Holly Zullo
Carroll College
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Holly Zullo.
Archive | 2011
Holly Zullo; Kelly Cline; Mark Parker; Ron Buckmire; John George; Katharine Gurski; Jakob Juul Larsen; Blake Mellor; Jack Oberweiser; Dennis Peterson; Richard Spindler; Ann Stewart; Christopher Storm
Many individual faculty have surveyed their students about classroom voting, and they generally report positive results. How robust are these results across a wide variety of students, campuses, instructors, and courses? In this study, a total of 513 students in 26 classes were surveyed regarding the use of classroom voting in their classes. (See Appendix A for the survey form.) Fourteen instructors from ten different schools participated. The classes surveyed were primarily freshman and sophomore level courses in calculus, multivariable calculus, linear algebra, and differential equations. While several questions show the variation in response that one might expect, other questions generate consistent results, showing that student opinion in these areas is uniform across many variables.
PRIMUS | 2012
Kelly Cline; Holly Zullo; Lahna VonEpps
Abstract We study how different sections voted on the same set of classroom voting questions in differential calculus, finding that voting patterns can be used to identify some of the questions that have the most pedagogic value. We use statistics to identify three types of especially useful questions: 1. To identify good discussion questions, we look for those that produce the greatest diversity of responses, indicating that several answers are regularly plausible to students. 2. We identify questions that consistently provoke a common misconception, causing a majority of students to vote for one particular incorrect answer. When this is revealed to the students, they are usually quite surprised that the majority is wrong, and they are very curious to learn what they missed, resulting in a powerfully teachable moment. 3. By looking for questions where the percentage of correct votes varies the most between classes, we can find checkpoint questions that provide effective formative assessment as to whether a class has mastered a particular concept.
PRIMUS | 2012
Kelly Cline; Mark Parker; Holly Zullo; Ann Stewart
Abstract One technique for identifying and addressing common student errors is the method of classroom voting, in which the instructor presents a multiple-choice question to the class, and after a few minutes for consideration and small group discussion, each student votes on the correct answer, often using a hand-held electronic clicker. If a large number of students have voted for one particular incorrect answer, the instructor can recognize and address the issue. In order to identify multiple-choice questions which are especially effective at provoking common errors, we recorded the percentages of students voting for each option on each question used in 11 sections of multivariable calculus, taught by four instructors, at two small liberal arts institutions, all drawing from the same collection of 317 classroom voting questions, over the course of 5 years, during which we recorded the results of 1,038 class votes. We found six questions in which, on average, more than 50% of each class voted for the same incorrect answer. Here we present these six questions and we discuss how we used them in the classroom in order to promote discussion and student learning.
International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology | 2013
Kelly Cline; Holly Zullo; Jonathan Duncan; Ann Stewart; Marie Snipes
We present a study of classroom voting in linear algebra, in which the instructors posed multiple-choice questions to the class and then allowed a few minutes for consideration and small-group discussion. After each student in the class voted on the correct answer using a classroom response system, a set of clickers, the instructor then guided a class-wide discussion of the results. We recorded the percentage of students voting for each option on each question used in 18 sections of linear algebra, taught by 10 instructors, at 8 institutions, over the course of 5 years, together recording the results of 781 votes on a collection of 311 questions. To find the questions most likely to provoke significant discussions, we identify the six questions for which votes were most broadly distributed. Here we present these questions, we discuss how we used them to advance student learning, and we discuss the common features of these questions, to identify why they were so good at stimulating discussions.
PRIMUS | 2018
Kelly Cline; Holly Zullo; David A. Huckaby; Christopher Storm; Ann Stewart
Abstract Classroom voting can be an effective way to stimulate student discussions. In this pedagogy, the instructor poses a multiple-choice question to the class, and then allows a few minutes for consideration and small-group discussion before students vote, either with clickers, cell phones, or a non-electronic method. After the vote the instructor guides a class-wide discussion. Here we report on a study of precalculus voting questions that includes data from 25 classes taught by eight instructors at five institutions over the course of 7 years. The goal of this study is to explore ways of identifying the questions most likely to provoke good student discussions. We recorded the percentage of each class voting for each option on each question posed, a total of 851 votes. We have 60 questions on which we recorded the results from at least five classes. We identified the five questions with the most widely dispersed votes, a method that has a history of being helpful in identifying good discussion questions. We present these five questions here, four of which we found to be examples of questions which are particularly good at stimulating student discussions. We include notes about how we used the questions in class.
The Mathematics Teacher | 2012
Kelly Cline; Jean McGivney-Burelle; Holly Zullo
Archive | 2011
Kelly Cline; Holly Zullo
Archive | 2011
Lee R. Gibson; Kelly Cline; Holly Zullo
Archive | 2011
Raymond J. McGivney; Jean McGivney-Burelle; Kelly Cline; Holly Zullo
Teaching Statistics | 2008
Holly Zullo