Ho Yee Tiong

A systematic approach to minimizing wound problems for de novo sirolimus-treated kidney transplant recipients.

Background. Wound healing problems and lymphoceles have been reported with greater frequency in kidney recipients given de novo sirolimus. This problem has led to increased patient morbidity and cost; and has been an impediment to the completion of randomized controlled trials in which wound problems have necessitated premature discontinuation of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors. Methods. We developed a systematic program to reduce these problems based on patient selection (body mass index [BMI] <32 kg/m2), the use of closed suction drains, modifications of surgical technique, and avoidance of a loading dose of sirolimus. Consecutive series of adult kidney-only recipients given antibody induction followed by de novo sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids were compared; group 1: 204 patients transplanted with few restrictions and group 2: 103 patients transplanted using the above program. Results. This approach resulted in a significant reduction (group 2 vs. group 1) in cumulative wound complications (7.8% vs. 19.6%, P=0.007), and nonoperative wound complications (2.9% vs. 14.2%, P=0.001). In addition, the incidence of lymphoceles detected (22.3% vs. 47.1%, P<0.0001), treated (4.8% vs. 24.5%, P<0.0001), or needing surgical intervention (1.9% vs. 14.2%, P=0.001) was significantly reduced. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a BMI more than 30 to 32 kg/m2 was the most significant variable related to delayed wound healing (odds ratio [OR] 3.01, 0.02) or surgical repair (OR 8.05, P=0.0001), whereas BMI (OR 1.54, P=0.038) and acute rejections (OR 1.34, P=0.03) were most associated with lymphocele treatment. Conclusions. A systematic program of wound care using de novo sirolimus can produce wound healing complications comparable with that reported with other agents.

Management of the Adrenal Gland During Partial Nephrectomy

PURPOSE Nephron sparing surgery is an increasingly used alternative to Robsons radical nephroadrenalectomy. The indications for adrenalectomy in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy are not clearly defined and some surgeons perform it routinely for large and/or upper pole renal tumors. We analyzed initial management and oncological outcomes of adrenal glands after open partial nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study. During partial nephrectomy the ipsilateral adrenal gland was resected if a suspicious adrenal nodule was noted on radiographic imaging, or if intraoperative findings indicated direct extension or metastasis. RESULTS Concomitant adrenalectomy was performed in 48 of 2,065 partial nephrectomies (2.3%). Pathological analysis revealed direct invasion of the adrenal gland by renal cell carcinoma (1), renal cell carcinoma metastasis (2), other adrenal neoplasms (3) or benign tissue (42, 87%). During a median followup of 5.5 years only 15 patients underwent subsequent adrenalectomy (0.74%). Metachronous adrenalectomy was ipsilateral (10), contralateral (2) or bilateral (3), revealing metastatic renal cell carcinoma in 11 patients. Overall survival at 5 years in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy with or without adrenalectomy was 82% and 85%, respectively (p = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS Adrenalectomy should not be routinely performed during partial nephrectomy, even for upper pole tumors. We propose concomitant adrenalectomy only if a suspicious adrenal lesion is identified radiographically or invasion of the adrenal gland is suspected intraoperatively. Using these criteria adrenalectomy was avoided in more than 97% of patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. Even using such strict criteria only 13% of these suspicious adrenal nodules contained cancer. The rarity of metachronous adrenal metastasis and the lack of an observable benefit to concomitant adrenalectomy support adrenal preservation during partial nephrectomy except as previously outlined.

Nomograms for Predicting Graft Function and Survival in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Based on the UNOS Registry

PURPOSE We developed nomograms that predict transplant renal function at 1 year (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation [estimated glomerular filtration rate]) and 5-year graft survival after living donor kidney transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data for living donor renal transplants were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing registry for 2000 to 2003. Nomograms were designed using linear or Cox regression models to predict 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate and 5-year graft survival based on pretransplant information including demographic factors, immunosuppressive therapy, immunological factors and organ procurement technique. A third nomogram was constructed to predict 5-year graft survival using additional information available by 6 months after transplantation. These data included delayed graft function, any treated rejection episodes and the 6-month estimated glomerular filtration rate. The nomograms were internally validated using 10-fold cross-validation. RESULTS The renal function nomogram had an r-square value of 0.13. It worked best when predicting estimated glomerular filtration rate values between 50 and 70 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2). The 5-year graft survival nomograms had a concordance index of 0.71 for the pretransplant nomogram and 0.78 for the 6-month posttransplant nomogram. Calibration was adequate for all nomograms. CONCLUSIONS Nomograms based on data from the United Network for Organ Sharing registry have been validated to predict the 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate and 5-year graft survival. These nomograms may facilitate individualized patient care in living donor kidney transplantation.

