Hiraki Sakuta

Identification of Retinal Ganglion Cells and Their Projections Involved in Central Transmission of Information about Upward and Downward Image Motion

The direction of image motion is coded by direction-selective (DS) ganglion cells in the retina. Particularly, the ON DS ganglion cells project their axons specifically to terminal nuclei of the accessory optic system (AOS) responsible for optokinetic reflex (OKR). We recently generated a knock-in mouse in which SPIG1 (SPARC-related protein containing immunoglobulin domains 1)-expressing cells are visualized with GFP, and found that retinal ganglion cells projecting to the medial terminal nucleus (MTN), the principal nucleus of the AOS, are comprised of SPIG1+ and SPIG1− ganglion cells distributed in distinct mosaic patterns in the retina. Here we examined light responses of these two subtypes of MTN-projecting cells by targeted electrophysiological recordings. SPIG1+ and SPIG1− ganglion cells respond preferentially to upward motion and downward motion, respectively, in the visual field. The direction selectivity of SPIG1+ ganglion cells develops normally in dark-reared mice. The MTN neurons are activated by optokinetic stimuli only of the vertical motion as shown by Fos expression analysis. Combination of genetic labeling and conventional retrograde labeling revealed that axons of SPIG1+ and SPIG1− ganglion cells project to the MTN via different pathways. The axon terminals of the two subtypes are organized into discrete clusters in the MTN. These results suggest that information about upward and downward image motion transmitted by distinct ON DS cells is separately processed in the MTN, if not independently. Our findings provide insights into the neural mechanisms of OKR, how information about the direction of image motion is deciphered by the AOS.

Identification of RALDH-3, a novel retinaldehyde dehydrogenase, expressed in the ventral region of the retina

In the developing retina, a retinoic acid (RA) gradient along the dorso-ventral axis is believed to be a prerequisite for the establishment of dorso-ventral asymmetry. This RA gradient is thought to result from the asymmetrical distribution of RA-generating aldehyde dehydrogenases along the dorso-ventral axis. Here, we identified a novel aldehyde dehydrogenase specifically expressed in the chick ventral retina, using restriction landmark cDNA scanning (RLCS). Since this molecule showed enzymatic activity to produce RA from retinaldehyde, we designated it retinaldehyde dehydrogenase 3 (RALDH-3). Structural similarity suggested that RALDH-3 is the orthologue of human aldehyde dehydrogenase 6. We also isolated RALDH-1 which is expressed in the chick dorsal retina and implicated in RA formation. Raldh-3 was preferentially expressed first in the surface ectoderm overlying the ventral portion of the prospective eye region and then in the ventral retina, earlier than Raldh-1 in chick and mouse embryos. High level expression of Raldh-3 was also observed in the nasal region. In addition, we found that Pax6 mutants are devoid of Raldh-3 expression. These results suggested that Raldh-3 is the key enzyme in the formation of an RA gradient along the dorso-ventral axis during the early eye development, and also in the development of the olfactory system.

Eph receptors are negatively controlled by protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type O

Eph receptors are activated by the autophosphorylation of tyrosine residues upon the binding of their ligands, the ephrins; however, the protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) responsible for the negative regulation of Eph receptors have not been elucidated. Here, we identified protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type O (Ptpro) as a specific PTP that efficiently dephosphorylates both EphA and EphB receptors as substrates. Biochemical analyses revealed that Ptpro dephosphorylates a phosphotyrosine residue conserved in the juxtamembrane region, which is required for the activation and signal transmission of Eph receptors. Ptpro thus seems to moderate the amount of maximal activation of Eph receptors. Using the chick retinotectal projection system, we show that Ptpro controls the sensitivity of retinal axons to ephrins and thereby has a crucial role in the establishment of topographic projections. Our findings explain the molecular mechanism that determines the threshold of the response of Eph receptors to ephrins in vivo.

