Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Hironori Shiozaki is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Hironori Shiozaki.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2014

Importance of Surveillance and Success of Salvage Strategies After Definitive Chemoradiation in Patients With Esophageal Cancer

Kazuki Sudo; Lianchun Xiao; Roopma Wadhwa; Hironori Shiozaki; Elena Elimova; Takashi Taketa; Mariela A. Blum; Jeffrey H. Lee; Manoop S. Bhutani; Brian Weston; William A. Ross; Ritsuko Komaki; David C. Rice; Stephen G. Swisher; Wayne L. Hofstetter; Dipen M. Maru; Heath D. Skinner; Jaffer A. Ajani

PURPOSE Patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC) who are treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (bimodality therapy [BMT]) experience frequent relapses. In a large cohort, we assessed the timing, frequency, and types of relapses during an aggressive surveillance program and the value of the salvage strategies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with EC (N = 276) who received BMT were analyzed. Patients who had surgery within 6 months of chemoradiotherapy were excluded to reduce bias. We focused on local relapse (LR) and distant metastases (DM) and the salvage treatment of patients with LR only. Standard statistical methods were applied. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 54.3 months (95% CI, 48.4 to 62.4). First relapses included LR only in 23.2% (n = 64), DM with or without LR in 43.5% (n = 120), and no relapses in 33.3% (n = 92) of patients. Final relapses included no relapses in 33.3%, LR only in 14.5%, DM only in 15.9%, and DM plus LR in 36.2% of patients. Ninety-one percent of LRs occurred within 2 years and 98% occurred within 3 years of BMT. Twenty-three (36%) of 64 patients with LR only underwent salvage surgery, and their median overall survival was 58.6 months (95% CI, 28.8 to not reached) compared with those patients with LR only who were unable to undergo surgery (9.5 months; 95% CI, 7.8 to 13.3). CONCLUSION Unlike in patients undergoing trimodality therapy, for whom surveillance/salvage treatment plays a lesser role,(1) in the BMT population, approximately 8% of all patients (or 36% of patients with LR only) with LRs occurring more than 6 months after chemoradiotherapy can undergo salvage treatment, and their survival is excellent. Our data support vigilant surveillance, at least in the first 24 months after chemotherapy, in these patients.


World Journal of Gastroenterology | 2014

Medical management of gastric cancer: A 2014 update

Elena Elimova; Hironori Shiozaki; Roopma Wadhwa; Kazuki Sudo; Qiongrong Chen; Jeannelyn S. Estrella; Mariela A. Blum; Brian D. Badgwell; Prajnan Das; Shumei Song; Jaffer A. Ajani

Gastric cancer represents a serious health problem on a global scale. It is the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Novel therapeutic targets are desperately needed because the meager improvement in the cure rate of about 10% realized by adjunctive treatments to surgery is unacceptable as > 50% patients with localized gastric cancer succumb to their disease. Either postoperative chemoradiotherapy (United States), pre-and post-operative chemotherapy (Europe), and adjuvant chemotherapy after a D2 resection (Asia) can all be regarded as standards of care in the localized gastric cancer management. In metastatic disease the addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy is standard of care in Her2 positive disease. In the HER2 negative population, the treatments remain limited. In the first line setting, the standard of care is a combination of fluoropyrimidine and platinum containing chemotherapy, with or without epirubicin or docetaxel. The results of targeted therapy trials have by and large been disappointing, but none of these trials looked at an appropriately enriched population. Finally there is a meager overall survival benefit in treating patients with metastatic disease in the second line setting, with either irinotecan, docetaxel or ramucirumab however none of these drugs have been compared head to head in a well-powered randomized controlled trial.


Cancer | 2014

A validated miRNA profile predicts response to therapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma

Heath D. Skinner; Jeffrey H. Lee; Manoop S. Bhutani; Brian Weston; Wayne L. Hofstetter; Ritsuko Komaki; Hironori Shiozaki; Roopma Wadhwa; Kazuki Sudo; Elena Elimova; Shumei Song; Yuanqing Ye; Maosheng Huang; Jaffer A. Ajani; Xifeng Wu

In the current study we present a validated miRNA signature to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in esophageal adenocarcinoma.


