Hiroyuki Nojima

Hepatocyte exosomes mediate liver repair and regeneration via sphingosine-1-phosphate

BACKGROUND & AIMS Exosomes are small membrane vesicles involved in intercellular communication. Hepatocytes are known to release exosomes, but little is known about their biological function. We sought to determine if exosomes derived from hepatocytes contribute to liver repair and regeneration after injury. METHODS Exosomes derived from primary murine hepatocytes were isolated and characterized biochemically and biophysically. Using cultures of primary hepatocytes, we tested whether hepatocyte exosomes induced proliferation of hepatocytes in vitro. Using models of ischemia/reperfusion injury and partial hepatectomy, we evaluated whether hepatocyte exosomes promote hepatocyte proliferation and liver regeneration in vivo. RESULTS Hepatocyte exosomes, but not exosomes from other liver cell types, induce dose-dependent hepatocyte proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, hepatocyte exosomes directly fuse with target hepatocytes and transfer neutral ceramidase and sphingosine kinase 2 (SK2) causing increased synthesis of sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) within target hepatocytes. Ablation of exosomal SK prevents the proliferative effect of exosomes. After ischemia/reperfusion injury, the number of circulating exosomes with proliferative effects increases. CONCLUSIONS Our data shows that hepatocyte-derived exosomes deliver the synthetic machinery to form S1P in target hepatocytes resulting in cell proliferation and liver regeneration after ischemia/reperfusion injury or partial hepatectomy. These findings represent a potentially novel new contributing mechanism of liver regeneration and have important implications for new therapeutic approaches to acute and chronic liver disease.

Inhibition of acidic sphingomyelinase reduces established hepatic fibrosis in mice

Liver fibrosis occurs as a result of several chronic liver diseases and leads to portal hypertension, cirrhosis and liver failure, often requiring liver transplantation. Activated hepatic stellate cells (HSC) are known to contribute to liver fibrosis, but currently there are no effective therapies for the treatment of established liver fibrosis. Activation of the acidic sphingomyelinase (ASM) has been shown to be involved in HSC activation. In the present study we investigated whether treatment with the ASM inhibitor, amitriptyline (TCA), could prevent and/or reverse fibrosis induced in mice by carbon tetrachloride (CCl4).

Sphingolipids in liver injury, repair and regeneration.

Abstract Sphingolipids are not only essential components of cellular membranes but also function as intracellular and extracellular mediators that regulate important physiological cellular processes including cell survival, proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, migration and immune responses. The liver possesses the unique ability to regenerate after injury in a complex manner that involves numerous mediators, including sphingolipids such as ceramide and sphingosine 1-phosphate. Here we present the current understanding of the involvement of the sphingolipid pathway and the role this pathway plays in regulating liver injury, repair and regeneration. The regulation of sphingolipids and their enzymes may have a great impact in the development of novel therapeutic modalities for a variety of liver injuries and diseases.

Characterization of microparticles after hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Background Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) is a well-studied model of liver injury and has demonstrated a biphasic injury followed by recovery and regeneration. Microparticles (MPs) are a developing field of study and these small membrane bound vesicles have been shown to have effector function in other physiologic and pathologic states. This study was designed to quantify the levels of MPs from various cell origins–platelets, neutrophils, and endolethial cells–following hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury. Methods A murine model was used with mice undergoing 90 minutes of partial hepatic ischemia followed by various times of reperfusion. Following reperfusion, plasma samples were taken and MPs of various cell origins were labeled and levels were measured using flow cytometry. Additionally, cell specific MPs were further assessed by Annexin V, which stains for the presence of phosphatidylserine, a cell surface marker linked to apoptosis. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance with subsequent Student-Newman-Keuls test with data presented as the mean and standard error of the mean. Results MPs from varying sources show an increase in circulating levels following hepatic I/R injury. However, the timing of the appearance of different MP subtypes differs for each cell type. Platelet and neutrophil-derived MP levels demonstrated an acute elevation following injury whereas endothelial-derived MP levels demonstrated a delayed elevation. Conclusion This is the first study to characterize circulating levels of cell-specific MPs after hepatic I/R injury and suggests that MPs derived from platelets and neutrophils serve as markers of inflammatory injury and may be active participants in this process. In contrast, MPs derived from endothelial cells increase after the injury response during the reparative phase and may be important in angiogenesis that occurs in the regenerating liver.