Expression of SPIG1 Reveals Development of a Retinal Ganglion Cell Subtype Projecting to the Medial Terminal Nucleus in the Mouse

Visual information is transmitted to the brain by roughly a dozen distinct types of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) defined by a characteristic morphology, physiology, and central projections. However, our understanding about how these parallel pathways develop is still in its infancy, because few molecular markers corresponding to individual RGC types are available. Previously, we reported a secretory protein, SPIG1 (clone name; D/Bsp120I #1), preferentially expressed in the dorsal region in the developing chick retina. Here, we generated knock-in mice to visualize SPIG1-expressing cells with green fluorescent protein. We found that the mouse retina is subdivided into two distinct domains for SPIG1 expression and SPIG1 effectively marks a unique subtype of the retinal ganglion cells during the neonatal period. SPIG1-positive RGCs in the dorsotemporal domain project to the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN), superior colliculus, and accessory optic system (AOS). In contrast, in the remaining region, here named the pan-ventronasal domain, SPIG1-positive cells form a regular mosaic and project exclusively to the medial terminal nucleus (MTN) of the AOS that mediates the optokinetic nystagmus as early as P1. Their dendrites costratify with ON cholinergic amacrine strata in the inner plexiform layer as early as P3. These findings suggest that these SPIG1-positive cells are the ON direction selective ganglion cells (DSGCs). Moreover, the MTN-projecting cells in the pan-ventronasal domain are apparently composed of two distinct but interdependent regular mosaics depending on the presence or absence of SPIG1, indicating that they comprise two functionally distinct subtypes of the ON DSGCs. The formation of the regular mosaic appears to be commenced at the end of the prenatal stage and completed through the peak period of the cell death at P6. SPIG1 will thus serve as a useful molecular marker for future studies on the development and function of ON DSGCs.

CBF1 controls the retinotectal topographical map along the anteroposterior axis through multiple mechanisms.

Chick brain factor 1 (CBF1), a nasal retina-specific winged-helix transcription factor, is known to prescribe the nasal specificity that leads to the formation of the precise retinotectal map, especially along the anteroposterior (AP) axis. However, its downstream topographic genes and the molecular mechanisms by which CBF1 controls the expression of them have not been elucidated. We show that misexpression of CBF1 represses the expression of EphA3 and CBF2, and induces that of SOHo1, GH6, ephrin A2 and ephrin A5. CBF1 controls ephrin A5 by a DNA binding-dependent mechanism, ephrin A2 by a DNA binding-independent mechanism, and CBF2, SOHo1, GH6 and EphA3 by dual mechanisms. BMP2 expression begins double-gradiently in the retina from E5 in a complementary pattern to Ventroptin expression. Ventroptin antagonizes BMP2 as well as BMP4. CBF1 interferes in BMP2 signaling and thereby induces expression of ephrin A2. Our data suggest that CBF1 is located at the top of the gene cascade for the regional specification along the nasotemporal (NT) axis in the retina and distinct BMP signals play pivotal roles in the topographic projection along both axes.

Role of Bone Morphogenic Protein 2 in Retinal Patterning and Retinotectal Projection

It has been long believed that the anteroposterior (A-P) and dorsoventral (D-V) axes in the developing retina are determined independently and also that the retinotectal projection along the two axes is controlled independently. However, we recently demonstrated that misexpression of Ventroptin, a bone morphogenic protein (BMP) antagonist, in the developing chick retina alters the retinotectal projection not only along the D-V (or mediolateral) axis but also along the A-P axis. Moreover, the dorsal-high expression of BMP4 is relieved by the dorsotemporal-high expression of BMP2 at embryonic day 5 (E5) in the retina, during which Ventroptin continuously counteracts the two BMPs keeping on the countergradient expression pattern, respectively. Here, we show that the topographic molecules so far reported to have a gradient only along the D-V axis and ephrin-A2 so far only along the A-P axis are both controlled by the BMP signal, and that they are expressed in a gradient manner along the tilted axis from E6 on in the developing chick retina: the expression patterns of these oblique-gradient molecules are all changed, when BMP2 expression is manipulated in the developing retina. Furthermore, in both BMP2 knockdown embryos and ephrin-A2-misexpressed embryos, the retinotectal projection is altered along the two orthogonal axes. The expressional switching from BMP4 to BMP2 thus appears to play a key role in the retinal patterning and topographic retinotectal projection by tilting the D-V axis toward the posterior side during retinal development. Our results also indicate that BMP2 expression is essential for the maintenance of regional specificity along the revised D-V axis.

