Howard Gluckman

Partial Extraction Therapies (PET) Part 2: Procedures and Technical Aspects

Part 1 of this series introduced the partial extraction therapies as a group of techniques for ridge preservation at immediate implant placement and beneath pontic sites. The concept proposes a paradigm shift away from extract and augment toward partly retaining the tooth root to preserve the ridge and prevent buccopalatal collapse. The revolutionary socket-shield technique was introduced in 2010; however, there has been no follow-up literature to guide the clinician in terms of procedural steps. While root submergence is well established, the socket-shield and pontic shield are still in their clinical infancy and require long-term clinical data before they can be proposed as routine in everyday implant dentistry. Yet without sound knowledge on how to carry out the partial extraction therapies, a global dental community cannot participate in their application or contribute to the growing knowledge base. In this, the second part of the series, the procedures for root submergence, socket-shield, and pontic shield are addressed, step by step, supplemented with applicable guidelines as the first such publication guiding the clinician to apply these root- and ridge-preservation techniques. Technical aspects and complication management are also addressed.

Choukroun Platelet-Rich Fibrin as an Autogenous Graft Biomaterial in Preimplant Surgery: Results of a Preliminary Randomized, Human Histomorphometric, Split-Mouth Study.

This study aimed to test the null hypothesis that platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), as an immediate postextraction graft material, produces bone that is histomorphometrically no different than bone derived from healing without intervention. The authors compared split-mouth human bone biopsy specimens derived from PRF with bone that had healed without intervention. Eight human bone biopsies were successfully harvested from four patients. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) percent of newly formed osteoid was 9.9% ± 5.9% for specimens derived from PRF, and 4% ± 2.1% for specimens derived from the control sites (P = .089; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.5-18.1 and 1.6-6.6, respectively). Mean ± SD percent of new mineralized bone was 40.8% ± 10.3% for the PRF specimens and 43.9% ± 16.8% for the control specimens (P = .72, 95% CI, 33.4-55.6 and 19.3-55.5, respectively). Newly formed bone to fibrovascular tissue ratios for specimens in the PRF and control groups were 51%:49% and 48%:52%, respectively. Within the limitations of this study, the null hypothesis could not be rejected. Bone derived from PRF histologically did not differ from bone that healed without intervention.

Human Histologic Evidence of New Bone Formation and Osseointegration Between Root Dentin (Unplanned Socket-Shield) and Dental Implant: Case Report

The socket-shield technique described 7 years ago has since grown in its reporting in the literature as a valid method of ridge preservation at immediate implant placement. To date, large clinical cohorts with up-to-4-year follow-up have been reported. Additionally, evidence of tissue histology at the dental implant and socket-shield has been demonstrated in the animal model. However, human histologic evidence has not yet been available, and the clinicians uncertainty regarding the tissues that may form between the socket-shield and dental implant may remain unanswered until now. This case report presents the first human histologic evidence that bone may entirely fill the space between root dentin and an osseointegrated implant surface.

The socket-shield technique at molar sites: A proof-of-principle technique report

The socket-shield technique for avoiding postextraction tissue alteration was first described in 2010. The technique was developed for hopeless teeth in anterior esthetic sites but has not yet been described for molar sites. Managing postextractive ridge changes in the posterior region by prevention or regeneration remains a challenge. The socket shield aims to offset these ridge changes wherever possible, preserving the patients residual tissues at immediate implants. This technique report describes the molar socket-shield step by step.

Radial plane tooth position and bone wall dimensions in the anterior maxilla: A CBCT classification for immediate implant placement

Statement of problem. The biological and esthetic challenge of the post‐extraction ridge is relevant to restorative implant dentistry, most significantly in the anterior esthetic zone. Previous authors have discussed facial bone wall dimensions and classified their variations. A reclassification may be pertinent. Purpose. The purpose of this observational, clinical study was to introduce a new classification system for anterior maxilla tooth position with guidelines for immediate implant placement. Data for facial and palatal bone wall height and thickness are also presented. Material and methods. Maxillary anterior teeth (n=591) were analyzed as viewed in the radial plane of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans from 150 patients. Each tooth was classified according to its position and inclination within its alveolus (class I, middle of the alveolus; IA, thick facial bone; IB, thin facial bone; class II, retroclined; IIA, thick crestal bone; IIB, thin crestal bone; class III, proclined; class IV, facially outside bone envelope; class V, both thin facial and palatal bone with apical isthmus). Bone thickness was measured for both facial and palatal walls at the following points: crestal (A), mid‐root (B), apex (C), and 4 mm beyond the apex. Bone wall height was also evaluated. Results. A thin facial bone wall predominated (≤1 mm) at the crest (83%) and the mid‐root point (92%). Most palatal walls were thin (<1 mm) at the crest (63%) and thick (≥2 mm) at the mid‐root point (98%) and apex (99%). Class I tooth position accounted for 6.1%, class II for 76.5%, class III for 9.5%, class IV for 7.3%, and class V for 0.7%. Conclusions. Maxillary anterior teeth have predominantly thin facial bones, making palatal bone thickness a crucial variable. The new classification system for radial plane tooth position is a pragmatic clinical analysis for immediate implant treatment planning.