient-year (1,019). The overall survival, at 15 years, was 31.1%+/2.8% (p < 0.05; aortic valve replacement greater than mitral valve replacement or multiple valve replacement). The freedom from structural valve deterioration for aortic valve replacement was, at 12 years, for patients older than 70 years, 95.3%+/-2.7%; 61 to 70 years, 92.9%+/-2.1%; 51 to 60 years, 70.1%+/-5.3%; 41 to 50 years, 60.0%+/-8.8%; and 21 to 40 years, 75.7%+/-7.3%. The freedom from structural valve deterioration for mitral valve replacement was, at 12 years, for patients older than 70 years, 66.1%+/-9.7%; 61 to 70 years, 53.1%+/-4.7%; 51 to 60 years, 52.6%+/-5.5%; 41 to 50 years, 39.3%+/-6.9%; and 21 to 40 years, 42.1%+/-9.4%. CONCLUSIONS The prosthesis is recommended for aortic valve replacement for patients older than 70 years and for patients 61 to 70 years (when extended longevity is not anticipated) and for mitral valve replacement for patients older than 70 years (when extended longevity is not anticipated).

Mitroflow aortic pericardial bioprosthesis--clinical performance.

OBJECTIVE Advancing life expectancy with the increased prevalence of aortic valve degenerative disease brings the need for an aortic bioprosthesis with excellent haemodynamic performance and comparable durability. The Mitroflow bioprosthesis has been on the worldwide market, except in the United States, since 1982, while the current model (1991) has only recently gained regulatory approval in the latter country. This study was primarily performed to determine the durability of the current Mitroflow bioprosthesis. METHODS The contemporary Mitroflow bioprosthesis was implanted in 381 patients in three centres. The mean age was 76.4 years (range 53-91 years) and the mean follow-up period was 5.4+/-3.4 years, a total of 2048.7 years of evaluation. Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) was classified by reference effective orifice area index categories: normal > or = 0.85 cm(2) m(-2) (53.9%), mild 0.84-0.76 cm(2) m(-2) (33.9%), moderate < or = 0.75-0.66 cm(2) m(-2) (11.7%) and severe < or = 0.65 cm(2) m(-2) (0.5%). RESULTS The survival, at 10 years, was 39.9+/-7.9% for 50-69 years, 27.0+/-3.7% for 70-79 years and 16.6+/-4.4% for > or = 80 years (p=0.011). There was a trend (p=0.063) influencing survival for moderate-to-severe PPM. Of the independent predictors influencing survival--moderate-to-severe projected effective orifice area index (pEOAI) (Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.6, p=0.0142) and left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < 35%) (HR 1.9, p=0.0193) were included. The 10-year freedom from structural valve deterioration (SVD) at explant assessing the same age groups as survival was not different (p=0.081). The 10-year actual/actuarial freedom from SVD, at explant was for > or = 60 years--94.4+/-1.4% (85.2+/-3.9%), for > or = 65 years--94.2+/-1.4% (85.0+/-4.0%), for 61-70 years--97.4+/-2.6% (95.7+/-4.3%) and for > 70 years--94.0+/-1.5% (83.2+/-4.6%). CONCLUSIONS The Mitroflow external mounted, pericardial aortic bioprosthesis with documented excellent haemodynamics (especially for the small aortic root), demonstrates that prosthesis-patient mismatch in moderate and severe categories can essentially be eliminated, with durability performance comparable to other heterograft (porcine and pericardial) bioprostheses.

A potential clinical method for calculating transmural left ventricular filling pressure during positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation: An intraoperative study in humans

OBJECTIVES This study sought to investigate whether right atrial pressure could be used to estimate pericardial pressure during positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). BACKGROUND Because of elevated intrathoracic pressure during PEEP, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure may not accurately reflect left ventricular preload. An estimate of pericardial pressure during PEEP would allow assessment of transmural filling pressure. METHODS In eight patients, at the start of cardiac surgery, pericardial and pleural pressures were recorded by balloon transducers placed over the anterolateral left ventricular wall. We also recorded intravascular pressures and left ventricular short-axis area by transesophageal echocardiography. RESULTS A stepwise increase in PEEP from 0 to 15 cm H2O caused a linear increase in pleural pressure from 0.3 +/- 0.6 (mean +/- SEM) to 6.1 +/- 0.8 mm Hg (p < 0.01). Pericardial pressure increased from 2.3 +/- 0.5 to 5.9 +/- 0.6 mm Hg (p < 0.01). The correlation between right atrial (Pra) and pericardial pressure (Pperic) was good: Pra = 0.85 x Pperic + 1.8, r = 0.77. The correlation between changes in right atrial pressure and in pericardial pressure was better: delta Pra = 0.96 x delta Pperic -0.2, r = 0.97. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure increased with PEEP (p < 0.05), whereas left ventricular area decreased (p < 0.05). However, there was a progressive reduction in transmural pressure, calculated as wedge pressure minus pericardial pressure (p < 0.05), and in transmural pressure, estimated as wedge pressure minus right atrial pressure (p < 0.05). The estimated transmural filling pressure correlated (r = 0.86) with end-diastolic area. CONCLUSIONS The present observations suggest that right atrial pressure may be used to estimate changes in pericardial pressure with PEEP and that pulmonary capillary wedge pressure minus right atrial pressure is a potentially clinically useful approximation of transmural filling pressure.

Clinical performance of biological and mechanical prostheses

Prosthetic valve replacement remains the most viable alternative for the treatment of severely diseased heart valves. The cumulative experience of mechanical protheses and bioprostheses was evaluated for a 10-year performance comparison: Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis (CE-S), 1,214 operations; Carpentier-Edwards supraannular porcine bioprosthesis (CE-SAV), 2,489; and mechanical prostheses, 1,364 operations (St. Jude Medical, Carbomedics, Duromedics, and Björk-Shiley Monostrut). The freedom from thromboembolism and hemorrhage at 10 years was 82% for CE-S, 78% for CE-SAV, and 65% for mechanical prostheses (p < 0.05). The relationship existed for major thromboembolism and hemorrhage, 91% (CE-S), 87% (CE-SAV), and 88% (mechanical) (p < 0.05), without clinical relevance. The freedom from structural valve deterioration and valve-related reoperation favored mechanical prostheses (p < 0.05) at 10 years (structural failure: 78% for CE-S, 81% for CE-SAV, and 99% for the mechanical group; reoperation: 74% for CE-S, 76% for CE-SAV, and 88% for mechanical prostheses). The freedom from fatal reoperation was not clinically different: 96% for CE-S, 99% for CE-SAV, and 99% for mechanical prostheses (p < 0.05) at 10 years. The freedom from valve-related mortality was not different (p = not significant) at 10 years: 87% for CE-S; 92% for CE-SAV; and 91% for mechanical. The freedom from permanent impairment or residual morbidity, primarily from thromboembolism, was 95% for CE-S, 92% for CE-SAV, and 95% for mechanical group (p < 0.05) but not clinically relevant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)