Central regulation of body-fluid homeostasis

Body-fluid homeostasis is essential to life, and the concentration of Na(+) ([Na(+)]) and osmolality in plasma and the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are continuously monitored in the brain. To maintain a physiological level of Na/osmolality in body fluids, the control of Na and water intake and excretion are of prime importance. Two independent sensing systems for [Na(+)] and osmolality in circumventricular organs (CVOs) have long been postulated to be involved in the monitoring of body-fluid conditions. In the past decade, several molecules were reported as promising candidates for these sensors - Nax for the [Na(+)] sensor and transient receptor potential (TRP) channels for the osmosensor. This review presents a summary of developments in these areas over recent years.

APC2 Plays an Essential Role in Axonal Projections through the Regulation of Microtubule Stability

Growth cones at the tip of growing axons are key cellular structures that detect guidance cues and mediate axonal growth. An increasing number of studies have suggested that the dynamic regulation of microtubules in the growth cone plays an essential role in growth cone steering. The dynamic properties of microtubules are considered to be regulated by variegated cellular factors but, in particular, through microtubule-interacting proteins. Here, we examined the functional role of adenomatous polyposis coli-like molecule 2 (APC2) in the development of axonal projections by using the chick retinotectal topographic projection system. APC2 is preferentially expressed in the nervous system from early developmental stages through to adulthood. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that APC2 is distributed along microtubules in growth cones as well as axon shafts of retinal axons. Overexpression of APC2 in cultured cells induced the stabilization of microtubules, whereas the knockdown of APC2 in chick retinas with specific short hairpin RNA reduced the stability of microtubules in retinal axons. APC2 knockdown retinal axons showed abnormal growth attributable to a reduced response to ephrin-A2 in vitro. Furthermore, they showed drastic alterations in retinotectal projections without making clear target zones in the tectum in vivo. These results suggest that APC2 plays a critical role in the development of the nervous system through the regulation of microtubule stability.

Functional mode of FoxD1/CBF2 for the establishment of temporal retinal specificity in the developing chick retina

Two winged-helix transcription factors, FoxG1 (previously called chick brain factor1, CBF1) and FoxD1 (chick brain factor2, CBF2), are expressed specifically in the nasal and temporal regions of the developing chick retina, respectively. We previously demonstrated that FoxG1 controls the expression of topographic molecules including FoxD1, and determines the regional specificity of the nasal retina. FoxD1 is known to prescribe temporal specificity, however, molecular mechanisms and downstream targets have not been elucidated. Here we addressed the genetic mechanisms for establishing temporal specificity in the developing retina using an in ovo electroporation technique. Fibroblast growth factor (Fgf) and Wnt first play pivotal roles in inducing the region-specific expression of FoxG1 and FoxD1 in the optic vesicle. Misexpression of FoxD1 represses the expression of FoxG1, GH6, SOHo1, and ephrin-A5, and induces that of EphA3 in the retina. GH6 and SOHo1 repress the expression of FoxD1. In contrast to the inhibitory effect of FoxG1 on bone morphogenic protein (BMP) signaling, FoxD1 does not alter the expression of BMP4 or BMP2. Studies with chimeric mutants of FoxD1 showed that FoxD1 acts as a transcription repressor in controlling its downstream targets in the retina. Taken together with previous findings, our data suggest that FoxG1 and FoxD1 are located at the top of the gene cascade for regional specification along the nasotemporal (anteroposterior) axis in the retina, and FoxD1 determines temporal specificity.

Retrovirus vector-mediated gene transfer into the chick optic vesicle by in ovo electroporation

Owing to its external position in the embryo, the chick eye has been used as a readily accessible model for studying the molecular mechanisms behind the patterning of the central nervous system. Although methods of genetic analysis have not been established as in the mouse, the chick is convenient for analyzing the functions of genes by in ovo electroporation of retroviral vectors. In this review, we describe the retroviral vector‐mediated transfer of genes into the chick optic vesicle by in ovo electroporation. A rapid, efficient, and sustained expression of transgenes is achieved by this approach.