Hiroya Takiuchi

Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: a randomised phase 3 study

BACKGROUND The best chemotherapy regimen for metastatic gastric cancer is uncertain, but promising findings have been reported with irinotecan plus cisplatin and S-1 (tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydropyrimidine, and potassium oxonate). We aimed to investigate the superiority of irinotecan plus cisplatin and non-inferiority of S-1 compared with fluorouracil, with respect to overall survival, in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. METHODS We undertook a phase 3 open label randomised trial in 34 institutions in Japan. We enrolled patients aged 20-75 years or younger, who had histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma, and randomly assigned them by minimisation to receive either: a continuous infusion of fluorouracil (800 mg/m(2) per day, on days 1-5) every 4 weeks (n=234); intravenous irinotecan (70 mg/m(2), on days 1 and 15) and cisplatin (80 mg/m(2), on day 1) every 4 weeks (n=236); or oral S-1 (40 mg/m(2), twice a day, on days 1-28) every 6 weeks (n=234). The primary endpoint was overall survival. Analyses were done by intention to treat. This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT00142350, and with UMIN-CTR, number C000000062. FINDINGS All randomised patients were included in the primary analysis. Median overall survival was 10.8 months (IQR 5.7-17.8) for individuals assigned fluorouracil, 12.3 months (8.1-19.5) for those allocated irinotecan plus cisplatin (hazard ratio 0.85 [95% CI 0.70-1.04]; p=0.0552), and 11.4 months (6.4-21.3) for those assigned S-1 (0.83 [0.68-1.01]; p=0.0005 for non-inferiority). Three treatment-related deaths occurred in the irinotecan plus cisplatin group and one was recorded in the S-1 group. INTERPRETATION S-1 is non-inferior to fluorouracil and, in view of the convenience of an oral administration, could replace intravenous fluorouracil for treatment of unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer, at least in Asia. Irinotecan plus cisplatin is not superior to fluorouracil in this setting.

Multicenter Phase II Study of Everolimus in Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE Everolimus, an oral inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin, has shown antitumor activity in gastric cancer in preclinical and phase I studies. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of everolimus in pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced gastric cancer who experienced progression despite prior chemotherapy received everolimus 10 mg orally daily until disease progression or study discontinuation. The primary end point was disease control rate (DCR; ie, complete response, partial response, or stable disease). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS Fifty-three patients were assessable (median age, 63 years; 51% and 49% received one or two prior chemotherapy regimens, respectively). Although no complete or partial response was obtained, a decrease in tumor size from baseline was observed in 45% of patients by central review. The DCR was 56.0% (95% CI, 41.3% to 70.0%); median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI, 1.6 to 3.0 months). At a median follow-up time of 9.6 months, median OS was 10.1 months (95% CI, 6.5 to 12.1 months). Common grade 3 or 4 adverse events included anemia, hyponatremia, increased gamma-glutamyltransferase, and lymphopenia. Grade 1 or 2 pneumonitis was reported in eight patients (15.1%). CONCLUSION Everolimus monotherapy resulted in a promising DCR in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer. Adverse events are consistent with the reported safety profile of everolimus. These results warrant further evaluation in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) versus fluorouracil and folinic acid plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomised phase 2/3 non-inferiority study (FIRIS study)

BACKGROUND Fluorouracil and folinic acid with either oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or irinotecan (FOLFIRI) are widely used as first-line or second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. However, infusional fluorouracil-based regimens, requiring continuous infusion and implantation of an intravenous port system, are inconvenient. We therefore planned an open-label randomised controlled trial to verify the non-inferiority of irinotecan plus oral S-1 (a combination of tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine, and potassium oxonate; IRIS) to FOLFIRI as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS Between Jan 30, 2006, and Jan 29, 2008, 426 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer needing second-line chemotherapy from 40 institutions in Japan were randomly assigned by a computer-based minimisation method to receive either FOLFIRI (n=213) or IRIS (n=213). In the FOLFIRI group, patients received folinic acid (200 mg/m(2)) and irinotecan (150 mg/m(2)) and then a bolus injection of fluorouracil (400 mg/m(2)) on day 1 and a continuous infusion of fluorouracil (2400 mg/m(2)) over 46 h, repeated every 2 weeks. In the IRIS group, patients received irinotecan (125 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 15 and S-1 (40-60 mg according to body surface area) twice daily for 2 weeks, repeated every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, with a non-inferiority margin of 1.333. Statistical analysis was on the basis of initially randomised participants. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00284258. FINDINGS All randomised patients were included in the primary analysis. After a median follow-up of 12.9 months (IQR 11.5-18.2), median progression-free survival was 5.1 months in the FOLFIRI group and 5.8 months in the IRIS group (hazard ratio 1.077, 95% CI 0.879-1.319, non-inferiority test p=0.039). The most common grade three or four adverse drug reactions were neutropenia (110 [52.1%] of 211 patients in the FOLFIRI group and 76 [36.2%] of 210 patients in the IRIS group; p=0.0012), leucopenia (33 [15.6%] in the FOLFIRI group and 38 [18.1%] in the IRIS group; p=0.5178), and diarrhoea (ten [4.7%] in the FOLFIRI group and 43 [20.5%] in the IRIS group; p<0.0001). One treatment-related death from hypotension due to shock was reported in the FOLFIRI group within 28 days after the end of treatment; no treatment-related deaths were reported in the IRIS group. INTERPRETATION Progression-free survival with IRIS is not inferior to that with FOLFIRI in patients receiving second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Treatment with IRIS could be an additional therapeutic option for second-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. FUNDING Taiho Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Daiichi Sankyo Co Ltd.

Phase II Study of Chemoradiotherapy With 5-Fluorouracil and Cisplatin for Stage II–III Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: JCOG Trial (JCOG 9906)

PURPOSE In this Phase II study, we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for Stage II-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with clinical Stage II-III (T1N1M0 or T2-3N0-1M0) thoracic ESCC were enrolled between April 2000 and March 2002. Chemotherapy comprised two courses of protracted infusion of 5-FU (400 mg/m(2)/day) on Days 1-5 and 8-12, and 2-h infusion of CDDP (40 mg/m(2)) on Days 1 and 8; this regimen was repeated every 5 weeks. Concurrent radiotherapy involved 60-Gy irradiation (30 fractions) for 8 weeks with a 2-week break. Responders received two courses of 5-FU (800 mg/m(2)/day) on Days 1-5 and CDDP (80 mg/m(2)) on Day 1. Final analysis was conducted in March 2007. Survival and late toxicities were monitored for 5 years. RESULTS The characteristics of the 76 patients enrolled were as follows: median age, 61 years; male/female, 68/8; performance status 0/1, 59/17 patients; Stage IIA/IIB/III, 26/12/38 patients. Of the 74 eligible patients, 46 (62.2%) achieved complete response. Median survival time was 29 months, with 3- and 5-year survival rates of 44.7% and 36.8%, respectively. Acute toxicities included Grade 3/4 esophagitis (17%), nausea (17%), hyponatremia (16%), and infection without neutropenia (12%). Late toxicities comprised Grade 3/4 esophagitis (13%), pericardial (16%) and pleural (9%) effusion, and radiation pneumonitis (4%), causing 4 deaths. CONCLUSIONS CRT is effective for Stage II-III ESCC with manageable acute toxicities and can provide a nonsurgical treatment option. However, further improvement is required for reduction in late toxicity.

Pharmacodynamic Studies of Gefitinib in Tumor Biopsy Specimens From Patients With Advanced Gastric Carcinoma

PURPOSE Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is highly expressed in some gastric cancers and is implicated in cancer cell growth and proliferation. The objective of this study was to assess the in situ biologic activity of the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib in gastric tumor samples in a phase II study. METHODS Patients with previously treated stage IV adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction were randomly assigned to receive gefitinib (250 or 500 mg/d). Tumor biopsies, obtained at screening and on day 28 of treatment, were assessed for biomarker expression using immunohistochemistry and analysis of apoptosis. RESULTS One hundred sixteen tumor samples from 70 patients were available, 70 were baseline and 46 were on-therapy biopsies. At baseline, levels of EGFR expression significantly correlated with levels of phosphorylated EGFR (pEGFR; P < .001) and Ki67 expression (P = .011), but not with phosphorylated mitogen-activated protein kinase (pMAPK). After gefitinib treatment, levels of pEGFR in tumor cells were significantly reduced (P = .001); this was not the case for pMAPK and phosphorylated Akt (pAkt). However, in some cases gefitinib inhibited pAkt and these tumors had enhanced apoptosis. Likewise, there was a significant correlation between increased exposure to geftinib and enhanced apoptosis. CONCLUSION Gefitinib reached the tumors at concentrations sufficient to inhibit EGFR activation in advanced gastric carcinoma patients, although this did not translate into clinical benefit. Overall, intratumoral phosphorylation of MAPK and Akt was not significantly inhibited by gefitinib. However, the finding that decreases in pAkt correlated with enhanced apoptosis deserves further exploration.

Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Carcinoma of the Esophagus April 2012 edited by the Japan Esophageal Society

Purpose These guidelines are intended for doctors who are engaged in the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal carcinoma, for the following purposes: (1) to present the standard practice for the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal carcinoma with a high regard for the principles of evidence-based medicine (EBM); (2) to improve the safety and results of treatment, thereby reducing the difference in treatment results among different institutions; (3) to reduce unnecessary costs and efforts; (4) help enable people to undergo treatment without anxiety. These guidelines provide only guidance on the indications for treatment and do not restrict or prohibit the use of any treatment deviating from those described herein.

Phase II study of paclitaxel with 3-h infusion in patients with advanced gastric cancer

Abstract.Abstract.Background: To increase the options for agents for gastric cancer chemotherapy, we performed a phase II clinical trial on the use of a 3-h infusion of paclitaxel to confirm its efficacy and the feasibility of its use in patients with advanced gastric cancer.Methods: Thirty-two (32) patients with measurable metastatic gastric cancer were enrolled in this study. Seventeen patients (53%) had received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, 4 patients (13%) had adjuvant chemotherapy alone, and 11 patients (34%) were chemotherapy-naive.Paclitaxel was intravenously infused for 3 h, at a dose of 210 mg/m2, once every 3 weeks. To prevent hypersensitivity reactions, standard premedication was administered to all patients.Results: Nine (28%; 9/32 ) objective partial responses (PRs) were observed (95% confidence interval [CI], 14%–47%), and the remaining 23 patients showed stable (12 patients; 37.5%) and progressive disease (11 patients; 34.4%). The median time to response was 20 days (range, 14–38 days). The median response duration was 87 days (range, 50–103 days). The median survival of all patients was 234 days (range, 13–646+ days). The major adverse reactions were myelosuppression (grade 3/4 leukopenia and neutropenia were observed in 59% and 88% of the patients, respectively), alopecia, and peripheral neuropathy. Peripheral neuropathy was observed in 19 patients, however, most of the patients recovered after the completion of treatment.Conclusion: A 3-h infusion of paclitaxel is an effective therapy for advanced gastric cancer and is clinically well tolerated by the patients.

Phase I/II study of docetaxel and S-1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer

The aims of this phase I/II study of docetaxel and S-1 were to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended dose (RD) in the phase I part and to explore the tumour response, survival and safety in the phase II part. Patients with histologically- or cytologically confirmed unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer were eligible. Treatment consisted of intravenous docetaxel on day 1 (starting dose 50 mg m−2) and oral S-1 at a fixed dose of 40 mg m−2 twice daily on days 1–14, every 4 weeks up to six cycles. Nine patients took part in the phase I portion of the study. The MTD of docetaxel was determined to be 50 mg m−2, with the DLTs of grade 3 infection associated with grade 3 neutropenia and grade 4 neutropenia during S-1 administration. The RD of docetaxel was 40 mg m−2 in combination with S-1 40 mg m−2 b.i.d. The efficacy and safety of this regimen was therefore assessed in 46 patients with at least one measurable lesion. The overall response rate and estimated median overall survival were 46% (95% CI, 31–61%) and 14.0 months (8.3–17.3 months), respectively. The most common grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia (67% of patients), which was predictable and manageable. This regimen showed promising activity with moderate toxicities in advanced gastric cancer.

Phase II study of oxaliplatin plus S-1 as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (G-SOX study)

BACKGROUND The efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin combined with S-1 (SOX regimen) for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer were investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS Oxaliplatin was administered i.v. (100 mg/m(2)) on day 1, while S-1 was administered orally (80 mg/m(2)/day, b.i.d.) for 14 days followed by a 7-day rest. This schedule was repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS Among 55 patients enrolled, one patient received oxaliplatin for the other study, and three patients were considered unsuitable against the inclusion criteria. Accordingly, 51 patients were assessable for efficacy. The response rate was 59%, and the disease control rate was 84%. The median progression-free survival time was 6.5 months, the 1-year survival rate was 71%, and the median survival time was 16.5 months. In 54 patients assessed for safety, the major grade 3/4 toxic effects were neutropenia (22%), thrombocytopenia (13%), anemia (9%), anorexia (6%), fatigue (6%), and sensory neuropathy (4%). CONCLUSION These findings indicate that SOX regimen with oxaliplatin at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) is feasible and shows promising efficacy against advanced gastric cancer.

A Phase 2 Clinical Trial of Panitumumab Monotherapy in Japanese Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

OBJECTIVE Panitumumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), has antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This Phase 2 study evaluated efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety of panitumumab in Japanese patients with mCRC who developed progressive disease during or after fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin chemotherapy. METHODS Eligible patients had histologically proven colorectal adenocarcinoma and EGFR tumor expression in > or =1% of tumor cells by immunohistochemistry. Patients received panitumumab 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) by independent central review. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), pharmacokinetic parameters and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS Fifty-two patients received at least one dose of panitumumab. Seven patients had partial responses for a confirmed ORR of 13.5% (95% CI: 5.6, 25.8). Median PFS was 8.0 weeks (95% CI: 7.4, 11.4) and median OS was 9.3 months (95% CI: 7.1, 12.8). Panitumumab pharmacokinetics were consistent with prior studies in Japanese and non-Japanese patients. The most common treatment-related adverse events (all, worst grade 3) were acne (81%, 2%), dry skin (62%, 0%), rash (46%, 2%), paronychia (33%, 2%), pruritus (33%, 0%) and hypomagnesemia (33%, 0%). No adverse event of infusion reaction was reported by the investigators. CONCLUSIONS Panitumumab monotherapy was active in Japanese patients with chemotherapy-refractory mCRC, with pharmacokinetic and safety profiles similar to those seen in prior studies.