Oncology | 2014

Distribution and Timing of Distant Metastasis after Local Therapy in a Large Cohort of Patients with Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancer

Hironori Shiozaki; Kazuki Sudo; Lianchun Xiao; Roopma Wadhwa; Elena Elimova; Wayne L. Hofstetter; Heath D. Skinner; Jeffrey H. Lee; Brian Weston; Manoop S. Bhutani; Mariela A. Blum; Dipen M. Maru; Jaffer A. Ajani

Background: Patients with localized esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer (EAC) receive chemoradiation and then surgery (trimodality, TMT) or definitive chemoradiation (bimodality, BMT). Distant metastases (DMs) are common but the details of their distribution and timing in a large cohort have not been described. Methods: 629 patients with localized EAC who had TMT or BMT were analyzed. Standard statistical methods were used to define the end points. Results: The median follow-up time was 37.2 months (interquartile range 17.8-65.0). Of 356 TMT patients, 33% (119) developed DM as their first relapse and of 273 BMT patients, 40% (109) developed DM; 91% (TMT) and 96% (BMT) of the DMs were diagnosed within 2 years of local therapy. The most common sites of DM were: lung, distant nodes, liver, peritoneal cavity, bone, brain and pleura in order of frequency. The median overall survival of TMT patients with DM was 10.2 months (95% CI 7.8-12.7) and that for BMT patients with DM was 7.8 months (95% CI 5.7-9.9). Conclusions: Following TMT or BMT, ≥33% of patients developed DMs and most of these occurred within 2 years (>90%) of local therapy. A clinical model is desirable that associates clinical parameters with a high risk for DM in TMT-eligible patients prior to surgery.


European Journal of Cancer | 2015

18-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission computed tomography as predictive of response after chemoradiation in oesophageal cancer patients.

Elena Elimova; Xuemei Wang; Elba C. Etchebehere; Hironori Shiozaki; Yusuke Shimodaira; Roopma Wadhwa; Venkatram Planjery; Nikolaos Charalampakis; Mariela A. Blum; Wayne L. Hofstetter; Jeffrey H. Lee; Brian Weston; Manoop S. Bhutani; Jane E. Rogers; Dipen M. Maru; Heath D. Skinner; Homer A. Macapinlac; Jaffer A. Ajani

INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to evaluate if a baseline, an interim or a post-chemoradiation (CTRT) 18-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) studies could provide information on pathologic response to CTRT and overall survival (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-one patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus, fit for trimodality therapy were prospectively enrolled. Most were men (93.5%), and had a stage III cancer (74.2%). Chemotherapy consisted of oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil (45.2%) and taxane/5-fluorouracil (54.8%). All patients underwent a baseline, an interim (performed 12 ± 2 days after the onset of CTRT) and a post-CTRT 18F-FDG PET/CT study. The 18F-FDG PET/CT variables evaluated were at baseline, interim and post-CTRT studies maximum standardised uptake value (SUV max) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Clinical and 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters were correlated with pathologic complete response (pathCR) and OS. RESULTS Among the 31 patients studied, 61.3% achieved a clinical complete response (cCR) and 87.1% had surgery. The median OS was 35.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 19.9-NA). PathCR rate was 22.2%. There was only a marginal association between cCR and pathCR (p = 0.06). None of the other variables was predictive of pathCR. There was association between OS and baseline TLG (p = 0.03) at the optimal cutoff TLG value of 75.15. Additionally, TLG and ΔTLG post-CTRT were also associated with OS (p = 0.01 and 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSION None of the PET parameters is predictive of pathCR but TLG at baseline and post-CTRT are prognostic of OS.


Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy | 2014

Anti-angiogenic agent ramucirumab: meaningful or marginal?