Transplant nephrectomy after allograft failure is associated with allosensitization.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effect of transplant nephrectomy (TN) on the percentage of panel reactive antibody (%PRA) and donor-specific antibody (DSA) levels in patients with renal allograft failure. METHODS The records of patients with failed kidney transplants, who had undergone TN from 2000 to 2007, were reviewed. The pre- and post-TN serum samples were available for analysis from 31 patients. Human leukocyte antigen typing and the %PRA was measured in these patients using standard serologic techniques. The pre- and post-TN patient serum samples were evaluated for DSA levels using solid phase assays and single antigen beads. The pre- and post-TN measurements of the %PRA and DSA levels were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, and the associated clinical variables were identified on multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS The mean %PRA increased from 33.4 to 75.6 for class I antigens (P < .001) and from 38.9 to 60.6 (P = .002) for class II antigens in patients before and after TN, respectively. This increase was associated with an increase in the mean human leukocyte antigen class I and class II DSA levels from 33,518 molecular equivalents of soluble fluorochrome (MESF) to 121,457 MESF (P < .001) and from 45,459 MESF to 126,968 MESF (P < .001), respectively. Regression analysis showed that rejection episodes and an interval from graft failure to TN of <10 months were associated with greater increases in the mean %PRA (P < .001) and mean DSA levels (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS The results of the present study have confirmed that the %PRA increases after TN in patients with renal allograft failure, and sensitization occurs after TN, with an increase in DSA levels. Rejection episodes and early TN after graft failure might result in a greater degree of sensitization.

Renal Artery Aneurysm Treated With Ex Vivo Reconstruction and Autotransplantation

A 64-year-old former heavy smoker with a history significant for hypertension was found to have a 2.2-cm left renal artery aneurysm. Computed tomographic arteriography with 3-dimensional reconstruction determined the management of this patient, who ultimately underwent successful ex vivo left renal artery aneurysm repair with autotransplantation.

Renal Transplantations in African Americans: A Single-center Experience of Outcomes and Innovations to Improve Access and Results

OBJECTIVE To report a single-center 10-year experience of outcomes of kidney transplantation in African Americans (AAs) vs Caucasian Americans (CA) and to propose ways in which to improve kidney transplant outcomes in AAs, increased access to kidney transplantation, prevention of kidney disease, and acceptance of organ donor registration rates in AAs. METHODS We compared outcomes of deceased donor (DD) and living donor (LD) renal transplantation in AAs vs CAs in 772 recipients of first allografts at our transplant center from January 1995 to March 2004. For DD and LD transplants, no significant differences in gender, age, body mass index, or transplant panel reactive antibody (PRA) existed between AA and CA recipients. RESULTS Primary diagnosis of hypertension was more common in AA, DD, and LD recipients. Significant differences for DD transplants included Medicaid insurance in 23% AA compared with 7.0% CA (P<.0001) and more frequent diabetes mellitus type 2 in AAs (15% vs 4.1%, P=.0009). Eighty-three percent of AAs had received hemodialysis compared with 72% of CAs (P=.02). AAs endured significantly longer pretransplant dialysis (911±618 vs 682±526 days CA, P=.0006) and greater time on the waiting list (972±575 vs 637±466 days CA, P<0001). In DD renal transplants, AAs had more human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches than CAs (4.1±1.4 vs 2.7±2.1, P<.0001). Mean follow-up for survivors was 7.1±2.5 years. Among LD transplants, graft survival and graft function were comparable for AAs and CAs; however, among DD transplants, graft function and survival were substantially worse for AAs (P=.0003). In both LD and DD transplants, patient survival was similar for AAs and CAs. CONCLUSION Our data show that AAs receiving allografts from LDs have equivalent short- and long-term outcomes to CAs, but AAs have worse short- and long-term outcomes after DD transplantation. As such, we conclude that AAs should be educated about prevention of kidney disease, the importance of organ donor registration, the merits of LD over DD, and encouraged to seek LD options.