Hiroshi Kuriki

Three-Year Follow-Up of an Alectinib Phase I/II Study in ALK-Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: AF-001JP

Purpose Alectinib is an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) –specific kinase inhibitor that seems to be effective against non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a variety of ALK mutations. The primary analysis of AF-001JP reported a promising overall response rate. To assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), patients from the phase II part of AF-001JP were followed up for approximately 3 years. Patients and Methods Oral alectinib 300 mg was administered twice per day to patients with ALK inhibitor–naïve, ALK-positive NSCLC who had progressed after one or more regimens of previous chemotherapy. In this long-term follow-up, efficacy (PFS, OS), correlation between tumor shrinkage and PFS, safety of alectinib, and relief of cancer symptoms were evaluated. Results At the updated data cutoff (September 10, 2015; first patient in August 30, 2011, last patient in April 18, 2012), 25 of 46 phase II patients were still receiving alectinib. Disease progression was confirmed in 18 patients (39%); median PFS was not reached (3-year PFS rate, 62%; 95% CI, 45 to 75). Fourteen patients had brain metastases at baseline; of these, 6 remained in the study without CNS and systemic progression. Tumor shrinkage and PFS showed no correlation. The 3-year OS rate was 78% (13 events). The most common treatment-related adverse event (all grades) was increased blood bilirubin (36.2%). Most cancer symptoms were relieved early, and medication for symptoms was dramatically decreased during alectinib therapy. Conclusion Alectinib was effective in this 3-year follow-up with a favorable safety profile over a long administration period in ALK-positive NSCLC without previous ALK inhibitor treatment.

Bias in Spontaneous Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in Japan

Background Attitudes of healthcare professionals regarding spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in Japan are not well known, and Japan’s unique system of surveillance, called early post-marketing phase vigilance (EPPV), may affect these reporting attitudes. Our objectives were to describe potential effects of EPPV and to test whether ADR seriousness, prominence, and frequency are related to changes in reporting over time. Methods A manufacturer’s database of spontaneous ADR reports was used to extract data from individual case safety reports for 5 drugs subject to EPPV. The trend of reporting and the time lag between ADR onset and reporting to the manufacturer were examined. The following indices for ADRs occurring with each drug were calculated and analyzed to assess reporting trends: Serious:Non-serious ratio, High prominence:Low prominence ratio, and High frequency:Low frequency ratio. Results For all 5 drugs, the time lag between ADR onset and reporting to the manufacturer was shorter in the EPPV period than in the post-EPPV period. All drugs showed higher Serious:Non-serious ratios in the post-EPPV period. No specific patterns were observed for the High prominence:Low prominence ratio. The High frequency:Low frequency ratio for peginterferon alpha-2a and sevelamer hydrochloride decreased steadily throughout the study period. Conclusions Healthcare professionals may be more likely to report serious ADRs than to report non-serious ADRs, but the effect of event prominence on reporting trends is still unclear. Factors associated with ADR reporting attitude in Japan might be different from those in other countries because of EPPV and the involvement of medical representatives in the spontaneous reporting process. Pharmacovigilance specialists should therefore be cautious when comparing data between different time periods or different countries. Further studies are needed to elucidate the underlying mechanism of spontaneous ADR reporting in Japan.

Analysis of central nervous system efficacy in the J-ALEX study of alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK -positive non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES We determined the central nervous system (CNS) efficacy of alectinib by calculating time to CNS progression and cumulative incidence rates (CIRs) of CNS progression, non-CNS progression and death in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) enrolled in the J-ALEX phase III study. MATERIALS AND METHODS Japanese patients aged ≥20 years with ALK-positive NSCLC who were ALK inhibitor-naïve and chemotherapy-naïve, or who had received one previous chemotherapy regimen, were enrolled. Patients with treated or untreated asymptomatic CNS metastases were eligible. Treatment comprised oral alectinib 300 mg twice daily or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, death or withdrawal. Imaging scans (computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging) were taken at baseline and at regular intervals throughout the study. The CIRs for CNS progression, non-CNS progression and death were calculated for patients with and without baseline CNS metastases using a competing risks method. RESULTS The hazard ratio for time to CNS progression in patients with and without baseline CNS metastases was 0.51 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.16-1.64; P = 0.2502) and 0.19 (95% CI: 0.07-0.53; P = 0.0004), respectively. The CIRs of CNS progression and non-CNS progression were lower in the alectinib group than in the crizotinib group at all time points. The 1-year CIRs of CNS progression were 16.8% and 5.9% with crizotinib and alectinib, respectively, and the 1-year CIRs of non-CNS progression were 38.4% and 17.5%, respectively. Comparable findings were obtained in patients with or without baseline CNS metastases. CONCLUSION Alectinib appears to avert the progression of CNS metastases in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC and baseline CNS metastases, and to prevent the development of new CNS lesions in patients without baseline CNS disease.

Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of shorter duration of infusion of obinutuzumab in Japanese patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: final results of the phase II GATS study

Obinutuzumab given by a shorter duration of infusion (90 min) plus conventional cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone chemotherapy was feasible in Japanese patients with previously untreated B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Phase I study of taselisib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors or hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer

Taselisib is a potent and selective phosphatidylinositide 3‐kinase (PI3K) inhibitor. The present article reports the first study of taselisib administration in Japanese patients. The aim of this 2‐stage, phase I, multicenter, open‐label, dose‐escalation study was to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of taselisib as monotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors (stage 1), and as part of combination therapy in Japanese patients with hormone receptor (HR)‐positive locally advanced or recurrent breast cancer (stage 2). In stage 1, oral taselisib tablets 2, 4, and 6 mg/d were given in 28‐day cycles. In stage 2, successive cohorts of patients received oral taselisib tablets (2 or 4 mg/d) with i.m. fulvestrant 500 mg. Nine and 6 patients were enrolled in stage 1 and stage 2, respectively. Taselisib was well tolerated. No dose‐limiting toxicities were experienced in any cohort of patients and no deaths were observed. The most common treatment‐related adverse events in stage 1 and stage 2, respectively, were rash (55.6%, 66.7%), diarrhea (44.4%, 66.7%), and stomatitis (44.4%, 66.7%). Taselisib was rapidly absorbed after dosage; its half‐life was 12.9‐32.0 hours in stage 1 and 16.1‐26.5 hours in stage 2. Two patients achieved partial response (PR), 5 patients had stable disease (SD) and 2 patients had progressive disease (PD) in stage 1, and 1 patient had PR and 3 patients had SD in stage 2. All patients with PR were positive for PIK3CA gene mutations. These preliminary data suggest that taselisib may be effective in patients with PIK3CA‐mutated solid tumors or HR‐positive advanced breast cancer.

Risk of HBV reactivation in patients with B-cell lymphomas receiving obinutuzumab or rituximab immunochemotherapy

Risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation was assessed in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients with resolved HBV infection (hepatitis B surface antigen negative, hepatitis B core antibody positive) who received obinutuzumab- or rituximab-containing immunochemotherapy in the phase 3 GOYA and GALLIUM studies. HBV DNA monitoring was undertaken monthly to 1 year after the last dose of study drug. In case of HBV reactivation (confirmed, HBV DNA ≥29 IU/mL), immunochemotherapy was withheld and nucleos(t)ide analog treatment (preemptive NAT) started. Immunochemotherapy was restarted if HBV DNA became undetectable or reactivation was not confirmed, and discontinued if HBV DNA exceeded 100 IU/mL on NAT. Prophylactic NAT was allowed by investigator discretion. Among 326 patients with resolved HBV infection, 27 (8.2%) had HBV reactivation, occurring a median of 125 days (interquartile range, 85-331 days) after the first dose. In 232 patients without prophylactic NAT, 25 (10.8%) had HBV reactivation; all received preemptive NAT. Ninety-four patients received prophylactic NAT; 2 (2.1%) had HBV reactivation. No patients developed HBV-related hepatitis. On multivariate Cox analysis, detectable HBV DNA at baseline was strongly associated with an increased risk of reactivation (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 18.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.04-54.93; P < .0001). Prophylactic NAT was strongly associated with a reduced risk (adjusted HR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.02-0.41; P = .0018). HBV DNA monitoring-guided preemptive NAT was effective in preventing HBV-related hepatitis during anti-CD20-containing immunochemotherapy in B-cell NHL patients with resolved HBV infection. Antiviral prophylaxis was also effective and may be appropriate for high-risk patients. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01287741 (GOYA) and NCT01332968 (GALLIUM).