Hongjie Liang

Association of XRCC3 Thr241Met Polymorphisms and Gliomas Risk: Evidence from a Meta-analysis

UNLABELLED The relationship between the X-ray repair cross-complementing group 3 (XRCC3) Thr241Met polymorphism and gliomas remains inclusive or controversial. For better understanding of the effect of XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism on glioma risk, a meta-analysis was performed. All eligible studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Elsevier Science Direct, Excerpta Medica Database (Embase) and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) before May 2013. The association between the XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and gliomas risk was conducted by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). A total of nine case-control studies including 3,533 cases and 4,696 controls were eventually collected. Overall, we found that XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism was significantly associated with the risk of gliomas (T vs. C: OR=1.10, 95%CI=1.01-1.20, P=0.034; TT vs. CC: OR=1.30, 95%CI=1.03-1.65, P=0.027; TT vs. TC/CC OR=1.29, 95%CI=1.01-1.64, P=0.039). In the subgroup analysis based on ethnicity, the significant association was found in Asian under four models (T vs. C: OR=1.17, 95%CI=1.07-1.28, P=0.00; TT vs. CC: OR=1.79, 95%CI=1.36- 2.36, P=0.00; TT vs. TC/CC OR=1.75, 95%CI=1.32-2.32, P=0.00; TT/TC vs. CC: OR=1.11,95% CI=1.02-1.20). This meta-analysis suggested that the XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism is a risk factor for gliomas, especially for Asians. Considering the limited sample size and ethnicities included in the meta-analysis, further large scale and well-designed studies are needed to confirm our results.

Association of XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and leukemia risk: evidence from a meta-analysis

Abstract The relationship between the X-ray repair cross-complementing group 3 (XRCC3) Thr241Met (rs861539) polymorphism and the risk of leukemia remains inclusive or controversial. For a better understanding of the effect of XRCC3 Thr241Met (rs861539) polymorphism on leukemia risk, we performed a meta-analysis. All eligible studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (Embase) and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) up to August 2013. The association between the XRCC3 Thr241Met (rs861539) polymorphism and leukemia risk was analyzed by means of odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Ultimately, seven studies with 1070 cases and 1850 controls were included in the meta-analysis. There was no association between Thr241Met polymorphism and leukemia risk in any of the five models in the overall populations (T vs. C: OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.95–2.13, p = 0.086; TT vs. CC: OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 0.88–3.33, p = 0.112; TC vs. CC: OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 0.96–1.91, p = 0.089; TT vs. TC/CC: OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 0.87–2.89, p = 0.132; TT/TC vs. CC: OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 0.98–1.94, p = 0.070). In subgroup analysis according to ethnicity, a significant association was found between XRCC3 Thr241Met (rs861539) polymorphism and leukemia risk in Asian but not in Caucasian or mixed populations. In conclusion, the results suggest no association between XRCC3 Thr241Met (rs861539) polymorphism and leukemia risk in the overall populations but a significant association between XRCC3 Thr241Met (rs861539) polymorphism and leukemia risk in the Asian population. Considering the limited sample size and ethnicities included in the meta-analysis, further large-scale, well-designed studies are needed to confirm our results.

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase A1298C polymorphism and diabetes risk: evidence from a meta-analysis

Abstract Aim: The relationship between the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) A1298C polymorphism and the susceptibility of diabetes remains inclusive or controversial. For better understanding of the influence of MTHFR A1298C polymorphism on diabetes risk, we performed this meta-analysis. Methods: All related articles were identified through a search of PubMed, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM, Chinese), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wangfang Database (Chinese). The relationship between the MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and diabetes susceptibility was conducted by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Total of six studies with 897 cases and 852 controls were included in our meta-analysis. Overall, the significance associated was found between MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and the susceptibility of diabetes under recessive model (CC vs. AC/AA: OR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.18–2.45, p = 0.004). On the subgroup analysis according to ethnicity, the results indicated that MTHFR A1298C polymorphism has a significant association with diabetes in Asian population under dominant model (CC/AC vs. AA: OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.003–1.72, p = 0.047). However, there was no association found between MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and diabetes susceptibility in Caucasians. Conclusions: The results indicated that the MTHFR A1298C polymorphism is a dangerous factor for diabetes, especially for Asians.

