Howard A. Kadish

A Retrospective Review of Pediatric Patients With Epididymitis, Testicular Torsion, and Torsion of Testicular Appendages

Study Objective. To compare historical features, physical examination findings, and testicular color Doppler ultrasound in pediatric patients with epididymitis, testicular torsion, and torsion of appendix testis. Methods. A retrospective review of patients with the diagnosis of epididymitis, testicular torsion, or torsion of appendix testis. Results. Ninety patients were included in the study (64 with epididymitis, 13 with testicular torsion, and 13 with torsion of appendix testis). Historical features did not differ among groups except for duration of symptoms. Of 13 patients with testicular torsion all had a tender testicle and an absent cremasteric reflex. When compared with the testicular torsion group, fewer patients with epididymitis had a tender testicle (69%) or an absent cremasteric reflex (14%). 62 (97%) patients with epididymitis had a tender epididymis and 43 (67%) had scrotal erythema/edema. By comparison, 3 (23%) and 5 (38%) patients with testicular torsion had a tender epididymis or scrotal erythema/edema, respectively. Doppler ultrasound showed decreased or absent blood flow in 8 patients, 7 of whom were diagnosed with testicular torsion. Ten out of 13 patients with testicular torsion had a salvageable testicle at the time of surgery. Conclusion. The physical examination is helpful in distinguishing among epididymitis, testicular torsion, and torsion of appendix testis. Patients presenting with a tender testicle and an absent cremasteric reflex were more likely to have a testicular torsion rather than epididymitis or torsion of appendix testis. An absent cremasteric reflex was the most sensitive physical finding for diagnosing testicular torsion. Color Doppler ultrasound is a useful adjunct in the evaluation of the acute scrotum when physical findings are equivocal.

Propofol sedation by emergency physicians for elective pediatric outpatient procedures

STUDY OBJECTIVE We describe the efficacy of propofol sedation administered by pediatric emergency physicians to facilitate painful outpatient procedures. METHODS By using a protocol for patients receiving propofol sedation in an emergency department-affiliated short-stay unit, a prospective, consecutive case series was performed from January to September 2000. Patients were prescheduled, underwent a medical evaluation, and met fasting requirements. A sedation team was present throughout the procedure. All patients received supplemental oxygen. Sedation depth and vital signs were monitored while propofol was manually titrated to the desired level of sedation. RESULTS There were 291 separate sedation events in 87 patients. No patient had more than 1 sedation event per day. Median patient age was 6 years; 57% were male patients and 72% were oncology patients. Many children required more than 1 procedure per encounter. Most commonly performed procedures included lumbar puncture (43%), intrathecal chemotherapy administration (31%), bone marrow aspiration (19%), and bone biopsy (3%). Median total propofol dose was 3.5 mg/kg. Median systolic and diastolic blood pressures were lowered 22 mm Hg (range 0 to 65 mm Hg) and 21 mm Hg (range 0 to 62 mm Hg), respectively. Partial airway obstruction requiring brief jaw-thrust maneuver was noted for 4% of patient sedations, whereas transient apnea requiring bag-valve-mask ventilation occurred in 1% of patient sedations. All procedures were successfully completed. Median procedure duration was 13 minutes, median sedation duration was 22 minutes, and median total time in the short stay unit was 40 minutes. CONCLUSION Propofol sedation administered by emergency physicians safely facilitated short painful procedures in children under conditions studied, with rapid recovery.

Applying Outpatient Protocols in Febrile Infants 1-28 Days of Age: Can the Threshold Be Lowered?

The purpose of this study was to determine the applicability of two accepted outpatient management protocols for the febrile infant 1-2 months of age (Boston and Philadelphia protocols) in febrile infants 1-28 days of age. We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients 1-28 days of age with a temperature greater than or equal to 38.00C. Criteria from each of the above-cited management protocols were applied to the patients to determine their applicability in screening for serious bacterial infection (SBI). An SBI was defined as bacterial growth in cultures from blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), stool, or any aspirated fluid. Overall, 372 febrile infants were included in the study. Ages ranged from 1 to 28 days of age. The mean age was 15 days. SBI occurred in 45 patients (12%). The mean age of the patients with an SBI was 13 days. Thirty-two infants (8.6%) had a urinary tract infection; 12 (3.2%), bacteremia; five (1.3%), bacterial meningitis; three (0.8%), cellulitis; one (0.3%), septic arthritis; one (0.3%), bacterial gastroenteritis; and one (0.3%), pneumonia. Ten infants had more than one SBI. Of 372 patients, 231 (62%) met the Bostons laboratory low-risk criteria; eight (3.5%) would have been sent home with an SBI with these criteria. Philadelphias laboratory low-risk criteria would have been met by 186 patients (50%); six (3.2%) would have been sent home with an SBI with these criteria. The negative predictive value of both the Boston and Philadelphia protocols for excluding an SBI was 97%. We conclude that current management protocols for febrile infants 1-2 months of age when applied to febrile infants 1 to 28 days of age would allow 3% of febrile infants less than 28 days of age to be sent home with an SBI. Current guidelines recommending admitting all febrile infants less than 28 days of age should be followed until the outcome of those 3% of febrile infants with an SBI treated as outpatients can be determined.