Roopma Wadhwa; Elena Elimova; Hironori Shiozaki; Kazuki Sudo; Mariela A. Blum; Jeannelyn S. Estrella; Qiongrong Chen; Shumei Song; Jaffer A. Ajani

Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B) targets VEGFR-2. Ramucirumab is being investigated in many malignancies including gastric cancer. The Phase III trial in patients with advanced breast cancer failed to improve the primary end point The REGARD trial, a Phase III study, in patients with advanced gastric cancer in the second line setting, had a marginal improvement in overall survival but did not achieve the expected hazard ratio target (of 0.69) and the median duration of therapy with ramucirumab was meager 8 weeks (only 2 weeks longer than the placebo’s). Other notable agents in the second line setting are docetaxel and irinotecan. Preliminary results of the RAINBOW trial suggest that ramucirumab may be providing more than marginal advantage. In this review, we briefly summarize the process of angiogenesis and address the emerging cost-benefit issues that surround all newly developed agents including ramucirumab.


Oncology | 2016

Metastatic Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma Patients Treated with Systemic Therapy Followed by Consolidative Local Therapy: A Nomogram Associated with Long-Term Survivors

Hironori Shiozaki; Rebecca S. Slack; Hsiang Chun Chen; Elena Elimova; Venkatram Planjery; Nick Charalampakis; Roopma Wadhwa; Yusuke Shimodaira; Heath D. Skinner; Jeffrey H. Lee; Brian Weston; Manoop S. Bhutani; Mariela Blum-Murphy; Jane E. Rogers; Dipen M. Maru; Aurelio Matamoros; Tara Sagebiel; Jeannelyn S. Estrella; Prajnan Das; Wayne L. Hofstetter; Jeannette E. Mares; Dilsa Mizrak Kaya; Kazuto Harada; Quan Lin; Bruce D. Minsky; Brian D. Badgwell; Jaffer A. Ajani

Objective: Patients with metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (MGEAC) have a poor but heterogeneous clinical course. Some patients have an unusually favorable outcome. We sought to identify clinical variables associated with more favorable outcomes. Methods: Of 246 patients with MGEAC, we identified 64 who received systemic therapy and eventually received local consolidation therapy. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used, and a nomogram was developed. Results: Of these 64 patients, 61% had received consolidation chemoradiation (CRT) with doses of 50-55 Gy and 78% did not undergo surgery. The median follow-up time of survivors was 3.9 years, and the median overall survival (OS) from CRT start was 1.5 years (95% CI, 1.2-2.2). Surgery (as local consolidation) was an independent prognosticator for longer OS in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.02). The 5-year OS rate was 25% (SE = 6%). The contributors to the nomogram were longer duration of systemic therapy before CRT and the type of local therapy. Conclusions: Our data suggest that a subset of patients with MGEAC have an excellent prognosis (OS >5 years). However, these patients need to be identified during their clinical course so that local consolidation (CRT, surgery, or both) may be offered.


British Journal of Cancer | 2017

Nuclear expression of Gli-1 is predictive of pathologic complete response to chemoradiation in trimodality treated oesophageal cancer patients

Roopma Wadhwa; Xuemei Wang; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani; Bin Liu; Hironori Shiozaki; Yusuke Shimodaira; Quan Lin; Elena Elimova; Wayne L. Hofstetter; Stephen G. Swisher; David C. Rice; Dipen M. Maru; Neda Kalhor; Manoop S. Bhutani; Brian Weston; Jeffrey H. Lee; Heath D. Skinner; Ailing W. Scott; Dilsa Mizrak Kaya; Kazuto Harada; Donald A. Berry; Shumei Song; Jaffer A. Ajani