The effect of MDR1 C3435T polymorphism on the eradication rate of H. pylori infection in PPI-based triple therapy: A meta-analysis

Background: Several studies have reported that multidrug resistance gene 1 (MDR1) C3435T polymorphism was associated with the rate of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication in proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy. However, the conclusions were inconsistent. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of MDR1 C3435T polymorphism on H. pylori eradication by PPI-based triple therapy. Methods: Seven eligible studies published up to August 2016 and including 1019 patients were identified by searching the Chinese Biomedical Literature database, Wan fang, PubMed, and the Web of Science electronic databases. Consequently, a meta-analysis was conducted with STATA software, using summary odds ratios (OR) and a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Overall, there was no significant difference between MDR1 C3435T polymorphism and the eradication rate of H. pylori in the entire genetic model, irrespective of the PPI used. Furthermore, in Asian populations, the TT genotype decreased H. pylori eradication (TT vs CT+CC: OR=0.411, 95% CI = 0.280–0.602, P = 0.000). In addition, a significantly low eradication rate was observed in a recessive model, in which either lansoprazole (TT vs CT+CC: OR = 0.305, 95% CI = 0.184–0.504, P = 0.000) or omeprazole (TT vs CT+CC: OR = 0.229, 95% CI = 0.069–0.763, P = 0.016) was taken, in a subanalysis of individual PPIs. In the analyses that were stratified by disease type, no significant difference was observed in the peptic ulcer group and the combined diseases subgroup. Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicated that the TT genotype of the MDR1 C3435T polymorphism decreased H. pylori eradication in Asian populations and was also associated with a low cure rate of H. pylori in patients taking lansoprazole- and omeprazole-based triple therapies. However, future studies using larger sample sizes are required.

Lack of association between EPHX1 polymorphism and esophageal cancer risk: evidence from meta‐analysis

The microsomal epoxide hydrolase 1 (EPHX1) Tyr113His and His139Arg polymorphisms have been reported to be associated with esophageal cancer (EC) risk, yet the results of these previous results have been inconsistent or controversial. The objective of this study was to explore whether the EPHX1 Tyr113His and His139Arg polymorphisms confer risk to EC. The relevant studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), Elsevier Science Direct, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database until May 2013. The association between the EPHX1 Tyr113His and His139Arg polymorphisms and EC risk was pooled by odds ratios (ORs) together with their 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs). A total of eight case-control studies with 1163 EC patients and 1868 controls (seven studies for both Tyr113His and His139Arg polymorphisms, one study only for Tyr113His polymorphism) were eventually identified. We found no association between EPHX1 Tyr113His and His139Arg polymorphisms and EC risk in overall population (For Tyr113His: His vs. Tyr: OR = 1.05, 95%CI = 0.95-1.15, P = 0.379; His/His vs. Tyr/Tyr: OR = 1.04, 95%CI = 0.88-1.22, P = 0.208; His/Tyr vs. Tyr/Tyr: OR = 0.96, 95%CI = 0.80-1.15, P = 0.577; His/His vs. His/Tyr + Tyr/Tyr: OR = 1.10, 95%CI = 0.96-1.26, P = 0.164; His/His + His/Tyr vs. Tyr/Tyr: OR = 1.01, 95%CI = 0.90-1.12, P = 0.543. For His139Arg: Arg vs. His: OR = 1.04, 95%CI = 0.94-1.14, P = 0.465; Arg/Arg vs. His/His: OR = 1.06, 95%CI = 0.91-1.24, P = 0.470; Arg/His vs. His/His: OR = 1.03, 95%CI = 0.91-1.16, P = 0.673; Arg/Arg vs. Arg/His + His/His: OR = 1.04, 95%CI = 0.85-1.27, P = 0.708; Arg/Arg + Arg/His vs. His/His: OR = 1.02, 95%CI = 0.93-1.13, P = 0.617). In subgroup analysis based on ethnicity, significant association has been found in neither EPHX1 Tyr113His nor His139Arg polymorphism. The current meta-analysis suggests no evidence of association between the EPHX1 polymorphism and EC risk.