Removal of nasal foreign bodies in the pediatric population

Nasal foreign bodies requiring removal occur commonly in young children. Different techniques of removal are needed depending on the type of nasal foreign body. A retrospective chart review of a 19-month period identified 60 pediatric patients with nasal foreign bodies evaluated in a pediatric emergency department. Twenty-four different types of foreign bodies were removed; beads, rocks and plastic toys were the most common. Numerous removal techniques were used; forceps and Foley catheter techniques were the most common. Most foreign bodies can be managed with simple equipment and without requiring otolaryngology consultation. Because of the many different nasal foreign bodies found, the physician should be skilled in numerous techniques of removal. Each one of these useful techniques is reviewed.

The pediatric hybrid observation unit: an analysis of 6477 consecutive patient encounters.

Objectives.Pediatric observation units (OUs) are becoming more common in hospitals throughout the United States, providing physicians with a new disposition option for children who are judged to be too ill for home management. Some OUs function as “hybrid” units, serving both acutely ill and injured observation patients as well as scheduled elective procedure patients. How best to utilize this new resource is not yet defined. We studied the utilization of our pediatric hybrid OU during the first 2 years of operation to determine (1) the spectrum and frequency of diagnoses treated, (2) diagnoses and procedures most (and least) likely to attain discharge successfully within 24 hours, and (3) whether age was associated with inability to be discharged from the OU within 24 hours. Methods.The study setting was a 20-bed hybrid OU located in a pediatric tertiary care hospital in Salt Lake City, Utah. The records of all patients admitted during the first 2 years of OU operation, from August 1999 through July 2001, were examined retrospectively. Results.There were 6477 OU admissions: 4189 (65%) for acutely ill and injured observation patients and 2288 (35%) for scheduled elective procedure patients. For the observation patients, median age was 2.5 years and median length of stay was 15.5 hours. Common admission diagnoses in these patients included enteritis/dehydration (n = 722), orthopedic injuries (n = 362), asthma (n = 327), closed head injury (n = 289), urgent transfusion/infusion (n = 221), bronchiolitis (n = 212), croup (n = 207), abdominal pain (n = 199), cellulitis (n = 177), and nonfebrile seizure (n = 98). Overall, 15% of observation patients required subsequent inpatient admission for >24-hour stay. Observation diagnoses that were most likely to require inpatient admission were hematochezia (60%), viral pneumonia (46%), and bronchiolitis (43%). We demonstrated successful OU discharge rates (>85%) for several diagnoses not commonly reported: neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, aseptic meningitis, and diabetic ketoacidosis in the patient with known diabetes. Among the scheduled elective procedure patients, median age was 5.0 years and median length of stay was 3.0 hours. Only 1% of these patients required subsequent inpatient admission. In both populations, age ≤30 days was associated with increased need for inpatient admission, with a relative risk of 1.9 (95% confidence interval: 1.4–2.6) among the observation patients and 13.9 (95% confidence interval: 3.0–65.0) among scheduled procedure patients. Conclusion.Our pediatric hybrid OU played an important role in the treatment of children who were admitted for observation as a result of acute illness or injury, as well as children who required scheduled procedures. For both patient types, we identified diagnoses that are most and least likely to attain successful discharge within 24 hours. The majority (85%) of observation patients were discharged successfully within 24 hours. Successful discharge rates for diagnoses that are not commonly managed in other pediatric OUs were reported. We identified certain age groups within selected diagnoses that may not have been appropriate for the OU.

Pediatric male rectal and genital trauma: accidental and nonaccidental injuries.

Objective To characterize accidental pediatric rectal/genital trauma in males and compare these physical findings to a cohort of boys evaluated for sexual abuse. Design Retrospective chart review. Setting Tertiary pediatric trauma center/sexual abuse clinic. Participants Male patients evaluated in the emergency department for rectal/genital trauma from 9/1/89 through 10/31/93 (“accidental group”). Male patients referred to Child Protection Services for suspected sexual abuse from 1/1/93 through 12/31/95 who had abnormal genital physical findings (“sexual abuse group”). Main outcome measures Outcomes measured included age, mechanism of injury, category of diagnosis, location of injury, and type of injury. Results Forty-four male patients comprised the accidental group, aged six months to 17 years. The most common mechanism was a fall onto an object (34%). The most common injuries were lacerations/perforations of the scrotum (36%) followed by penile lacerations/perforations (25%). No patient had an isolated rectal laceration. Forty-four male patients with positive physical findings comprised the sexual abuse group. Ages ranged from seven months to 18 years. All patients had rectal lesions. Penile lacerations/perforations were the only other injuries documented, occurring in two patients. Conclusions Accidental rectal/genital trauma in “the pediatric population is uncommon; scrotal trauma occurs much more frequently than rectal trauma. Rectal/genital injury in the sexual abuse group typically involves only the rectal area. Sexual assault should be considered in patients with isolated rectal injury or whenever the alleged history does not correlate with physical findings.

Blunt pediatric laryngotracheal trauma: Case reports and review of the literature

Blunt laryngotracheal trauma can be a life-threatening event. Two cases of isolated blunt laryngotracheal trauma in pediatric patients are presented. One case involves a 12-year-old mate who suffered isolated tracheal trauma from a fall. He developed respiratory distress and required a tracheostomy. Intraoperatively he was noted to have a thyroid cartilage fracture. The other case involves a 14-year-old female who was kicked in the neck by a horse. After unsuccessful intubation attempts that completed a tracheal transection, she required an emergency cricothyrotomy and a subsequent tracheostomy. The diagnosis, differential diagnosis, associated injuries, and treatment options for blunt laryngeal trauma are reviewed.

Children with asthma admitted to a pediatric observation unit.

Objective: Observation units (OUs) serve patients who require more evaluation or treatment than possible during an emergency department visit and who are anticipated to stay in the hospital for a short defined period. Asthma is a common admission diagnosis in a pediatric OU. Our main objective was to identify clinical factors associated with failure to discharge a child with asthma from our OU within 24 hours. Methods: Retrospective chart review at a tertiary care childrens hospital. Participants were children 2 years or older with asthma admitted from the emergency department to the OU during August 1999 to August 2001. The OU-discharged group comprised those successfully discharged from the OU within 24 hours. The unplanned inpatient admission group comprised those subsequently admitted from the OU to a traditional inpatient ward or those readmitted to the hospital within 48 hours of OU discharge. Results: One hundred sixty-one children aged 2 to 20 years (median 4.0; 63% boys) met inclusion criteria; 40 patients (25%) required unplanned inpatient admission. In a multiple logistic regression model, 3 factors were associated with need for unplanned inpatient admission: female sex (adjusted odds ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-6.4; P = 0.03), temperature 38.5°C or higher (adjusted odds ratio, 6.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-23.5; P < 0.01), and need for supplemental oxygen at the end of emergency department management (adjusted odds ratio, 5; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-15.1; P < 0.01). Conclusions: Many children with asthma can be admitted to a pediatric OU and discharged safely within 24 hours. Prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings and to identify other factors predictive of unplanned inpatient admission.

Ear and Nose Foreign Bodies “It is all about the tools”

Ear and nose foreign bodies occur commonly in children. Most pediatricians, family practitioners, emergency medicine physicians, and general health care providers have or will have patients with a foreign body in either their ear or nose. Removal of the foreign body can be extremely easy or painfully difficult depending on the location, type of foreign body, cooperation of the patient, trauma to the ear from previous attempts, tools available for removal, and the experience of the person removing the foreign body.1,2 Multiple articles have evaluated different techniques in the removal of nasal or ear foreign bodies and the different type of foreign bodies removed with these techniques.1-4 The few larger studies attempt to identify foreign bodies and their successful removal rates, and the associated complication rates.1,2 The most common foreign bodies are usually round and cylindrical shaped (beads, peas, popcorn kernels).1-4 Unfortunately, much of the literature is made up of case reports with very few large retrospective reviews or prospective studies. Nevertheless, plenty of techniques are available for the practicing health care provider to attempt a removal of a nasal or ear foreign body. If these attempts fail, or the type or location of the foreign body carries a high failure rate, then otolaryngology referral is indicated. This article reviews specific techniques in the removal of nasal and ear foreign bodies and discusses the advantages and disadvantages that go with each technique. Like most home improvement projects, one cannot do the job without the proper set of tools, and each foreign body requires its own special tool or technique for removal. After reviewing this article the reader should be familiar with the different techniques, the advantages and disadvantages of each technique, which foreign bodies have a higher success rate of removal with certain techniques, and which foreign bodies should automatically be referred to specialty-trained physicians (otolaryngology).

Barriers to Discharge From a 24-hour Observation Unit for Children With Bronchiolitis

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine physician-identified barriers to discharge of patients with bronchiolitis from a 24-hour emergency department-based observation unit. Methods: Patients 3 to 24 months of age with a diagnosis of bronchiolitis were prospectively enrolled from January through April 2008. Patients were treated according to a standard hospital-wide bronchiolitis pathway that included an option for discharge on home oxygen. Treating physicians recorded barriers to discharge in those not sent home within 24 hours. The primary outcome was successful discharge within 24 hours; we analyzed barriers to such discharges. Results: Fifty-five patients were enrolled in the study. Discharge within 24 hours failed in 30 patients (55%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 42%-67%). Among the 25 discharged patients, 6 (24%) went home on supplemental oxygen without adverse outcomes or readmission. Hypoxia was the most commonly identified barrier to discharge (n = 22, 73%). Of the 22 cases where hypoxia was a barrier, 18 (82%) also noted the need for deep nasal suctioning; 12 (55%), parental discomfort; 12 (55%), respiratory distress; 10 (46%), poor feeding; and 4 (18%), MD discomfort. Conclusions: Hypoxia was the most common barrier to discharge within 24 hours for patients with bronchiolitis, and a common cofactor when other barriers were identified. Research on home oxygen, the use of deep nasal suctioning, and parental discomfort with early discharge may be useful in reducing the need for inpatient care for bronchiolitis.