Hisanori Hara

Phenobarbital Induces Cell Cycle Transcriptional Responses in Mouse Liver Humanized for Constitutive Androstane and Pregnane X Receptors

The constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) and the pregnane X receptor (PXR) are closely related nuclear receptors involved in drug metabolism and play important roles in the mechanism of phenobarbital (PB)-induced rodent nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogenesis. Here, we have used a humanized CAR/PXR mouse model to examine potential species differences in receptor-dependent mechanisms underlying liver tissue molecular responses to PB. Early and late transcriptomic responses to sustained PB exposure were investigated in liver tissue from double knock-out CAR and PXR (CAR(KO)-PXR(KO)), double humanized CAR and PXR (CAR(h)-PXR(h)), and wild-type C57BL/6 mice. Wild-type and CAR(h)-PXR(h) mouse livers exhibited temporally and quantitatively similar transcriptional responses during 91 days of PB exposure including the sustained induction of the xenobiotic response gene Cyp2b10, the Wnt signaling inhibitor Wisp1, and noncoding RNA biomarkers from the Dlk1-Dio3 locus. Transient induction of DNA replication (Hells, Mcm6, and Esco2) and mitotic genes (Ccnb2, Cdc20, and Cdk1) and the proliferation-related nuclear antigen Mki67 were observed with peak expression occurring between 1 and 7 days PB exposure. All these transcriptional responses were absent in CAR(KO)-PXR(KO) mouse livers and largely reversible in wild-type and CAR(h)-PXR(h) mouse livers following 91 days of PB exposure and a subsequent 4-week recovery period. Furthermore, PB-mediated upregulation of the noncoding RNA Meg3, which has recently been associated with cellular pluripotency, exhibited a similar dose response and perivenous hepatocyte-specific localization in both wild-type and CAR(h)-PXR(h) mice. Thus, mouse livers coexpressing human CAR and PXR support both the xenobiotic metabolizing and the proliferative transcriptional responses following exposure to PB.

Effect of dual bronchodilation with QVA149 on cardiac safety in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVES QVA149 is a dual bronchodilator, containing a fixed-dose combination of the long-acting β2-agonist indacaterol and long-acting muscarinic antagonist glycopyrronium, for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Here we assess the potential of QVA149 (440/200 μg) at 4-fold the therapeutic dose for causing cardiac pharmacodynamic (PD) effects. METHODS This double-blind, randomized study estimated the time-matched largest heart rate (HR) change and average HR change (over 24 hours) from baseline for QVA149 vs. placebo in healthy subjects. Similar analyses were done for QVA149 vs. indacaterol 600 μg, glycopyrronium 200 μg, and salmeterol 200 μg. The time-matched and average change from baseline in QT interval corrected for HR using Fridericias formula (QTcF), effects on serum potassium and blood glucose, pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, and safety were also assessed. RESULTS Of 50 subjects randomized, 43 completed the study. QVA149, when compared with placebo, showed the time-matched largest mean increase and decrease in HR of 5.69 bpm and -2.51 bpm, respectively, and average HR change from baseline of 0.62 bpm. QVA149 showed no tachycardic potential compared with indacaterol and no relevant tachycardic effect compared with glycopyrronium. No consistent differences were seen in the time-matched largest mean change and average change from baseline in QTcF for QVA149 vs. other treatments. There were no relevant effects of QVA149 on serum potassium and blood glucose. There was no apparent PK/PD relationship between the observed exposures to indacaterol and glycopyrronium in QVA149 on HR and QTcF. There were no deaths or serious adverse events. CONCLUSION Overall, short-term administration of QVA149 showed a good cardiovascular safety and tolerability profile in healthy subjects.

Glycopyrronium does not affect QT interval in healthy subjects: a randomized, three- period, cross-over, placebo- and positive-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE Glycopyrronium (NVA237), a once-daily long-acting muscarinic antagonist, has recently been approved for the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study evaluated the effect of glycopyrronium on the QT interval and other cardiac parameters in healthy subjects. METHODS This randomized, partially blinded, single-dose, placebo- and positive- (moxifloxacin) controlled, three-way cross-over study investigated the effect of a single inhaled supra-therapeutic dose (8-fold clinical dose in COPD patients) of 400 µg glycopyrronium on the Fridericia-corrected QT interval (QTcF; primary objective), Bazettcorrected QT interval (QTcB), heart rate, blood pressure, pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability. RESULTS A total of 73 healthy male (n = 35) and female (n = 38) subjects, aged between 18 and 45 years, were randomized. Glycopyrronium did not cause significant QTcF prolongation compared to placebo. The largest time-matched mean difference to placebo was 2.97 ms at 5 minutes, with the upper limit of the two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) being 4.80 ms, excluding a relevant QT effect as defined by the ICH E14 guideline. Glycopyrronium had a slight bradycardic effect with a mean change of -2.88 (90% CI: -3.78, -1.99) beats per minutes (bpm) and a maximum of -5.87 (90% CI: -7.82, -3.92) bpm at 5 hours post-inhalation. No clinically relevant effects were seen on QTcB, other electrocardiogram (ECG) intervals, or blood pressure. Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of glycopyrronium was achieved shortly after inhalation (median tmax = 7 minutes). All the treatments were well tolerated with no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION A supra-therapeutic dose of glycopyrronium had a favorable cardiovascular safety profile with no clinically relevant effect on QT interval.

Recommendations from the Global Bioanalysis Consortium Team A8: Documentation

The A8 Global Harmonization Team focused on the documentation needed to support both small and large molecule bioanalysis. Current regulatory requirements were compiled and compared. The scope of the team’s discussions included the validation report, the bioanalytical report, study plans, raw data, and bioanalytical summaries for the common technical document (CTD). A common high-level table of contents for method validation and sample analysis reports is proposed. Suggestions have been made as to how the CTD can be standardized to improve usability and review. Additional comments have been made on reports of failure investigations, study plans, and raw data documentation. The recommendation is that no prescriptive guidelines are required in these areas but should be led by good scientific practices subject to particular circumstances.

Pharmacokinetics of QMF149 in Japanese versus Caucasian subjects: an open-label, randomized phase I study.

OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate influence of ethnic factors on the pharmacokinetics of orally inhaled QMF149, a novel combination of an approved longacting β2-agonist, indacaterol (Onbrez® Breezhaler® for COPD), and an approved inhaled corticosteroid, mometasone furoate (MF), (Asmanex® Twisthaler® for asthma), following multiple dose administration of QMF149 (indacaterol acetate/MF) 150/80 μg and 150/320 μg via the Breezhaler® device in healthy Japanese and Caucasian subjects. METHODS This was a single-center, openlabel, multiple-dose, two-period, complete crossover study that randomized healthy Japanese and, age and weight matched Caucasian subjects to QMF149 150/80 μg or 150/320 μg once daily (o.d.) for 14 days in each period. Pharmacokinetics (PK) were assessed up to 24 hours on days 1 and 14. RESULTS 24 Japanese and 24 Caucasian healthy subjects were enrolled. Indacaterol and MF had similar PK profiles across both the doses and both ethnic groups. The maximum geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval (CI)) for Japanese vs. Caucasian subjects for Cmax were 1.23 (1.11 - 1.38) and 1.24 (1.11 - 1.38) for indacaterol and MF, respectively. For AUC, the maximum ratios were 1.22 (1.09 - 1.36) and 1.30 (1.18 - 1.44) for indacaterol and MF, respectively. The mild trend towards higher exposure in Japanese subjects could be explained by the fact that the mean body weight was 14% higher for Caucasians compared to their Japanese counterparts. No serious adverse events or discontinuations related to study medication were reported. CONCLUSION The study demonstrated increase of mean exposure parameters in Japanese subjects vs. Caucasian subjects, which ranged between 19 - 23% and 17 - 30%, for indacaterol and MF components, respectively. Multiple doses of both the QMF149 dose levels were safe and well-tolerated in all subjects. Body weight was considered a key contributory factor for the observed difference in exposure. These results suggest no dose adjustment for QMF149 is required in Asian populations.

Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Fingolimod and Carbamazepine in Healthy Subjects

This open‐label, single‐sequence study in healthy subjects investigated the effects of steady‐state carbamazepine on the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of a single 2‐mg dose of fingolimod. In period 1, a single oral dose of fingolimod 2 mg (day 1) was followed by PK and safety assessments up to 36 days. In period 2, carbamazepine was administered in flexible, up‐titrated doses (600 mg twice daily maximum) for 49 days. Fingolimod was administered on day 35, followed by a study completion evaluation (day 71). The PK analysis included 23 of 26 of the enrolled subjects (88.5%). Coadministration of fingolimod at steady‐state carbamazepine concentrations resulted in increased fingolimod CL/F by 67% through the induction of CYP3A4, a cytochrome with negligible involvement in fingolimod clearance in an uninduced state. Fingolimod Cmax was reduced by 18% and AUCinf by 40%, as was T1/2 (106 vs 163 hours). A similar trend was observed for fingolimod‐P. Models linking fingolimod‐P blood concentrations to lymphocyte count or annual relapse rate suggest that such a decrease would have a low impact on the treatment effect. However, in the absence of efficacy data of fingolimod at doses lower than the therapeutic dose, their coadministration should be used with caution.

Determination of Seminal Concentration of Fingolimod and Fingolimod‐Phosphate in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Receiving Chronic Treatment With Fingolimod

The safety profile of fingolimod 0.5 mg, approved therapy for relapsing multiple sclerosis, is well established in clinical and real‐world studies. As fingolimod is teratogenic in rats, it was considered important to assess the concentrations of fingolimod and its active metabolite, fingolimod‐phosphate, in the semen of male patients on treatment and the risk of harming a fetus in a pregnant partner. In this multicenter open‐label study, 13 male patients receiving fingolimod for at least 6 months provided 1 semen and 1 blood sample for analyte concentration measurements. The steady‐state seminal concentrations of fingolimod and fingolimod‐phosphate were close to those simultaneously observed in blood. The amount of fingolimod‐related material in 10 mL of ejaculate was estimated to be 47.5 ng. The estimated fingolimod and fingolimod‐phosphate blood Cmax values in a woman having regular sexual intercourse with a male patient treated with fingolimod 0.5 mg were approximately 400 and 2400 times smaller than the estimated values in the embryo‐fetal development study in rats at the no‐observed‐adverse‐event level. Consequently, the risk of harming a fetus in a pregnant woman is considered extremely unlikely.

CYP3A but not P-gp plays a relevant role in the in vivo intestinal and hepatic clearance of the delta-specific phosphoinositide-3 kinase inhibitor leniolisib

This study investigated the effect of itraconazole, a strong dual inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and P‐glycoprotein (P‐gp), on the single dose pharmacokinetics of leniolisib. In order to differentiate the specific contribution of CYP3A from P‐gp, the potential interaction with quinidine, a strong inhibitor of P‐gp but not CYP3A, was studied as well. Using a fixed‐sequence, 3‐way crossover design, 20 healthy male subjects received single oral doses of 10 mg leniolisib during three phases separated by a washout: (1) leniolisib alone, (2) 200 mg itraconazole once daily for 9 days plus leniolisib on day 5, and (3) 300 mg quinidine administered 1 h before and 3 h after leniolisib. Itraconazole increased the leniolisib oral drug exposure (AUCinf) by on average 2.1‐fold, whereas the peak drug concentration (Cmax) was less impacted (1.25‐fold). The terminal elimination half‐life (T1/2) of leniolisib was also increased by ~2‐fold. Neither oral AUCinf nor Cmax or T1/2 was found to be altered by quinidine. These findings suggest that the interaction with itraconazole occurred mainly systemically through inhibition of CYP3A, and corroborate our in vitro findings that leniolisib is neither a sensitive CYP3A substrate nor a relevant in vivo substrate for intestinal or hepatic P‐gp. Assuming itraconazole levels achieved complete inhibition of CYP3A, the fractional contribution of CYP3A to the overall disposition of leniolisib is estimated to be about 50%. The concomitant use of leniolisib with strong inhibitors of CYP3A as well as strong and moderate inducers of CYP3A is best avoided.

Lung Delivery of Indacaterol and Mometasone Furoate Following Inhalation of QMF149 in Healthy Volunteers

This single‐dose, 4‐period crossover study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the β2‐agonist indacaterol maleate and the corticosteroid mometasone furoate (MF) after inhalation of a fixed‐dose combination (QMF149, indacaterol maleate/MF, 500/400 μg) via the Twisthaler (TH) device with and without activated charcoal and postdose mouth rinsing in healthy volunteers. The PK of indacaterol maleate 300 μg inhaled via the Breezhaler (BRZ) device was also characterized. Relative bioavailability of indacaterol and MF for inhalation with versus without charcoal, based on AUClast, was 0.25 (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.18–0.35) and 0.70 (90%CI, 0.52–0.93), respectively. Thus, 25% and 70% of systemic exposure of indacaterol and MF, respectively was due to pulmonary absorption and 75% and 30%, respectively, was due to gastrointestinal absorption. Mouth rinsing reduced the systemic exposure of indacaterol by approximately 35% but had no relevant effect on the exposure of MF. Dose‐normalized AUClast for indacaterol inhaled via the BRZ device was 2.3‐fold higher than QMF149 via the TH device. All treatments had a good safety profile and were well tolerated. Data from this study and comparison with inhalation of indacaterol via the BRZ device suggest that the latter was more efficient than the TH device regarding lung delivery of indacaterol.