CXC chemokines function as a rheostat for hepatocyte proliferation and liver regeneration.

Background Our previous in vitro studies have demonstrated dose-dependent effects of CXCR2 ligands on hepatocyte cell death and proliferation. In the current study, we sought to determine if CXCR2 ligand concentration is responsible for the divergent effects of these mediators on liver regeneration after ischemia/reperfusion injury and partial hepatectomy. Methods Murine models of partial ischemia/reperfusion injury and hepatectomy were used to study the effect of CXCR2 ligands on liver regeneration. Results We found that hepatic expression of the CXCR2 ligands, macrophage inflammatory protein-2 (MIP-2) and keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC), was significantly increased after both I/R injury and partial hepatectomy. However, expression of these ligands after I/R injury was 30-100-fold greater than after hepatectomy. Interestingly, the same pattern of expression was found in ischemic versus non-ischemic liver lobes following I/R injury with expression significantly greater in the ischemic liver lobes. In both systems, lower ligand expression was associated with increased hepatocyte proliferation and liver regeneration in a CXCR2-dependent fashion. To confirm that these effects were related to ligand concentration, we administered exogenous MIP-2 and KC to mice undergoing partial hepatectomy. Mice received a “high” dose that replicated serum levels found after I/R injury and a “low” dose that was similar to that found after hepatectomy. Mice receiving the “high” dose had reduced levels of hepatocyte proliferation and regeneration whereas the “low” dose promoted hepatocyte proliferation and regeneration. Conclusions Together, these data demonstrate that concentrations of CXC chemokines regulate the hepatic proliferative response and subsequent liver regeneration.

CXC chemokine receptor-4 signaling limits hepatocyte proliferation after hepatic ischemia-reperfusion in mice

The role of stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1 or CXCL12) and its receptor CXC chemokine receptor-4 (CXCR4) in ischemic liver injury and recovery has not been studied. Some reports suggest that this chemokine may aid in liver regeneration, but others suggest that it may be profibrotic through its activation of hepatic stellate cells. In this study we sought to elucidate the role of SDF-1 and its receptor CXCR4 during liver injury, recovery, and regeneration after ischemia-reperfusion (I/R). A murine model of partial (70%) I/R was used to induce liver injury and study the reparative and regenerative response. CXCR4 was expressed constitutively in the liver, and hepatic levels of SDF-1 peaked 8 h after reperfusion but remained significantly increased for 96 h. Treatment of mice with the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 or agonist SDF-1 had no effect on acute liver injury assessed 8 h after I/R. However, treatment with AMD3100 increased hepatocyte proliferation after 72 and 96 h of reperfusion and reduced the amount of liver necrosis. In contrast, treatment with SDF-1 significantly decreased hepatocyte proliferation. These effects appeared to be dependent on the presence of liver injury, as AMD3100 and SDF-1 had no effect on hepatocyte proliferation or liver mass in mice undergoing 70% partial hepatectomy. The data suggest that signaling through CXCR4 is detrimental to liver recovery and regeneration after I/R and that clinical therapy with a CXCR4 antagonist may improve hepatic recovery following acute liver injury.

Chemokine Receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2, Differentially Regulate Exosome Release in Hepatocytes.

Exosomes are small membrane vesicles released by different cell types, including hepatocytes, that play important roles in intercellular communication. We have previously demonstrated that hepatocyte-derived exosomes contain the synthetic machinery to form sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) in target hepatocytes resulting in proliferation and liver regeneration after ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. We also demonstrated that the chemokine receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2, regulate liver recovery and regeneration after I/R injury. In the current study, we sought to determine if the regulatory effects of CXCR1 and CXCR2 on liver recovery and regeneration might occur via altered release of hepatocyte exosomes. We found that hepatocyte release of exosomes was dependent upon CXCR1 and CXCR2. CXCR1-deficient hepatocytes produced fewer exosomes, whereas CXCR2-deficient hepatocytes produced more exosomes compared to their wild-type controls. In CXCR2-deficient hepatocytes, there was increased activity of neutral sphingomyelinase (Nsm) and intracellular ceramide. CXCR1-deficient hepatocytes had no alterations in Nsm activity or ceramide production. Interestingly, exosomes from CXCR1-deficient hepatocytes had no effect on hepatocyte proliferation, due to a lack of neutral ceramidase and sphingosine kinase. The data demonstrate that CXCR1 and CXCR2 regulate hepatocyte exosome release. The mechanism utilized by CXCR1 remains elusive, but CXCR2 appears to modulate Nsm activity and resultant production of ceramide to control exosome release. CXCR1 is required for packaging of enzymes into exosomes that mediate their hepatocyte proliferative effect.

Advanced moderately differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma of the rectum with favorable prognosis by postoperative chemoradiation

Rectal neuroendocrine carcinoma is rare with poor prognosis. We report herein a case of advanced moderately differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma of the rectum with relatively favorable prognosis treated by postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation therapy. A 58-year-old Japanese female was referred and colonofiberscopy revealed an easy-bleeding irregular tumor in the lower rectum, which was pathologically diagnosed as a neuroendocrine carcinoma. Surgical treatment consisted of abdominoperineal resection and lymph node dissection. The tumor invaded deeply into perirectal tissues, and 9 of 11 lymph node metastases were observed. Immunohistochemically, chromogranin A showed diffuse and strong staining, and the MIB-1 labeling index was 18.3 ± 5.6, supporting the high proliferation of the tumor. Some nucleus of the tumor showed positive staining for p21/WAF1. A total dose of 46 Gy of radiotherapy was delivered with 800 mg of daily oral doxifluridine. At 5 years post-surgery, the patient demonstrated no clinical evidence of intrapelvic recurrence or distant metastases.

Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines (DARC) expressing in cancer cells inhibits tumor progression by suppressing CXCR2 signaling in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a dismal prognosis. Chemokines play important roles in the progression of many malignancies; however, the role of chemokine receptor expression in clinical cases of PDAC is unclear. Moreover, little is known about DARC, a decoy receptor of CXC chemokines, in the regulation of tumor progression. Methods Functions of chemokine receptors were evaluated using surgical specimens collected from PDAC patients, and PDAC cell lines. Results CXCR2 expression had no impacts on predicting prognosis, but low DARC expression in cancer cells was an independent risk factor for poor prognosis. In PDAC with low DARC expression, tumor sizes were larger and vascular invasion was increased. High CXCR2 expression was a significant predictor for poor prognosis, only in PDAC patients with low DARC expression. CXCR2 signaling induced STAT3 activation in PDAC, resulting in promoting cell cycle progression, inhibiting apoptosis, inducing angiogenesis, and enhancing invasiveness. DARC inhibited STAT3 activation by down‐regulating CXCR2 signaling. These effects were confirmed by EMSA in vitro. DARC knockdown significantly increased cell proliferation in CFPAC‐1 cells with high DARC expression, by activating STAT3. In contrast, CXCR2 knockdown inhibited the proliferative effects of IL‐8 in MIA PaCa‐2 cells with low DARC expression. Moreover, the inhibitory effect of CXCR2 antagonist on PDAC cell proliferation was more powerful in MIA PaCa‐2 cells than CFPAC‐1 cells. Conclusions DARC expressing in cancer cells inhibits PDAC progression by suppressing STAT3 activation through the inhibition of CXCR2 signaling. Therefore, DARC is a novel prognostic predictor and a potential therapeutic target for PDAC. HighlightsDARC inhibited cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and invasiveness in human PDAC.DARC suppressed CXCR2‐mediated STAT3 activation in PDAC.Low DARC expression was an independent risk factor for poor prognosis.DARC knockdown activated STAT3 and increased cell proliferation in PDAC cells.DARC is a novel prognostic predictor and a potential therapeutic target for PDAC.

Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma inhibits tumor growth by negatively regulating nuclear factor-κB activation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

The prognosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is poor because of its rapid progression. Peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor‐gamma (PPARγ) is known to inhibit tumor growth in vitro; however, the behavior of PPARγ in clinical cases of HCC remains uncertain.