Background:Predictive biomarkers or signature(s) for oesophageal cancer (OC) patients undergoing preoperative therapy could help administration of effective therapy, avoidance of ineffective ones, and establishment new strategies. Since the hedgehog pathway is often upregulated in OC, we examined its transcriptional factor, Gli-1, which confers therapy resistance, we wanted to assess Gli-1 as a predictive biomarker for chemoradiation response and validate it.Methods:Untreated OC tissues from patients who underwent chemoradiation and surgery were assessed for nuclear Gli-1 by immunohistochemistry and labelling indices (LIs) were correlated with pathologic complete response (pathCR) or <pathCR (resistance) and validated in a unique cohort.Results:Initial 60 patients formed the discovery set (TDS) and then unique 167 patients formed the validation set (TVS). 16 (27%) patients in TDS and 40 (24%) patients in TVS achieved a pathCR. Nuclear Gli-1 LIs were highly associated with pathCR based on the fitted logistic regression models (P<0.0001) in TDS and TVS. The areas under the curve (AUCs) for receiver-operating characteristics (ROCs) based on a fitted model were 0.813 (fivefold cross validation (0.813) and bootstrap resampling (0.816) for TDS and 0.902 (fivefold cross validation (0.901) and bootstrap resampling (0.902)) for TVS. Our preclinical (including genetic knockdown) studies with FU or radiation resistant cell lines demonstrated that Gli-1 indeed mediates therapy resistance in OC.Conclusions:Our validated data in OC show that nuclear Gli-1 LIs are predictive of pathCR after chemoradiation with desirable sensitivity and specificity.


Journal of Surgical Oncology | 2016

Prognosis of gastric adenocarcinoma patients with various burdens of peritoneal metastases

Hironori Shiozaki; Elena Elimova; Rebecca S. Slack; Hsiang Chun Chen; Gregg Staerkel; Nour Sneige; Yusuke Shimodaira; Tara Sagebiel; Jeffrey H. Lee; Manoop S. Bhutani; Prajnan Das; Paul F. Mansfield; Jeannelyn S. Estrella; Brian D. Badgwell; Jaffer A. Ajani

Peritoneal metastases (PM) in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) may be identified by diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) or imaging (I). Although prognosis is poor, some patients have excellent outcome. We compared the overall survival (OS) of patients in 3 groups: those with positive cytology (CY+) by DL (DL‐CY+), those with gross PM (GPM) by DL (DL‐GPM+) and with GPM obvious on I (I‐GPM+).


Chinese Journal of Cancer | 2016

Evolution of gastric surgery techniques and outcomes.

Hironori Shiozaki; Yusuke Shimodaira; Elena Elimova; Roopma Wadhwa; Kazuki Sudo; Kazuto Harada; Jeannelyn S. Estrella; Prajnan Das; Brian D. Badgwell; Jaffer A. Ajani

Surgical management of gastric cancer improves survival. However, for some time, surgeons have had diverse opinions about the extent of gastrectomy. Researchers have conducted many clinical studies, making slow but steady progress in determining the optimal surgical approach. The extent of lymph node dissection has been one of the major issues in surgery for gastric cancer. Many trials demonstrated that D2 dissection resulted in greater morbidity and mortality than D1 dissection. However, long-term outcomes demonstrated that D2 dissection resulted in longer survival than D1 dissection. In 2004, the Japan Clinical Oncology Group reported a pivotal trial which was performed to determine whether para-aortic lymph node dissection combined with D2 dissection was superior to D2 dissection alone and found no benefit of the additional surgery. Gastrectomy with pancreatectomy, splenectomy, and bursectomy was initially recommended as part of the D2 dissection. Now, pancreas-preserving total gastrectomy with D2 dissection is standard, and ongoing trials are addressing the role of splenectomy. Furthermore, the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic gastrectomy are well established. Survival and quality of life are increasingly recognized as the most important endpoints. In this review, we present perspectives on surgical techniques and important trials of these techniques in gastric cancer patients.

Collaboration


Dive into the Hironori Shiozaki's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jaffer A. Ajani

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elena Elimova

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Roopma Wadhwa

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mariela A. Blum

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Manoop S. Bhutani

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brian Weston

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kazuki Sudo

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey H. Lee

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wayne L. Hofstetter

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Yusuke Shimodaira

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge