Hisashi Mitsufuji

Successful rechallenge with erlotinib in a patient with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma who developed gefitinib-related interstitial lung disease

Small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathways are used clinically for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is well established that somatic mutations in the kinase domain of the EGFR (Lynch et al. in N Engl J Med 350:2129–2139, 2004; Paez et al. in Science 304:1497–1500, 2004) are strongly associated with the tumor response and clinical outcomes in patients with NSCLC receiving EGFR-TKIs (Mitsudomi and Yatabe in Cancer Sci 98:1817–1824, 2007). Although the most common adverse events are skin rash and diarrhea, the most serious adverse effect reported is drug-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) (Inoue et al. in Lancet 361:137–139, 2003; Ando et al. in J Clin Oncol 24:2549–2556, 2006). The precise mechanism underlying the development of drug-related ILD remains unknown. Here, we describe a case of EGFR-mutant NSCLC who was rechallenged with the small-molecule EGFR antagonist erlotinib after developing gefitinib-related ILD.

Effect of gefitinib on warfarin antithrombotic activity.

BackgroundDespite the literature indicating adverse interactions between warfarin and cytotoxic agents, whether such an interaction occurs when warfarin and gefitinib are used concomitantly is unknown. We analyzed the prevalence of the concomitant use of warfarin and gefitinib, and the incidence of prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) alterations or adverse interactions in concomitant users of warfarin and gefitinib.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated at the Kitasato University Hospital who received concomitant warfarin and gefitinib between September 2002 and January 2007. Medical information, including the indication for warfarin use, warfarin dosing and dosing changes, and exposure to gefitinib were collected from computerized databases and medical records.ResultsTwelve (4.1%) of 296 patients treated with gefi— tinib received warfarin. PT-INR elevation occurred in 6 patients (50.0%). Two (16.7%) of the 12 patients had liver metastases. Liver dysfunction was associated with PT-INR elevation (P = 0.0100).ConclusionAs there is a possibility of PT-INR abnormalities occurring during the concomitant use of gefitinib and warfarin, clinicians should be aware of this interaction. Because of the potentially severe consequences of this interaction, close monitoring of PT-INR and warfarin dose adjustment are recommended for patients receiving warfarin and gefitinib, especially during the first 2 weeks in the beginning of warfarin therapy.

Safety and efficacy of carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel for treating advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with interstitial lung disease

There are few established treatments for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with interstitial lung disease (ILD). The safety and efficacy of albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) in combination with carboplatin is uncertain, although the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel is the most common regimen for treating NSCLC patients with ILD. A total of 9 NSCLC patients with ILD, treated between April 2013 and March 2016, were retrospectively investigated. Carboplatin (AUC 5-6) was administered on day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on days 1, 8 and 15, every 4-6 weeks. The median age of the patients upon initiating chemotherapy was 67 years. The pathological examination revealed 6 patients with squamous cell carcinoma, and 6 patients exhibited the typical pattern of ILD. The response rate was 55.6%, and the median progression-free and overall survival time was 174 and 344 days, respectively. Acute exacerbation of ILD was not observed in any of the patients, and febrile neutropenia developed in 3 patients (3/9, 33.3%). Thus, treatment with carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel was found to be safe and effective for NSCLC patients with ILD, although management of hematological adverse events, such as febrile neutropenia, was required. However, these encouraging results require confirmation by a large-scale clinical trial.

Comparison of carboplatin plus etoposide with amrubicin monotherapy for extensive-disease small cell lung cancer in the elderly and patients with poor performance status: CE vs. amrubicin for SCLC

Carboplatin plus etoposide (CE) is a standard treatment for elderly patients with extensive‐disease small cell lung cancer (ED‐SCLC). However, amrubicin monotherapy (AMR) may be a feasible alternative. We compared the efficacies and safety profiles of CE and AMR for ED‐SCLC in elderly patients and chemotherapy‐naive patients with poor performance status (PS).

Efficacy of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for Relapsed Small-Cell Lung Cancer after Amrubicin Monotherapy in Elderly Patients and Patients with Poor Performance Status

Background: Previous studies have shown amrubicin to be an effective first- or second-line treatment option for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, there have been few studies reporting the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy after amrubicin therapy. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy as second-line treatment for elderly patients and those with SCLC with poor performance status (PS) previously treated with amrubicin monotherapy. Methods: The records of SCLC patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy as a second-line chemotherapy after first-line treatment with amrubicin monotherapy were retrospectively reviewed and the treatment outcomes were evaluated. Results: A total of 48 patients were enrolled in this study. Forty-one patients (85%) received carboplatin plus etoposide. The overall response rate was 39.6%. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.7 and 7.6 months, respectively. The efficacy of the platinum-based regimen did not differ with the type of relapse after amrubicin monotherapy. The most common adverse events were hematological toxicities, including grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (38%), leukopenia (33%), and thrombocytopenia (10%). Conclusions: Platinum-based chemotherapy is potentially a valid treatment option for elderly patients or those with extensive-stage SCLC with poor PS as second-line chemotherapy, who progressed after first-line treatment with amrubicin monotherapy.

Smoking History as a Predictor of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring EGFR Mutations

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKIs) therapy has been recognized as the standard treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. However, resistance to EGFR-TKIs has been observed in certain subpopulations of these patients. We aimed to evaluate the impact of smoking history on the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs. Methods: The records of patients (n = 248) with NSCLC harboring activating EGFR mutations who were treated with gefitinib or erlotinib at our institution between March 2010 and June 2016 were retrospectively reviewed, and the treatment outcomes were evaluated. Results: The overall response rate and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 59.7% and 10.7 months, respectively. The overall response rate was significantly higher in the ex- and nonsmokers than in the current smokers (64.6 vs. 51.1%, p = 0.038). PFS also differed significantly between the current smokers and the ex- and nonsmokers (12.4 vs. 7.4 months, p = 0.016). Multivariate analysis identified smoking history as an independent predictor of PFS and overall survival. Conclusion: The clinical data obtained in this study provide a valuable rationale for considering smoking history as a predictor of the efficacy of EGFR-TKI in NSCLC patients harboring activating EGFR mutations.

Evaluation of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced NSCLC according to EGFR mutation status

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). However, the efficacy and safety of this treatment has not been compared between patients who possess epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and patients with wild-type EGFR. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the presence of EGFR gene mutations in patients with LA-NSCLC receiving cCRT. Between January 2007 and December 2013, the records of 64 patients were reviewed retrospectively. The data were statistically analyzed to evaluate the efficacy of cCRT according to EGFR mutation status. In total, 15/64 were revealed to possess EGFR mutations, 23%, and comprised the mutant EGFR group. The progression-free survival time was significantly shorter in the mutant EGFR group compared with the patient group with tumors exhibiting wild-type EGFR, 6.3 and 9.5 months, respectively (P<0.001). The overall survival rate was longer in the mutant EGFR group compared with the wild-type EGFR group, although the difference was not statistically significant, 37.1 and 21.1 months, respectively (P=0.26). The disease recurred in all of the patients of the mutant EGFR group, whilst the recurrence rate in the wild-type EGFR group was 89%. The frequency of distant metastasis was significantly higher in the mutant EGFR group compared with the wild-type EGFR group. In conclusion, these data suggest that additional studies are required to identify strategies for reinforcing the efficacy of cCRT, with a focus on the potential use of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients exhibiting an EGFR mutation.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of erlotinib administered in combination with amrubicin in patients with previously treated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Objectives:We conducted a phase I trial of erlotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, combined with amrubicin, a topoisomerase II inhibitor. The aim was to determine the maximum tolerated dose, the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and the pharmacokinetics of this combination in patients with non–small cell lung cancer who had received previous chemotherapy. Methods:A total of 9 patients with stage IV disease were treated at 3-week intervals with erlotinib once daily on days 1 through 21 plus a 5-minute intravenous injection of amrubicin on days 1 through 3. Results:The dose levels evaluated were erlotinib (mg/body)/amrubicin (mg/m2): 100/30 (n=3), 100/35 (n=3), and 150/30 (n=3). The maximum tolerated dose of erlotinib and amrubicin was 100 mg/body and 35 mg/m2 because 2 of the 3 patients experienced DLTs during the first cycle of treatment at the third dose level of 150 mg/body and 30 mg/m2. Cessation of erlotinib administration for 8 days because of grade 3 leukopenia and grade 3 skin infection (erysipelas) were the DLTs. No drug-drug interactions between erlotinib and amrubicin were observed in this study. The overall response rate was 33%, including 3 partial responses, in the 9 patients. The median progression-free survival for all patients was quite long, 11.3 months, and the median overall survival has not yet been reached. Conclusions:Combined erlotinib plus amrubicin therapy seems to be highly effective, with acceptable toxicity, against non–small cell lung cancer. The recommended dose for phase II studies was erlotinib 100 mg once daily on days 1 through 21, and amrubicin 35 mg/m2 on days 1 through 3 administered every 21 days.

Amrubicin monotherapy for elderly patients with relapsed extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer: A retrospective study: Amrubicin for relapsed SCLC in elderly

Previous studies have shown amrubicin (AMR) to be an effective second‐line treatment option for small‐cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, the efficacy of AMR in elderly patients with relapsed SCLC has not been sufficiently evaluated.

Intracranial Response to Nivolumab in a Patient with PD-L1-negative Lung Adenocarcinoma

We herein report the case of a 52-year-old man with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma. The patient was negative for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4) /anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement. He was treated with nivolumab as a third-line chemotherapy. After four cycles of nivolumab treatment, a partial response was observed in the brain and at the primary tumor site. Nivolumab treatment has been continued for 11 months without progression. Immunohistochemistry revealed that the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was 0% (according to the tumor proportion score). Our case indicates that the efficacy of programmed cell death 1 inhibitors is not solely predicted by the PD-L1 status, and that immune checkpoint inhibitors might be effective for the treatment of central nervous system metastasis.