Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Holly Teetzel is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Holly Teetzel.


Critical Care Medicine | 2000

Impact of ethics consultations in the intensive care setting: a randomized, controlled trial.

Lawrence J. Schneiderman; Todd P. Gilmer; Holly Teetzel

ObjectiveTo determine the following: a) whether ethics consultations in the intensive care setting reduce nonbeneficial treatments, defined as days in the intensive care unit (ICU) and treatments delivered to those patients who ultimately fail to survive to hospital discharge; and b) whether physicians, nurses, social workers, and patients/families agree that ethics consultations in the ICU are beneficial in addressing treatment conflicts. DesignProspective, randomized, controlled trial of ethics consultations. SettingMedical and pediatric ICUs in a university medical center. PatientsSeventy-four patients in whom value-based treatment conflicts arose during the course of treatment. InterventionsThe patients were randomly assigned to an intervention (ethics consultation offered) or nonintervention (ethics consultation not offered) arm of the trial. MeasurementsMedical data and ICU hospital days were compared between the intervention and control groups before and after the randomization. Likert scale and commentary responses were recorded to structured and open-ended interviews with the responsible physicians, nurses, social workers, and families of patients assigned to the intervention arm within 1 month after the patient’s death or hospital discharge. Interviewees were asked whether ethics consultations helped with the following: a) to identify ethical issues; b) to analyze ethical issues; c) to resolve ethical issues; d) to educate about ethical issues; and e) to present personal views. Main ResultsThere were no differences in overall mortality between the control patients and patients receiving ethics consultations. However, ethics consultations were associated with reductions in ICU hospital days and life-sustaining treatments in those patients who ultimately failed to survive to discharge. Also, ethics consultations were regarded favorably by most participants. ConclusionsEthics consultations seem to be useful in resolving conflicts that may be inappropriately prolonging futile or unwanted treatments and are perceived to be beneficial.


JAMA | 2003

Effect of Ethics Consultations on Nonbeneficial Life-Sustaining Treatments in the Intensive Care Setting A Randomized Controlled Trial

Lawrence J. Schneiderman; Todd P. Gilmer; Holly Teetzel; Daniel O. Dugan; Jeffrey Blustein; Ronald E. Cranford; Kathleen B. Briggs; Glen I. Komatsu; Paula Goodman-Crews; Felicia Cohn; Ernlé W. D. Young


Journal of Clinical Ethics | 1993

Do physicians' own preferences for life-sustaining treatment influence their perceptions of patients' preferences?

Lawrence J. Schneiderman; Robert M. Kaplan; Robert A. Pearlman; Holly Teetzel


Health Affairs | 2005

The Costs Of Nonbeneficial Treatment In The Intensive Care Setting

Todd P. Gilmer; Lawrence J. Schneiderman; Holly Teetzel; Jeffrey Blustein; Kathleen B. Briggs; Felicia Cohn; Ronald E. Cranford; Daniel O. Dugan; Glen I. Komatsu; Ernlé Young


Archive | 2010

Evaluation of Control Measures Implemented in the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Outbreak

Lawrence J. Schneiderman; Todd P. Gilmer; Holly Teetzel; Daniel O. Dugan; Jeffrey Blustein; Ronald E. Cranford; Kathleen B. Briggs; Glen I. Komatsu; Paula Goodman-Crews; Felicia Cohn; Ernlé W. D. Young; Gerald Antoch; Florian M. Vogt; Lutz S. Freudenberg; F. Nazaradeh; Susanne C. Goehde; Jörg Barkhausen; Gerlinde Dahmen; Andreas Bockisch; Joerg F. Debatin; Stefan G. Ruehm; Xh Pang; Zhengge Zhu; F. Xu; Jianhun Guo; X. Gong; David M. Liu; Zhengyu Liu; Daniel P. Chin; D. R. Feikin


Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics | 1997

Do physicians' own preferences for life-sustaining treatment influence their perceptions of patients' preferences? A second look

Lawrence J. Schneiderman; Robert M. Kaplan; Esther Rosenberg; Holly Teetzel


Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics | 2006

Dissatisfaction with Ethics Consultations: The Anna Karenina Principle

Lawrence J. Schneiderman; Todd P. Gilmer; Holly Teetzel; Daniel O. Dugan; Paula Goodman-Crews; Felicia Cohn


JAMA Internal Medicine | 1995

Who Decides Who Decides?: When Disagreement Occurs Between the Physician and the Patient's Appointed Proxy About the Patient's Decision-Making Capacity

Lawrence J. Schneiderman; Holly Teetzel; Alvin G. Kalmanson


Critical Care Medicine | 2002

Ethics consultations in the intensive care setting.

Lawrence J. Schneiderman; Todd P. Gilmer; Holly Teetzel


Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | 1996

End-of-life directives : Powers of attorney, living wills, and other matters

Lawrence J. Schneiderman; Holly Teetzel

Collaboration


Dive into the Holly Teetzel's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Todd P. Gilmer

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel O. Dugan

Swedish Covenant Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Felicia Cohn

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge