Hollis Day

A qualitative study of physicians’ experiences with online learning in a masters degree program: Benefits, challenges, and proposed solutions

Background: In response to challenges to faculty development (e.g. time away from clinical, teaching, and other responsibilities; lack of mentors; and limited resources) online learning has become an important venue to provide education for physicians in curriculum development, instruction, assessment, evaluation, educational leadership, and education scholarship. Online learning however has its own unique challenges. Little is known about clinician-educators’ experiences while participating in online programs and few studies have focused on their approaches to facilitate online learning. Aim: To explore the experiences of physicians pursuing a degree in higher education with online learning, including motivations for choosing this format, barriers encountered, and ideas for facilitating learning in the online environment. Method: All students (n = 71) enrolled in online courses in the University of Illinois at Chicago Masters of Health Profession Education Program were surveyed in the spring of 2006. Responses were analysed using a qualitative approach. Results: Of the 48 students who completed the survey (response rate 68%) 45 (94%) were physicians. The online format is convenient, flexible, and may be beneficial for learning. Students’ responses raise issues inherent to online learning that must be addressed to optimize student-centered learning. These issues relate to: clarity of communication; difficulties in negotiating team work and in building relationships; technical demands; learning style preferences, and time commitment. Students provided recommendations for strategies to address these issues such as how to communicate clearly, facilitate teamwork, and optimize time management. Member checking supported the analysis. Conclusions: Online education programs meet the needs of physicians but have associated challenges. Further research is needed to explore the potential value of student suggested ways to optimize the online learning experience.

Complexity in Graduate Medical Education: A Collaborative Education Agenda for Internal Medicine and Geriatric Medicine

ABSTRACTInternal medicine residents today face significant challenges in caring for an increasingly complex patient population within ever-changing education and health care environments. As a result, medical educators, health care system leaders, payers, and patients are demanding change and accountability in graduate medical education (GME). A 2012 Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) retreat identified medical education as an area for collaboration between internal medicine and geriatric medicine. The authors first determined a short-term research agenda for resident education by mapping selected internal medicine reporting milestones to geriatrics competencies, and listing available sample learner assessment tools. Next, the authors proposed a strategy for long-term collaboration in three priority areas in clinical medicine that are challenging for residents today: (1) team-based care, (2) transitions and readmissions, and (3) multi-morbidity. The short-term agenda focuses on learner assessment, while the long-term agenda allows for program evaluation and improvement. This model of collaboration in medical education combines the resources and expertise of internal medicine and geriatric medicine educators with the goal of increasing innovation and improving outcomes in GME targeting the needs of our residents and their patients.

Using Elements from an Acute Abdominal Pain Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Leads to More Standardized Grading in the Surgical Clerkship for Third-Year Medical Students

BACKGROUND There is poor reliability in the Likert-based assessments of patient interaction and general knowledge base for medical students in the surgical clerkship. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) can be used to assess these competencies. OBJECTIVE We hypothesize that using OSCE performance to replace the current Likert-based patient interaction and general knowledge base assessments will not affect the pass/fail rate for third-year medical students in the surgical clerkship. METHODS In this retrospective study, third-year medical student clerkship data from a three-station acute abdominal pain OSCE were collected from the 2009-2010 academic year. New patient interaction and general knowledge base assessments were derived from the performance data and substituted for original assessments to generate new clerkship scores and ordinal grades. Two-sided nonparametric statistics were used for comparative analyses, using an α = 0.05. RESULTS Seventy third-year medical students (50.0% female) were evaluated. A sign test showed a difference in the original (4.45/5) and the new (4.20/5) median patient interaction scores (p < 0.01). A sign test did not show a difference in the original (4.00/5) and the new (4.11/5) median general knowledge base scores (p = 0.28). Nine clerkship grades changed between these different grading schemes (p = 0.045), with an overall agreement of 87.1% and a kappa statistic of 0.81. There were no differences in the pass/fail rate (p > 0.99). CONCLUSIONS We conclude that there are no differences in pass/fail rate, but there is a more standardized distribution of patient interaction assessments and utilization of the full spectrum of possible passing grades. We recommend that the current patient interaction assessment for third-year medical students in the surgical clerkship be replaced with that found through trained standardized patients in this three-station acute abdominal pain OSCE.

Systematic outpatient screening for the elderly: care of the vulnerable elderly practice improvement module to assess resident care of older adults.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility of using the American Board of Internal Medicine Care of the Vulnerable Elderly Practice Improvement Module (CoVE PIM) in an internal medicine residency program and to assess aggregate resident documentation of geriatric screening in continuity clinics.

Optimizing Health for Complex Adults in Primary Care: Current Challenges and a Way Forward

ABSTRACTAs the population ages, the quantity and complexity of comorbidities only increases in the primary care setting. Health systems strive to improve quality of care and enhance cost savings, but current administrative and payment systems do not easily support the implementation of existing evidence and best practices for multimorbid adults in most primary care offices. This perspectives piece sets forth a research agenda in the area of implementation science at the intersection of geriatrics and general internal medicine. We challenge academic medical centers, medical societies, journals, and funders to actively value and support investigation in this area as much as traditional research pathways.

Update in Geriatric Medicine

INTRODUCTIONWith an aging population, internists will provide care to a growing number of older adults, a population at risk of developing multiple chronic medical conditions and geriatric syndromes. For this update in geriatric medicine, we highlight recent key articles focused on preventive strategies and lifestyle changes that reduce the burden of disease and functional decline in older adults.METHODSWe identified English-language articles published between March 1, 2010 and March 31, 2011 by review of the contents of major geriatrics/general medicine journals and journal watch services including: New England Journal of Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, Lancet, Archives of Internal Medicine, British Medical Journal, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, and the Journals of Gerontology. We also reviewed updates to the Cochrane database of systematic reviews and articles highlighted by the ACP Journal Club and Journal Watch. Inclusion criteria included (1) randomized controlled trials, (2) conditions exclusive or common to older adults, and (3) commonly seen in generalist practices. After abstract review, each author selected five articles, and these were reviewed again by all authors. Through multiple discussions, consensus was reached on the final articles selected for inclusion based on their quality and potential to improve the health of older patients cared for by generalists.

Posthospital home visit as teaching tool for internal medicine residents

ABSTRACT Internal medicine residency programs consider effectively discharging patients from the hospital an important training milestone. However, it is rare for residents to have the opportunity to follow discharged patients into the community and see discharge plans in action. This curriculum provided residents with the opportunity to evaluate patients in their homes after they were discharged from the hospital to assess the alignment of the discharge plan with patients’ real-life circumstances. Thirty-nine internal medicine residents participated in a structured exercise during a posthospital discharge home visit to older patients they cared for during the hospital admission. After completing the exercise, residents were asked what they learned from the experience. We found that by visiting patients’ homes, residents were able to better assess patient needs, which highlighted the necessity for more individualized discharge plans with regard to in-home functioning, communication with caregivers, and medication reconciliation. Further, the posthospital visit exercise enhanced residents’ awareness of challenges in developing and implementing discharge care plans for complex older patients.