Holger Fritsch

Randomized, phase 2 trial of low-dose cytarabine with or without volasertib in AML patients not suitable for induction therapy

Treatment outcomes for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have remained dismal. This randomized, phase 2 trial in AML patients not considered suitable for intensive induction therapy compared low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) with or without volasertib, a highly potent and selective inhibitor of polo-like kinases. Eighty-seven patients (median age 75 years) received LDAC 20 mg twice daily subcutaneously days 1-10 or LDAC + volasertib 350 mg IV days 1 + 15 every 4 weeks. Response rate (complete remission and complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery) was higher for LDAC + volasertib vs LDAC (31.0% vs 13.3%; odds ratio, 2.91; P = .052). Responses in the LDAC + volasertib arm were observed across all genetic groups, including 5 of 14 patients with adverse cytogenetics. Median event-free survival was significantly prolonged by LDAC + volasertib compared with LDAC (5.6 vs 2.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.92; P = .021); median overall survival was 8.0 vs 5.2 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.00; P = .047). LDAC + volasertib led to an increased frequency of adverse events that was most pronounced for neutropenic fever/infections and gastrointestinal events; there was no increase in the death rate at days 60 + 90. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00804856.

An Open-Label, Phase I Study of the Polo-like Kinase-1 Inhibitor, BI 2536, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Purpose: This phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of BI 2536, a small-molecule polo-like kinase (Plk)–1 inhibitor, in two treatment schedules in patients with advanced solid tumors. Secondary objectives included evaluation of safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics. Experimental Design: Patients received a single i.v. dose of BI 2536 as a 1-hour infusion on days 1 and 8 or a single 24-hour infusion on day 1 of each 21-day treatment course. MTD determination was based on dose-limiting toxicities. Results: Forty-four and 26 patients received each treatment schedule, respectively. The MTD of BI 2536 in the day 1 and 8 schedule was 100 mg per administration (200 mg per course). The MTD for the second dosing schedule was not determined; a 225-mg dose was well tolerated. The most frequently reported treatment-related nonhematologic adverse events were gastrointestinal events and fatigue. Hematotoxicity as the most relevant side effect was similar in both schedules; neutropenia grades 3 and 4 were observed in 16 patients (36.4%) of the day 1 and 8 schedule and 13 patients (50%) of the 24-hour infusion. Fourteen patients (32%) treated in the day 1 and 8 dosing schedule had a best overall response of stable disease. Plasma concentrations of BI 2536 increased dose proportionally, with no relevant accumulation of exposure in the day 1 and 8 dosing schedule. The average terminal half-life was 50 hours. Conclusions: BI 2536 administered in either treatment schedule has adequate safety in patients with advanced solid tumors, warranting further clinical investigation of polo-like kinase–1 inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res; 16(18); 4666–74. ©2010 AACR.

The Efficacy and Safety of BI 2536, a Novel Plk-1 Inhibitor, in Patients with Stage IIIB/IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Who Had Relapsed after, or Failed, Chemotherapy Results from an Open-Label, Randomized Phase II Clinical Trial

Objective: To investigate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of two dosing schedules of BI 2536, a novel polo-like kinase-1 inhibitor, in patients with relapsed stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: Ninety-five patients were randomized to intravenous BI 2536 on day 1 (200 mg) or days 1 to 3 (50 or 60 mg) of a 21-day treatment course. BI 2536 doses were escalated beyond course 2 if well tolerated. The primary objective was response, and the secondary objectives were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), quality of life, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Primary statistical aim was to demonstrate the difference in objective response rate to historical placebo for both treatment groups. Results: Four patients (4.2%) had a partial response; two were confirmed by independent review. Median PFS was 8.3 weeks (58 days 95% confidence interval [CI]: 48–85) and 7 weeks (49 days 95% CI: 46–70) assessed by investigator and independent review, respectively. Median OS was 28.7 weeks (201 days 95% CI: 180–305). No statistically significant difference was observed between the two treatment schedules regarding clinical benefit, PFS, or OS. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 37% of patients; common nonhematologic adverse events were fatigue (31%) and nausea (27%). Two deaths (pulmonary hemorrhage and sepsis) were considered drug related. There was a trend in favor of the days 1 to 3 dosing schedule in quality of life. BI 2536 displayed moderate interpatient variability. Conclusions: BI 2536 monotherapy has modest efficacy and favorable safety in relapsed non-small cell lung cancer. The findings support the further development of polo-like kinase-1 inhibitors within this indication.

An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase 2 Trial of the Polo-Like Kinase Inhibitor Volasertib (BI 6727) in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer

Polo‐like kinases (Plks) control multiple steps during the cell cycle, and Plk1 is overexpressed in urothelial cancer (UC). Volasertib (BI 6727), a Plk inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor activity in several malignancies, including UC. In this phase 2 trial, the authors investigated volasertib as a second‐line treatment in advanced/metastatic UC.

A Phase I Open-Label Dose-Escalation Study of Intravenous BI 2536 Together With Pemetrexed in Previously Treated Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION BI 2536 is a potent, highly selective inhibitor of polo-like kinase (Plk) 1. This open-label, phase I study investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of BI 2536 IV in combination with standard-dose pemetrexed in previously treated advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A standard 3 + 3 design was used. The patients received 500 mg/m(2) pemetrexed and escalating doses of BI 2536 on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary objective was the MTD of BI 2536 combined with pemetrexed. Secondary endpoints were response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors), overall safety, and PK. RESULTS Forty-one patients received BI 2536 (100-325 mg). Two dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) occurred at BI 2536 325 mg (grade 3 pruritus and rash; grade 4 neutropenia). Therefore, the MTD for BI 2536 in combination with pemetrexed was 300 mg. After expanding the MTD dose level, 3 additional patients experienced DLTs, which resulted in expansion of the 250 mg cohort, in which 4 of the 13 additional patients experienced DLTs. Therefore, the recommended dose of BI 2536 was 200 mg. Most frequently reported drug-related adverse events were fatigue (71%), nausea (37%), and rash (34%). Two patients had durable confirmed partial responses; 21 (54%) patients had stable disease after the treatment cycle 2. PK analysis showed that BI 2536 and pemetrexed exposure were not altered when coadministered. CONCLUSION BI 2536 200 mg combined with standard-dose pemetrexed has an acceptable safety profile in relapsed non-small-cell lung cancer. The antitumor activity observed is encouraging and supports further investigation of Plk inhibitors.

A randomized, open-label, phase I/II trial to investigate the maximum tolerated dose of the Polo-like kinase inhibitor BI 2536 in elderly patients with refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia.

Polo‐like kinases (Plks) play an important role in cell cycle checkpoint controls and are over‐expressed in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). BI 2536, a novel Plk inhibitor, induces mitotic arrest and apoptosis. In this phase I/II trial of BI 2536 in 68 elderly patients with relapsed/refractory AML, three schedules were investigated (day 1, days 1–3, and days 1 + 8). Maximum tolerated dose was 350 and 200 mg in the day 1 and days 1 + 8 schedules, respectively. The day 1–3 schedule appeared equivalent to the day 1 schedule and was discontinued early. BI 2536 exhibited multi‐compartmental pharmacokinetic behaviour. The majority of patients showed an increase of bone marrow cells in G2/M with a characteristic pattern of mitotic catastrophe. The overall response rate in the day 1 and day 1 + 8 schedules was 9% (5/54) with 2 complete and 3 partial responses. The majority of drug‐related adverse events grade ≥3 were haematological. Taken together, Plk inhibition induced cell cycle arrest in AML blasts in vivo and BI 2536 monotherapy showed modest clinical activity in this poor prognosis patient group.

Prediction of Neutropenia-Related Effects of a New Combination Therapy With the Anticancer Drugs BI 2536 (a Plk1 Inhibitor) and Pemetrexed

This study investigated the feasibility of predicting the neutropenia‐related effects of a therapy that combines the investigational drug BI 2536 (inhibitor of Polo‐like kinase 1) and pemetrexed, an approved anticancer drug. Predictions were arrived at using the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters of each of the drugs obtained from monotherapy studies and assuming that the neutropenic effect is additive when the drugs are administered as a combination therapy. Subsequently, a PK/PD model was developed to determine whether this assumption of additive effect was reasonable in relation to these two drugs. All analyses and simulations were performed using the population approach in NONMEM, version VI.

The Plk1 inhibitor BI 2536 in patients with refractory or relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a phase I, open-label, single dose-escalation study

Abstract Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) is expressed during mitosis and overexpressed in multiple cancers, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). This phase I study determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of BI 2536, a Plk1 inhibitor, as a 1 h infusion once every 3 weeks in post-transplant relapsed (n = 17) and transplant-naive (n = 24) patients with relapsed/refractory NHL. Median treatment cycles were 2 and 1.5, respectively. MTD was 175 mg for both populations; dose-limiting toxicities were grade 4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. Most treatment-related adverse events were grade 1/2; drug-related grade 3/4 events included thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. Four patients achieved responses (three complete and one partial at doses ≥ 150 mg, all post-transplant relapsed patients) for an overall response rate of 9.8%. BI 2536 exhibited multi-compartmental pharmacokinetics with a high volume of distribution. The activity and safety of BI 2536 in this pretreated patient population support Plk inhibitors as a therapeutic strategy in oncology.

An open-label, phase II study of the polo-like kinase-1 (Plk-1) inhibitor, BI 2536, in patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC)

OBJECTIVES This phase II, open-label study was designed to evaluate the response rate to the polo-like kinase 1 (Plk-1) inhibitor BI 2536 in patients with sensitive-relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response, and safety. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients were treated with the recommended phase II dose of 200mg of BI 2536 intravenously every 21days. This was a two-stage design with an early stopping rule in place if responses were not seen in at least 2 of the first 18 enrolled patients. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION Twenty-three patients were enrolled in the study and 21 patients were evaluable for response. No responses were observed and all 23 patients have progressed. The median PFS was 1.4 months. Treatment was generally well tolerated and the most frequent adverse events were neutropenia, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and constipation. BI 2536 is not effective in the treatment of sensitive relapsed SCLC. The criteria for expanding the trial to the second stage were not achieved, and the study was terminated for a lack of efficacy.

Strategic and Statistical Considerations on the QT Assessment of Volasertib

Volasertib is a selective cell cycle kinase inhibitor that induces mitotic arrest and apoptosis by targeting Polo-like kinase (Plk). A potential for prolonged QT intervals was indicated with volasertib in preclinical studies and preliminary clinical data. As a result, electrocardiograms (ECGs) have been collected in all volasertib clinical trials to monitor potential cardiac effects. This article describes strategic and statistical methods prospectively planned to perform an integrated analysis of ECG data from available trials to evaluate volasertib’s effect on cardiac repolarization, as reflected by changes in the duration of QT interval and other ECG-related endpoints. Methods to effectively cope with heterogeneity between trials (ie, differences in study designs) are discussed. These strategies may be useful for other investigational drugs for which QT risk assessment is required, but a thorough QT/QTc trial is not feasible, resulting in the need for an alternative approach. Volasertib therapy relevantly prolonged adjusted mean QTcF change from administration baseline following the first and subsequent infusions. The integrated analysis revealed that the volasertib effects on the mean QTc changes from baseline were transient and had resolved at 24 hours after start of the first infusion. There was no evidence for a long-term impact on the QTcF interval following multiple infusions with volasertib.